Database Users

Accurate benchmarking.

Quadrant is very inaccurate the tests are not up to spec for testing +1Ghz devices accurately.
The reason i say this is due to the fact that the benchmark varies from test to test.
I suggest AnTutu Benchmark.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
It is much more accurate, as the the scores are closely similar time and time again.
The tests are a bit longer
But that is the good thing "accuracy"
It also gives info on each testing stage.
I got 2176 on WB's 007.1 TW rom, BB.67 with custom kernel.

OmegaRED^ said:
Quadrant is very inaccurate the tests are not up to spec for testing +1Ghz devices accurately.
The reason i say this is due to the fact that the benchmark varies from test to test.
I suggest AnTutu Benchmark.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark
It is much more accurate, as the the scores are closely similar time and time again.
The tests are a bit longer
But that is the good thing "accuracy"
It also gives info on each testing stage.
I got 2176 on WB's 007.1 TW rom, BB.67 with custom kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good, will give it a try but it'd been better if you post this in themes & apps I guess
by the way what scores do you get with this rom in quadrant?

Chainfire released his new benchmarking tool yesterday, its called CF-Bench, search in the market

i've got 1973 on CM6 006 at 1.1Ghz

benchmarking
It does not matter what benchmarking utility you use. They all give you a general idea of the performance of your phone. I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see.
In reality the score of any phone using any utility is always relative to the scores of other phones using the same utility.
The thing to focus on is not the actual figures you get back but how your device measures up to other phones using the same benchmark test.

kryptoner said:
Chainfire released his new benchmarking tool yesterday, its called CF-Bench, search in the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2232 hmm right behind the nexus s
Cm6 wb bb67 custom kernel z
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

Try smartbench 2011. That's the best one
Sent from my x10 on gingerbread

All benchmarking apps generaly suck. Its about how you feel using your phone. Not the numbers.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

pepy_24 said:
All benchmarking apps generaly suck. Its about how you feel using your phone. Not the numbers.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it's a good comparison between phones after having a average score for each phone. But like you say, the numbers don't mean anything. Everything is personal.

zodiac100 said:
It does not matter what benchmarking utility you use. They all give you a general idea of the performance of your phone. I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see.
In reality the score of any phone using any utility is always relative to the scores of other phones using the same utility.
The thing to focus on is not the actual figures you get back but how your device measures up to other phones using the same benchmark test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True about benchmark apps but I don't think I think the OP just wants to use the tool that gives him the score he wants to see. What the OP is saying that with this app the difference between each time's score is not much hence why calling it accurate.

To look for a good benchmark is more important if you use a new phone with dual core CPU cos the old benchmarks aren´t optimised for them. I read that CF-Bench is optimised for dual cores and stresses the CPU and not so much the GPU of the phone.
But interesting that it seems that the overclocking have such a huge influence. With the first run (Wolfbreaks CM6 TW007) i had 2800 points with 1152MHz and in the second run with 998MHz 2400 points.
But true....it´s more a interesting gadget than to take it too seriously

maddes1402 said:
To look for a good benchmark is more important if you use a new phone with dual core CPU cos the old benchmarks aren´t optimised for them. I read that CF-Bench is optimised for dual cores and stresses the CPU and not so much the GPU of the phone.
But interesting that it seems that the overclocking have such a huge influence. With the first run (Wolfbreaks CM6 TW007) i had 2800 points with 1152MHz and in the second run with 998MHz 2400 points.
But true....it´s more a interesting gadget than to take it too seriously
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It comes down to what you have happening in the background.
If your phone suddenly "for example" decides to fetch data off of 3G or suddenly refreshes the media midway thru the bench then it can effect your score. this is why it's best to do tests when the rom is clean and gone silent. "no background activity" with data disabled.
Benchmarking is used to place the current performance of a device in a certain category.
It's no different from benchmarking PC's.
A whole profession has been built around PC benchmarking with people competing for a first place.
If your score is higher than everyone else you win the competition.

i got 2232 on custom kernel at 1113 mhz processor
Sent from my X10 TripNMiUI-IRIS

CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF Bench (full version) has the most stable results, and IMO its the best out there.
Sent from my Sony Ericsson Xperia™ phone

Linpack is perfect

kantk20111 said:
Linpack is perfect
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack only tests the cpu.
I haven't checked how CF bench works yet.
will report.

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CF bench 101%

Wolfbreak said:
CF-Bench
Smartbench 2011
Quadrant
Antutu Benchmark
what is the best now?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chainfire one!
that thing is scale-able across cores (single/multi-cores) and fairly accurate

[Q] Banchmarks and reality

Hi. I have my HD2 with android 4.0.4 with HWA. My friend has Galaxy mini with 2.3.7 (CM7 rom). And he has better 2D and 3D score in all benchmarks. Why? I don't think Galaxy is so new and so better than HWA HD2... So are the benchmarks lying or I have really worse performance?
And questions to devs or people who understand it: why I have 5000 points in I/O on Dorimanx's CM7 rom and on 4.0.4 HWA I have 1000?

Galaxy mini has only 320x240 resolution, so it has a better score.

OK, but shouldn't I have better CPU and GPU (I mean Adreno) to process more stuff? But ok, I am not grumbling, I was just curious.
And what with that I/O speed? Because in HWA roms write and read is very very slow.

kubekpop said:
OK, but shouldn't I have better CPU and GPU (I mean Adreno) to process more stuff? But ok, I am not grumbling, I was just curious.
And what with that I/O speed? Because in HWA roms write and read is very very slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With dorimanxs ROM you must of had data 2 ext enabled so the io scores were that high because of your memory card and on ics you are using your internal memory which is slower than ext4 partitions
Sent from my HTC HD2 using Tapatalk

kubekpop said:
OK, but shouldn't I have better CPU and GPU (I mean Adreno) to process more stuff? But ok, I am not grumbling, I was just curious.
And what with that I/O speed? Because in HWA roms write and read is very very slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TBH, benchmarks mean nothing. All that really matters is the end user experience. If you're satisfied with the performance then it really couldn't matter less what you get in benchmarks. Think about it this way, a Galaxy mini might get a higher benchmark but could you really live with a tiny low res screen and TouchWiz (vs almost ANYTHING on the HD2)?

Thank you guys. I am happy about your answers. That's right. Mini has too small screen.
And one more thing: people (like Rick_1995) can play GTA 3 smoothly. I have still lags. I am not requiering 60fps, but ability of playing it comfortable Am I doing something wrong?

kubekpop said:
Thank you guys. I am happy about your answers. That's right. Mini has too small screen.
And one more thing: people (like Rick_1995) can play GTA 3 smoothly. I have still lags. I am not requiering 60fps, but ability of playing it comfortable Am I doing something wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly that he is overclocking and you arent?

elesbb said:
Possibly that he is overclocking and you arent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been trying to get GTA3 running too. Even after setting the governor to performance and details to minimum driving wasn't possible. Does anyone know how to do it? Should we increase volts?

I cannot overclock above 1.2GHz (I don't know why won't they add 1.6GHz from Dorimanx kernel).

kubekpop said:
I cannot overclock above 1.2GHz (I don't know why won't they add 1.6GHz from Dorimanx kernel).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dunno why but for me on Typhoon CM7 there was no difference between 1.2GHz and 1.6GHz so I doubt there will be for CM9 either. I can give a +1 to GTA running poorly despite what others say.

kubekpop said:
Thank you guys. I am happy about your answers. That's right. Mini has too small screen.
And one more thing: people (like Rick_1995) can play GTA 3 smoothly. I have still lags. I am not requiering 60fps, but ability of playing it comfortable Am I doing something wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nigeldg said:
Dunno why but for me on Typhoon CM7 there was no difference between 1.2GHz and 1.6GHz so I doubt there will be for CM9 either. I can give a +1 to GTA running poorly despite what others say.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GTA3 on my phone:
elesbb said:
Possibly that he is overclocking and you arent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU running at 998MHz (no OC), I'm using unreleased drivers so it could be them.
Daycrawler said:
I've been trying to get GTA3 running too. Even after setting the governor to performance and details to minimum driving wasn't possible. Does anyone know how to do it? Should we increase volts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
voltage wouldn't make a difference.
kubekpop said:
I cannot overclock above 1.2GHz (I don't know why won't they add 1.6GHz from Dorimanx kernel).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can you tell that the cpu is really running at 1.6GHz and the kernel is just not faking it ? Qualcomm, the company which made the cpu never released any info about how cpu is clocked in hardware, or the pll limits, the multiplier limits, what internal clock logic checks for etc..

Are they going to be released?

Rick_1995 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's how it runs on my phone as well. I definitely don't define that as smooth. I've played it on my Mum's Desire S and it was far better, with a much higher framerate and better resolution (although that's probably due to the smaller screen) so I personally expect more from the game. Also, what about Real Racing? Happen to have a video of that? Because I've heard that's supposed to work without lag but it most certainly doesn't (Raging Thunder and NFS: Shift do but Real Racing doesn't). On a side note, thanks so much for all of the work you've been doing to keep this phone alive, without people like you in the community this phone would be completely dead

CM10.1 HUGE drop in Antutu Score

Stock 4.2.1 with franco's kernel: 1723
Stock 4.2.1 without franco's kernel: 1841
Now here comes the weird part...
CM10.1 4.2.1 with franco's kernel: 1243
What gives? What's with the sudden drop in the score? Is anybody else getting similar results? Is it because CM10.1 shuts off two of the cores? This comes as a surprise to me because I've been running CM10.1 for the past hour and it's noticeably smoother than the stock rom.

Silencer96 said:
Stock 4.2.1 with franco's kernel: 1723
Stock 4.2.1 without franco's kernel: 1841
Now here comes the weird part...
CM10.1 4.2.1 with franco's kernel: 1243
What gives? What's with the sudden drop in the score? Is anybody else getting similar results? Is it because CM10.1 shuts off two of the cores? This comes as a surprise to me because I've been running CM10.1 for the past hour and it's noticeably smoother than the stock rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So why care what worthless benchmarks say? Your phone - your experience. Screw what any benchmark app says mate. :thumbup:

Vangelis13 said:
So why care what worthless benchmarks say? Your phone - your experience. Screw what any benchmark app says mate. :thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could care less about the benchmark itself. What worries me is whether or not CM10.1 shuts down two of my Nexus' four cores.

Silencer96 said:
I could care less about the benchmark itself. What worries me is whether or not CM10.1 shuts down two of my Nexus' four cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably franco's kernel does that. Which one are you on?
P. S. Why does it matter if phone runs ok for your usage..?

Vangelis13 said:
Probably franco's kernel does that. Which one are you on?
P. S. Why does it matter if phone runs ok for your usage..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
r72.
Also, because I paid top dollar to make the switch from my Galaxy S. If I really wanted functionality and nothing more, I would've just stuck with my Galaxy S.
Would you mind running an Antutu benchmark and telling me what you get? It could be an error on my side. thx

Silencer96 said:
r72.
Also, because I paid top dollar to make the switch from my Galaxy S. If I really wanted functionality and nothing more, I would've just stuck with my Galaxy S.
Would you mind running an Antutu benchmark and telling me what you get? It could be an error on my side. thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, can't do that, sorry. Last time I run a benchmark was more than a year ago, I hate them passionately. Particularly with the crappy job LG has done in the building of this phone, antutu is like the devil..
Isn't that r72 supposed to turn the cores off though? Try a different one?

Vangelis13 said:
Hm, can't do that, sorry. Last time I run a benchmark was more than a year ago, I hate them passionately. Particularly with the crappy hob LG has done in the building of this phone, antutu is like the devil..
Isn't that r72 supposed to turn the cores off though? Try a different one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, r72 introduced hot-plugging. Anyway, that definitely had nothing to do with the score seeing as to how I was running the same kernel on stock when I ran the test.

You got serious problems if you can't break 2000 on antutu. Because i can tell you at least one app that runs awfully slow for you, and thats antutu.

meangreenie said:
You got serious problems if you can't break 2000 on antutu. Because i can tell you at least one app that runs awfully slow for you, and thats antutu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, what?

meangreenie said:
You got serious problems if you can't break 2000 on antutu. Because i can tell you at least one app that runs awfully slow for you, and thats antutu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
only those devices running bionic patched roms are going over 20000 in antutu, devices running the normal roms score a little less.

simms22 said:
only those devices running bionic patched roms are going over 20000 in antutu, devices running the normal roms score a little less.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah a little less, not 18000+ less though, lol

meangreenie said:
yeah a little less, not 18000+ less though, lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh, i see what you are saying. i think he just accidentally dropped a digit at the end of each score.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app

Note Edge Benchmarks

Here's a link to recent benchmarks for the Galaxy Note Edge:
http://www.androidheadlines.com/2014/11/samsung-galaxy-note-edge-perform-benchmarks.html

Couple of screen shots from my device's benchmark results.
It says it is 64bit but currently set to 32bit.☺

I had 49850 on my 915k after root cm and freezing a few apps
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app

dennis nai said:
I had 49850 on my 915k after root cm and freezing a few apps
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which apps?

knox,some google apps and some samsung apps

Antutu = 49771 (N915S)
This is from the stock before root. Now I am running SkyHigh rom. Will test again soon.

Please can some xda expert help us to bring this beast above the 55000 mark? I truly belive it can be done.
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app

Finally broke 50k!
SM-N915S
Antutu: 50480
SkyHigh Rom by UpInTheAir, Rooted, DVFS disabled
Can't wait until UpInTheAir has a working kernel for the 915S. Once I can properly overclock this beast I can easily see this device hitting 55k+

tospace2006 said:
Finally broke 50k!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine.... Don't have overclok!

jafangie said:
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haven't tried Antutu 5.5 yet I'll try to top yours

jafangie said:
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe still running no overclock as well: 51874
Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous in terms of score.
UpInTheAir just finished his kernel for 915S so finally time to get overclocking

tospace2006 said:
Hehe still running no overclock as well: 51874
Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous in terms of score.
UpInTheAir just finished his kernel for 915S so finally time to get overclocking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I was annoyed few minutes... But yes you 're right : Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous.... in the morning!
On waking, it is still better!
Have a nice day!
Seriously, I think that 53000 should be the maximum without overclocking...

jafangie said:
Hi,
I was annoyed few minutes... But yes you 're right : Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous.... in the morning!
On waking, it is still better!
Have a nice day!
Seriously, I think that 53000 should be the maximum without overclocking...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
53000 would be quite a challenge I believe. Here is my one last attempt with stock.
Getting closer to 53000 but I think an extra 800 points without OC will be a bit of a stretch.

tospace2006 said:
53000 would be quite a challenge I believe. Here is my one last attempt with stock.
Getting closer to 53000 but I think an extra 800 points without OC will be a bit of a stretch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!

jafangie said:
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am lucky if I can break 40,000! Nice scores.

jafangie said:
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been trying... can't beat that man good job. It's -10 so maybe I'll give it another go later. OC is being tricky and seems to be degrading performance than gaining atm...

CreekDirt said:
I am lucky if I can break 40,000! Nice scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM

UpInTheAir said:
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my first Snapdragon phone from Samsung. All of my previous versions were the Exynos builds since as far back as the S2. Stock unrooted it was around 38,000. Stock rooted it is only marginally better.

UpInTheAir said:
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4. I am observing this quite a bit after consecutive benchmarks.
5. My god even after debloating and freezing all unwanted proccesses the phone still requires 2GB or ram to run at all times and at max I only have less than 1GB of free ram. I feel like this is taking a hit on the scores too. My G3 I had it down to 1.3GB used RAM so effectively had about 1.7GB free at max. What could be taking up so much RAM at all times.
CreekDirt said:
This is my first Snapdragon phone from Samsung. All of my previous versions were the Exynos builds since as far back as the S2. Stock unrooted it was around 38,000. Stock rooted it is only marginally better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the G3 Cat.6 with SD805 and noticed very disappointing scores stock. The G3 also had very aggressive thermal throttling and the SD805 was a very hot running chip.
Once I got everything debloated and thermal turned off it hit almost 48,000.
I know that the S5 prime had better scores than the Cat.6 due to much better thermals and would expect the same out of the Note.
Try rooting and debloating your phone if you want to experiment and disable DVFS for better scores.
I also place my phone by an open window as it's -10 degrees Celsius now and low temp gives great boosts to your scores.

tospace2006 said:
4. I am observing this quite a bit after consecutive benchmarks.
5. My god even after debloating and freezing all unwanted proccesses the phone still requires 2GB or ram to run at all times and at max I only have less than 1GB of free ram. I feel like this is taking a hit on the scores too. My G3 I had it down to 1.3GB used RAM so effectively had about 1.7GB free at max. What could be taking up so much RAM at all times.
I had the G3 Cat.6 with SD805 and noticed very disappointing scores stock. The G3 also had very aggressive thermal throttling and the SD805 was a very hot running chip.
Once I got everything debloated and thermal turned off it hit almost 48,000.
I know that the S5 prime had better scores than the Cat.6 due to much better thermals and would expect the same out of the Note.
Try rooting and debloating your phone if you want to experiment and disable DVFS for better scores.
I also place my phone by an open window as it's -10 degrees Celsius now and low temp gives great boosts to your scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been rooted for almost a month now, but haven't gotten around to debloating since there isn't a need to. My phone flies. The only hesitation I see is if I actually use the menu key to see the task manager. Since I have the manager on my Edge bar I rarely even do that.
Debloating might be in my future just to see if I can finally reach that 6 hour screen on time. This phone has very few wake locks which has surprised me.

Benchmark score dropped!

Hi I'm highly satisfied with my oneplus 5 and I like to show off my benchmark scores. Recently my benchmark has only been around a little over 150k when I use to score 185k sometimes 190k. Anyone know why this is? I do have xposed framework installed but I even switched my Rom and tested it and still got only 155k. I don't notice any drops in performance I would just like to know what the issue may be. Thanks guys

182k on No Limits 3.4 rom with Franco kernel v7.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

jamorimpt said:
182k on No Limits 3.4 rom with Franco kernel v7.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly what I'm running it's very frustrating

Hey,
Your processor scores significantly less than it should, usually it scores around 40000 on the oneplus 5.
Maybe it's underclocked?
Please upload a screenshot with more details, like this one:
Best regards,

Most probably the highest frequency of big.little is stuck at an lower frequency. Go to developer options in ROM and turn on overscale CPU usage, then run Antutu again and see what's the highest frequency(s) you got while running. If it doesnt go above 2457mhz (cluster 2) than it makes sense why your score is low. Also check your "i/o" scheduler and "read ahead buffer size" in your kernel tweak app. This can also affect your score.
Besides all this, don't run Antutu with low battery this affects the score for sure.

lekiaM said:
Most probably the highest frequency of big.little is stuck at an lower frequency. Go to developer options in ROM and turn on overscale CPU usage, then run Antutu again and see what's the highest frequency(s) you got while running. If it doesnt go above 2457mhz (cluster 2) than it makes sense why your score is low. Also check your "i/o" scheduler and "read ahead buffer size" in your kernel tweak app. This can also affect your score.
Besides all this, don't run Antutu with low battery this affects the score for sure.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the help I'm going to reflash my rom and see if it helps.

Benchmarks are what they are... Anyway I've tested with stock kernel and it's giving even more:
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

vegoja said:
Thanks for the help I'm going to reflash my rom and see if it helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
reflash, keep it clean, full charge, put it in the freezer pluged-in. andddd hit 188000 :good:

I wouldn't get too caught up in the whole benchmarks thing. They don't always translate to real world performance; I would rather show off my phone's snappy interface (i.e. quick app loading, navigating menus, etc.)
I personally think that's worth showing off more than just numbers that appear on an app!
Just my two cents though, you're free to disagree and do what makes you happy of course

rickysidhu_ said:
I wouldn't get too caught up in the whole benchmarks thing. They don't always translate to real world performance; I would rather show off my phone's snappy interface (i.e. quick app loading, navigating menus, etc.)
I personally think that's worth showing off more than just numbers that appear on an app!
Just my two cents though, you're free to disagree and do what makes you happy of course
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I don't notice any less performance so I'm not too worried about it. I do wonder how my big cluster got set to 1.9 ghz tho as I haven't messed with the tuning of my kernel seems to try to set it as default. But like I said I have xposed, a couple of audio mods, and gravity box. I'm bound to have some unwanted side effects from it.

vegoja said:
Yea I don't notice any less performance so I'm not too worried about it. I do wonder how my big cluster got set to 1.9 ghz tho as I haven't messed with the tuning of my kernel seems to try to set it as default. But like I said I have xposed, a couple of audio mods, and gravity box. I'm bound to have some unwanted side effects from it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair points! Kind of off-topic but I'm just curious as to how you went about installing Xposed? Are you using the Magisk module or did you flash via TWRP?

rickysidhu_ said:
Fair points! Kind of off-topic but I'm just curious as to how you went about installing Xposed? Are you using the Magisk module or did you flash via TWRP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is an option to flash with xXx Rom but Ive flash the purify xposed zip via TWRP. I've also used the systemless xposed from magisk but I believe it only works if you already have xposed installed.