Database Users

Trinity Kernel...1400mhz max?

I recently flashed the newest Trinity Kernel on my Nexus 7. I still have the stock ROM. I tried to tweak the CPU settings with ROM Toolbox and the most I can overclock is 1400mhz. Why can't I overclock to 1600? Is it because of the stock ROM? I'm looking into Glazed Jelly Bean as a custom ROM but I'm not sure I want or need to use a custom ROM at this point.
Any suggestions?

Because he dropped the Max. You probably flashed A111 correct? That's a TSVZ meaning it is slightly over clocked and undervolted kernel meant for battery not for performance.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Xparent White Tapatalk 2

U2Bono269 said:
I recently flashed the newest Trinity Kernel on my Nexus 7. I still have the stock ROM. I tried to tweak the CPU settings with ROM Toolbox and the most I can overclock is 1400mhz. Why can't I overclock to 1600? Is it because of the stock ROM? I'm looking into Glazed Jelly Bean as a custom ROM but I'm not sure I want or need to use a custom ROM at this point.
Any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try a96, its one of my faves. it has a max of 1700mhz http://goo.gl/mLUCZ

Mildly on topic question ... do you notice any imporvments with overclocking? My first experience with overclocking as on my Hero, and then Galaxy S1, but this N7 just feels so fast i cant see overclocking making it any smoother? lol
thanks

myke66 said:
Mildly on topic question ... do you notice any imporvments with overclocking? My first experience with overclocking as on my Hero, and then Galaxy S1, but this N7 just feels so fast i cant see overclocking making it any smoother? lol
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes. its noticeable, but not like on the older devices.

simms22 said:
yes. its noticeable, but not like on the older devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, ill have to look into rooting sometime soon.

Ok, I got the a96 and I've flashed it...
Is there a detailed changelog for each version? The a111 said it was a 1600mhz kernel so I don't understand why it was dropped down to 1400. That's where my confusion was.
I did notice some increase in speed at 1400. I was having some stuttering issues with Dead Trigger and Minecraft PE, and they were less with the 1400. I've got it running at 1600 now but I don't know what it will do to the battery or how well it will perform. I'll find out later. I've run through the battery pretty quickly today, but I was tinkering with it A LOT so it's not accurate.
What kind of tweaks could I do using Rom Toolbox that would help me maximize my battery while overclocking to 1.6?

Dont over clock.. i dont even see a need to. I use the ondemand gov which stutters a little but using interactive clears that up. Also using the CFQ IO as it is the stock IO used. Its stock so its gotta be good . Also you should turn F-Sync off that helps quite a bit. Also you could toggle auto hotplug and make it only run two cores while gaming and then turn it back on when finished so that way it will hotplug cores as it sees necessary. You could also up the voltages a little bit, some CPU's dont like the lower voltage and that will cause stuttering and glitching just up them by 25mV and see if it clears if not try another 25mV.

I will try those things, but I really want to play with overclocking and learn what happens. This is my first Android device so I'm experimenting and playing around.
But I have one more question...I've overclocked to 1.5...I found 1.6 to be the same as 1.5. But it seems that after an hour or so, it resets to 1.3. in ROMToolbox. Why is this?

Don't use rom toolbox. Use the Trinity app. It sticks just fine for me. Besides you support the dev to make better kernels.
Sent From My Toro+ via White Tapatalk

simms22 said:
try a96, its one of my faves. it has a max of 1700mhz http://goo.gl/mLUCZ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i **** my pants a little when it says "system succesfully corrupted, please freak out now"

MRsf27 said:
i **** my pants a little when it says "system succesfully corrupted, please freak out now"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol its a joke... its the updater-script you can make it say anything... :laugh:

MRsf27 said:
i **** my pants a little when it says "system succesfully corrupted, please freak out now"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha!
youre not the first

Overclocking past 1.4 Ghz doesn't result in any major usability improvements. I've gone up to 1.7 Ghz and the only thing it does is make my tablet really warm and unstable. All you really need for improving system performance is I/O tweaks to speed up app and page loading, and a little bit of GPU overclocking to help with the transitional effects.

and, to be honest, depending which trinity kernel im using, im using either 1100 or 1150mhz mostly. on a111 im using 1100mhz and on a96 i used 1150mhz. with those speeds everything is still fast but a bit better on battery

Overclocking
If you want a little more information about the the overclocking if you havent already you might want to check out http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1788759 its the official thread of the trinity kernel for grouper.

[Q] Performance difference from different kernels on different roms

Hi,
I've noticed a huge performance difference between kernels and the roms they're used with.
For example:
I was using AOKP and Franco kernel and got around 20000 antutu points, I've switched to Carbon Rom (because of the build in pie control) and Franco kernel and only get around 13000 points, that's a huge difference.
As a test I've installed Matr1x-kenel on Carbon and get around 21000 points.
I really like Franco-kernel and all the tweaks it offers but don't like the huge drop in benchmarks, I know benchmarks are not a real representation of actual performance but it's still a big difference.
This also occurs in Quadrant and Geekbench.
So my question is why does this happen?
Aren't most roms supposed to be compatible with most kernels?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards.

I can't answer your question as to why that happens (no doubt someone else will) but you seriously should just stop bothering with benchmarks and use your own eyes and experiences as a measure of how good a kernel/ROM is. I doubt you could find a kernel which made the phone visibly slow or that affected usability so I don't see what your concern is tbh.

Thanks for your answer.
Yeah, I read that a lot on XDA, don't trust benchmarks...I understand that but they must have some meaning.
I mean, if not why do they exist or do people bother using them?
To be honest I don't really notice any real performance difference between most kernels I've tested.
Best regards

some roms include many optimizations(like skia/dalvik, krait optimizations, and others), while some dont. its not thekernel thats crapping out on you, its the rom.
---------- Post added at 07:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:58 PM ----------
Nigeldg said:
I can't answer your question as to why that happens (no doubt someone else will) butcomseriously should just stop bothering with benchmarks and use your own eyes and experiences as a measure of how good a kernel/ROM is. I doubt you could find a kernel which made the phone visibly slow or that affected usability so I don't see what your concern is tbh.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your eyes can be decieved.. they can see whats happening in the ui for example, but you can not see the complex calculations that are being performed or how your cpu is really performing. you can have a slow device whos ui is quick.

OK, I can understand that not all roms are equal but why does changing the kernel have such a seamingly big impact?
If a rom is bad to begin with it should stay that way no matter what kernel you use with it.
Offcourse what do I know, I'm not a developer so my knowledge on the subject is limited.
I'm just trying to understand what's going on...
Best regards

Pihkal said:
OK, I can understand that not all roms are equal but why does changing the kernel have such a seamingly big impact?
If a rom is bad to begin with it should stay that way no matter what kernel you use with it.
Offcourse what do I know, I'm not a developer so my knowledge on the subject is limited.
I'm just trying to understand what's going on...
Best regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernels vary too, and they impact greatly because they control just about everything in the phone, kinda like a brain. since the kernels themselves vary, one kernel might be better set up than another to deal with certain code from a certain rom. and then also, every phone reacts differently to each kernel(and roms to a point). thats why its recommended to try out different kernels, combos. only then you can find the perfect combo for you/your device. what works great for somebody, can be lousy for another.

OK, so if i understand correctly it boils down to this:
1. You can do benchmarks but don't base your opinion on just the benchmark scores.
2. Roms can vary greatly in optimizations and efficiency of coding.
3. Kernels can also vary greatly in optimizations and efficiency of coding.
4. There's no such thing as a "best for everyone rom/kernel combo".
5. Not all roms/kernels play equally nice with each other.
6. Play around with as many roms / kernels as possible and decide what works best for ME based on MY experience.
Thanks for the advice.
Best regards.

Its been well over a year since I ran any benchmark of any sort but I tested Franco and carbon because that's what I'm on and you mentioned low scores. I'm on Franco m3 with some tweaked settings and carbon nightly from 7-5. Antutu gave me 20636. I'm using stock CPU and GPU frequencies.

username8611 said:
Its been well over a year since I ran any benchmark of any sort but I tested Franco and carbon because that's what I'm on and you mentioned low scores. I'm on Franco m3 with some tweaked settings and carbon nightly from 7-5. Antutu gave me 20636. I'm using stock CPU and GPU frequencies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe the nightly Carbon rom is more optimized?
I'm on Carbon 1.7 Stable and used Franco nightly 162 to test with.
When I benchmark I try to be as consistent as possible ie same temperature, performance governor, airplane mode etc.
I even cooled my Nexus in the freezer for some minutes to eliminate thermal throttling (yeah I know, watchout for condensation) but still got the same low scores.
Best regards.

Pihkal said:
Maybe the nightly Carbon rom is more optimized?
I'm on Carbon 1.7 Stable and used Franco nightly 162 to test with.
When I benchmark I try to be as consistent as possible ie same temperature, performance governor, airplane mode etc.
I even cooled my Nexus in the freezer for some minutes to eliminate thermal throttling (yeah I know, watchout for condensation) but still got the same low scores.
Best regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It might be, I didn't do anything special. I left all my background apps running, didnt close anything in the recents, didn't cool the phone first. I just downloaded it and hit start. I use the interactive governor tweaked a bit, and I also tweaked the hotplug settings so it more readily onlines all 4 cores instead of waiting for some of the higher loads to trigger it.

username8611 said:
It might be, I didn't do anything special. I left all my background apps running, didnt close anything in the recents, didn't cool the phone first. I just downloaded it and hit start. I use the interactive governor tweaked a bit, and I also tweaked the hotplug settings so it more readily onlines all 4 cores instead of waiting for some of the higher loads to trigger it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I had to try it myself so I did a factory reset, cleared system,data and dalvik, installed latest carbon nightly.
With stock kernel I almost reached 21000 points, with franco I barely get 17000 points.
Very strange...
edit:
I stand corrected, did a second benchmark and am now getting 20880 points...

are you benchmarking with your cpu speed benchmarked set as highest and lowest cpu speed? you should. if you dont put the same cpu speed as highest and lowest then itll scale up and down. if it scales, you dont actually know what speed its testing and it gives you inconsistamt scores. you want the cpu speed to be the same throughout the test.

When I benchmark I set the governor to performance, this should keep the cpu running at maximum speed without scaling unless I'm mistaking...

Pihkal said:
When I benchmark I set the governor to performance, this should keep the cpu running at maximum speed without scaling unless I'm mistaking...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
meh, performance is the worst for benchmarking. its such a deceiving name. try either ondemand or interactive. set your cpu speed to be the same high and low.

simms22 said:
meh, performance is the worst for benchmarking. its such a deceiving name. try either ondemand or interactive. set your cpu speed to be the same high and low.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woow, that's a great tip, I now get 22003 points with Matr1x-kernel.

Pihkal said:
Woow, that's a great tip, I now get 22003 points with Matr1x-kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
better :highfive:

Scores of our Shield Tablet in Antutu

Hello there!
I've got an idea to make a post-poll to see what scores Antutu Benchmark is giving us in the Shield Tablet on any ROM, like CM11, Stock, etc.
Mine (WiFi-only model) got 53.844 points, with the latest stock firmware (1.2.1) and Antutu Benchmark 5.1.. Also, it was set to Max. Performance mode..
I also made a video, you can check it here:
What are your best scores with the Shield Tablet?
(And sorry for my bad english lol)

Of course, I didn't mentioned it, but It'd be nice to compare scores between roms, so, if you're using a different rom than stock, like CM11, please post it, so that we know which rom has best performance

56674
Settings > SHIELD Power Control > Processor Mode: Using Max Performance
Stock 2.2.1 update, no root.

hapihakr said:
Settings > SHIELD Power Control > Processor Mode: Using Max Performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In mine with 2.2.1 rooted I got the other days around 57 thousand and something, what a pity I didn't take any screenshot :silly:
(Also on max performance)

linuxct said:
Of course, I didn't mentioned it, but It'd be nice to compare scores between roms, so, if you're using a different rom than stock, like CM11, please post it, so that we know which rom has best performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROM that has the highest Antutu score, and the ROM that has the best performance could (most probably) be different. It's been proven time and time again that benchmarks mean little when it comes to real world performance.

stock and shaky kernel
Before 62000 couples times stock, shaky kernel, booster plus and battery saver,busyboox ,CPU tuner and shield in my power mode full
Right now 59326 with stock,shaky,booster plus,busybox,device control,CPU tuner,auto kill apk and shield in my power mode.

57,340
always one guy that just has to remind us that benchmarks don't necessarily mean your going to have a good experience across the board, yeah bud, we know, this is XDA, it's fun to benchmark, get over it. [rant off]
anywho, I'm stock, unlocked, and rooted with titanium to freeze apps and CWM for backups.
got a 56,593 & 57,340 Whoot!

Here's a recent one on mine. I want to hit 65k but that will likely require a GPU OC among other optimizations.

Pilz said:
Here's a recent one on mine. I want to hit 65k but that will likely require a GPU OC among other optimizations.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How so much, custom kernel & overclock?????

cyraxx84 said:
How so much, custom kernel & overclock?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I OC'd my CPU to 2.5ghz and that's was about it. I'm running BitOsessions kernel on my stock Shield Tablet. I did another one a while ago that hit 63k but I can't find my screenshot so I'm working to get past that again.

Here's another one I did when I dropped the resolution from 1080 FHD to 720 HD.

Accidental double post... Delete

90009 on Stock Rooted MM ROM...

I got 84071 on mine
Edit: re-did the test after installing the latest update and got 84767

About 91500 on latest antutu 6.01. Stock 6.0 rooted and debloated.

Beat Y'all If you can
Screenshot Or it Didn't Happened

Nvidia Stock LP v5.1.1, rooted, no "performance related" modifications to speak of.
highest: 82517
average: 81842 (based on reboot then running Antutu v6.0.1 6 times in a row, scores increased on each run until the sixth)

FoxyDrew said:
The ROM that has the highest Antutu score, and the ROM that has the best performance could (most probably) be different. It's been proven time and time again that benchmarks mean little when it comes to real world performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely disagree with this without meaning to be rude because every person suffers from confirmation bias and "self benchmarking" is one area where it effects everybody greatly.
To the extent that people can have very different experiences on exactly the same hardware and software as a matter of routine - and no one can know that it has ocurred since it's automatic.
Benchmarks are the in fact the only way to measure objectively IME and opinion.
This is certainly not to say that anyone has a better or worse experience though as you point out, that i agree with.

Antutu Benchmark
No root/no debloat - MM 6.0.1

Overclocking snapdragon 800.

So I was wondering about the truth behind the risks of frying your cpu through overclocking or the chip itself degrading faster over time, and if there are such risks do they apply to a simple 2.5 ghz overclocking ?

There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...

devilsdouble said:
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.

MohamedOMostafa said:
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.

devilsdouble said:
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the first thing I did actually

MohamedOMostafa said:
That's the first thing I did actually
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once

devilsdouble said:
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will do.

If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).

Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??

Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.

djak272 said:
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
devilsdouble said:
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.

Graffiti Exploit said:
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!

devilsdouble said:
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it comes with 2 apps for customization. You apply frequency on the first one and open the other and select apply changes. I'm not sure if it was this kernel or was it AEL. Lol. Anyways good luck. Maybe your ROM doesn't support a certain "stuff". I'm sorry but I really forgot about those terminologies. You can read up on the closed thread if you want. I'm sure you'll have a clue or on that link I gave you. *Google Translate ftw*

Please help PUBG lag's very much

Hello i have a redmi note 7 3/32 model.When i play pubg even on low settings i.e smooth/high it lags very much.Phone heats very much.Tried disabling battery saver for pubg with no restriction but still lags very much.It had sd660 thats the reason bought it but it is really very disappointing.i had tried every combination of graphics settings but its the same.Phone heats after 15 min and then lag starts.
Should i install a custom rom? If yes then which rom will be best for pubg?
Or
Should i downgrade to miui 10 version ?
Please help..
Thanks in advance.

Do you have fps set to high? Change it to med or low.

kennyk09 said:
Do you have fps set to high? Change it to med or low.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for reply
But sd660 can handle high fps in pubg.I have seen other mobile ex.Asus max pro m2.which can handle pubg very smoothly.Cant find what the real issue is

ChandrakantBelell said:
Thanks for reply
But sd660 can handle high fps in pubg.I have seen other mobile ex.Asus max pro m2.which can handle pubg very smoothly.Cant find what the real issue is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can handle high fps, yes.
Can still create much heat and use much battery, also yes. Thus lower fps to keep it less warm. Try it yourself and see the difference.

Add all unnecessary apps/games in memory exceptions within game booster app. Also disable ingame shortcut and enable bandwidth priority.
In pubg I have fps set to high and graphic to smooth.
I find these settings work the best on my phone for game performance and less heat too.

kennyk09 said:
enable bandwidth priority.
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How to do this btw?

Inside game speed booster settings.
And of course you need to add pubg to this app too.
I set pubg to restrict battery in MIUI setting FYI. It has no effect on game play.

kennyk09 said:
Inside game speed booster settings.
And of course you need to add pubg to this app too.
I set pubg to restrict battery in MIUI setting FYI. It has no effect on game play.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had done everything but still it lags when played even on smooth and low/medium settings.

Try running a few benchmarks to see if everything is right, like Antutu, 3dmark etc and compare the scores to others RN7.
If not, try resetting your phone.

yeah mine too , i can play pubg on my mi max 3 with no laggs in the same setting but with this redmi note 7 will laggs from time to times , it supposed to be better than sd636 in my mi max 3.

Gonime said:
Try running a few benchmarks to see if everything is right, like Antutu, 3dmark etc and compare the scores to others RN7.
If not, try resetting your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the benchmark scores seems to be normal.Will reset today hope will get better performance
Thanks for reply

I have try antutu benchmark and the result is very far from ranking redmi note 7 list at there. My device at 51. How to raise up the performance?

ChandrakantBelell said:
All the benchmark scores seems to be normal.Will reset today hope will get better performance
Thanks for reply
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reset will do almost nothing. It does only in short term. Longterm it will lags again. Just like you reboot ur phone and cleaning cache, etc...
The main cause is, miui thermal and stock kernel restirct cpu frequency too 'agressively'. When our device start to heat, thermal will restrict -half of- our cpu to only use max freq for bigcluster 1,7Ghz & littlecluster 1,4Ghz and downclock soo oftenly. So, lags will occurs.
Reason behind is good actually to "save" the phone and decrease heat. But, when it comes for gaming (my opinion) Its NO USE at all. It Just ruins the gameplay.
Sad thing..., xiaomi like do nothin :'( its been a couple stable update and they are doing nothing to provide best gaming experience at least.

GueztStar said:
Reset will do almost nothing. It does only in short term. Longterm it will lags again. Just like you reboot ur phone and cleaning cache, etc...
The main cause is, miui thermal and stock kernel restirct cpu frequency too 'agressively'. When our device start to heat, thermal will restrict -half of- our cpu to only use max freq for bigcluster 1,7Ghz & littlecluster 1,4Ghz and downclock soo oftenly. So, lags will occurs.
Reason behind is good actually to "save" the phone and decrease heat. But, when it comes for gaming (my opinion) Its NO USE at all. It Just ruins the gameplay.
Sad thing..., xiaomi like do nothin :'( its been a couple stable update and they are doing nothing to provide best gaming experience at least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you are right after reset again it starts to lag.
Can't we do anything for this mini thermal throttle?
I mean can we root and go for a custom rom Or anything like that to improve performance? I don't want any battery saver stuff.. Just want lag free gaming

ChandrakantBelell said:
Yes you are right after reset again it starts to lag.
Can't we do anything for this mini thermal throttle?
I mean can we root and go for a custom rom Or anything like that to improve performance? I don't want any battery saver stuff.. Just want lag free gaming
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Root method? Of course yes.
Flash recovery Orangefox R10 > Flash Magisk Root > Flash Thermal-Config Mod (its a magisk module) > Flash Custom Kernel (if you want, i recommend genom or evira). Done.
Now you will get best perfomance of our device should have.
*thermal-engine mod will disable cpu restriction
**custom kernel will increase battery and perfomance
You can go to custom rom too, it'll give you more :v
Head over development rom thread..

GueztStar said:
Reset will do almost nothing. It does only in short term. Longterm it will lags again. Just like you reboot ur phone and cleaning cache, etc...
The main cause is, miui thermal and stock kernel restirct cpu frequency too 'agressively'. When our device start to heat, thermal will restrict -half of- our cpu to only use max freq for bigcluster 1,7Ghz & littlecluster 1,4Ghz and downclock soo oftenly. So, lags will occurs.
Reason behind is good actually to "save" the phone and decrease heat. But, when it comes for gaming (my opinion) Its NO USE at all. It Just ruins the gameplay.
Sad thing..., xiaomi like do nothin :'( its been a couple stable update and they are doing nothing to provide best gaming experience at least.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What if we disable MIUI optimization? Will it remove the restriction? Or the only choices are thermal mod?

Fritzkier said:
What if we disable MIUI optimization? Will it remove the restriction? Or the only choices are thermal mod?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disabling MIUI optimization will not remove kernel restrictions, you're better off flashing another kernel or using a thermal mod as recommended before.

GueztStar said:
Root method? Of course yes.
Flash recovery Orangefox R10 > Flash Magisk Root > Flash Thermal-Config Mod (its a magisk module) > Flash Custom Kernel (if you want, i recommend genom or evira). Done.
Now you will get best perfomance of our device should have.
*thermal-engine mod will disable cpu restriction
**custom kernel will increase battery and perfomance
You can go to custom rom too, it'll give you more :v
Head over development rom thread..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thankyou very much for the reply.I will definitely root my note 7 and install everything you said.Can you share the link of thermal-config mod? and evira kernal? please that would be very helpful .

ChandrakantBelell said:
Thankyou very much for the reply.I will definitely root my note 7 and install everything you said.Can you share the link of thermal-config mod? and evira kernal? please that would be very helpful .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://forum.xda-developers.com/re.../official-orangefox-recovery-project-t3941822
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-note-7/development/evira-kernel-redminote-7-t3919265
Coudn't find the thermal-mod link, maybe it has to do with editing the kernel.

Gonime said:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/re.../official-orangefox-recovery-project-t3941822
https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-note-7/development/evira-kernel-redminote-7-t3919265
Coudn't find the thermal-mod link, maybe it has to do with editing the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes i also didnt find the thermal-mod link
but thanku very much for the help