Hello every genius !!
Can someone add 3D driver optimisations in their fabulous kernel / rom like cyanogen mod7?
In cyanogen mod we can notice a real boost performance in 3d applications. So why not include the cyanogen 3d driver in next rom or kernel ?
Thank you all !
Jimmy from France
jimmy72 said:
Hello every genius !!
Can someone add 3D driver optimisations in their fabulous kernel / rom like cyanogen mod7?
In cyanogen mod we can notice a real boost performance in 3d applications. So why not include the cyanogen 3d driver in next rom or kernel ?
Thank you all !
Jimmy from France
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because 3D diver from samsung is not open.
So nobody cant take it.
True near my words
Ivan from Russia
I'll quote my post from another topic
Guys, look at that:
http://glbenchmark.com/subtest_results_of_device.jsp?D=Google+Nexus+S&id=405
There are 12 tests of Nexus S in GLBenchmark, and 11 of them are below 2400 points (more or less like our SGS), but the most recent one (uploaded at 2011.02.11) scored 3025 points, more than Tegra 2. This result's is made by someone from GLBenchmark, and shows at "GLBenchmark team tested" page of the results. How is that possible?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, according to this benchmark, the performance of Nexus S'ses SGX540 increased dramatically somehow. And according to this article,
LG's software build also uses a newer version of Imagination Technologies' driver (1.6 instead of 1.5)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, maybe, in the latest update (2.3.2, or whatever) Nexus S got this new 1.6 GPU driver with increased up to 30% performance?
Now this is getting interesting!
any more info about this ?
fake?
I think ots a fake or it was a special rom, i use darys rom with voodoo and have 2537
But wich driver the Cyanogen team use in their cyanogen mod7 ?
Their 3d driver score in quadrant pro is very impresive, nearly 30 to 40% more than stock froyo 2.2 rom.
I will try to ask the cyanogen team.
Kepp in touch
// oh your right
Well.. This really looks interesting.
Now this is interesting
Looking forward to this
Surprised someone with a little more knowledge hasn't commented on this yet. Hopefully we'll have an answer soon
In the meantime -> report here if the sources (I mean precompiled module, which will be inside the package) are online
jimmy72 said:
But wich driver the Cyanogen team use in their cyanogen mod7 ?
Their 3d driver score in quadrant pro is very impresive, nearly 30 to 40% more than stock froyo 2.2 rom.
I will try to ask the cyanogen team.
Kepp in touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure? On my i9000 with CM7, quadrant 3D test even can't be finished normally.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
louyaorong said:
Are you sure? On my i9000 with CM7, quadrant 3D test even can't be finished normally.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gingerbread bug, same thing happens on the nexus s. I'm sure quadrant updated there app to work with gingerbread recently.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
PaulForde said:
Gingerbread bug, same thing happens on the nexus s. I'm sure quadrant updated there app to work with gingerbread recently.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it seems that I need to upgrade my quadrant version.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
jimmy72 said:
But wich driver the Cyanogen team use in their cyanogen mod7 ?
Their 3d driver score in quadrant pro is very impresive, nearly 30 to 40% more than stock froyo 2.2 rom.
I will try to ask the cyanogen team.
Kepp in touch
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is your quadrant GPU score in CM? On JS5 2.2.1 i have 2d:293; 3d:879. Are CM scores really better?
SGX540 is much better GPU than the one used in Tegra 2.
So I guess these results are caused by the newer driver version (1.6) released by IT.
with mitra rom i have these score on quadran advanced:
overclocked to 1.3ghz (on set cpu min and max @1.3)
total score 3702
at stock 1ghz (on set cpu min and max @1ghz)
total score 2865
good score for me with this rom.
i thing that the driver are updated...
Related
how bout another benchmark for all these latest and greatest roms that claim to be too fast for class. so we know the truth once again
I agree
Sent from my HERO200 using the XDA mobile application powered by Tapatalk
No problem. I should have time to do it tomorrow.
flipzmode said:
No problem. I should have time to do it tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha, awesome...
flipzmode said:
No problem. I should have time to do it tomorrow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow awesome quick response too... i knew i liked u for some reason
Won't hardware benchmarks always be the same between all ROMs?
Is there a way to objectively benchmark resource management? Speed of the interface, opening apps etc.
i didnt see the last one but id like to see benchmarks like on te gsm roms
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=656818
Also the following for benchmarking:
For 3D Performance
* Qualcomm's "NeoCore" 1.9.18 - Measured in FPS
For 2D Performance
* Softweg's "Benchmark" 1.03 - Measured by an internal score
* "Lag test" - Originally to measure 2D performance for Motorola Droid users. Measured in FPS
For CPU Performance
* Linpack for Android - Measured in MFLOPS
All of the tests mean: The higher, the better.
The method of testing was the usual flashing, a couple of reboots to make sure every caching necessary was done and the average of 3 benchmark of each test.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Make sure to test Pancake 0.1! Still the fastest rom out there .
bikcmp said:
Still the fastest rom out there .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really liked your rom, but seriously....
;/
TrevE said:
i didnt see the last one but id like to see benchmarks like on te gsm roms
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=656818
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://geekfor.me/news/benchmarking-sprint21/
I'll add linpack to the list too.
bikcmp said:
Make sure to test Pancake 0.1! Still the fastest rom out there .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And it's also 1.5 which makes it irrelevant for these tests.
Someone should come out with a rom, with JIT enabled.
Then they can claim they have the fastest rom.
I had it running on dc 2.7.2 without any problems.. Just cant use anything HTC, like lockscreen or sense.
But nexus or helix launcher and beautiful widgets, everything is normal again.
JIT is too buggy still, im looking foward to playing with compcache when someone gets 2.6.29 source working
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php/Compcache
thanks flipz just looked it over like the benchmark setup
TrevE said:
JIT is too buggy still, im looking foward to playing with compcache when someone gets 2.6.29 source working
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php/Compcache
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea. We had some goodies starting to go in the .27 kernel but then the 2.1 stuff became the main focus so it never got finished. Ha.
TrevE said:
JIT is too buggy still, im looking foward to playing with compcache when someone gets 2.6.29 source working
http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/index.php/Compcache
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree its not perfect.. But i can use it on my daily rom and run every app I would on a normal day without an issue.
Before dc 2.06 came out, i ran it on dc 2.05 for 3 days straight.'
I dont use bluetooth or some other random things. So it would probably start 101 problems for some people.. Like theres not enough already.
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Best of 3 was 365 on unbranded 2.1 update 1
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App
Constantly above 1xxx with CM RC1/RC2 and OC787 kernel...but that's normal since it's overclocked
Sent from my Legend using XDA App
My result was 387 on 2.1 update 1 official Rom
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App
im_iceman said:
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using a normal 2.1 legend, benchmarked three times... 377, 332 and 361. Even more anxious to get froyo now then!
rajasyaitan said:
Azure, 2.2 = 4XX-5XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-11XX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed....
Sense 2.1 was 3XX (4XX with OC)
However, even going from 3XX to 8XX (CM6.1) I did not see any speed improvements in games. OC DID improve the speed
Skardy said:
Fixed....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
rajasyaitan said:
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right I forgot to specify
First run on rooted Sense Froyo was 915. Second run was 870. Third was 927.
rajasyaitan said:
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
I have not programmed anything in android yet, but I know programming java for some years and I think that I can tell you why those spectacular benchmarks doesn't apply in most games.
The improvements have been made in the dalvik virtual machine, which is responsible for executing the java code of the applications.
But if programmes want more performance, they can write part of the program directly in native code, developed in C or C++. This code cannot be optimized (more), thus applicacions using JNI massively don't see any improvement.
I suppose many games should be using JNI because of the advantages in performance, so they're already 'optimized'.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong
--Edu
no0neX said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
I'm with you my friend. Some people are just ignorant.
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Legend using XDA App
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Skardy said:
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
rajasyaitan said:
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Skardy said:
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. Seriously? The last time I used Azure I got around 8XX. That was version 1.0 I think.
versifier said:
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Install Quadrant and run it. Well, technically it is just numbers. But most of the benchmarkers do admit feeling the difference between lower and higher scores. Some say those are placebo effect, but meh. I don't buy that ****.
2.1 Stock
1st test
380
2nd test
381
3rd test
383
/T
Hi Captivators!
Let me introduce a tool that helps to improve performance of your phone!
NEED ROOT!
Overclock can be harm to your hardware.
Use at your own risk.
I made a overclocking application for Samsung GalaxyS family.
It's designed to make overclock very easy on stock kernel and custom kernels (almost, not CM7, it has its own way)
Only needs to click 3 times to do it.
I know here is not app category, but based on kernel module.
so I chose "Development" category.
If I'm wrong, please move my thread to correct position.
Working perfectly on GalaxyS Froyo. already proved by many people.
I'm waiting Gingerbread for my phone (SHW-M110S).
App will support Gingerbread after I got it. Hey Samsung, give it to me!!!!
My wish is that all of GalaxyS users install this application on their phone... over 10 million..
But I know. It's just a dream.
Features
*Set cpu max frequency 1.0 to 1.3 GHz
*Show ARM core voltage at max frequency.
*Show frequency and voltage on each CPU perf levels.
*Show your device information
Screen Shots #1 #2
Available Models
*Captivate (SGH-I897, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Captivate, Rogers (SGH-I896, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Epic 4G (SPH-D700, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Fascinate (SCH-I500, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Fascinate, Telus (SGH-T959D, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Galaxy S (GT-I9000, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Galaxy S (GT-I9000M, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Galaxy S (GT-I9000B, Froyo 2.2 /2.2.1)
*Galaxy S (SHW-M110S, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Giorgio Armani Galaxy S (GT-I9010, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Galaxy K (SHW-M130K, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Galaxy U (SHW-M130L, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Mesmerize (SCH-I500, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
*Vibrant (SGH-T959, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1 )
*Vibrant Plus (SGH-T959V, Froyo 2.2 / 2.2.1)
The maximum frequency that I found on my phone,
1.15 GHz, 1.25 V (stock voltage)
I experienced faster web surfing, more quadrant score, better Linpack result and more..
Hey, who don't want to make phone faster?
You can find a free version app in Android Market.
If you like it you can also buy ultimate version to help me (think as a donation ver)
UV(under voltage) and OV(over voltage) controls are only available at Ultimate version.
Sorry for that but I believe Free version is quite enough for most of you!
@1.43 Ghz, 1.375V + ext4 = quadrant score 2250, and fried my hands
Enjoy your enhanced phone with my application!
Any questions or opinions? found bugs?
Follow me on http://twitter.com/@tegrak
Leave a comment on http://tegrak2x.blogspot.com
Contact me on gmail (luciferanna)
isnt tegrak only for tegra based devices?
smackdownn said:
isnt tegrak only for tegra based devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is just my kinckname. no relation to Tegra core... Haha
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App
but we already have voltage control for free and it does OC and UV....
xredjokerx said:
but we already have voltage control for free and it does OC and UV....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh is that true? can you show me a link about it? thanks. I did not know that. shameful. . :<
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App
tegrak said:
Oh is that true? can you show me a link about it? thanks. I did not know that. shameful. . :<
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=829731
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1030994
but i guess this is different since u can use it on a stock kernel?
mm i dont know how many people are still running stock however.
xredjokerx said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=829731
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1030994
but i guess this is different since u can use it on a stock kernel?
mm i dont know how many people are still running stock however.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just read all threads that you told me. Yeah you are right at last comment. My app does not need custom kernel. In addition
no reboot, can change at runtime.
This is a big differrence from another apps.
Thanks for links anyway!
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App
yes this app loads a kernel module much like voodoo control plus does. it adds overclock to any kernel instantly. unfortunately for the developer most of us have a favorite overclock kernel. but this will work for adding overclock to kb1 non overclock kernels that some members prefer to use for call quality reasons, and for people that love the stability of speedmod but want to experiment with faster clock speeds
Dani897 said:
yes this app loads a kernel module much like voodoo control plus does. it adds overclock to any kernel instantly. unfortunately for the developer most of us have a favorite overclock kernel. but this will work for adding overclock to kb1 non overclock kernels that some members prefer to use for call quality reasons, and for people that love the stability of speedmod but want to experiment with faster clock speeds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
onix is speedmod with OC/UV
EDIT: im just curious, ive traditionally undervolted my phone to increase battery life, what would be the purpose of increasing the voltage, seems as though it would be counter productive?
Well this is interesting. A good app for anyone who remains on stock and dosent want to load a custom rom but would like a little extra horsepower. The small percentage that people here make up may or may not use it, but to the rest of the world that is on stock, this could be really nice for them.
ballz0iron said:
onix is speedmod with OC/UV
EDIT: im just curious, ive traditionally undervolted my phone to increase battery life, what would be the purpose of increasing the voltage, seems as though it would be counter productive?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App
To AdamNimrod,Dany897
that is what I want to say. Thanks much.
Sent from my SHW-M110S using XDA App
ballz0iron said:
onix is speedmod with OC/UV
EDIT: im just curious, ive traditionally undervolted my phone to increase battery life, what would be the purpose of increasing the voltage, seems as though it would be counter productive?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is a gross over simplification. i believe onix has a lower kernel hz for battery life and additional patches though i never cared to keep track of specifically what features each kernel has.
also the ulk menu on speedmod actually works on all the options including jfs unlike onix
maybe you will have better luck in the epic and fascinate sections where there is no froyo source code so they have to choose between 2.1 overclocked and 2.2
Any chance to get this on 2.3.3?
Hey Dani, Thanks for advise.
.:Crack:. - I don't have Gingerbread rom for my device. I'm waiting for it..
tegrak said:
Hey Dani, Thanks for advise.
.:Crack:. - I don't have Gingerbread rom for my device. I'm waiting for it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for you being from south Korea . I hope to visit there next summer :]
yea but what are the values for 1.2ghz?
how long the battery hold with such speed?
Vsel?
ballz0iron said:
onix is speedmod with OC/UV
EDIT: im just curious, ive traditionally undervolted my phone to increase battery life, what would be the purpose of increasing the voltage, seems as though it would be counter productive?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Decreasing voltage increases battery life (obviously less juice = lasts longer) but also makes your phone less stable. The inverse holds true to a point. For every phone at every cpu speed, there is a range of voltages where your processor doesn't lock up and die instantaneously. Too much voltage makes it die, too little makes it shut off.
In the range where it works, however, the lower end is better for battery life, but if it's doing something towards the upper end of the freq range, it might still die, but the upper end of the voltage spectrum is pretty much good to go.
cant overclock my cappy at all raise it to 1.2ghz without any voltage change and
it says i need the full version...
whats the point in OC app that you cant use it?
The Optimus One has the adreno 200 GPU which supports OpenGL ES 2.0 and meets the requirements for Chainfire3D. I have it running on my Optimus T with 2.2 and haven't noticed anything different when configuring the default settings. Nightmode works, but that's just about it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1087427
Warning: This replaces (from my understanding of the thread) an existing driver with a new one. It requires root.
I would like to hear back experiences from others who have an Optimus one and tried Chainfire3D.
It also requires a 1 ghz+ cpu. Try running a tegra game to see if it works. Don't know if they will even start... HDPI res required.
Sent from my MB525 using XDA Premium App
Tegra Zone doesn't render properly in HVGA but the screen resolution is not entirely the problem. Installing a game from it crashes the device, probably because it was never made to work with ARM11 chipsets.
Maybe it is/will be useful for something we don't know yet.
Sent from my MB525 using XDA Premium App
For me only pinball hd for tegra works fine... nothing else :/
Tried with guerilla bob thd, and a few other thd games. But chainfire doesn't work with those games.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Problem with Chainfire
I am using an Optimus one Myself and attempted installing this but not only did it fail to install I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling and now it won't even open upthe app to allow the attempt of the installation of the codec. (basically I attempt to launch it, it fails goes back to menu, this first happened when I was able to launch the program and attempt to install the codec) Now my best guess if I had any is It's incorrect ROM or something. I'm not entirely sure I'm still getting used to this phone. Already rooted it and broken once thus fixing/reflashing. So I've learned a few things. But if someone better then me and I'm sure there are lots of you here could just point me in the right direction I'd be very happy person indeed. Also, If I'm posting in the wrong section I apologize I really suck at this forum thing.
Another odd thing I noticed, I was only able to oc to 600mhz when I've heard I could oc it to 1000mghz. Is this something to do with my rom?
UnoAphex said:
Another odd thing I noticed, I was only able to oc to 600mhz when I've heard I could oc it to 1000mghz. Is this something to do with my rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking to 1ghz is not possible with optimus one...maximum stable clock speed is 806mhz...it seems u r on stock with root...in that u cannot oc to more than 600mhz...
use any other custom kernel...or simply use any other ROM...
LOL 1gHz on an Optimus One... Haha my O1 gets 806mHz tops!
Sent from my SGH-i917 using Board Express
kiran2cy said:
Overclocking to 1ghz is not possible with optimus one...maximum stable clock speed is 806mhz...it seems u r on stock with root...in that u cannot oc to more than 600mhz...
use any other custom kernel...or simply use any other ROM...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for that information do you have any suggestions?
CJJames said:
LOL 1gHz on an Optimus One... Haha my O1 gets 806mHz tops!
Sent from my SGH-i917 using Board Express
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can run 864MHz on my phone and combined with the correct settings on chainfire 3d u can definitely notice a difference in gaming performance
Would the fact that Chainfire 3d is now not even booting also have something to with the fact that I'm running a stock ROM and cannot overclock passed 600?
UnoAphex said:
Thanks a lot for that information do you have any suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There r so many roms available in the forum...choose any of a stable one according to ur liking...most of 'em r good
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
I'm going to try out this talho rom and hope for the best.
I figured it all out. simple reading errors on my part as it were going through tutorials and whatnot. either way I got chainfire working just working on download GTa3 to see how it performs.
It worked for me a while ago on CM7 and oxygen, it doesn't need 1GHz+ and is no risk, reflashing the ROM replaces it
Just give it a go, but you need opengles line in build.prop
Seek the signature below the line
Is it just u8800's drivers that make its 2D performance 'sluggish' compared to Desire Z (they both have pretty much the same HW and both oc'd @ 1,5GHz (same Miui 2.1.20 2.3.5, same ondemand governor).
Just wondering 'cause you can see the difference IRL (Desire Z's browser has a lot smoother scrolling and the 2D seems snappier otherwise too).
Becuase ROM probably doesnt have the new GPU drivers This one is with CM7 which has them http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21616241&postcount=292
yannn007 said:
Becuase ROM probably doesnt have the new GPU drivers This one is with CM7 which has them http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=21616241&postcount=292
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice. Which version of CM was that? Hopefully we'll get the updated driver to Miui soon.
sbasil said:
Nice. Which version of CM was that? Hopefully we'll get the updated driver to Miui soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Propably newest cm7 .35 kernel.