Database Users

Benchmarked VillainROM 6.2.0

Hey guys, I just benchmarked my Hero(Telus) ... VillainRom 6.2.0 ... used the app from the market(blue table graph icon), just wondering what everyone else is being benched at??
The only thing that is backgrounded is the Desk Clock that comes with Rosie.
117.164 total graphics score
161.830 total CPU score
118.092 total memory score
37.326 total file system score

This means nothing if you don't post your CPU speed.

havn't touched cpu ... ROM and radio only updates ... not using setCPU, or the other popular overclocker, or any for that matter.

Graphic 119.479836
CPU 185.26137
Memory 139.53342
Filesystem 35.040806

bulltronStudios said:
havn't touched cpu ... ROM and radio only updates ... not using setCPU, or the other popular overclocker, or any for that matter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, so what is the default CPU settings for that ROM, then?

Well, the thread is for a particular rom, so, everyone should have same default for the rom, check google if your that curious
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

LOL! Ok.
.

bulltronStudios said:
Hey guys, I just benchmarked my Hero(Telus) ... VillainRom 6.2.0 ... used the app from the market(blue table graph icon), just wondering what everyone else is being benched at??
The only thing that is backgrounded is the Desk Clock that comes with Rosie.
117.164 total graphics score
161.830 total CPU score
118.092 total memory score
37.326 total file system score
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you be spamming the forum with YET another benchmark thread, while there are quite a few of them already; post in those.

adwinp said:
Why would you be spamming the forum with YET another benchmark thread, while there are quite a few of them already; post in those.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
guess i didn't cruise to page 400 in the forums ... figured mabye alot of ppl were downloading this ROM ... it does seem to be the fan favorite. and perhaps save people looking 399 pages past this one ...

Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)

bulltronStudios said:
guess i didn't cruise to page 400 in the forums ... figured mabye alot of ppl were downloading this ROM ... it does seem to be the fan favorite. and perhaps save people looking 399 pages past this one ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I guess if people are willing to download a new rom, they would like to look into all their options, not only one. For that matter, this thread (found on page 3) is much more helpful:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=656818
What's the point of having 20 people posting their results with the same rom on the same hardware? Are you going for a statistics? And your argument about people having to scroll around is completely pointless, because your thread won't stay on page 1 forever, you know? So people *will* have to scroll again to see it...

DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now, THAT's meaningful!

DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what kind of heat are you putting off at 748??
what are you using for overclock? setCPU?

killer4o said:
Well, I guess if people are willing to download a new rom, they would like to look into all their options, not only one. For that matter, this thread (found on page 3) is much more helpful:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=656818
What's the point of having 20 people posting their results with the same rom on the same hardware? Are you going for a statistics? And your argument about people having to scroll around is completely pointless, because your thread won't stay on page 1 forever, you know? So people *will* have to scroll again to see it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all i was saying was, in response to first dude, marinerb ... was I did NOT put aything on my phone, also, that i had STOCK rom ... if people have overclocks, good, post em, i dont, so i didn't list it.... looking for comparison, no need to be nazi's about it ... so, yeah... just let the thread die.

bulltronStudios said:
what kind of heat are you putting off at 748??
what are you using for overclock? setCPU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't notice more heat than usual. I only notice heat when charging and it's from the battery. Battery life is better than with stock settings. I use SetCPU, no profiles, ondemand governor and ben39_nobfs_noCC_no-whining kernel.

Thread Moved.

DeXa said:
Graphic: 146.38194
CPU: 227.27559
Memory: 153.31569
Filesys: 35.0106
HTC Hero, [email protected](Max)/352MHz(Min)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is yours stable at 748 if you run the setcpu stress tester for a minute or two?
if so then that's cool - I might have to try that speed too. I know mine locks up instantly at 780mHz more or less, but solid as a rock at 730. I have a feeling I tried 748 and it slowed to a crawl in the stress test and became really unresponsive yet not fully locking up... which to me makes that speed much worse than keeping it a little slower with 100% stability.
EDIT: stress testing 748 right now and it's still working ok... so maybe I stress tested a higher speed instead? running at basically 750mHz is freakin amazing for our little heroes if we can keep them running like that for the next couple of years
update: stress tested my phone at 748mHz results: lasted for 112725 ms before I exited the test with no errors! This little hero is so amazing!
EDIT: whoops - just reset itself LoL.... damn, I hope it boots up ok since I got cocky and set it to boot with the 748 top speed.... damn...
But I'll try it again - you've got me curious now

I have not stress tested the device but it runs stable for a couple of days now. No reboots and no lockups. The devices are somehow different some cannot run at 748 others can. Mine is even stable at 768Mhz but I i suffer less battery life with that setting, so I leave it 748 and everything is ok.

Dexa can you link me that kernel? I'm running ben39_nobfs_no-whining kernel clocked at 738mhz stable with stress testing and I'm curious about the noCC part that you're running. Thanks!

Ah never mind I found it; there was an updated version.

Kernel scheduler improvement.

Hi there a good news for responsiveness.
A patch of 200 lines have been checked and approved by Linus, improving greatly responsiveness maybe it should be interesting to test it on our phones.
News and links available here.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App

Holy hell, thats a monumental difference!

Awesome, I HATE how laggy my Nexus One gets when I'm compiling the kernel with 64 threads.

Integrated it into my latest kernel build...hasn't tested it out yet though...

intersectRaven said:
Integrated it into my latest kernel build...hasn't tested it out yet though...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool Can't wait to get my hands on this, (But have no time right now) .

Tested with new Rodriguez rom + intersectRaven kernel,
the new room is really nice to use, and the reactivity is awesome !
Really amazing, feel a huge difference in multitasking and fluidity.
Tried with the Miui browser included in the room, the web pages render time are really surprising really nice.

What is the name of the IR kernel you used?

fallingd0wn said:
What is the name of the IR kernel you used?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.mediafire.com/intersectRaven
2.6.35.8_AVS-CM-NOBOOST_CFS_20101116_2127.zip

so... does this take care of the "Cannot find CPU Subsystem.." (something like this) errors in the logcat when the CPU is pegged ?

buttery smooth!! thanks!!

holy ****. so smooth. got 22fps in nenamark

vivanshah said:
holy ****. so smooth. got 22fps in nenamark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doubt thats related as this particular fix is about scheduling.
I get 21.7 FPS @1113, old 2.6.35.7 CM kernel

I'm not seeing any improvement actually...
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App

What benchmarks would this show up in on the n1?

There's no benchmark about responsiveness or latency of the system at the moment.
But you really can feel it with multitasking.
I've nimbuzz, Skype, tweetdeck, Gmail, Ms email etc everything always ON.
I switch a lot between applications and so I really fell the difference not freeze while switching between browser and calandar music etc.
My nexus one is clearly under heavy usage with me all the time.
So since there's no benches I cannot tell exactly how good it is. But phoronix speak about
-10% lag
+60% responsiveness
Which is awesome! Even just half of that would be excellent!
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App

liam.lah said:
What benchmarks would this show up in on the n1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is wrong with you people??? If you can only see it in a benchmark, who cares?

teh_lorax said:
What is wrong with you people??? If you can only see it in a benchmark, who cares?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing wrong with me, would just like to see some real stats, its way too easy to think things "feel faster" especially if you are expecting them to, just like some people feel certain UV kernels have longer life than others, unless you actually do the numbers(which was done), it is really just what people "feel", and that is extremely unreliable.

IntersectRaven - how did u integrate the patch, i am unable to integrate it cleanly

Great!
Applied to PureFroyo kernel. Let's test.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=820172

got it to compile, now testing

Benchmark Tests on Legend 2.1 vs 2.2

Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..

Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.

Best of 3 was 365 on unbranded 2.1 update 1
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App

Constantly above 1xxx with CM RC1/RC2 and OC787 kernel...but that's normal since it's overclocked
Sent from my Legend using XDA App

My result was 387 on 2.1 update 1 official Rom
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App

im_iceman said:
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using a normal 2.1 legend, benchmarked three times... 377, 332 and 361. Even more anxious to get froyo now then!

rajasyaitan said:
Azure, 2.2 = 4XX-5XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-11XX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed....
Sense 2.1 was 3XX (4XX with OC)
However, even going from 3XX to 8XX (CM6.1) I did not see any speed improvements in games. OC DID improve the speed

Skardy said:
Fixed....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.

rajasyaitan said:
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right I forgot to specify

First run on rooted Sense Froyo was 915. Second run was 870. Third was 927.

rajasyaitan said:
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.

I have not programmed anything in android yet, but I know programming java for some years and I think that I can tell you why those spectacular benchmarks doesn't apply in most games.
The improvements have been made in the dalvik virtual machine, which is responsible for executing the java code of the applications.
But if programmes want more performance, they can write part of the program directly in native code, developed in C or C++. This code cannot be optimized (more), thus applicacions using JNI massively don't see any improvement.
I suppose many games should be using JNI because of the advantages in performance, so they're already 'optimized'.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong
--Edu

no0neX said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.

I'm with you my friend. Some people are just ignorant.
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Legend using XDA App

rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.

Skardy said:
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.

rajasyaitan said:
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.

Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?

Skardy said:
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. Seriously? The last time I used Azure I got around 8XX. That was version 1.0 I think.
versifier said:
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Install Quadrant and run it. Well, technically it is just numbers. But most of the benchmarkers do admit feeling the difference between lower and higher scores. Some say those are placebo effect, but meh. I don't buy that ****.

2.1 Stock
1st test
380
2nd test
381
3rd test
383
/T

KA6 is frickin awesome !

Latency decreased from like 540 ms to 65ms and data speeds spiked from like 2 mb/s to about 4.6 mbits per second now.
I flashed ka6 OVER NEROV5 AND IT IS AWESOME.

Just to forewarn you. You'll get a message about the titles of this thread.
But any other enhancements to this ROM?

the rom has alot of elements from gingerbread and nexus s phone and gingerbread multitouch keyboard.

What are these...elements of Gingerbread you speak of? You're the first person to say anything about the build..

I think he thought you were talking about Nero.

I didn't like it, was getting slower data speed on this one.. so flashed back to ka5
just a ququestion.. i never noticed this till like now, the back of my phone is hot, i just checked and it's 106 degrees.. is that normal? I'm not charging right now, just listening to music and browsing the web, is it because of the leaked firmware?

That's 41'C right? Even so, that's pretty hot.

presence06 said:
That's 41'C right? Even so, that's pretty hot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone is having a fever. Nothing serious. Just reboot and it will be much happier.

presence06 said:
That's 41'C right? Even so, that's pretty hot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know right.. coz i hardly not have the case on it so i never really noticed, after flashing the new leaked rom then flashed back, i haven't put the case on and just noticed how hot it is..
Do I flash back to j16? Maybe I should, or do I even have to worry at all?

swehes said:
The phone is having a fever. Nothing serious. Just reboot and it will be much happier.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will do that.. thanks

I'd keep an eye on it and see if it happens again or continues to stay hot.

presence06 said:
That's 41'C right? Even so, that's pretty hot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's not too bad. i'm pretty sure i've seen mine get in excess of 50*C (according to setcpu widget) with no problems.

Ms_Vibrant said:
I didn't like it, was getting slower data speed on this one.. so flashed back to ka5
just a ququestion.. i never noticed this till like now, the back of my phone is hot, i just checked and it's 106 degrees.. is that normal? I'm not charging right now, just listening to music and browsing the web, is it because of the leaked firmware?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try replacing the water pump
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

That's why I run nitrogen cooling.

It just needs more cowbell.

KA6
Really, doesn't everything need more cowbell?
KA6: I have been using it since it was released. It is nice. Better GPS than the previous releases. I do wonder why its not giving a faster quadrant score. I think it's RFS and the absence of a JIT compiler. Why can't Samsung just change to EXT 4? I'm not an expert by any means but the lag fixes use EXT 4. I know Quadrant is not an end-all-be-all test, but why would the Nexus one be putting out big numbers on older hardware?

briaking said:
Really, doesn't everything need more cowbell?
KA6: I have been using it since it was released. It is nice. Better GPS than the previous releases. I do wonder why its not giving a faster quadrant score. I think it's RFS and the absence of a JIT compiler. Why can't Samsung just change to EXT 4? I'm not an expert by any means but the lag fixes use EXT 4. I know Quadrant is not an end-all-be-all test, but why would the Nexus one be putting out big numbers on older hardware?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absence of a JIT compiler? I thought THAT was a feature added in Froyo.

Who said this build didn't have a JIT compiler? It runs 13-14 Linpack scores just like every other SGS Froyo build. The compiler is not optimized for our processor, so you don't get the N1 type of scores. Gingerbread is optimized, which is the reason for the giant leap in stock Quadrant (ext 4 helps too). Patiently waiting for Krylon to work the bugs out of GB

Just went from a noob to a super duper updated vibrant, now running KA6 with Voodo kernel lagfix

[Q] Tips on getting a better speed on my Vibrant??

I have a Vibrant rooted running the Team Whiskey Bionix-v1.2.1 ROM. I have a few apps that I use daily, but the only one I know does any major damage to speed is beautiful widgets. I don't use any live backgrounds. I scored a 1536 on a benchmark test from Quadrant Standard.
Do you guys know of ways to better these scores?

Use AutoKiller Memory Optimizer

Unless your phone actually feels sluggish I wouldnt worry about quadrant scores. If it is sluggish try installing Voodoo or one of the Universal Lagfix in the developers section.

regP said:
Unless your phone actually feels sluggish I wouldnt worry about quadrant scores. If it is sluggish try installing Voodoo or one of the Universal Lagfix in the developers section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With a 1500+ quadrant he's already running Voodoo...
I do agree that unless the phone is feeling slow to not worry about it. Quadrant is pretty easy to fudge over 2k even though the phone isn't any faster.

Didn't wana assume lol..

Haha yes I have voodoo, bionix-v1.2.1 comes with it preset. Appreciate the help.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

actually, if you going for score some of the older J-rom series with over clock really scored high........ But with the current setup, you typically have 11-15 or so things that are open and TSR, if you remove alot of those to make it a vanilla barebones, then o.c it...... you can improve the score........ BUT speed scores are not worth much other than bragging rights.......... Like everyone else said if your phone is performing well then,..........who cares about the scores

Yea I'm just trying to see if there are things I can do to make it perform even better than it already is
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Andrew.Dodson07 said:
Yea I'm just trying to see if there are things I can do to make it perform even better than it already is
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What areas is the phone lacking performance for you?

Andrew.Dodson07 said:
Yea I'm just trying to see if there are things I can do to make it perform even better than it already is
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go look up the Dragon 3.6 Kernel in the Dev section. You can overclock the phone a little or a lot depending how much it can handle. I'm running 1.2ghz at the moment.

regP said:
What areas is the phone lacking performance for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really isn't particularly lacking in any way that I can tell. But i remember thinking that same thing back when i had AOL dial up haha. I'm impressed with the phones ability now, i just want to know if this is as good as it gets

Andrew.Dodson07 said:
It really isn't particularly lacking in any way that I can tell. But i remember thinking that same thing back when i had AOL dial up haha. I'm impressed with the phones ability now, i just want to know if this is as good as it gets
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock 2.2.1 is the fastest/smoothest ROM I've used on this phone ever and it hasn't even been optimized. I also downloaded the Dragon Kernel v3.6 and overclocked it to 1.28Ghz and its very stable. I always use my friends iPhone 4 to compare speeds and with the current setup I have now their isn't any difference in speed.