Anyone has noticed how in CM9, processor score goes really high compared to Cm7 ROMS? Is Because GB Processor Manager or what? Look at my score with stock cm9:
No idea but I thought my CPU was scoring low also but this is great could msmeabmn even higher scores with more tweaks
Sent from Atrix 4g Neutrino 2.5
Are you also useing the cm9 kernel?
Yeah Flashed CM9 Jokersax latest with Fauxs 1.3ghz kernel.
This is my score
Look in my post and see CPU score, that was with Stock CM9 kernel...
yea but even but on cm7 with the same kernel im getting 3400 just proving a point cm9 must fully support 2 cores in quadrant
Opposite for me, I was getting like 3800 on Feb 20 cm7, now get 3100 on 3.3 Jokersax CM9
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
Related
along with setup please.
Figured we might as well record benchmark progress as kernels and ROMs get faster. I'll start off.
Linpack -- 56.264 high, 52-55 consistent
Quadrant -- 2090 high, 2000-2050 consistent
Setup:
bcnice's 1.5 OC kernel
NFX's stock deodexed ROM
SetCPU 245/1516 interactive
Dread's GB theme modified
Thanks to all the devs working on this phone. Can't wait to see what else this thing is capable of.
my scores
Running:
Bcnices 1.8 Gingerbread AOSP kernel
Evervolv Alpha Update 3
Deodexed
Quadrant:
Highest: 2968 , 26-2800 consistently
Linpack:
Highest: 60.XXX, 55-58 consistently
Its also important to note which quadrant version you are using as well. Scores vary widely between the paid and free versions.
Jeezimus said:
Its also important to note which quadrant version you are using as well. Scores vary widely between the paid and free versions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is very true. The test that scored 2968 was run using Quadrant Advanced 1.1.1 Rev 1352
New screenshot is the same system as above but run on the newest version of Quadrant Standard (1.1.7) available.
I get about 2000 on Quadrant at 1.8GHz. How is there such a big difference?
Sent via carrier pigeon.
He's on an aosp rom with no sense framework
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
this was on regular quadrant OC'd to 1.8 on stock sense ROM and rooted
Is this any good?
If you have Advanced you can go into the Custom run and disable volumetric shadowing for the hallway. Scores will jump by 300-400. How the hell did you get over 4000?
Can someone explain exactly what it really means?
I know the higher the number the better your phone is working but beyond that i have no clue
I consistently get 2080 to 2250 on cm7 nightly 30 running ondemand governor min 368 max 1.3ghz. Im assuming thats respectable?
I ran it once on performance governor at 1.5ghz and got about 2500 on benchmark.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
This is the best score out of a series of three I ran right after flashing Cm6.1.1 and cranking setcpu up to max. I'm sure that this would run perfectly well at these speeds for day to day on his kernel, but I usually only run at around 1113mhz. The g2 is plenty fast on its stock 800mhz with fantastic battery life, don't get me wrong. But what the hell is the point of all this rooting and rom flashing wagoonery if I don't give myself a slight performance bump.
*Epenis waving*
At 1.5ghz max and 368 min (on-demand governor) with CM7 and Pershoot's latest kernel (I believe he incorporated the new GPU drivers), I get 2700-2800. Quadrant tests your CPU, memory, and GPU performance.
As for Quadrant I tend to find it unreliable, for benchmarks I use Smartbench 2011. Seems a bit more reasonable. Makes you realize how underpowered our GPU's is compared to the PowerVR SGX540.
And what is the gpu?
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
tackleberry said:
And what is the gpu?
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPU = Graphical processor unit
its the chip in the phone that draws polygons and renders graphics so games and graphic related things run smoothly
Thanks for that info, that's what I was thinking but wasn't positive.
I tried it on smartbench 2011 and got about a 1500.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
tackleberry said:
Thanks for that info, that's what I was thinking but wasn't positive.
I tried it on smartbench 2011 and got about a 1500.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got 1500 for what specifically?
Smartbench 2011 outputs 2 bars after the test. One for Productivity Index (CPU performance) and another for Gaming Index (GPU performance). Top bar is Productivity Index and bottom bar is Gaming Index.
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
sodvs said:
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so what kernel you're using???...
Now I just got a 2301pt at 1.5Gperformance in Quadrant Advanced
sodvs said:
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow the Smartbench 2011 results for Liquid Villain are impressive. Might have to give that rom a try.
I think it might I been a fluke lol the cloest I got that again 1600/2400ish.
On all the screen shoots I was using pershoots kernal
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App
If u want to go big use flippys turbo kernel. A phone as fast as u want, lol.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
I have used flippy's kernal and oc'ed to 1.9 and got 2997 on quandrant but smartbench score was 1900ish productivity/ 1700ish gaming...phone got a bit hot as well...with pershoots kernal I can get almost the same results and phone stays at normal temp.
I got 3158 on quadrant running CM7rc2 with pershoots .34 kernel. Oc'd to 1516 with performance governor.
Currently on CM7rc3 with pershoots .36 kernel I'm getting high 2900's.
All I know is ›3000 on quadrant is FAST!
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
How do I get pershoot's latest kernel?
just over 3200+ on quadrant running the latest CM7 nightly and setting [email protected]
for quadrant, i have noticed its important to run it several times before you get an accurate measurement... personally, i've had the best score around the 3rd or 4th run.... anything more after that just plateau the score or even dips a bit at times. and kill heavy background services (ie: f/b, lookout, juice defender, DSP manager)
FYI: if i set CPU back to stock, i'm still @ 2700ish
Quadrant hasn't been updated for a long time and it is not exactly reliable when it comes to evaluating a phone's performance. You're much better off with Antutu Benchmark.
And this is almost a year old of a post
crestofawave said:
Quadrant hasn't been updated for a long time and it is not exactly reliable when it comes to evaluating a phone's performance. You're much better off with Antutu Benchmark.
And this is almost a year old of a post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has anyone got any opinions on performance with either firmware? In terms of how fast/well they perform. FC issues and battery life?
I am currently using Prime 1.6 (without Netformer). Revolver has OC from Netformer built in. I'm trying to figure out which has the best performance/battery. Prime 1.6 with Netformer or Revolver.
If you think Clemsyn is better you can also throw that into the mix. Maybe we should have a shootout using some benchmark apps
netformer at 1.4 is realy fasy
I've installed it just yesterday, and changed the wallpaper to a regular pic (not live), and i gotta tell you the thing is just flying!
i've set the cpu to 1.4 - i could go up to 1.6, but i guess that will have a huge impact on the battery and the temp as well...
Im runing revolver right now and i hinks its pretty good. i have only had my pad for 4 days but have tried out most of the roms and kernals already. best preformance and battery seems to be revolver 1.1.1 (1.1.2 was just a test to see if his OTA app worked) with the elite tegra 18 kernal. not sure if that will work on your i have been told it is unstable for most people who dont have an elite processor. i have model b70 so that might factor into what kernal is best for you
Edit: Benchmarks
Antutu 6393
Linpack 95
Quadrant 3950
Vellamo 1882
Cf Bench 15373,3626,8324
mrevankyle said:
Vellamo 11882
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't tell me it's 10 times faster than an already overclocked TF in Vellamo. I've seen several reports from people with 1.4-1.6Ghz, and they all are in 1100-1300 range, getting 1195 myself @ 1.4.
mrevankyle said:
Im runing revolver right now and i hinks its pretty good. i have only had my pad for 4 days but have tried out most of the roms and kernals already. best preformance and battery seems to be revolver 1.1.1 (1.1.2 was just a test to see if his OTA app worked) with the elite tegra 18 kernal. not sure if that will work on your i have been told it is unstable for most people who dont have an elite processor. i have model b70 so that might factor into what kernal is best for you
Edit: Benchmarks
Antutu 6393
Linpack 95
Quadrant 3950
Vellamo 11882
Cf Bench 15373,3626,8324
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
minor nit pick: kernel
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Revolver is really fast, I'm running at 1.5 GHz. I haven't tried out Prime 1.6 yet.
I'm on prime 1.6,i havent tried revolver or netformer,of course i am using nets kernel @ 140000GHz,runs real smooth,even with my live wallpaper,battery doesnt drain too fast.I like running the themes and most of them are only made for prime 1.6.
GwynBleidd said:
Don't tell me it's 10 times faster than an already overclocked TF in Vellamo. I've seen several reports from people with 1.4-1.6Ghz, and they all are in 1100-1300 range, getting 1195 myself @ 1.4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry hit the 1 twice. its at 1.64 ghz and getting about an average of about 1800
Using Antutu benchmark, I hit 3600+ running Codenameandroid 1.3.3
OC'ed to 1300MHZ
Sent every time I hit the submit button
Mine is 4205 ! (Quadrant )MY Own Cm9-16 and CNA HYBRID ROM
Awesome, is your phone oc'ed?
My Score is so Low
Your Score is so high ,my i9000 only 32XX!
now,i flash to codenameandroid 1.3.3
Only 14xx Oc to1.2 Ghz
my english is so pool.
I am gonna try quadrant next...see how it fares.
ddrulze said:
Mine is 4205 ! (Quadrant )MY Own Cm9-16 and CNA HYBRID ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try the new quadrant. It seems like it doesn't vary much anymore
Here's my quadrant score, seems its at 1400+ as well
Sent every time I hit the submit key
The new quadrant sucks ...yp my phns oc.ed at 1300 mhz step with 14% live oc and uv ofcource ....and people this score is not fake ..i hav submitted my scores .!
Know where I can get the older versions?
You know that Quadrant doesn´t show real speed of a phone?
I also get values like 3000 and above with some roms and still lagy
and scores below 2000 with others which are super smooth.
So I don´t care ´bout it.
dark_knight35 said:
You know that Quadrant doesn´t show real speed of a phone?
I also get values like 3000 and above with some roms and still lagy
and scores below 2000 with others which are super smooth.
So I don´t care ´bout it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody is forcing you to post your benchmark scores mate
Samsung i9000
ICS 4.0.3 MIUI ASNET 1.3.0 with Devil kernel
Antutu Score 4249
quadrant is 4 kids
ryandabao said:
Know where I can get the older versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
search quadrant 1.17 mediafire in google ..u.ll find it !
qrsky said:
Samsung i9000
ICS 4.0.3 MIUI ASNET 1.3.0 with Devil kernel
Antutu Score 4249
quadrant is 4 kids
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OC 1610 => hell yeah!
im currently on ICSSGS 4.0.3 RC4.2 with semaphore 0.8.1
Antutu gives me 3100 without any overclocking
its weird how different those results sometimes are but i got no lag at all running on 1000MHz and a sweeeeet battery life as well
This one on glitch 14 v3
This one on devil's kernel best thing is that cpu score is worse than one on 1610MHz :what:
My new max score:
my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I'm on CM9 build 16 with semaphore 0.8.1 OC at 1150MHz this are my results :
So far i've only used basic overclocking on ICSSGS RC4.2 with Devil 1.1 CFS LED2 kernel. The rom works just amazingly and is super fast. I've not really tried to live oc this much because i need to manually set more voltages because the default ones crashes the phone. But i can say for example gta3 works fine with this rom without any serious issues and not many roms on sgs that game works even with oc...
i just now need to try and get the battery to live long and maybe after that i am trying to figure out how to enlarge my virtual penis with benchmark records
antutu is 3677 with oc'd to 1,4 ghz and quadrant is 1557.
ryandabao said:
Here's my quadrant score, seems its at 1400+ as well
Sent every time I hit the submit key
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 2.3k quadrant(latest version quadrant) using TeamIcssgs 4.2 rom with devil kernel 14.2..using smartassv2 cpu..no OC
Updated: 2289. under galaxy TAB
On ICS 4.0.4 with devil 14.2
Without anu UV or OV
Wysłane z mojego GT-I9000 za pomocą Tapatalk
I'm on ICSSGS 4.0.3 RC4.2 with devil 14.2
Sent from my GT-I9000
Hello.this is my antutu result.please share opinion and screenshots.i use cm10 stable with marmite kernel.
Whats your score?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?
Serris said:
My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep i used oc 1400.I just flashed jellyshot with mermite kernel with 1.32 OC and smartass and got this
First two screens are result for cm-10.1-20130408-NIGHTLY rom with cm kernel.
The 3rd and 4th screenshot were made after updating to 20130416-NIGHTLY and flashing mermite-v8.5cm kernel.
Carbon ROM, no over clock and stock
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Over clocked 1300 Carbon ROM
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config
B33zal said:
Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On general (my experience) 3200-4000 is pretty normal without overclocking depending on rom/kernel/phone/battery level and temperature.. Two identical phones with the same set up will get different scores. Some mods/tweaks can increase this as well as having a good amount of free ram and no other programs running.
But these are just "fun" tests and not a true assessment of real performance..
With that said, Carbon rom is SOOOO much faster..
Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^
B33zal said:
Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed... And it is fun mopping the floor with slow ROMs (joking)...
This was set at only 800 mhz
Consider yourselves challenged..
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
burakgon said:
Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No matter what rom I've tried, I don't get much over 2k on 3d.. this test I was just a bit under, but still damn good for a Nexus S.. I saw you are trying to improve the graphics in your rom, I hope it works, but I really want a faster load time on apps and less lag in everything else. I have tried your rom, on this test as well, and you came up over 500 points below my score of 5300. I test all roms the same with multiple kernels (stock included as well) and different schedulers/ governors.. but as battery life goes you are towards the top..