Database Users

[discussion] Benchmarking!! Which is the best ROM/kernel ?

This discussion aims at getting our x10 the best ROM or kernel or any MOD of all TIME!!
Benchmarking is an easy way to test your phone performance.Either CPU,2D & 3D graphics or SD card and Data transfer.
you can do it simply by software like AnTuTu or Quadrant.
The Point in this discussion is to test your phone and write ur best score at all time.Then you tell us your phone status.and tell us what is -in your opinion is the cause of your high score,so that we can determine which are best ROMs,Kernels or CPU governors,etc.
Please notice that Benchmarking is A ROUGH indicator of your phone performance. it is not necessarily that your phone is slower if you have lower scores
PLEASE SHARE YOUR
1.Best score.
2.which software did u use? scores are very different.
3.ROM.
4.kernel.
5.CPU min/max.
6.CPU governor.
7.SD card info.
8.Opinions.
Thanks,
Omar.
---------- Post added at 01:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:37 AM ----------
MINE are:
1.1624
2.Quadrant.
3.WB 5.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.
5.192/1152 Mhz.
6.Performance.
7.8GB sandisk,class 6.
8. i think WB tweaks has increased my scores specially in v 5.0.
also overclocking and performance governor-CPU @ 1152 all the test-.

I was just about to ask this myself
1. 38.45 (Avg of 5 tests)
2. Linpack Pro
3. WB 5.0c ROM.
4. WB stock with OC tweak
5. 245/1152 Mhz.
6. interactive
7. 32GB Sandisk, class 4.
8. None.
It would be great if devs could post the performance stats of their Rom with their releases

1.- 2592
2.- AnTuTu Benchmark
3.- CM7 ZMOD
4.- DooMKernel v5 with overclock
5.- 128 - 1113 mhz
6.- smartassv2
7.- stock 16gb class 2
8.- I think you can get a better score with a tweaked rom, a better sd card and another cpu scaling

Score: 1795 Quadrant Advanced
ROM: MIUI 1.9.16 by 28Spawn with SWAP included- no data restored.
26fps stable on graphics- 2D leaf
class 2 stock 8gb card
Kernel: DooMKernel 05 for unlocked bootloader min 128 max 1075 smartass v2
8. SWAP files incrase my performance greatly. Tweaks do nothing but drain battery and cause lag. IMHO.

2352
Quadrant standard
Spaarc oxygenated gingerscape
Stock kernel
Locked bootloader
245-1113
Basic z oc
Zdzihu smartass
Memory card class 4
6.8 mB/s read
11.9 mB/s write
sent from my Android powered smart phone

1. 1.288
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. 1.152 / 128
6. Interactive
7. stock 8GB
8. None

KuSkUS_68 said:
1. 1.288
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. 1.152 / 128
6. Interactive
7. stock 8GB
8. None
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your benchmarking should have a higher score.is that the highest one?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

Prodigy said:
Score: 1795 Quadrant Advanced
ROM: MIUI 1.9.16 by 28Spawn with SWAP included- no data restored.
26fps stable on graphics- 2D leaf
class 2 stock 8gb card
Kernel: DooMKernel 05 for unlocked bootloader min 128 max 1075 smartass v2
8. SWAP files incrase my performance greatly. Tweaks do nothing but drain battery and cause lag. IMHO.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
spaarc said:
2352
Quadrant standard
Spaarc oxygenated gingerscape
Stock kernel
Locked bootloader
245-1113
Basic z oc
Zdzihu smartass
Memory card class 4
6.8 mB/s read
11.9 mB/s write
sent from my Android powered smart phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II

romasalah said:
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm using x10 very well ...
Search for gingerscape in x10 development thread
sent from my Android powered smart phone

romasalah said:
I think your benchmarking should have a higher score.is that the highest one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually that's what I thought comparing yours.
I have been trying other governors and the best score till now is 1378 with smartassv2 (tried only interactivex, interactive and smartassv2)
I'll keep on trying with other settings...

how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass

Skumtomten said:
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude it's the rom Not smartass
https://picasaweb.google.com/100227745563198630514/DropBox#5651119841938055298

romasalah said:
Yes man..i only got those scores with miui.
1.1755
2.Quadrant advanced.
3.Miui 1.9.9. Erenz's
4.DoomKernel v3b.
5.192/1152.
6.performance.
7.8GB sandisk class 6.
8. i got very high I/O scores "1600".used to get only 600 with WB ROM v5c.
but with AnTuTu are very low,only 4.5 Mb/s read & 8 Mb/s write. don't know why!!
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
---------- Post added at 01:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:18 PM ----------
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
spaarc said:
Dude it's the rom Not smartass
https://picasaweb.google.com/100227745563198630514/DropBox#5651119841938055298
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back

scoobysnacks said:
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1376
That's the score after disabling the tweak

scoobysnacks said:
he's obviously using the io hack which makes this score fake.. .
you could not get a legitimate score that high on an x10...
---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
so your rom uses a hack to give fake scores, they are trying to figure out the fastest rom objectively.
disable the hack and report back
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does MIUI uses this hack?
I got 1804 with MIUI 1.9.16
@1152-smartass v2

romasalah said:
does MIUI uses this hack?
I got 1804 with MIUI 1.9.16
@1152-smartass v2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no idea. anything over 1500 or 1600 is generally pretty suspect though

Skumtomten said:
how on smartass ?
That's very high man.. are using XPERIA x10 i need a photo to make sure u aren't using SGS II
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1212012&highlight=smartass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah,thanks I know about smartass and i use it. But i always have a wrong belief that performance is the best governor for benchmarking.May be cause it's always operates the processor @ Max frequency
---------- Post added at 06:18 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:15 PM ----------
scoobysnacks said:
no idea. anything over 1500 or 1600 is generally pretty suspect though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i guess MIUI may be using it...with AnTuTu my benchmarking is normal -from 2500 to 2700- but with Quadrant my I/O has increased from 600 to 1600 after MIUI.

...more of a test...
1.
a) 2262 (3087)
b) 1274 (at the third times), (1440)
c) 37 MFLOPS (over 39)
d) 60 sec. (51 sec.)
e) 30 fps (31.2)​
2.
a) Antutu benchmark.
b) Quadrant
c) Linpack
d) SQLite
e) Neocore​
3.XperiaTW 6.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.b
5.128/1113 Mhz.
6.SmartassV2.
7.16GB,class 6 Kingstone.
8. I state that the test results, the present condition (full of applications, more than 100, then the X10 is under stress), are lower than those obtained in the past without so many applications installed. I have met with many peaks FROYO (TW custom ROM) and are shown alongside those of the scores in brackets .. I tried several tests in the past who now do not use hardly any, this thread I have "suggested" to review the scores to currently, although the comparison is not reasonable
Sorry for my English, I used google translate

1. 1.004
2. Quadrant Std.
3. Wolf 6.0.0c
4. DooMKernel v04b
5. stock
6. Im a Noob so dont know Its all at standart^^
7. stock 8GB
8. None

Cecco1970 said:
1.
a) 2262 (3087)
b) 1274 (at the third times), (1440)
c) 37 MFLOPS (over 39)
d) 60 sec. (51 sec.)
e) 30 fps (31.2)​
2.
a) Antutu benchmark.
b) Quadrant
c) Linpack
d) SQLite
e) Neocore​
3.XperiaTW 6.0c ROM.
4.DooMKernel v4.0.b
5.128/1113 Mhz.
6.SmartassV2.
7.16GB,class 6 Kingstone.
8. I state that the test results, the present condition (full of applications, more than 100, then the X10 is under stress), are lower than those obtained in the past without so many applications installed. I have met with many peaks FROYO (TW custom ROM) and are shown alongside those of the scores in brackets .. I tried several tests in the past who now do not use hardly any, this thread I have "suggested" to review the scores to currently, although the comparison is not reasonable
Sorry for my English, I used google translate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for doing all these tests..
a large number of app affects memory testing and I/O..but i think not too much it doesn't have great range to play with.
Also i noticed high peaks with AnTuTu reaching above 3000 only with FROYO.
and noticed high graphics scores..may be double GB. but i don't know why .
Can't state that froyo has higher graphics than GB -although i heared alittle of that - Coz i didn't see high benchmarks with Quadrant in froyo.

LG G2 Performance

Is there any way to overclock the GPU and/or memory inside of a rooted and rom'd Verizon LG G2? I want to squeeze every last drop of performance out of the Snapdragon 800.
Any general performance suggestions?
Thanks in advance guys!

Hi, which rom and kernel do you use?

-JFK- said:
Hi, which rom and kernel do you use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey there, I'm in the process of updating to the latest Vanir build and the 8.0.1 Dorimanx F2FS kernel.

Till now, there has not been a way of overclocking the GPU of the LG G2.
But honestly? It would only cause the overall performance to drop. The G2 already has a hard time getting rid of the heat generated when running at 450 Mhz, so overclocking it would just generate more heat which, in the end, would result in an even more aggressive throttling.

With Dorimanx kernel, you can OC the GPU to 450Mhz, if I'm right the RAM frequency is not OC.
Then, there is a lot of tweak with STweak and Synapse.
The best thing that you can do is to try
I use it every days with the CPU @1.9Ghz and GPU @320Mhz without any lag.
I guess you will not succeed with F2FS... Not working for now.
---------- Post added at 11:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:09 PM ----------
-JFK- said:
With Dorimanx kernel, you can OC the GPU to 450Mhz, if I'm right the RAM frequency is not OC.
Then, there is a lot of tweak with STweak and Synapse.
The best thing that you can do is to try
I use it every days with the CPU @1.9Ghz and GPU @320Mhz without any lag.
I guess you will not succeed with F2FS... Not working for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad, you right, 450Mhz is the stock frequency.

Thank you for the prompt replies guys!
It's a little disappointing that those overclocking options are not available but this phone is still a beast! I was curious about those options as I am envious of new mobile chips such as the Snapdragon 805, 808, 810 and the Tegra K1.

It's the natural cycle for a phone. It's hard to admit and accept but that's how it is. I can't wait till there are more options of phones with 64 bit cpu.
BTW, 808 and 810 aren't even out yet.

Benchmarks with your Note 4

I am using firekat ROM with the KT kernel, and I am stable at 2918 MHZ. I wanted to get a general representation of different speeds whether it be stock touchwiz or rooted and OC'd like mine. I really don't know what the best benchmarks are, so here's some numbers.
I achieved 1842 on Vellamo metal test.
1777 on Vellamo multicore test.
3480 on Chrome Vellamo browser test.
1104 on geekbench 3 single core.
3209 on geekbench 3 multicore
And more to come.
Sorry I am a noob on XDA and do not know how to attach screenshots.
Just to note (no pun intended), 2918 MHZ is the most stable OC I achieved. When I set to 3072 MHZ, my device overheats and reboots.
Sent from my SM-N910T

This phone is a beast. Why would you want to overclock it?
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Premium HD app

So here is a quick update, and my point is proven. I am running CM 12 builds now on my N4. CM can run toe to toe with Firekat, but firekat destroys CM in mulithreaded benchmarks.
CM does have bugs and broken things but, it is still faster than TW. To add to CM's defense, I'm running a base clock instead of OC'ed on firekat.
That being said, here are my benchmarks
Vellamo metal: 1856
Vellamo multicore: 1419
Vellamo browser ( Chrome ): 4051
And more to come.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app

i don't care about Benkmark

betrayed sansung
I've ditched Samsung this time for Huawei Ascend Mate 7
Just to tease.. default Rom: Chrome 3700 .. Multicore 1800 .. Metal only 1333.
Pretty good for a 6 inch screen, damn low price, hardware fingerprint scanner, metal frame phablet, slimmer than Note 4

Completely stock
Browser : 3683
Metal:1783
Multicore:1918

Not as high as I was expecting. I'm running FireKat with AEL kernel over clocked to 2.89Ghz, umbrella_core governor, I/O set to ROW, read ahead size is 1024, I left the voltages alone. My phone scored lower than a non modified Note 4!
Benchmarks are stupid and pointless anyways, but it's still interesting to run them. The real world performance with my phone is outstanding, so I'm happy.

I am wondering why my scores are so low. Especially in the cpu and ram department. Could it be a faulty device?
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ----------
Just a side note this is completely stock. No root and no overclock. It this a corect score? Is antu comparing to other rooted devices.

jonahtriangle said:
I am wondering why my scores are so low. Especially in the cpu and ram department. Could it be a faulty device?
---------- Post added at 05:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:52 PM ----------
Just a side note this is completely stock. No root and no overclock. It this a corect score? Is antu comparing to other rooted devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's about what I got stock. As long as your device performs well in the real world then that's all that counts. Benchmarks don't mean squat.
On another note, here's my latest benchmark done in the freezer to avoid thermal throttling. My phone is so beastly that Antutu couldn't verify it.
When I removed it from my freezer the CPU temps were around 25° C, so there shouldn't have been any thermal throttling going on.

Benkmark is so fiction
not carre about it

Here's my latest

Firekat v11

projectvomit said:
Firekat v11
View attachment 3223827
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine was on FireKat v11 as well

New benchmark with Vision X Lollipop, KT kernel, performance governor, and tested outside to keep the phone cool (25°F right now).

Stock - AnTuTu - 49591

Here is mine completely stock. I am with GCI In Alaska. Left is encrypted and right is not. Nothing running or installed. Everything updated.
Hope this helps.
stomped the G3 before and after encryption.

Slie said:
Here is mine completely stock. I am with GCI In Alaska. Left is encrypted and right is not. Nothing running or installed. Everything updated.
Hope this helps.
stomped the G3 before and after encryption.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oops looks like photo didn't attach.

Mine

Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app

All about Exynos 4412 !!!

Ok guys , i want you to know that the exynos 4412 present in the s3 is a beast i will be writting all about it here !!
Hope you like it ..
Exynos 4412 is a quad packed cpu package with clock speed 1.4/1.6Ghz , has an architecture of cortex a9 32nm which was one of the most powerful architecture at its time .. It is accompanied by Mali 400MP4 clocked at 533Mhz , which was specifically made for 3d processing.Those four cores support up to 128-bit instruction internally, double what the previous Exynos supports. The chipset also has other potential advantages like USB-on-the-go, USB-host and -device regimes, as well as a number of other options, including the ability to connect up to four memory cards.
So , by now we get the image that this cpu is still a beast . But what about battery efficiency umm..
There come the Hot Plug functionality which has the ability to use any of the 4 cores at any clock speed and also has the ability to switch off its cores anytime it wants according to the user demand ..
So as we have 4 cores , when doing not so heavy work then only one core will be activated hence using a lot less battery as compared to other cpus . As said by samsung its 30% more efficient than exynos 4212 found in the s2 .
Also the cpu has a dedicated image signal processor for better image processing thats why s3 still has an awesome camera ..
If you want to know anything about this cpu ask , i will try to answer it .

why does it lag

Exynos 4412 is several years old by now and not in the least an interesting chipset.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

zapty said:
If you want to know anything about this cpu ask , i will try to answer it .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awhh, man....thanks a lot! I'm dying to know more about my almost 3year old phone that I've been rooting and tweaking since the day I bought it
Seriosly. What a strange thread!? :silly:

:fingers-crossed:
pepo930 said:
why does it lag
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol , the thing is that samsung apparantly bloats our touvhwiz roms and also when running a cuatom rom it does also because our complete sources are not available...hence making it a bit laggy..
Had our sources been available w Be would defeat nexus 4 in performance is custom rom stability.
I use a rom on my s3 which gives me 30k on antutu ... Thats better than snapdragon 600 ..
You wanna know how ???
menkromsen said:
Awhh, man....thanks a lot! I'm dying to know more about my almost 3year old phone that I've been rooting and tweaking since the day I bought it
Seriosly. What a strange thread!? :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol...
Ask me anything what ever you want to know ?
A question please !!

How is it that it gives you 30k on antutu ??

Mine gives 26616 on antutu i am running aosp neat rom 4.4.4 with a archi kernel without any overclocking....

Why does Samsung underclock it to 1400Mhz, when it runs stable at 1600Mhz? GIVE THE PEOPLE THE SPEED!!

Because it will get heated fastly and the battery life will degrade very fastly

Dark_bolt88 said:
Mine gives 26616 on antutu i am running aosp neat rom 4.4.4 with a archi kernel without any overclocking....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jay5204.abd said:
How is it that it gives you 30k on antutu ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the thing
i roxk back to noot v6 + archi kernel 1.7.2 , cpu oc to 1.6ghz and governor set as zzmove battery plus , which uses our hotplug functionality to the best .
also i have zram enabled to 2 devices with 400 mb each that does for me .
you try out these tweaks you check what scores you get i am sure you ill get 30 or 29k
as i get 29k and sometimes 30k
if ypu want lollipop then nameless 5.0 by dhiru gives 30k pn antutu as well you might want to look into that
k-semler said:
Why does Samsung underclock it to 1400Mhz, when it runs stable at 1600Mhz? GIVE THE PEOPLE THE SPEED!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our cpu can be safely clocked to 1.6 i recommend that too but i recommend it using along with zzmive battery plus governor which will not let your device heat up and even give bettery battery than pegasusq , oc it to 1.6ghz with zzmove battery plus i am sure you won't have any problems with power as well as battery !!

zapty said:
That's the thing
i roxk back to noot v6 + archi kernel 1.7.2 , cpu oc to 1.6ghz and governor set as zzmove battery plus , which uses our hotplug functionality to the best .
also i have zram enabled to 2 devices with 400 mb each that does for me .
you try out these tweaks you check what scores you get i am sure you ill get 30 or 29k
as i get 29k and sometimes 30k
if ypu want lollipop then nameless 5.0 by dhiru gives 30k pn antutu as well you might want to look into that
Our cpu can be safely clocked to 1.6 i recommend that too but i recommend it using along with zzmive battery plus governor which will not let your device heat up and even give bettery battery than pegasusq , oc it to 1.6ghz with zzmove battery plus i am sure you won't have any problems with power as well as battery !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Banchmarking is not an issue...its more like a feel good factor..
I am really interested in snappiness and battery improvement.
Should I configure my boeffla kernel on s5 sensation v8 4.4.2 as per your suggestion ?

Thanks to u for the informatiom

jay5204.abd said:
Banchmarking is not an issue...its more like a feel good factor..
I am really interested in snappiness and battery improvement.
Should I configure my boeffla kernel on s5 sensation v8 4.4.2 as per your suggestion ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah , sure why not !! i promise you will get amazing battery and performance too !!

Dark_bolt88 said:
Thanks to u for the informatiom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are welcome brother !!

I/O readahead
What the IO scheduler and read ahead setup for performance and battery in smdk4412 ?
---------- Post added at 08:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:52 PM ----------
I've just mild oc @1.6 GHz on boeffla kernel (rom : CM 12) sometimes my phone random reboot.
What about this symptom ?

[STABLE] [SMOOTH] Gustavo's Kernel My Settings [i9100]

Hi all xda! I am using Gustavo_s kernel for a long time. And If you don't like stock kernel values then read this thread.
What you need:
1. A GT-I9100
2. Gustavo_s kernel,
3. Synapse (from play store)
4. Devil kernel manager (from play store)
5. A little courage
Gustavo_s kernel is a feature rich kernel but some says it is not stable [I was agree with them since chrome beta update (because chrome freezes phone only on this and all fuse bug fixed kernels)]. Here is my settings for best battery life and performance balaced! Leave unchanged I don't write any setting here.
A. Devil kernel manager settings:
CPU settings:
idle mode: idle+lpa
B. Synapse settings
1. Cpu settings
Cpu max: 1GHz
Voltage
1GHz: 1075mV
800MHz: 1000mV
500MHz: 950mV
200MHz: 850mV
2. Gpu settings
4x MSAA: CHECK
GPU 4th step freq: 400 MHz
Voltage
1st: 800mV
2nd: 850mV
3rd: 950mV
4th: 1150mV
3. Colors
If you are complaining about washed up colors or yellow tint display look at my other thread here
Yellow tint fix
4. Sound
i9100 Microphone is too silent. Boost it by 20dB
5. BLN
Force disable: CHECK
Led voltage: 2500mV
6. I/O
internal and external storage settings;
sio
1024kb
7. TWEAKS
All 650mA
8. MISC
Uncheck logcat if you don't use it.
If this settings are helpful for you please hit thanks button

Interesting thread. Good tweaks though. Please make sure to advise people that the voltages you applied will not work with all people's phones, but in most cases it should be fine.

gsstudios said:
Interesting thread. Good tweaks though. Please make sure to advise people that the voltages you applied will not work with all people's phones, but in most cases it should be fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I usally use -25mV more undervolted but this values are safe and smooth

Can I ask what ROM you are currently using?

RuffBuster said:
Can I ask what ROM you are currently using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm11 linaro sabermod

Thnx for awesome setting..:thumbup:
---------- Post added at 09:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 PM ----------
But gallery is not open when I check 4x MSAA..??

Did you ever got the phone freezed with these settings (apart from Chrome's bad behaviour)?

vickymbbs said:
Thnx for awesome setting..:thumbup:
---------- Post added at 09:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 PM ----------
But gallery is not open when I check 4x MSAA..??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When msaa x4 is enabled, the GPU would have to work harder to render the visuals whether it is an app or a game. Some apps are not compatible with this option is ticked and that's why it is disabled by default.

thks, I will try

nhmanas said:
Gustavo_s kernel is a feature rich kernel but some says it is not stable [I was agree with them since chrome beta update (because chrome freezes phone only on this and all fuse bug fixed kernels)].
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't understand. you say chrome beta freezes the complete phone on fpbug fixed kernels? and not on others? how does this happen? can you elaborate?

Lanchon said:
i don't understand. you say chrome beta freezes the complete phone on fpbug fixed kernels? and not on others? how does this happen? can you elaborate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was a long time ago mate. I wrote almost same thing on your fpbug fix thread too if you remember

-zalo said:
THANXS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't quote unnecessary long posts.. You can just mention me.