the guys that are getting over 3000 on it are running froyo and oc kernal right? i'm only getting 2400+ with oc kernal on 2.1 with lag fix.
Well 2.2 uses JIT compiler so it should be a lot faster than 2.1.
Related
which one would you say is the MOST:
stable, jit enabled, sense ROM with the HIGHEST linpack score so far?
to be used everyday.
try not to post the same question in different sections.
i use villainrom 10.2 with jit enabled. Its stable and i get 4.6 linpack without live wallpapers. 4.2 with.
AFAIK the linpack score has very little to do with user experience.
I was getting 4.8 linpack with JIT on V10 however it was only stable for up to 12 hours at a time.
So,
Just compared most of the versions found here, before I start on my own work, I thought stuff it, do it. Here is the outcome:
XXJPM - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 994
OCLF - 1845
RAM - 114/304
XXJPK - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 1025
OCLF - 1917
RAM - N/A
Tayutama Edition v1.0.0 [I9000XXJPM] 14/10/2010
Lite
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 748
OCLF - Does not work
RAM - 139/304
Full
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 951
OCLF - 1830
RAM - 132/304
Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 875
OCLF - N/A
RAM - 113/304
Thanks for your work!
Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 875
A little lame, my voodoo'ed stock Eclair got sth. around 2000, gonna OCLF 2.2 now.
nitr8 said:
So,
Just compared most of the versions found here, before I start on my own work, I thought stuff it, do it. Here is the outcome:
XXJPM - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 994
OCLF - 1845
RAM - 114/304
XXJPK - Stock
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 1025
OCLF - 1917
RAM - N/A
Tayutama Edition v1.0.0 [I9000XXJPM] 14/10/2010
Lite
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 748
OCLF - Does not work
RAM - 139/304
Full
Quadrant Score:
Clean - 951
OCLF - 1830
RAM - 132/304
Doc's RomMod Froyo V1 (JP6-base / JPM-kernel) 13/10/10
Quadrant Score:
Clean - N/A
OCLF - N/A
RAM - 113/304
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Put in Sztupy's experimental ROM too the one that says NO RFS, its pretty good. I got a linpack 20+ & Quadrant 2000+ pre-rooted, NO LAGFIX.
ragin said:
Put in Sztupy's experimental ROM too the one that says NO RFS, its pretty good. I got a linpack 20+ & Quadrant 2000+ pre-rooted, NO LAGFIX.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sztupy's has an experimental lagfix included. (The lagfix is the whole point of the rom)
Vanilla JPA - Quadrant - 999
RAM - 113MB
RyanZA said:
Sztupy's has an experimental lagfix included. (The lagfix is the whole point of the rom)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's strange that we call the replacement of a filesystem "lagfix"
This obsession with Quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate Quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. OCLF on top of Voodoo gives you 2500 Quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally I'm waiting for Voodoo b5.
I'm currently using Doc's Mod for JPM/JP6 and I got 1030 Quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the OP said it wouldn't run.
with the same rom, if you run the quadrant test several times, the score varies...
all froyos are scoring about 900 - 1050 without LagFix and 1800 - 2000 with lagfix
chambo622 said:
this obsession with quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. Oclf on top of voodoo gives you 2500 quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally i'm waiting for voodoo b5.
I'm currently using doc's mod for jpm/jp6 and i got 1030 quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the op said it wouldn't run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+10000000 :d
Imo none of these benchmarks are able to really rate the overall perfomance of the different firmwares...
Reminds me a bit of DirectX-Benchmarks, same show but different artists
chambo622 said:
This obsession with Quadrant scores is stupid and very misleading. We already know that loop filesystems artificially inflate Quadrant scores even though the device isn't much faster (i.e. OCLF on top of Voodoo gives you 2500 Quadrant but performance isn't truly improved).
It can be useful for doing base comparisons, but it just ends up confusing everybody and perceverating about a number instead of actual performance in the real world and smoothness.
Personally I'm waiting for Voodoo b5.
I'm currently using Doc's Mod for JPM/JP6 and I got 1030 Quadrant with no lagfix. Not sure why the OP said it wouldn't run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it actually does give what it says and it's no quadrant error. It's just that probably no app other than a badly coded touch wiz launcher will ever need a faster memory.
Try noticing differences on your system with a 5600RPM HDD and a 7200HDD.
You won't feel any difference and only benchmarking software will be able to tell.
However if it's possible (because rfs is a crappy file system) why not replace it?
It's like going from FAT32 to NTFS, it's there, it's better so why not use it?
^^ welcome after, there's like three mods trying to accomplish right now..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Hello i am new and looking to learn a little bit.My next question for you all is what kernal/rom combinations do you use? what are your quadrant/linpack scores and what is your battery life like??
I am using
Epic experiance rom
With xtreme kernal
setcpu overclocked to 1.2 conservative
Quadrant 1030
Linpak 9.591
PyRo
Heroic Epic w/ Extreme Kernel
SetCPU 1.2 GHz Interactive
Quadrant = 988 (1200 when oc'd to 1.6GHz)
What do you mea by linpack/quadrant scores? I'm a bit new to rooting and haven't seen anyone talk about that yet
quadrant and linpack are available in the market
quadrant benchmarks cpu,I/O and 3d graphics
linpack behcmarks the cpu and looks at floating point operations per second.
PyRo
along with setup please.
Figured we might as well record benchmark progress as kernels and ROMs get faster. I'll start off.
Linpack -- 56.264 high, 52-55 consistent
Quadrant -- 2090 high, 2000-2050 consistent
Setup:
bcnice's 1.5 OC kernel
NFX's stock deodexed ROM
SetCPU 245/1516 interactive
Dread's GB theme modified
Thanks to all the devs working on this phone. Can't wait to see what else this thing is capable of.
my scores
Running:
Bcnices 1.8 Gingerbread AOSP kernel
Evervolv Alpha Update 3
Deodexed
Quadrant:
Highest: 2968 , 26-2800 consistently
Linpack:
Highest: 60.XXX, 55-58 consistently
Its also important to note which quadrant version you are using as well. Scores vary widely between the paid and free versions.
Jeezimus said:
Its also important to note which quadrant version you are using as well. Scores vary widely between the paid and free versions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is very true. The test that scored 2968 was run using Quadrant Advanced 1.1.1 Rev 1352
New screenshot is the same system as above but run on the newest version of Quadrant Standard (1.1.7) available.
I get about 2000 on Quadrant at 1.8GHz. How is there such a big difference?
Sent via carrier pigeon.
He's on an aosp rom with no sense framework
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
this was on regular quadrant OC'd to 1.8 on stock sense ROM and rooted
Is this any good?
If you have Advanced you can go into the Custom run and disable volumetric shadowing for the hallway. Scores will jump by 300-400. How the hell did you get over 4000?
Anyone has noticed how in CM9, processor score goes really high compared to Cm7 ROMS? Is Because GB Processor Manager or what? Look at my score with stock cm9:
No idea but I thought my CPU was scoring low also but this is great could msmeabmn even higher scores with more tweaks
Sent from Atrix 4g Neutrino 2.5
Are you also useing the cm9 kernel?
Yeah Flashed CM9 Jokersax latest with Fauxs 1.3ghz kernel.
This is my score
Look in my post and see CPU score, that was with Stock CM9 kernel...
yea but even but on cm7 with the same kernel im getting 3400 just proving a point cm9 must fully support 2 cores in quadrant
Opposite for me, I was getting like 3800 on Feb 20 cm7, now get 3100 on 3.3 Jokersax CM9
Sent from my MB860 using XDA