I know that this tool isn't a good indicator of performance... but when I see other people with the EVO getting 1200+ and I am at 800-900, I am starting to wonder if there is a setting wrong. My phone occasionally feels sluggish. Any idea's what the cause could be? using an AOSP rom with Tiamat Kernel
- Just realized I wasn't in Q&A forums Sorry! - please delete if needed
Stuke00 said:
I know that this tool isn't a good indicator of performance... but when I see other people with the EVO getting 1200+ and I am at 800-900, I am starting to wonder if there is a setting wrong. My phone occasionally feels sluggish. Any idea's what the cause could be? using an AOSP rom with Tiamat Kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good question!
Ive always wondered why some score so low on good combos.
I'm on CM nightly rc3 build 18 with savgzen 1.0.0 cfs-havs and scoring very well
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
new quad you will get low scores
imho quad and all the other benchmark test mean nothing
CheesyNutz said:
new quad you will get low scores
imho quad and all the other benchmark test mean nothing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree when comparing to other phones... but 2 phones of the same model should get similar scores right?
Stuke00 said:
I agree when comparing to other phones... but 2 phones of the same model should get similar scores right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ran it off of a fresh reboot?
I find my best scores were when I rebooted let it sit for 3-5 min after reboot, and then fire it up.
Mark_in_Tulsa said:
Have you ran it off of a fresh reboot?
I find my best scores were when I rebooted let it sit for 3-5 min after reboot, and then fire it up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trying it again after the phones been on a few minutes.
I used to use SETCPU and I thought maybe that screwed things up
If you want to increase scores why don't you put your Max frequency at 1190 and min at 1190 with setcpu. High scores are a thing of the past.
~ d3rk
dirkyd3rk said:
If you want to increase scores why don't you put your Max frequency at 1190 and min at 1190 with setcpu. High scores are a thing of the past.
~ d3rk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is with my CPU at 1190. I am not trying to get a high score, but a score my phone should be able to get, you know? I see someone with an EVO get 1500 and then I am thinking something is wrong with my phone... I have the same phone..
Stuke00 said:
That is with my CPU at 1190. I am not trying to get a high score, but a score my phone should be able to get, you know? I see someone with an EVO get 1500 and then I am thinking something is wrong with my phone... I have the same phone..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Putting stock in scores is foolish though. 936 does seem a Tad bit low for sure. My set up is cm7 #36, tiamat kernel 3.3.5, JIT on, setcpu 1113 Max, 422 min smartass governor. I just ran a linpack and got 37mflops and 1200 in benchmark. This is the same set up I usually run on any rom or kernel. I try not to clock so high because it just drains battery. My evo actually can perform flawlessly clocked at even 998mhz. The only thing I notice different is that scores change and I don't really take a performance hit. Underclocking is the new overclocking lol. My last suggestion would be to play around with different kernels to achieve what you desire. Try savage zen!
Edit: just ran these 2 test just for you right now. Same results and I'm using same kernel you are.
~ d3rk
Run, it once, and then run it again right after w/out quitting. The if you run it multiple times (at least on my phone), all subsequent scores are on par with the second one which is usually 1-300 more than the first. Won't mean anything any different, but at least you might get some higher scores.
Also, you might need to try some different kernel combinations as well as different clock speeds. Mine usually does fine at 998 sometimes even at 921, but if I go too high it will start to slow things down. If you're not getting good results at 1190, try backing it off one setting at a time and see if you can get improved scores.
As far as comparing to other phones, even of the same make/model, you can't really do that. As long as they're in the same ball park, within a couple hundred, you're probably OK. Every phone reacts differently.
It also depends on the version of quadrant. You def can't compare diff phones running diff versions. I usually don't use it to compare to other phones, just diff setups on my phone. I know if I'm getting 1200 avg and then I all of the sudden flash a ROM and kernel and can't break 800 that something is probably wrong.
The most important thing is how the phone feels though. The fact that you say it feels sluggish leads me to believe you might need to try a diff kernel or see if something is eating up your CPU. Also, when you're over clocking, the min clock speed can effect your scores just as much as the max speed.
Ya give savage a go.
Kernel CPU setting:
Ondemand governor
Min 245
Max 998
My Device scores high runs smooth battery drain not a problem.
I just tested mine and got 1326. With these settings.. CM7 Nightly 36 with 2.6.37.6-Tiamat -v3.3.5 kernal.
Governor - Conservative
Min - 384
Max 1036
Related
The system already dynamically clocks the CPU
Don't believe? Install OSMonitor and look at the "Misc" tab
Notice the "ondemand" governor scaling the processor from 245000 - 998400 hZ
Leads me to believe CPU governing is already in the kernel
You might be right.
The only difference I can think of is with the widget people are using (I have not tried it) the under clocking happens the instant the screen turns off. Where as we have no idea when/how the standard under clocking happens, if it does at all.
I am waiting it out. If the under clocking widget is true, it will eventually become common knowledge on these forums. For now I have not seen anything that has convinced me and I fear if i tried it I would suffer from the placebo effect. The last thing I want is another app running in the background for no reason.
strung said:
The system already dynamically clocks the CPU
Don't believe? Install OSMonitor and look at the "Misc" tab
Notice the "ondemand" governor scaling the processor from 245000 - 998400 hZ
Leads me to believe CPU governing is already in the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've noticed this as well. System Panel measures my CPU speed at around 245 Mhz when I'm just swiping through the home screen, but cranks up to 1 Ghz when the CPU usage approaches 100%.
Mecha2142 said:
I've noticed this as well. System Panel measures my CPU speed at around 245 Mhz when I'm just swiping through the home screen, but cranks up to 1 Ghz when the CPU usage approaches 100%.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? I wonder if that could explain some of the choppiness while scrolling around and general phone use.
I can confirm this with SetCPU's real time monitor. drops to 245 when not in use, and 1ghz when scrolling around
I think oc widget is better. I can choose a 5sec interval in which it checks to see if there are processes that need more CPU power.
I wonder what the intervals are in the stock unrooted OS
Oc widget def works for me, and I'm not just letting my phone sit as a paperweight, I'm using moderate to heavy everyday and the results for me are better.
Also, does the unrooted OS allow other frequencies besides 245 and 1ghz?
Oc widget runs mine in the 300s 500s 700s and 800s when needed
1ghz is not needed all he time when the screen is on. And I don't notice extra lag anywhere
And with 5sec intervals, the screen does not have be off to see 245. Just let it idle for 5 secs
I don't even think the OCwidget works. I mean it tries to set new values, and it thinks they succeed, but I think the new values are ignored by the kernel. For example, I tried to set min and max to 250 mHz and it still shot up to 1 GHz.
My apologies for being a debbie downer.
Here you go... can someone produce something similar with the stock OS unrooted
it does help.. even tho you see my battery between 81 and 79 lol... for me, the top 25% of battery life (from 100-75) goes by fast no matter what, but then it really holds good life afterwards.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
strung said:
I don't even think the OCwidget works. I mean it tries to set new values, and it thinks they succeed, but I think the new values are ignored by the kernel. For example, I tried to set min and max to 250 mHz and it still shot up to 1 GHz.
My apologies for being a debbie downer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is we are all in the "i think" stage, so its pure speculation. Maybe the oc widget developer could help us out here.
I Do think the op should put a ? In the thread title to get more discussion on this, cuz there are some brilliant minds here at xda
Edit: I emailed the dev w this thread asking for his insite, hopefully he jumps in
Faith is a powerful force
if overclock widget really controlled the clock
1) Linpack scores would reflect that
2) mHz readings would reflect that
But... they don't
strung said:
The system already dynamically clocks the CPU
Don't believe? Install OSMonitor and look at the "Misc" tab
Notice the "ondemand" governor scaling the processor from 245000 - 998400 hZ
Leads me to believe CPU governing is already in the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds like you have a problem if your Evo is only running from 245 kHz to 998 kHz.
Minjin said:
Sounds like you have a problem if your Evo is only running from 245 kHz to 998 kHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you figure a problem? 998mhz is max.. u just poking fun at "hz"? lol
So with OSMonitor, do you see any current values besides 245 and 998?
here's mine with OC Widget and some of my defined frequencies... If it truly fluctuates to differents clocks like mine on the stock OS with NO root (please show screenies), i will resign as the OC Widget evo underclock believer until an overclock kernel is released and camera works .
I'm on stock OS with root
It indeed goes to all the freq's
sorry too lazy to screenshot
EDIT: oh and I uninstalled OC widget!
strung said:
I'm on stock OS with root
It indeed goes to all the freq's
sorry too lazy to screenshot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and no oc widget? thought i was headed somewhere lol
itsallsubliminal said:
How do you figure a problem? 998mhz is max.. u just poking fun at "hz"? lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would be 998 millihertz which would be even slower.
I may seem like I'm being pedantic and I wouldn't even mention it if this forum was for arguing about American Idol winners but this forum is by definition populated by geeks and otherwise smart individuals.
Regardless of what the app displays, the phone is operating at 245MHz to 998MHz. The capitalization of the H is official but I'm not that anal. Capitalizing the M means mega (1000000). Lower case means milli (1/1000).
Minjin said:
That would be 998 millihertz which would be even slower.
I may seem like I'm being pedantic and I wouldn't even mention it if this forum was for arguing about American Idol winners but this forum is by definition populated by geeks and otherwise smart individuals.
Regardless of what the app displays, the phone is operating at 245MHz to 998MHz. The capitalization of the H is official but I'm not that anal. Capitalizing the M means mega (1000000). Lower case means milli (1/1000).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ROFL!
email from OC Widget dev
here is what the dev (Billy Cui) wrote back to me about OC Widget and the Evo...
"Yes, most system support dynamically clocking, but you will still
benefit on using OCW, especially for save battery. And some system do
not running cpu full speed, and with OCW, you can force it run faster."
Makes sense, like i said about the update interval being adjusted with OCWidget.
comments?
Just flashed enoms g2 rom and I cleared up what I can, tried making it efficient.I ran some benchmark tests on quadrant standard and was kinda disappointed in the numbers. My bests score was low 1100 after that it was 850,900, 835... very basic stuff any suggestions???
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
If you ran the benchmark on battery power, try plugging the phone in. Sometimes the CPU will underclock itself to save power. If that doesn't work, download SetCPU (google it) and make sure that the max speed is set above 800 MHz.
On the stock G2 ROM I was getting 1600-1800... maybe it's the ROM your using
omarsalmin said:
On the stock G2 ROM I was getting 1600-1800... maybe it's the ROM your using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah this is the typical range for a stock G2.
Those scores in the OP are so low, its almost like hes underclocking or something. Or possibly a running application using a ton of resources?
i got 2064. but i was running virtuous.
im running enom's rom and i had it underclocked at 768 and i was still able to get 1609
Stargazer418 said:
If you ran the benchmark on battery power, try plugging the phone in. Sometimes the CPU will underclock itself to save power. If that doesn't work, download SetCPU (google it) and make sure that the max speed is set above 800 MHz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm... No... The CPU doesn't underclock to save power...
gravis86 said:
Umm... No... The CPU doesn't underclock to save power...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps the kernel has an undervolting profile built in and it's triggered by a < battery percentage?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
What should I have my phone clocked at with enoms rom?? I dnt have much running at all I dnt understand why its so slow, I was gunna flash the latest kernal and try that... clock settings please anyone
Edit: jus tweaked my clock on spareparts. I switched cpu governor from ondemand to performance and the clock setting. I put underclock at the lowest and overclock at the max highest... benchmark test put up a 2200... I feel as if this will drain battery like crazy only time will tell... what do u think, should I drop the overclock? Is it safe at that high number???
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
If I run with Flippy's kernel, CM 6.1.1 Stable and OC my phone to 1.8 GHz, I can get a Quadrant score of 3037 (screenshot below). With it OC'd to 1.4 GHz (my normal OC setting) I can get around 2500.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
If I'm averging 2500 I'm fine wit that my current settings are Enoms Rom
Using enoms cpu controls
Cpu governor: performance
Max frequency: 1,516,800
Min frequency 245,760
I dropped 3 percent in battery writing this message.... my main concern is battery and overworking the cpu.... I'm thinking about downloading set cpu and clocking the performance settings then set it for power save after a certain drop point........ does this sound logical?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
When you set your cpu to performance it means your cpu will stay at max all the time and it never goes down which is why you are getting bad battery life.
There is no need for that.
Yes you can do that with setcpu
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Maybe you tested your Samsung Galaxy s by mistake?..lol..just joking.
I score around 2500 on quadrant:
OC'd to 1.4 (normally run 1.2)
SetCpu On Demand
CyanogenMod 6.1
fablife said:
Maybe you tested your Samsung Galaxy s by mistake?..lol..just joking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey! Not funny! My vibrant gets 2035 in the quadrant! But I'm going to get myself a g2 because I miss the hardware keyboard
Got me 2813 with Virtous 0.9 <---- (sense rom btw) and eVil's latest Glacier based kernel @ 1.5ghz... life is good
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Hey guys I was just wondering what's your best Quadrant score you've had on your HD2? I got what I think is a fairly high quadrant score today and I was fairly impressed.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
i think 2300 or 2700 somewhere in between
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
You beat my score!
johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not totally irrelevant, but sometimes close to it. Quadrant standard is useless, pro is a little better.
The problem with Quadrant is:
1) Disk IO test, if you try some of the builds with very high score you'll see it's coming from IO, you can just mount that one part that Quadrant use in RAM, get crazy high score, but that won't speed up any other apps/system as you still use your NAND/SD card
2) Video speed, as on early Darkstone builds video score was very low as that build had something turned off (because with it's ON there were other bugs), but all apps were using some other API for video, so only Quadrant was slow on it
3) Quadrant tests doesn't show real system performance, so higher score might have no increase in speed in other apps. For example you can put newest CPU on your PC, but having only 256mb RAM would make everything slow, no matter how fast your CPU is, but CPU score would be higher
This doesn't mean that Quadrant is bad, in my opinion if you're using pro version and you get some component score (for example CPU score) higher on one build then on other - that's good. If you get total score higher, build might be actually slower then other build with low score.
this is the old 1.32... at 1200mhz cedes sd build.
with the new 1.72... dhd base i get max 5000 cpu points and approx 5000 I/O points with data on ext4 partition. that makes 2400 overall quadrant points. at 998 mhz. but if i put all data to nand the I/O points are 1250, but the device feels faster and boots faster. for now i only put app folder on the ext4 partition, dalvik and data remain on internal memory. i am still testing whats the best combo, it takes lot of time
johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your right there.
I don't use Quadrant much but i got over 3000 before (using Darkstones SUPERAM)
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Skellyyy said:
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
SuperNAND got about 4000.
Proof:
Someone beat this . Quadrant scores are garbage, it proves nothing.
jonny68 said:
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm on my phone right now I can't get the link but its the DHD build by Andrew something. Should be on the first page in the NAND forum.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
theendfear said:
I'm curious to know if anyone has incredible results
I use quadrant and cf- bench, for now I have a quadrant screenshot, this is also my average score:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
I use last Mysam rom with abysskernel 2.5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At what cpu speed, 1600-1664-1704?
Use Antutu or CF-Bench...Quadrant is a random number generator.
Mine is fully stock and antutu gives something around 6200, what about others?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
this is my score with cf-bench:
Uploaded at Picoodle.com
always with abyssnote kernel 2.5 and mysam rom at 1.66ghz
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
@vessk0 wow!! at antutu test 7528 its exellent! I tried now, and don't go up 6900.. I think Its time to change rom =)
Are the 3D benchmarks limited to ±58fps (the refresh rate of the screen)? Is there any v-sync off setting that could unleash the power and give better results?
Yup, as far as i know it's limited to 60 fps. (Correct me if i'm wrong)
vessk0 said:
CPU at 1.7GHz @ Rocket ROM v11
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do I saw something wrong?
RAM: 1205
how you do that? can you teach me?
Even better with v12, second in world N7000 chart
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Hi vessk0, I have the same rom now, but the score is too low
what's your configuration? I tried with 1.7ghz, aggressive task killer in sistem tuner app, 2048mb cache on sd and noop setted in I/O scheduler section.. the score is around 6900-7000 points
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
vessk0 said:
For benchmark I use 1.7GHz @ Performance governer, but internal SD card in settings of Antutu. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
k-12 said:
every time I use 1.7GHz and performance gov. my phone allways freezes.
I tried some different roms and kernels but same result
any advice?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check your voltages, try to reduce it to 1325-1350 for 1.7 (default is 1450). That'll help it run cooler, and make it less likely to lock up.
But that said, you may just have an Exynos chip that is not happy at that speed, there is no guarantee that they can all do 1.7.
Rocket ROM V12/Abyss 2.6 @1.7GHz Performance Governor:
Quadrant
Linpack
Antutu
CF-Bench
SunSpider
BrowserMark
Vellamo
And here's a fairly recent benchmark of the Droid Razr with some other phones...you can use this as rough basis of comparison.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5198/motorola-droid-razr-review-a-better-clad-bionic/8
TL;DR: The Note really kicks ass when you crank up the clocks!
@croak I have tested your same combination rom/kernel and for now seems the best! with performance gov and cpu set to 1.7ghz the score is very higher in all tests
our note is one of the most promising device, estimating that the development is just at the beginning point
What's going to be amazing is how fast the upcoming A15-based Exynos will be. Clock for clock, it's supposed to be 20% faster than A9 cores. And they will be shipping at 2Ghz!
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Croak said:
I expect that the A15 Exynos dual-core will outperform a quad-core Tegra 3 and use a lot less power doing it. And it'll be cheaper to make.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One of the 3 can not be right. If it outperform a quadcore hardly will be needing less power. If it needs less power hardly will outperform quadcores and at end if both are true then no way to be cheaper!!!!
From quadlogic!!!
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Okay, so i was browsing through the results of the Antutu benchmarking application, and I saw this guy, he had a CPU freq of 844 freq. Is that even possible? Just wondering
for reference, hes number is 887243
It is possible, within 5 or 10 minutes. As soon as the run game, the phone goes to restart (((
PokMahPok said:
Okay, so i was browsing through the results of the Antutu benchmarking application, and I saw this guy, he had a CPU freq of 844 freq. Is that even possible? Just wondering
for reference, hes number is 887243
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overclocking the phone to even 787Mhz makes it quite unstable. That's why clock speeds above 806Mhz are not included in most kernels...but even if you do somehow overclock to 844Mhz I don't think the phone would survive for more than 15- 30 mins not to mention lots of heating up. In short-such speeds are not feasible for daily usage
Sent from my LG P500 using XDA Premium
Press thanks button if I helped you in any way
otrazhenye said:
It is possible, within 5 or 10 minutes. As soon as the run game, the phone goes to restart (((
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
> true.. 748 will be much stable.. mine can run 806.. but sometimes it reboot.. it can also handles 787.. except! when u play fruit ninja it crashes
PokMahPok said:
Okay, so i was browsing through the results of the Antutu benchmarking application, and I saw this guy, he had a CPU freq of 844 freq. Is that even possible? Just wondering
for reference, hes number is 887243
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've overclocked upto 864(Franco's old kernels 19.4)etc they're outdated now! but just as others said my phone used to crash up in 10Mins or slow with misplaced screen!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
PokMahPok said:
Okay, so i was browsing through the results of the Antutu benchmarking application, and I saw this guy, he had a CPU freq of 844 freq. Is that even possible? Just wondering
for reference, hes number is 887243
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you meant this guy?
sealtongue said:
Here im sharing to all LG P500 lovers my score when i once using Noejin's ROM
void #forever tested 2011 july 19. Wonderful work to the 3 equally unselfish modders having shared their work to us.
Now im testing DynamiteRom and trying to squeeze as much tweaks I can get from XDA, hopefully I be as successful as void #forever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
viv_jen said:
you meant this guy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
> if that what he was pointing out.. clearly the answer is there in the quoted sentences.
787
morph7777777 said:
Overclocking the phone to even 787Mhz makes it quite unstable. That's why clock speeds above 806Mhz are not included in most kernels...but even if you do somehow overclock to 844Mhz I don't think the phone would survive for more than 15- 30 mins not to mention lots of heating up. In short-such speeds are not feasible for daily usage
Sent from my LG P500 using XDA Premium
Press thanks button if I helped you in any way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol my phone is stable at 787 and sometimes even 806 and it works AWESOME
opera38205 said:
lol my phone is stable at 787 and sometimes even 806 and it works AWESOME
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On which ROM, may I ask? And is it stable while playing ANY game?
Sent from my LG P500 using XDA Premium
Press thanks button if I helped you in any way
If he's really hardcore, maybe he opened it up and used a fan or something.
Like the other ones written bevor me. Overclocking the O1 above 786 Mhz are like Gambling. Every CPU are a litle bit Unique, so nobody knows what kind of Frequency youre once are able to handle.
For Exemple iam running myone stable @ 320/787. But every Step Higher will be results in FCs and Reboots.
So the only way to go is to OC youre Phone step by step to find out what kind of Frequency youre CPU can handle
I once accidentally left my phone on 787mhz performance after benchmarking, and after a few days my phone crashed and would not boot into android, scared the **** out of me, but after about 10 mins it was fine, i quickly found out why this happened after. Overclocking your phone to 787mhz adds a lot of extra heat to your phone, and unless you live in a freezer or Antarctica and never keep your phone in your pockets I would not recommend over-clocking it that high.
If your new to the whole overclocking things, youtube extreme overclockers and you will realise would needs to be done to cpus to overcome the excessive heat.
deniso177 said:
I once accidentally left my phone on 787mhz performance after benchmarking, and after a few days my phone crashed and would not boot into android, scared the **** out of me, but after about 10 mins it was fine, i quickly found out why this happened after. Overclocking your phone to 787mhz adds a lot of extra heat to your phone, and unless you live in a freezer or Antarctica and never keep your phone in your pockets I would not recommend over-clocking it that high.
If your new to the whole overclocking things, youtube extreme overclockers and you will realise would needs to be done to cpus to overcome the excessive heat.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OTh lol i seen one of the videos, they overclock one pc so much they use liquid nitrogen to cool the pc itself.
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
When I go beyond 800 system crashes and Phone restarts
In theory our CPU could be OC to max 878 MHz. But i never heard anyone get that freq.
voyager20021 said:
In theory our CPU could be OC to max 878 MHz. But i never heard anyone get that freq.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it is possible. but the phone will heat up like mad.
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Mine runs stable at 806 in almost all ROMS i tried (except the ICS ones because it dosent have that frequency )
Yesterday I have overlooking to 806 and i have a black screen with message : arm6 crashed ...
Please reboot ...etc
tombost said:
Yesterday I have overlooking to 806 and i have a black screen with message : arm6 crashed ...
Please reboot ...etc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not all p500 are stable at 806mhz fyi.
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
overclock
morph7777777 said:
On which ROM, may I ask? And is it stable while playing ANY game?
Sent from my LG P500 using XDA Premium
Press thanks button if I helped you in any way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sometimes i go into the freezer (i have a really really big one) and OC my phone to 864 i get AMAZING benchmarks with gtr
usually my stable speed is 787 on new cm7 roms and 806 on mik's cm7 rom