Database Users

I just got a new highest quadrant benchmark

I just got this on virtuous 3.1.0 with kings kernel BFS #5. This is the highest I've seen so I thought I should share.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App

SR 3.3.2 KK #5
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

lol.

I was proud... Im now gonna try to get mine higher lol

Have y'all seen what the G2's doing overclocked? It's sick.

whats with the ads on screen shots??? your on rooted phones...ADFREE(market app)

jager420 said:
whats with the ads on screen shots??? your on rooted phones...ADFREE(market app)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actually leave mine on most of the time to support the devs who hand out free apps.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App

Im not even getting 1200 on Redemptive 1.8. Is it purely the rom and kernel that are giving those scores? Im sure to kill any running apps via running services in the settings menu.

PonsAsinorem said:
I actually leave mine on most of the time to support the devs who hand out free apps.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ha. I do that too. Even with flash and some websites.
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App

RyanTX said:
Im not even getting 1200 on Redemptive 1.8. Is it purely the rom and kernel that are giving those scores? Im sure to kill any running apps via running services in the settings menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never kill apps. Which kernel are you using and what are your setcpu settings.

silverramsrt said:
I never kill apps. Which kernel are you using and what are your setcpu settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well that's probably it... I have had the phone since release but have been afraid to do anything until a couple weeks ago.
I just installed my first rom - Redemptive Revolution 1.8 (love it BTW) but it came with the newest HTC kernel, so that's what I am using. I dont even have SetCPU on my phone. You think the sub 1200 is about right for not having it?

RyanTX said:
Well that's probably it... I have had the phone since release but have been afraid to do anything until a couple weeks ago.
I just installed my first rom - Redemptive Revolution 1.8 (love it BTW) but it came with the newest HTC kernel, so that's what I am using. I dont even have SetCPU on my phone. You think the sub 1200 is about right for not having it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, since you're new to this don't get caught up on numbers. Take a look at what Lou's got to say (and fwiw, I completely agree).
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=8734924&postcount=1875

What app are you guys using to benchmark?

my highest benchmark has been 1710 using skyraider vanilla 3.0 and kings kernal #5/#5
Wish i had a screenshot

setexascustoms said:
Have y'all seen what the G2's doing overclocked? It's sick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is pretty sick but. I wish it was possible to clock the Inc to 1.5 gHz and be stable. Also some overclocks lately have been fake but its awesome that this one is real XD.

makos101 said:
What app are you guys using to benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The app is called "Quadrant" and you can find it in the android market. XD Theirs also "Linpack" that you can use to test out Mega Flops.

got these scores had to redo test becuase drocap didnt capture screen like i wanted as you can see.. had to use shootme for second test and score droped a little. Im on ROM The new guy v5 with the blue theme v2. with king kernal bfs #5..love the ROM
**edit
BTW i was reading above about app killing(which i usally do) and both these test were done w/o killing apps and such went straight to testing..

Uber Rom Rules!
On Uber Desire Z, I got 1745 on my incredible!!!!!!!!!!!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=861285

I got 3985 on my HTC HD2 which isn't even a native android device. lol
This is 100% legit & I currently hold the highest score I've ever seen. The system im running is in my sig & has no set cpu or overclocking enabled. It has parts of the operating system stored in the RAM which has much faster I/O than NAND.

quadrant honestly doesn't mean much

G2 benchmark... numbers sucked!

Just flashed enoms g2 rom and I cleared up what I can, tried making it efficient.I ran some benchmark tests on quadrant standard and was kinda disappointed in the numbers. My bests score was low 1100 after that it was 850,900, 835... very basic stuff any suggestions???
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

If you ran the benchmark on battery power, try plugging the phone in. Sometimes the CPU will underclock itself to save power. If that doesn't work, download SetCPU (google it) and make sure that the max speed is set above 800 MHz.

On the stock G2 ROM I was getting 1600-1800... maybe it's the ROM your using

omarsalmin said:
On the stock G2 ROM I was getting 1600-1800... maybe it's the ROM your using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah this is the typical range for a stock G2.
Those scores in the OP are so low, its almost like hes underclocking or something. Or possibly a running application using a ton of resources?

i got 2064. but i was running virtuous.

im running enom's rom and i had it underclocked at 768 and i was still able to get 1609

Stargazer418 said:
If you ran the benchmark on battery power, try plugging the phone in. Sometimes the CPU will underclock itself to save power. If that doesn't work, download SetCPU (google it) and make sure that the max speed is set above 800 MHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm... No... The CPU doesn't underclock to save power...

gravis86 said:
Umm... No... The CPU doesn't underclock to save power...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps the kernel has an undervolting profile built in and it's triggered by a < battery percentage?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

What should I have my phone clocked at with enoms rom?? I dnt have much running at all I dnt understand why its so slow, I was gunna flash the latest kernal and try that... clock settings please anyone
Edit: jus tweaked my clock on spareparts. I switched cpu governor from ondemand to performance and the clock setting. I put underclock at the lowest and overclock at the max highest... benchmark test put up a 2200... I feel as if this will drain battery like crazy only time will tell... what do u think, should I drop the overclock? Is it safe at that high number???
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

If I run with Flippy's kernel, CM 6.1.1 Stable and OC my phone to 1.8 GHz, I can get a Quadrant score of 3037 (screenshot below). With it OC'd to 1.4 GHz (my normal OC setting) I can get around 2500.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

If I'm averging 2500 I'm fine wit that my current settings are Enoms Rom
Using enoms cpu controls
Cpu governor: performance
Max frequency: 1,516,800
Min frequency 245,760
I dropped 3 percent in battery writing this message.... my main concern is battery and overworking the cpu.... I'm thinking about downloading set cpu and clocking the performance settings then set it for power save after a certain drop point........ does this sound logical?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

When you set your cpu to performance it means your cpu will stay at max all the time and it never goes down which is why you are getting bad battery life.
There is no need for that.
Yes you can do that with setcpu
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

Maybe you tested your Samsung Galaxy s by mistake?..lol..just joking.

I score around 2500 on quadrant:
OC'd to 1.4 (normally run 1.2)
SetCpu On Demand
CyanogenMod 6.1

fablife said:
Maybe you tested your Samsung Galaxy s by mistake?..lol..just joking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey! Not funny! My vibrant gets 2035 in the quadrant! But I'm going to get myself a g2 because I miss the hardware keyboard

Got me 2813 with Virtous 0.9 <---- (sense rom btw) and eVil's latest Glacier based kernel @ 1.5ghz... life is good
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

[Quadrant Scores] Thread!

I dont think we have a quadrant score thread.
Lets start it up!!
Rules:
Post your Quadrant Pic (No pic, didnt happen )
and tell us what ROM and Kernel you are using.

I hear Quadrant isn't as accurate as it could be, but I'll go along.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This was one of the CM7 Nightlies and I believe, Miguel's kernel.

Idk about this man. Alot of people are skeptical at the accuracy of quadrant to include me
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

cm7, no OC, but using data2ext
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

This is why. The numerous random mis-benching.
It's always either underrated or overrated depending on how your set up is.
There are better tests out there.
CM6, smartass, dtapps.

Yeah a bit unreliable because I doubt my phone can outperform an Evo but, 1360 so...
With CM7 (Ungodly fast BTW) And Miguels Kernel OC'd at MAX 864 MIN 245 SETCPU
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

That's what I usually get with CM7 nightly + miguelthekernel Smartass 245-844Mhz + data2ext.

What the heck. My score is significantly less than everyone here. I only got 988 and I'm using CM7 nightly with miguelthe kernal and smartass 245-825. Any idea why it'd be so slow?
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App

Try to free up some RAM with a task manager, you should get about 1200 with 825 oc, I used to get 1185 yet on CM 6.x. data2ext would significally increase your I/O score. Look at my screenshot above.

F0rgiven said:
What the heck. My score is significantly less than everyone here. I only got 988 and I'm using CM7 nightly with miguelthe kernal and smartass 245-825. Any idea why it'd be so slow?
Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't actually make those scores anymore for a while I was hittin mid 900's then back up to 1000s... But never that high again D:

My results/stats are attached...too bad I didn't have a screenie program earlier, I got it up to 3328, and can't reproduce it again.

CaptainPointless said:
My results/stats are attached...too bad I didn't have a screenie program earlier, I got it up to 3328, and can't reproduce it again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This might be in the wrong forum. Glacier is the MT4G.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk

No pic but I average 1400-1500 with latest cm7 nightlies, smartass kernel , and data2ext

I keep seeing people post about smartass kernel and getting high scores. I keep getting scores in the 800d's, could somebody please point in the right direction in getting smartass kernel right now I have 2.6.32.17 cyanogenmod running CM7.
Thanks-

data2ext and being overclocked get you the high quadrant score not smartass. I get the same scores with the kernel included in cm7. Smartass just gets rid of the need for setcpu profiles

sbell7105 said:
data2ext and being overclocked get you the high quadrant score not smartass. I get the same scores with the kernel included in cm7. Smartass just gets rid of the need for setcpu profiles
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If I'm not mistaken doesn't CM7 already come with data2ext installed, because I see that I can move apps to the sd card. Also how would one know what apps are ok to be moved?
Thanks-

cdsbj6508 said:
If I'm not mistaken doesn't CM7 already come with data2ext installed, because I see that I can move apps to the sd card. Also how would one know what apps are ok to be moved?
Thanks-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
apps2sd FAT, not EXT.

Data2ext is different than app2ext it completely frees up your internal storage search in the development section

feel so slow
These scores make me want to get a new SD card and do some apps2ext to see how much nicer it will make my phone (not bad btw).

Xoom HRI66-from-HRI39 raises Quadrant benchmark 23%

Getting amazing improvement after applying the update. Yes, I repeated this twice to be sure: "No overclock"
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Very impressive. A lot of people have been mentioning snappiness from the update and this backs that up.

I wanna see what this update looks like with OC kernels.

my quadrant and best linpack
Kernal: coolbho3000 v2 1.5GHz
Governer: Interactive
Quadrant: 3072
Linpack: 64.191MFlops

arrtoodeetoo said:
I wanna see what this update looks like with OC kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the 3.0.1 update, have you or anyone else tried the OC (1.5) kernel that everyone's been missing with. I thought I had read over in that thread that there were issues with it now (FC's?). Not sure if I should even bother with flashing it at this point.

lasphyxial said:
my quadrant and best linpack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is this with the 1.5 ghz OC kernel?

I,m using the oc kernel with 3.0.1, no FCs at all.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

whitedragon33 said:
I,m using the oc kernel with 3.0.1, no FCs at all.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And there was no issue installing it using the exact same files/instructions from before the 3.0.1 update?

I used the apk that jrummy made to install the update for rooted users and it worked like a charm and I still have my overclocked kernel. I didn't have to reinstall the overclocked kernel after the update.
from my Xoom using XDA App

Well I'm not sure what is going on with this kernel. After updating to 3.0.1, then unlocking, then rooting, I went through the procedure for flashing this kernel just as I had done last week. I was able to successfully send the xoom_ocboot.img, then rebooted in fastboot, then remounted, then pushed the bcm4329.ko kernel (verified afterwards by looking with Root Explorer), then rebooted in adb, but the kernel didn't take. The kernel from the 3.0.1 update is still in effect.
What gives??!?!
Maybe I should try the tiamat kernel instead? Whats the difference?
EDIT: I ended up wiping everything and starting from scratch, and this time I modded the OC first, THEN I used the update installer app to update to 3.0.1, which worked perfectly.

despich said:
... and I still have my overclocked kernel. I didn't have to reinstall the overclocked kernel after the update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHS; and no issues here.
FWIW, SetCPU shows I'm running 216-1504, but my best LinPack is only ~44.

My original quadrant scores were between 1800-1900. I got the update, and they are still in the same area, no jump to 2100+ like in your attached photo. Was kinda sad cuz I noticed some choppiness while playing Dungeon Defenders and probably could have used that boost to fix it up.
...Then, just to be sure, I restarted it. My scores now match yours. I mean, it already restarted when it updated, but whatever. So if anybody else wants the boost, be sure to do another restart. I rarely restart so it would be a shame for anyone to miss out on a performance boost.

MichaelWestin said:
... Then, just to be sure, I restarted it. My scores now match yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sumbitch. After a restart, my (1.5GHz OCed) device now gets 2454. Before that, it was less than yours.
OP, what do you use to make screenshots? Neither "Shoot Me" nor ... (uh, another one I tried) work. I'm rooted BTW.

kcrudup said:
OP, what do you use to make screenshots? Neither "Shoot Me" nor ... (uh, another one I tried) work. I'm rooted BTW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screenshots were with the Dalvik Debug Monitor in the SDK Tools.

I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.

Who cares about quadrant, should be using Smartbench 2011 anyway.

quadrant is a terrible benchmarking application.
scores are very inconsistent. if you rerun the application you will get a higher score.
btw, going from 3.0 to 3.01 did not give any improvement in terms of snappiness.

eloist said:
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same. Quadrant has always been this way, however - not everyone gets the same scores.

eloist said:
I got an average score of 1871 on quadrant before and after the HR166 update.
The score remains the same no matter if it's after a fresh reboot or after the device has been on and used for hours.
I have to say the OP's results are very lucky.
This isn't the case across the board.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must add that my experience is the same. My Xoom has been getting around 1820 regardless of update or reboots.

nubsors said:
Who cares about quadrant, should be using Smartbench 2011 anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just DL'd Smartbench 2011 and ran it. I must say I'm very pleased. All of the stock Xooms running 3.0.1 are getting between 2945-2963. Mine scored a 3329 and is running stock ROM & kernel on 3.0.1. Am quite happy now!

[Q] Low Quadrant Scores

I know that this tool isn't a good indicator of performance... but when I see other people with the EVO getting 1200+ and I am at 800-900, I am starting to wonder if there is a setting wrong. My phone occasionally feels sluggish. Any idea's what the cause could be? using an AOSP rom with Tiamat Kernel
- Just realized I wasn't in Q&A forums Sorry! - please delete if needed

Stuke00 said:
I know that this tool isn't a good indicator of performance... but when I see other people with the EVO getting 1200+ and I am at 800-900, I am starting to wonder if there is a setting wrong. My phone occasionally feels sluggish. Any idea's what the cause could be? using an AOSP rom with Tiamat Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question!
Ive always wondered why some score so low on good combos.
I'm on CM nightly rc3 build 18 with savgzen 1.0.0 cfs-havs and scoring very well
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

new quad you will get low scores
imho quad and all the other benchmark test mean nothing

CheesyNutz said:
new quad you will get low scores
imho quad and all the other benchmark test mean nothing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree when comparing to other phones... but 2 phones of the same model should get similar scores right?

Stuke00 said:
I agree when comparing to other phones... but 2 phones of the same model should get similar scores right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ran it off of a fresh reboot?
I find my best scores were when I rebooted let it sit for 3-5 min after reboot, and then fire it up.

Mark_in_Tulsa said:
Have you ran it off of a fresh reboot?
I find my best scores were when I rebooted let it sit for 3-5 min after reboot, and then fire it up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trying it again after the phones been on a few minutes.
I used to use SETCPU and I thought maybe that screwed things up

If you want to increase scores why don't you put your Max frequency at 1190 and min at 1190 with setcpu. High scores are a thing of the past.
~ d3rk

dirkyd3rk said:
If you want to increase scores why don't you put your Max frequency at 1190 and min at 1190 with setcpu. High scores are a thing of the past.
~ d3rk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is with my CPU at 1190. I am not trying to get a high score, but a score my phone should be able to get, you know? I see someone with an EVO get 1500 and then I am thinking something is wrong with my phone... I have the same phone..

Stuke00 said:
That is with my CPU at 1190. I am not trying to get a high score, but a score my phone should be able to get, you know? I see someone with an EVO get 1500 and then I am thinking something is wrong with my phone... I have the same phone..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Putting stock in scores is foolish though. 936 does seem a Tad bit low for sure. My set up is cm7 #36, tiamat kernel 3.3.5, JIT on, setcpu 1113 Max, 422 min smartass governor. I just ran a linpack and got 37mflops and 1200 in benchmark. This is the same set up I usually run on any rom or kernel. I try not to clock so high because it just drains battery. My evo actually can perform flawlessly clocked at even 998mhz. The only thing I notice different is that scores change and I don't really take a performance hit. Underclocking is the new overclocking lol. My last suggestion would be to play around with different kernels to achieve what you desire. Try savage zen!
Edit: just ran these 2 test just for you right now. Same results and I'm using same kernel you are.
~ d3rk

Run, it once, and then run it again right after w/out quitting. The if you run it multiple times (at least on my phone), all subsequent scores are on par with the second one which is usually 1-300 more than the first. Won't mean anything any different, but at least you might get some higher scores.
Also, you might need to try some different kernel combinations as well as different clock speeds. Mine usually does fine at 998 sometimes even at 921, but if I go too high it will start to slow things down. If you're not getting good results at 1190, try backing it off one setting at a time and see if you can get improved scores.
As far as comparing to other phones, even of the same make/model, you can't really do that. As long as they're in the same ball park, within a couple hundred, you're probably OK. Every phone reacts differently.
It also depends on the version of quadrant. You def can't compare diff phones running diff versions. I usually don't use it to compare to other phones, just diff setups on my phone. I know if I'm getting 1200 avg and then I all of the sudden flash a ROM and kernel and can't break 800 that something is probably wrong.
The most important thing is how the phone feels though. The fact that you say it feels sluggish leads me to believe you might need to try a diff kernel or see if something is eating up your CPU. Also, when you're over clocking, the min clock speed can effect your scores just as much as the max speed.

Ya give savage a go.
Kernel CPU setting:
Ondemand governor
Min 245
Max 998
My Device scores high runs smooth battery drain not a problem.

I just tested mine and got 1326. With these settings.. CM7 Nightly 36 with 2.6.37.6-Tiamat -v3.3.5 kernal.
Governor - Conservative
Min - 384
Max 1036