Database Users

ROM benchmarks

Can someone please make a benchmarks for most popular x8 roms! it would help for me and for others as well, i suppose!
anyone who can take this advantage

I can tell you mine.
Using XGin 5.3 with no overclock or undervolt, I get ~1000 in Quadrant and ~1500 in AnTuTu Benchmark

I'm using Floyo v1.0 with [email protected]
I get ~1100 in Quadrant(Advanced Version,I found Standard's score is lower than Advance's.)
Edit:Without OC,The score is ~1000

Using FroyoBread v020
No OC, No UV
Quadrant Advanced: 1100~1155
Neo Core: 44~48
Linpack: 4.1~4.3

I get 993 on my X8 with miniCM6 by ponanovn.
No OC, no UV, but I installed x8MDDI-lagfix.

Cool! and how about the 3D marks? just curious!
would be cool if someone could make a diagramm with x8 rom benchmarks
may go for it...but i guess im too busy for such fun!
nice, now i have to decide...was flasing a rom and my mum badly touched the phone it fell down battery out...
i cant decide between hackdroid floyo 1.0 and froyobread the newest!

having froyobread v021 now and got 726 points in quadrant... didn't ever get such low points..

i get around 820 to 860 on quadrant standard and Neo Core: 44~46
i have overlocked to 720mhz which pretty much stable and undervolt but don't know which app best for this can help me i am using foryobread 0.21v

[DEV] XWKPN vs. XXKPH - Benchmark Results

Hi all. I just wanna share my research about two gingerbread firmwares: KPN and KPH. Everybody says KPN much more stable, no SODs, smooth, and etc. and KPH not stable enough, and have much SODs. but how about the benchmark result?
Sorry, I was forget to take a screenshot of the benchmark results.
First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Second: KPH (2.3.4)
Score: 1000 - 1500 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 1600 - 1900 (with CF-Root)
Wow, it's shocking. Even it has random SOD issue (stock or cf-root) but the performance is great. Angry birds, lags there are only small lags. On the benchmark reading & writing database it's really fast, graphic test fps almost same as KPN. And I think it has better battery, depends on the ussage.
Conclusion
In my opinion, KPN is stable enough but slow. And KPH is fair, the performance was great. About my ROM, fla.sh it's ready for packaging. But now, I will start over again and use KPH as base. How about you?

What was it about 2.3.4 showing up anomalous results on quadrant? Rumour or fact?
Edit: just ran quadrant on 2.3.3 kpn 1500+
Anyways kpn has a shorter wake time but slightly longer time for screen off.

consegregate said:
What was it about 2.3.4 showing up anomalous results on quadrant? Rumour or fact?
Edit: just ran quadrant on 2.3.3 kpn 1500+
Anyways kpn has a shorter wake time but slightly longer time for screen off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow.. CF-Root? MicroSD high class? I just flash KPN and ran bencmark with result 500 -600. KPH will show high result (and getting higher after you run benchmark again).

Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App

chinoyray said:
Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? But how about performance? I think KPH is better.

fla.sh said:
Wow.. CF-Root? MicroSD high class? I just flash KPN and ran bencmark with result 500 -600. KPH will show high result (and getting higher after you run benchmark again).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On ext4 with both KPN/KPH gives me benchmarks of around 1500, no difference.
Playing games, no difference.
So it comes to stability plus bln support

chinoyray said:
Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree for this. Benchmark on KPH just to good to be true.
From my experience, KPN is better than KPH, KPN more smooth than KPH. But i don't try it on game. IMHO, the real benchmark is game.

First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use KPN, and the results of my benchmark 1600 + +, and has not happened SOD. ...
KPN play game more better than KPH
sorry my bad english. .

my KPN benchmark is 1734. with cfroot of course. when i installed gingerreal RC1 (KPN as base), my benchmark became 1819. everything is so smooth. except for the android keyboard which is btw still bugged with gingerreal. but it doesn't matter since gingerbread keyboardis so much better. so legit. )

Wow! Thoose values are greater than expected... Now I'm packaging my ROM

Waiting for fla.sh's package now....
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App

fla.sh said:
Hi all. I just wanna share my research about two gingerbread firmwares: KPN and KPH. Everybody says KPN much more stable, no SODs, smooth, and etc. and KPH not stable enough, and have much SODs. but how about the benchmark result?
Sorry, I was forget to take a screenshot of the benchmark results.
First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey fla.sh,
my Quadrant standard benchmark results for stock KPN and only a few tweaks in build.prop are 1000-1200 everytime. And for me KPN looks better then KPH, althoug i didn't try KPH for a long time now.
What about CF-root for KPN and SOD's? Are you sure? You know whats the problem with it exactly? I'm testing this to and i must say that i didn't have SOD'S for a week now being on only stock KPN.
Cheers.

fla.sh said:
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never had SOD with cf-root and KPN. i don't know about the battery drain since even with KPH, my battery drains fast.

quadrant scores are clearly not reliable. i am better off with kpn as it does not have sod problem.

Scores
There is a great difference in the scores.
But I'm just happy using KPH.

1jesper1 said:
There is a great difference in the scores.
But I'm just happy using KPH.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't revive dead topics
Sent from my MSM7227 with Adreno 200 using XDA App

EmoBoiix3 said:
Please don't revive dead topics
Sent from my MSM7227 with Adreno 200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This tread just contains interesting information I had never seen before.
This goes about 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 firmware, so it's recent.

edit: Nevermind.. I wasn't aware that this is an old topic.

Sorry guys but why you use quadrant ? If you try other app like Antutu or SmarthBench i think that it willi be better. In my case the results on Smarthbench are:
498 / 982 tweak enabled; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
479 / 986 Tweak disabled; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
501 / 960 Tweak disabled; V6 supercharged enabled belaced 3; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
503 / 929 Tweak disabled; V6 supercharged enabled belaced 3; 97loopy_smoothness; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
On antutu bench i have: 1797
I know that they aren't stock firm but the base is the same....

[Q] Quadrant Standard

Anyone has noticed how in CM9, processor score goes really high compared to Cm7 ROMS? Is Because GB Processor Manager or what? Look at my score with stock cm9:

No idea but I thought my CPU was scoring low also but this is great could msmeabmn even higher scores with more tweaks
Sent from Atrix 4g Neutrino 2.5

Are you also useing the cm9 kernel?

Yeah Flashed CM9 Jokersax latest with Fauxs 1.3ghz kernel.
This is my score

Look in my post and see CPU score, that was with Stock CM9 kernel...

yea but even but on cm7 with the same kernel im getting 3400 just proving a point cm9 must fully support 2 cores in quadrant

Opposite for me, I was getting like 3800 on Feb 20 cm7, now get 3100 on 3.3 Jokersax CM9
Sent from my MB860 using XDA

[Q] CM9 performance i9001

Hi everyone,
I had installed CM9 RC2 by ivendors and it's graet
there is some lag using UI and it's very slow loading cantacts.
How can I increase performance? now i check only 16bit transparentcy.
thanks
Carlo

Use CastagnaIT's kernel and adreno jelly beam drivers from galaxy w.
Smooth UI, all games work well, 4400 antutu score @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2
Do not use app killers and manual kill only aps that you don't use often.
Good luck and Pm if you need links.
Sent from my GT-I9001 using xda app-developers app

Invendor RC3 Release, it is recommended

benchmark results
thank you everyone.
I try different setting to find best performance.
the results of my benchmark are shown below ( 16bit transparentcy checked ):
Invendor rc3.1
4028 antutu score
2446 Quadrant Standard score
Invendor rc3.1 + CastagnaIT Kernel v6.3 @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2
4175 antutu score
2538 Quadrant Standard score
Invendor rc3.1 + CastagnaIT Kernel v6.3 @ 1.4Ghz and smartassV2 + JB Adreno libs
4127 antutu score
2651 Quadrant Standard score
bye

Frankly speaking i don't see any problem with low performance slow device etc...
Updated to RC3 yesterday and I'm glad to have it.
Typed with my I9001

Nexus benchmark

Hello.this is my antutu result.please share opinion and screenshots.i use cm10 stable with marmite kernel.
Whats your score?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?

Serris said:
My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep i used oc 1400.I just flashed jellyshot with mermite kernel with 1.32 OC and smartass and got this

First two screens are result for cm-10.1-20130408-NIGHTLY rom with cm kernel.
The 3rd and 4th screenshot were made after updating to 20130416-NIGHTLY and flashing mermite-v8.5cm kernel.

Carbon ROM, no over clock and stock
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

Over clocked 1300 Carbon ROM
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config

B33zal said:
Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On general (my experience) 3200-4000 is pretty normal without overclocking depending on rom/kernel/phone/battery level and temperature.. Two identical phones with the same set up will get different scores. Some mods/tweaks can increase this as well as having a good amount of free ram and no other programs running.
But these are just "fun" tests and not a true assessment of real performance..
With that said, Carbon rom is SOOOO much faster..

Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^

B33zal said:
Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed... And it is fun mopping the floor with slow ROMs (joking)...
This was set at only 800 mhz
Consider yourselves challenged..
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium

Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app

burakgon said:
Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No matter what rom I've tried, I don't get much over 2k on 3d.. this test I was just a bit under, but still damn good for a Nexus S.. I saw you are trying to improve the graphics in your rom, I hope it works, but I really want a faster load time on apps and less lag in everything else. I have tried your rom, on this test as well, and you came up over 500 points below my score of 5300. I test all roms the same with multiple kernels (stock included as well) and different schedulers/ governors.. but as battery life goes you are towards the top..