Database Users

What's up with my bench scores?

I'm running Cyanogen Mod 7 v 2.5 Gingerbread on my HD2 which is clocked at 1.536Ghz.
Best quadrant score I could pull was 1418, with results being inconsistent every time I run the test.
Best score in linpack was 41 MFLOPS.
Best CPU bench score was 672ms.
Now, don't get me wrong. I know these scores are a def improvement over stock and nothing to sneer at, but I've seen HD2's that only run at 1.1 - 1.2Ghz with Froyo in the 1600+ Quadrant/60 MFLOPS+ CPU bench range.
I'm kinda stumped here. What's up?

Benchmark Bragging

Most people on this forum have tinkerer with their xoom, and at some point ran quadrant and linpack. I'm curious as to who has the fastest benchmark xoom.
We all know benchmarks don't mean squat in the real world but its still cool to OC it and see what it will do.
So post up your quadrant and linpack scores and at what speed
Mine @ 1.6
Quadrant 4513, it ran 4517 however was unable to get a screen shot.
68.772 linpack. Ranks 124 of all devices

I got 4157 as my highest on quad (1.6 ghz) but I got a 69.4 on linpack (screenshot lost when I had to flash stock images to recover, also at 1.6 ghz) ( its a GIF, so the app doesn't like it)
http://db.tt/GQ8XznI
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App

This is kinda weird for a brag I guess, but I get 3758 on quadrant and 60 on linpack with the 1.4ghz 1.4.2 kernel.

[Q] really slow a500/ quadrant score 656???

Hi,
as i'm using my iconia a500 i noticed some heavy Performance issues. i rooted and installed several Roms but my Quadrant score keeps being low. right now i am on lightspeed 1.0.1 with Richard's Kernel and my Quadrant score is only 656!!!
i'm really curious about this any suggestions?
thanks in advance
kiark

Just a guess, but the cpu probably is not running full during the test. Might have to use a app to force to 1000 during the test.

Running 2.4 kernel? If so, the default intersctive scaling governor is borked so either use setcpu to change to on demand or flash back to 2.3. Im personally running 1.6ghz as max speed with on demand.

thank u very much, setting the cpu up with setcpu worked!

CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App

IM using the xoom 3.2 rom
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072

naturallight said:
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure on this. if it doesnt have much effect why do you see such a huge difference between 216 Mhz and 1.5 Ghz clock speeds in quadrant?

bench score

Hello,
What is your bench score with QUADRANT BENCHMARK
the mine is 1550 with hc3.1 OTA, Villain_iconia_kernel_2.5 kernel

Quandrant Score : 3423
Acer Iconia A500
Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2
LightSpeed Rom
over clocked to 1.4ghz

MrTonyToca said:
Quandrant Score : 3423
Acer Iconia A500
Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2
LightSpeed Rom
over clocked to 1.4ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does it get that high? Mine is oc. To 1.5 and my highest is 2100!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App

monkey10120 said:
How does it get that high? Mine is oc. To 1.5 and my highest is 2100!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know, It might be the Rom.....Its the newest version of the Light Speed Rom....OC'd to 1.4ghz using SetCPU Ondemand governer , with the Honey Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2, thats the highest I've gotten but since I've flashed both it has ranged from 2800-3300

[ROM][26/08]Lightspeed_1.0.2[HC3.2]
[KERNEL] Stock/HV/Taboonay V3.3 for HC 3.2 07-09 - 1.64Ghz/UV control

quadrant is very unreliable. to some searching on it, it is easy to manipulate I/O or other factors just get high scores. Doesn't really mean it is a great ROM/kernel combo. I've seen posts where people can get their quadrant score upwards of 20,000. All benchmarks apps have their pros and cons but from i've been told/seen in threads CF bench and vellamo seem to be the most reliable.

mburke178 said:
quadrant is very unreliable. to some searching on it, it is easy to manipulate I/O or other factors just get high scores. Doesn't really mean it is a great ROM/kernel combo. I've seen posts where people can get their quadrant score upwards of 20,000. All benchmarks apps have their pros and cons but from i've been told/seen in threads CF bench and vellamo seem to be the most reliable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've also tried Smartbench 2011, since it measures both cores instead of one and push around 4400 there.....Im loving the speed on this thing....

Performance of Quarx 5/12 CM10 compared to other ROMS

I have a question regarding performance. I have a MB525 (red lense), with the JORLA_U3_3.4.2_108-2_R02_SIGNED_USAJORDMR1B25RETLALA01F.0R_JORLAFRORETLALA_P008_A005_M001_HWp3_WIG147146_Service1FF as my base ROM. I'm currently on Quarx's 5/12 CM10 ROM, and performance is really good, the user experience is the smoothest I've had in all the ROMs I've flashed. I'm using Interactive Governor, and my OC settings are 300/20, 600/35, 800/45, 1100/59. Now the deal is that for some reason Quadrant benchmarks give me a really low score, lower 2D and I/O scores, even though I feel that the actual user performance is a lot better with the 2nd Boot ROM.
I must admit that with my current Vsel settings, this is the lowest I've ever undervolted, and in my previous benchmarks I might have been OC'd to 1.2 ghz, but I don't think a 100 mhz difference would change the scores that much, especially regarding the I/O score.
Should I be worried about this drop in score? Or is Quadrant simply acting up?

Antiga Prime said:
I have a question regarding performance. I have a MB525 (red lense), with the JORLA_U3_3.4.2_108-2_R02_SIGNED_USAJORDMR1B25RETLALA01F.0R_JORLAFRORETLALA_P008_A005_M001_HWp3_WIG147146_Service1FF as my base ROM. I'm currently on Quarx's 5/12 CM10 ROM, and performance is really good, the user experience is the smoothest I've had in all the ROMs I've flashed. I'm using Interactive Governor, and my OC settings are 300/20, 600/35, 800/45, 1100/59. Now the deal is that for some reason Quadrant benchmarks give me a really low score, lower 2D and I/O scores, even though I feel that the actual user performance is a lot better with the 2nd Boot ROM.
I must admit that with my current Vsel settings, this is the lowest I've ever undervolted, and in my previous benchmarks I might have been OC'd to 1.2 ghz, but I don't think a 100 mhz difference would change the scores that much, especially regarding the I/O score.
Should I be worried about this drop in score? Or is Quadrant simply acting up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the same situation.
Same phone, same cm10 quarx rom...
1200 in quadrant, i have
400 32vsel
700 40vsel
1000 54vsel
1300 67vsel
Lowest score: 2d graphics and i/o.

Very interesting Would be nice if someone could explain it.
I tested some roms with Antutu and Quadrant.
WiuiGB:
Antutu 2912-3131
Quadrant 1883
MiuiICS (Braun's):
Antutu 2272
Quadrant 1755
CM10 (Quarx's Early April Nightly 2ndboot):
Antutu 3064
Quadrant 1167
Quadrant score is much lower on CM10 with 2ndboot, but Antutu is pretty high.