Excellent News Gentlemen - Verizon Motorola Droid Turbo General

About an hour ago.
DATE/TIME: 2016-10-01 16:41:30
Chat Transcript
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE - All replies are automatically deleted.
LOGAN : Thank you for contacting the Verizon Wireless Chat Team regarding your device. How can we help you today?
You : when is the Droid turbo to receive the marshmallow update?
You : i noticed this https://motorola-global-portal.cust...prod_answer_detail/a_id/102367/p/30,6720,9277
LOGAN : Hi there! I know how important it is to know if you device will be receiving a software update! Let me take a look and I will see If I can find a release date for Marshmallow on the Droid Turbo!
You : thank you
LOGAN : No problem!
LOGAN : I just want to check in on you and let you know I am still researching this for you!
You : ok
LOGAN : Thank you very much!
LOGAN : Ok I was looking over my resources and I see that Motorola is still in the process of testing the Marshmallow update for this device, to ensure it does not cause network or device issues. Once that testing has been completed however they will release the update for this device!
You : ok thanks alot
Sure Verizon is still blame shifting but support says it IS coming.

Verizon has had the Motorola Marshmallow image at least since July 01, 2016 (maybe even earlier!) when Marshmallow started rolling out for other Quarks (XT1225) AND we saw the Wi-Fi certification for 6.0.1 running on Droid Turbo XT1254.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Today is October 1, 2016.
Doesn't take 3 months to test that when all the other Quarks are running fine with the same image. In fact, some XT1254 are running the Brazil XT1225 Marshmallow image with a custom kernel!
So, what's Verizon's hold-up? Uh, they want to sell NEW phones first. Like the silly Moto Z series....

Uhhhggg. This isn't excellent news at all. Just old news. I don't even care about marshmallow anymore. I just want the suspense to end at this point.
---------- Post added at 11:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:56 PM ----------
ChazzMatt said:
So, what's Verizon's hold-up? Uh, they want to sell NEW phones first. Like the silly Moto Z series....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know about that. 90% of the time, when I try to talk to someone about android and mention any of the OS names, they respond with something like "what? Dessert? You have a marshmallow on your phone? I don't understand." If having the latest OS was really that big of a deal, it would get hyped up more. The only advertisement that I've seen for any recent phone that even mentioned the OS version was for the LG V20. So I don't think Verizon plans on losing any sales because someone thinks "oh wait, that phone from 2014 just got upgraded to not even the latest version of android? Forget that S7 or Z Force Droid or whatever, I'm getting me an OG Turbo."

TheSt33v said:
I don't know about that. 90% of the time, when I try to talk to someone about android and mention any of the OS names, they respond with something like "what? Dessert? You have a marshmallow on your phone? I don't understand." If having the latest OS was really that big of a deal, it would get hyped up more. The only advertisement that I've seen for any recent phone that even mentioned the OS version was for the LG V20. So I don't think Verizon plans on losing any sales because someone thinks "oh wait, that phone from 2014 just got upgraded to not even the latest version of android? Forget that S7 or Z Force Droid or whatever, I'm getting me an OG Turbo."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Verizon Droid Turbo XT1254 (and all Quark) in late 2014 was a spec hound's dream. Verizon made a huge emphasis about the battery, the RAM, the 1440p AMOLED display, Qi wireless, etc. Verizon loved it so much they lied blatantly it was a "worldwide exclusive".
A LOT of people bought the Droid Turbo believing that hype, even people who were not Verizon subscribers. (when in reality one of the other Quarks would have been better for those non-Verizon people.)
Even after we proved the XT1225 was the non-CDMA equivalent (with different FCC ID), there was a 4-page heated argument while the Verizon fanbois refused to admit the XT1250 was IDENTICAL. They didn't want to believe it. They were willing to believe that if Verizon didn't have the "world wide" exclusive, they wanted to believe it was "U.S exclusive". Uh, no -- at least dozen other U.S. carriers sold this exact same device.
My point is this... Droid Turbo owners bought this phone because they were sold on the specs (true), the exclusivity to make them feel special (false), and fast Motorola updates (true at the time, but then increasingly false).
Off the top of your head, what phones out there right now would adequately replace your Droid Turbo XT1254?
The only two easy ones I can think of would be perhaps the 2015 LG G4 (if you bought a European LG Qi wireless back cover) or the 2016 Samsung Galaxy Edge. But neither has all the Moto functions like Moto Display...
OR the 2016 Moto Z Force Droid with the mod extended battery pack with Qi wireless functionality. DING. DING. DING.
That latter one is the only option that also has Moto Display, which Motorola fans love.
And it has Marshmallow.
It's also "exclusive" -- the magic word.
So, for the die hard Droid Turbo fans who love specs and are techies, you would have to pay not only for a new phone but also buy an EXPENSIVE mod to match or beat what you have right now. And if the Droid Turbo also had Marshmallow, it would be even less a winning proposition.
But since the Droid Turbo doesn't have stock Marshmallow (with VoLTE), for techies/nerds, if you want the latest, actually want an "exclusive", then the Moto Z Force looks better for Verizon customers.
It's not unheard of for a company to make one of their products look worse, to make a more expensive one look better -- if it makes them money. Giving the Droid Turbo Marshmallow won't make them any money. NOT giving the Droid Turbo Marshmallow might help them sell new phones to Droid Turbo owners, especially the Moto Z Force.
May sound like a conspiracy theory, but this is the kind of stuff executives talk amongst themselves. They always have a "strategy" whether it's based on reality or not.

ChazzMatt said:
The Verizon Droid Turbo XT1254 (and all Quark) in late 2014 was a spec hound's dream. Verizon made a huge emphasis about the battery, the RAM, the 1440p AMOLED display, Qi wireless, etc. Verizon loved it so much they lied blatantly it was a "worldwide exclusive".
A LOT of people bought the Droid Turbo believing that hype, even people who were not Verizon subscribers. (when in reality one of the other Quarks would have been better for those non-Verizon people.)
Even after we proved the XT1225 was the non-CDMA equivalent (with different FCC ID), there was a 4-page heated argument while the Verizon fanbois refused to admit the XT1250 was IDENTICAL. They didn't want to believe it. They were willing to believe that if Verizon didn't have the "world wide" exclusive, they wanted to believe it was "U.S exclusive". Uh, no -- at least dozen other U.S. carriers sold this exact same device.
My point is this... Droid Turbo owners bought this phone because they were sold on the specs (true), the exclusivity to make them feel special (false), and fast Motorola updates (true at the time, but then increasingly false).
Off the top of your head, what phones out there right now would adequately replace your Droid Turbo XT1254?
The only two easy ones I can think of would be perhaps the 2015 LG G4 (if you bought a European LG Qi wireless back cover) or the 2016 Samsung Galaxy Edge. But neither has all the Moto functions like Moto Display...
OR the 2016 Moto Z Force Droid with the mod extended battery pack with Qi wireless functionality. DING. DING. DING.
That latter one is the only option that also has Moto Display, which Motorola fans love.
And it has Marshmallow.
It's also "exclusive" -- the magic word.
So, for the die hard Droid Turbo fans who love specs and are techies, you would have to pay not only for a new phone but also buy an EXPENSIVE mod to match or beat what you have right now. And if the Droid Turbo also had Marshmallow, it would be even less a winning proposition.
But since the Droid Turbo doesn't have stock Marshmallow (with VoLTE), for techies/nerds, if you want the latest, actually want an "exclusive", then the Moto Z Force looks better for Verizon customers.
It's not unheard of for a company to make one of their products look worse, to make a more expensive one look better -- if it makes them money. Giving the Droid Turbo Marshmallow won't make them any money. NOT giving the Droid Turbo Marshmallow might help them sell new phones to Droid Turbo owners, especially the Moto Z Force.
May sound like a conspiracy theory, but this is the kind of stuff executives talk amongst themselves. They always have a "strategy" whether it's based on reality or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your explanation would make sense if the average customer cared about specs, but I don't think they do. If the average customer was nerds like us, we'd have unlocked bootloaders on all carriers, stock toggleable root access and timely updates. The reason why we don't is because the carriers know that that's not the case.
The average customer, if I had to guess, cares about how pretty the screen looks, the size of the phone, how pretty the pictures/videos are, and how pretty/popular the phone itself is. That's it. That's why manufacturers started taking away SD card support and removable batteries, and why the Droid Turbo 2 was a hardware downgrade in many ways compared to the original. That's also why modularity became a thing. The manufacturers are desperate to find a way to invent a new feature that is so blatantly obvious that average Joe non techie will notice it.
To summarize, it doesn't make sense to withhold an update to increase sales for two reasons: 90% of your customers don't even know it's coming/dread updates because they don't like learning new things, and the update isn't even to the latest Android version, so even if it was pushed, you still aren't giving the nerds what they want, and therefore they would still need to buy a new phone to get what they want.

Actually the "main" reason for non removable batteries is so you are always able to be triangulated.
You don't want to get into "conspiracies" with moi
Tesla laughs at" Qi" charging
.

Of course, with all this testing, you know the update will be flawless and perfect. I can't wait!
All you modders and rommers are just destroying the network, didn't you know?
/s

Yeah unfortunately it is known it's coming, but when I don't know. Either way, and not to hi-jack the thread here but I'm riding out my turbo as long as the hardware lasts. In the next month or two I will be ordering myself a replacement battery because I have noticed mine is starting to fade, or seems like it at least. I have installed some new apps lately so maybe it's that. I don't know. But, I will replace the battery, it's easy, and keep riding the this phone out. This is the first phone I'm actually not in a hurry to upgrade, maybe because I'm also getting older and have more bills to pay so I just can't afford the latest and greatest anymore. But i still very much enjoy this phone and it doesn't ever seem slow to me and it still is, to this day, a pretty damn good phone in terms of specs. I feel that every phone from this point on, I will drag it along until it dies or becomes so outdated it can barely use the current apps anymore. This phone definitely has another 1-3 years in it.
Sorry, went off on a crazy tangent there.

install Naptime, watch your battery life skyrocket (needs root)

Let me fix that for you.
solidus636 said:
install Naptime, watch your battery life skyrocket (needs MARSHMALLOW)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

BlueForce64 said:
Yeah unfortunately it is known it's coming, but when I don't know. Either way, and not to hi-jack the thread here but I'm riding out my turbo as long as the hardware lasts. In the next month or two I will be ordering myself a replacement battery because I have noticed mine is starting to fade, or seems like it at least. I have installed some new apps lately so maybe it's that. I don't know. But, I will replace the battery, it's easy, and keep riding the this phone out. This is the first phone I'm actually not in a hurry to upgrade, maybe because I'm also getting older and have more bills to pay so I just can't afford the latest and greatest anymore. But i still very much enjoy this phone and it doesn't ever seem slow to me and it still is, to this day, a pretty damn good phone in terms of specs. I feel that every phone from this point on, I will drag it along until it dies or becomes so outdated it can barely use the current apps anymore. This phone definitely has another 1-3 years in it.
Sorry, went off on a crazy tangent there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm with you friend, as long as I can make "my own updates" work, I'll be using my Turbo (Quark) until it's absolutely dead and/or obsolete! I gave up on VZW upgrades a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...

Yeah definitely!

May sound like a conspiracy theory, but this is the kind of stuff executives talk amongst themselves. They always have a "strategy" whether it's based on reality or not.[/QUOTE]
You sir are correct. Def doesnt sound like a conspiracy theory.

just updated ...

3Dota said:
just updated ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
probably for LTE advanced update.

So since the Verizon Pixel bootloader was just unlocked by the coolest ninjas I know, there is now a 99.9% chance I'm buying it. Once the unlock method is released, that will become 100%. I'm done waiting an absurd amount of time for 1 or 2 official updates, and the 3rd party solutions just aren't doing it for me. I'll be sacrificing my QHD screen (sniff), but I think it's worth it to get regular updates straight from Google. I'll still be floating around this forum to help people and provide the 100% stock rom of the new update when it comes out though.
This probably isn't related to the original topic of this thread, but neither are the last few posts.

TheSt33v said:
So since the Verizon Pixel bootloader was just unlocked by the coolest ninjas I know, there is now a 99.9% chance I'm buying it. Once the unlock method is released, that will become 100%. I'm done waiting an absurd amount of time for 1 or 2 official updates, and the 3rd party solutions just aren't doing it for me. I'll be sacrificing my QHD screen (sniff), but I think it's worth it to get regular updates straight from Google. I'll still be floating around this forum to help people and provide the 100% stock rom of the new update when it comes out though.
This probably isn't related to the original topic of this thread, but neither are the last few posts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be wary.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=69325024&postcount=520

ChazzMatt said:
Be wary.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=69325024&postcount=520
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm. Very interesting. It's something to consider, but I doubt it will change my mind. The fact that HTC had a heavy hand in development doesn't bother me. HTC makes great phones, and I've always wanted to own one. I've been haunting the Pixel forums, and everyone seems to love it so far.

TheSt33v said:
Hmm. Very interesting. It's something to consider, but I doubt it will change my mind. The fact that HTC had a heavy hand in development doesn't bother me. HTC makes great phones, and I've always wanted to own one. I've been haunting the Pixel forums, and everyone seems to love it so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
one of the aspects that would keep me away from the Pixel is the smaller battery (2700 on the 5.0, but 3450 on the 5.5). given that the Quark has 3900, anything less will be a downgrade. also, the Quark is already too big, so I certainly do not want anything larger.
I know this is old news, but for those wanting Nougat, there is an Xposed module that gives you all of the functionality of Nougat called AndroidN-ify:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/modules/xposed-android-n-ify-features-t3345091

jco23 said:
one of the aspects that would keep me away from the Pixel is the smaller battery (2700 on the 5.0, but 3450 on the 5.5). given that the Quark has 3900, anything less will be a downgrade. also, the Quark is already too big, so I certainly do not want anything larger.
I know this is old news, but for those wanting Nougat, there is an Xposed module that gives you all of the functionality of Nougat called AndroidN-ify:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/xposed/modules/xposed-android-n-ify-features-t3345091
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's true that the battery is smaller, but since the screen is only FHD on the small one, it doesn't drain as much power. Also, the 821 is more energy efficient than the 805. And yes, I'm using N-ify right now, but all it does is change the settings menu and the notifications. It certainly doesn't give you all the functionality nougat.
I actually think the turbo is the perfect size. The little pixel is the same size as my old S4, and I don't mind that. Uhhggg. Maybe I do need to think more about this. I just hate not having regular software updates. I hate the fact that we're all waiting over a year for a version of Android that is already obsolete, and that this is the last one we will ever get, if we get it. If CM could just provide me the same signal reception as I get on stock, I'd just stay on RR and not worry about it, but I don't think it ever will. The maintainers of our CM builds don't use CDMA, so I don't think they'd be able to test any improvements even if they wanted to make them.

Related

Droid X has a locked bootloader or "how motorola killed the Droid X for me"

i was really looking forward on getting myself a droid/milestone X/2 when it's available in europe. but i just read that the droidX (and maybe all upcoming motorola devices according to http://community.developer.motorola...OMs-and-Motorola-s-Android-Handsets/ba-p/4224) will have a completely locked bootloader as the original milestone had. it's as of today not possible to flash a custom rom on a >7 month old milestone, how weak is that?!
although i like the hardware of the moto-devices and really wanted one, this is definitly a no-go for me and defeats the purpose of android as a open(source)/linux os! i'm done with motorola, just ordered a galaxy s which is completely open!
i don't believe that motorola cares if 10.000 geeky people won't buy theire device because it's locked but it would nevertheless be good to show them that we care!
i'm curious what others think about that!
I think it's horse**** that they are locking it
I mean what's it to them if we can flash our phones??
Maybe they don't want their rom software to be leaked out? besides that I see no other reason for this
sp1kez said:
I think it's horse**** that they are locking it
I mean what's it to them if we can flash our phones??
Maybe they don't want their rom software to be leaked out? besides that I see no other reason for this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's my point. if i buy a piece of hardware, i should own it completely and do with it what i want! also one would think that motorola would (or at least could) appreciate a bunch of developers modding and patching their devices to make them more appealing to the community. i just installed cm6 (froyo) on my htc magic. it works better than ever, how cool is that! would not be possible with a locked bootloader...
example milestone: although no custom rom's can be booted (the bootloader boots only moto-signed kernels) the device can be rooted and so it should be no problem to get a rom-dump. so that can't be the reason...
I was ready to pull the trigger on the Droid X until I heard this. I hate it. You are right, we buy the phone we should own the phone. I still might buy this phone, a vote of confidence to the devs.
I want the large screen. There's nothing out there with as large a screen. The evo, but I've already been burned by that. Maybe if they swap the screen for a better one.
I'm just as angry at Motorola, but I'm still going to purchase a Droid X. It has everything I'm looking for in a phone hardware-wise, and I can't wait any longer to dump the dumbphone I've been using for years. I'm a huge fan of tweaking every piece of technology I have (e.g. hackintosh netbook just for kicks), but I'm going to stick it out with a one-year contract on the Droid X until a better phone comes along.
I've taken a look at the Galaxy S/Fascinate, but it looks far too much like an iPhone to appeal to me, rootable as it may be. Samsung's post-release support is also less than stellar. As closed as Motorola may be by using this bootloader, they are still providing 2.2 to the original Droid this summer, which is more than can be said of a /lot/ of manufacturers.
Yea I had it preordered and everything til I figured out they locked it down, guess they are okay with losing sales by turning unto an apple type company stupid
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
Mikerrrrrrrr said:
...
I've taken a look at the Galaxy S/Fascinate, but it looks far too much like an iPhone to appeal to me, rootable as it may be. Samsung's post-release support is also less than stellar. As closed as Motorola may be by using this bootloader, they are still providing 2.2 to the original Droid this summer, which is more than can be said of a /lot/ of manufacturers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree. i don't like the iphony-look of the galaxy-s either and i feel like the droid X casing is much more stable. also the omap seemed more appealing to me than samsungs hummingbird. and so on ...
while i think it's a good thing that motorola supports their older devices with updates (at least they do with the droid) my point is/was that a open device enables the community to push the software further ahead. for instance: atm. i still have a htc magic. i just installed cm6 running froyo about a week ago. my device is running better and faster than ever. this would not be possible with a locked bootloader. i would be at the mercy of htc to supply me with an update "sometime in the future", quite frustrating ...
i just don't understand their reasons for this! if it's all just about warranty they could implement a "root and unlock" feature in the settings which would void your warranty e.g. by sending a request to a moto-server or something similar.
maybe it has something to do with drm-stuff as i also wondered that one can only use the (awesome) hdmi-out for self-made media ... kills >50% of the potential of the hdmi-out in my opinion.
jodue said:
i agree. i don't like the iphony-look of the galaxy-s either and i feel like the droid X casing is much more stable. also the omap seemed more appealing to me than samsungs hummingbird. and so on ...
while i think it's a good thing that motorola supports their older devices with updates (at least they do with the droid) my point is/was that a open device enables the community to push the software further ahead. for instance: atm. i still have a htc magic. i just installed cm6 running froyo about a week ago. my device is running better and faster than ever. this would not be possible with a locked bootloader. i would be at the mercy of htc to supply me with an update "sometime in the future", quite frustrating ...
i just don't understand their reasons for this! if it's all just about warranty they could implement a "root and unlock" feature in the settings which would void your warranty ...
maybe it has something to do with drm-stuff as i also wondered that one can only use the (awesome) hdmi-out for self-made media ... kills >50% of the potential of the hdmi-out in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, but as it stands, I'm still going to get the phone and hoping out hope for root, although this link (http://www.mydroidworld.com/forums/...-locked-down-let-me-tell-you-what-i-know.html) has me worried about that too.
Mikerrrrrrrr said:
I agree, but as it stands, I'm still going to get the phone and hoping out hope for root, although this link (http://www.mydroidworld.com/forums/...-locked-down-let-me-tell-you-what-i-know.html) has me worried about that too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope the best for you mate. maybe it's not that bad and in 2 weeks we are laughing about motorola because some 14 years old hacker has already torn the bootloader apart
I am officially passing on the x droid2 and whatever else Motorola decides to release sorry but I would rather have an open galaxy s than a locked down droidx. IPhone like ui can be changed with a launcher. But their isn't much hope for a double locked bootloader
whoops... has root
Am I wrong to say that the Milestone is still stuck at the OS ver. that it was sold with? And if so, I hear that 2.2 is coming to the X by the end of the summer. I'm sure and exploit can be found in the update process, or hope so.
I'm going to switch to this, simply because I believe that the devs WILL find a way to get around this problem. This is XDA we're talking about, along with a bunch of other communities dedicated to this stuff. Someone will find a way to pull it off, it's just a matter of time. But I plan on having this phone for at least a year, so I have the patience for it.
jodue said:
while i think it's a good thing that motorola supports their older devices with updates (at least they do with the droid) my point is/was that a open device enables the community to push the software further ahead. for instance: atm. i still have a htc magic. i just installed cm6 running froyo about a week ago. my device is running better and faster than ever. this would not be possible with a locked bootloader. i would be at the mercy of htc to supply me with an update "sometime in the future", quite frustrating ...
i just don't understand their reasons for this! if it's all just about warranty they could implement a "root and unlock" feature in the settings which would void your warranty e.g. by sending a request to a moto-server or something similar.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you explained 2 reasons for the lock down.
1 is warranty issues
2 is that motorolla can control the life of their product. if after 2 years they give updating the software then you'll be left in the dust and forced to upgrade if want new features.
it's like dlc for games. what used to be free by modding communities has now become a way to squeeze more money out of gamers.
I also agree with you on point 2. This phone is pretty powerful even for me. I consider myself a power user but dont really see how I need a faster phone that this.
This phone, If completely hacked, can have a very long lifespan.
this takes one moto dev
to be on the modder's side.
All this takes is one dev to mess with an official moto update, and this will be tossed due the massive amount of phones that are bricked.
total BS. Knowing Verizon, and why they were late jump on the android bandwagon(because they couldn't "control" an open source opertaing system), this probably came from Verizon pushing Moto to do this. Moto is so desperate to corner the market(unlike HTC) with Verizon, they said yes'maam. Sure no problem you are giving ungodly sums of money why cant we "scratch" your back.
bull****
Let's say that we DON'T unlock this phone.... Would anyone be surprised to see Motorola keep up to day within months of releases in the future???
I see people mentioning the reasoning for it being locked it to control the life of the device.... But seeing how powerful this is and how it is you could say Moto's Flagship model, wouldn't it be int their best interest to keep their customers happy????
Or does everything sell and do you really think they will fall behind on updates...??
Seriously if you really hate the device being locked this much work on an email. I will be shooting an email over to Motorola and Verizon Wireless Customer Support. I can post the email that I am sending on here if you guys want, when I finish typing it.
As for the device being locked it is extremely sad, but many hardware developers are starting to do this. The thinking is that the more they can control what the user does the better the end experience is. That is hardly the truth so just keep cracking the devices so that they get the message we want our own control on the device.
Other than that good luck to all the dev crews out there working to crack the device.
i second the email plan. if enough people fight for an open device, motorola will listen...
12yan said:
i second the email plan. if enough people fight for an open device, motorola will listen...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. Every single Droid and Droid X user could email Motorola and they wouldn't care unless it affected sales. The bottom line speaks the loudest. Hell, more than that, it's the ONLY line that speaks

I LOVE my Moto X. But...

It doesn't seem to be selling very well. Or have any ROM development (but that's a separate topic).
I mean it has some game changing features, but I don't think people really understood those unique features it offers. The Rogers employees at various stores didn't even have a clue about Touchless Controls so what selling point would they pitch to a client looking to get a new phone? It's got "less cores", "I would just go with the Galaxy S4". The ONLY Canadian carrier selling this phone is not even educating it's employees about new upcoming products, prior to release. It's sad, really. Is that why the only two OEM's doing well (Samsung, Apple) are the ones that bombard us with advertising?
I have not seen any advertising for Moto X at all.
I dunno it seems like the Moto X is the best phone that not many people bought. Seems like a complete marketing failure if anything.
I hope I'm wrong about this!
Discuss.
Does whether or not it sells well affect your usage of the device?
For me, it doesn't. I'm sure Google and Motorola are aware of the mountain they need to climb in order to build mindshare and attain high sales, and they probably don't expect it to happen immediately with this one device.
ultravisitor said:
Does whether or not it sells well affect your usage of the device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was never implied in any way, shape or form. What is the reasoning behind this question?
It's not really about the phone at all. It's about what I suspect was a poor marketing execution for a product that could have turned a lot more heads than it has. I mean, sure I don't have statistics, but I'm posting it as an open discussion to see if other people feel this way or if I'm just crazy...
Having went to school for advertising/marketing, it genuinely bothers me when GOOD products fail to sell well because of a failed marketing campaign. It happens a lot, but with Google backing Motorola up on this one, I expected a little more as far as the marketing side goes.
They may be waiting until Motomaker comes out for all carriers to hardcore advertise, they have a few ads out already, go to YouTube and search "Lazy Phone"
Sent from my Rooted AT&T Moto X!
Last I heard it was a "success" in Motorola's eyes.
It might be a success in the USA, but not in Canada. There's no marketing whatsoever going on. All the nice displays & merchandising seen in the US is nowhere to be found in Canada.
I agree with the OP - When I went to buy it outright at Future Shop, they looked at me and said "Why don't you buy a Samsung or Nexus? That phone isn't up to par."
Unfortunately, Motorola Canada continues to underwhelm... Saddening, really. This phone really is the best-kept secret on the market... in Canada.
Sent from my Moto X
Motorola is owned by Google, how well this excellent phone is selling is not an issue for me at all.
Now if it was an HTC phone, and a flop, I'd be worried.
As for the dev support, This is the first device I've ever owned that I didn't feel needed "fixing" with a custom ROM. We have Root, we have Xposed mods, I'm good.
The problem with today's consumers..
gunnyman said:
Motorola is owned by Google, how well this excellent phone is selling is not an issue for me at all.
Now if it was an HTC phone, and a flop, I'd be worried.
As for the dev support, This is the first device I've ever owned that I didn't feel needed "fixing" with a custom ROM. We have Root, we have Xposed mods, I'm good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was honestly hoping this would be a good device to learn about developing roms on. I have a bunch of things I want to do and no one to go ask for help ;_;
That's what the nexus phones are for
scorpion667 said:
It doesn't seem to be selling very well.
...
The ONLY Canadian carrier selling this phone is not even educating it's employees about new upcoming products, prior to release.
...
I have not seen any advertising for Moto X at all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In the United States, it has been sold out from Verizon Wireless retail stores within a 50-mile radius of me for weeks. So I think that it is selling fairly well.
You are correct that it hasn't been marketed very well. But that all comes down to marketing spend in two areas:
1) Advertisements. Other manufacturers (Samsung, Apple) have more prominently-placed advertisements. Even Motorola and Verizon Wireless tend to promote the Droid RAZR / Ultra / Maxx phones over the Moto X.
2) In-store placement. If you go into a retail store, you'll likely find other phones right at the entrance to the store. The Moto X is usually in the back.
mrbradeli said:
I was honestly hoping this would be a good device to learn about developing roms on. I have a bunch of things I want to do and no one to go ask for help ;_;
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you wanted to learn developing you should have gone with a more open device (Nexus 4).
Also, coming from a N4 myself, this is the first phone I don't want to root and mod. I would flash roms, kernels, and tinker with the N4 all the time. But this phone has the perfect blend of software.
The reason people normally flash roms is to get closer to AOSP, and this phone is pretty much pure android with some welcomed additions.
#TeamStockMotoX lol
scorpion667 said:
This was never implied in any way, shape or form. What is the reasoning behind this question?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was an honest question because some people might actually start to become unhappy with the Moto X if it doesn't sell well. I didn't know if that was the case with you or not--some might make that clear in their post, and some might not. Again, it was just a question. There really is no need to be so defensive.
KiNG OMaR said:
If you wanted to learn developing you should have gone with a more open device (Nexus 4).
Also, coming from a N4 myself, this is the first phone I don't want to root and mod. I would flash roms, kernels, and tinker with the N4 all the time. But this phone has the perfect blend of software.
The reason people normally flash roms is to get closer to AOSP, and this phone is pretty much pure android with some welcomed additions.
#TeamStockMotoX lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The extra storage in this phone won me over. Either way, I'm mainly interested in audio stuff. If possible I'd like to mod the phone to do something similar to Voodoo Sound's DAC direct and analog amp. Aside from that I'd like the ability to build AOSP from the source for this device, which I'm pretty sure is possible with the kernel source Motorola posted a while back.
I think advertising might be more aggressive here in the States than in Canada. The only commercials for the Moto X I've seen are the ones with TJ miller and I've only seen them online, not TV since I haven't been watching it recently.
I have seen a lot of national moto x spots during sporting events on television. especially ncaa and nfl football.
Ah okay I wasn't aware it was doing so well in the states. I guess my observation only holds true for Canada. It really is the best android phone to date IMHO. That's why I was thrown off when I saw it was getting zero recognition here in Canada lol. It's good to hear it's at least somewhat successful because they (Google and Moto) revolutionised how I interact with my phone. When major changes like Touchless Controls or Active Notifications are successful, perhaps it will inspire other manufacturers to dust off those R&D facilities and try something new once in a while.
ultravisitor said:
It was an honest question because some people might actually start to become unhappy with the Moto X if it doesn't sell well. I didn't know if that was the case with you or not--some might make that clear in their post, and some might not. Again, it was just a question. There really is no need to be so defensive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah okay I was just thrown off cause the point of me making this thread was BECAUSE I believe the Moto X is an amazing phone, why is it not getting recognized - kind of thing. Reading back, I could have worded it better to reflect that. Sorry.
Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk 2
I personally love my Moto X.
It's essentially a Nexus device with a couple extra goodies for increased functionality.
Sure the camera needs a little tweaking here n' there, but it's overall a wonderful phone.
This phone came at a perfect time for me. I don't want to flash roms every other day anymore. With my new son my priorities are elsewhere now.
Doesn't matter to me if it's not selling well, just means I'll get extra wow factor when showing it off because less people know about it. As long as motorola keeps supporting it, I'm a happy camper.
I snapped this pic real quick inside At&t retail while ordering my 32gig motomaker card. They are pushing it pretty hard.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4
scorpion667 said:
It doesn't seem to be selling very well. Or have any ROM development (but that's a separate topic).
I mean it has some game changing features, but I don't think people really understood those unique features it offers. The Rogers employees at various stores didn't even have a clue about Touchless Controls so what selling point would they pitch to a client looking to get a new phone? It's got "less cores", "I would just go with the Galaxy S4". The ONLY Canadian carrier selling this phone is not even educating it's employees about new upcoming products, prior to release. It's sad, really. Is that why the only two OEM's doing well (Samsung, Apple) are the ones that bombard us with advertising?
I have not seen any advertising for Moto X at all.
I dunno it seems like the Moto X is the best phone that not many people bought. Seems like a complete marketing failure if anything.
I hope I'm wrong about this!
Discuss.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are your sources for sales? Or is this just a personal observation? Google and moto seem to be pretty happy with its sales... ya, it's no iphone or Galaxy in terms of sales, but everything here in the states have been bouncing been in stock/out of stock.
Overall, I care little about how well a device sells as long as it continues to be supported by the manufacturer. I don't think they were aiming for a big swing in market share, but rather, proving a point about how the industry has become over obsessed with specs and to bring the mobile device manufacturing process back to the states. Discounting sales, which is definitely important, I think the moto x had been a great success for what it was made to achieve... And I think it will continue to prove more successful in the coming months. Just my personal observation.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

All Moto X Owners Please Read

Hello, i just wanted bring all of you together to read this thread. Ok so i know since you've been a Moto owner, you've heard or seen at least once insulting comment about your device or the Motorola company. For example, "Anything that Motorola makes sucks" "People only get them because they're cheap" "That phone is crappy". I know that those people are ignorant to other people's liking. I'm tired of hearing the same thing. A lot of people that own super expensive high end- flashy smartphones say things like that about devices like the Moto series. Well that really offends me, just because they might not be the most high-end smartphones or the most expensive smartphones doesn't mean they are worthless. We Moto owners take great pride in our device, we appreciate what we have and we value our smartphones.
If someone offered me a brand new Galaxy S6 and a brand new Moto X and said i could only pick one. I would pick the Moto X hands down without a doubt in my mind. Because I know, We know what matters in a smartphone. What is that? User experience and performance for the price. That's what a review comes down to at the end of the day. A company could make a super spec'd out smartphone but get the same review score as a phone a fraction of its cost. I know if i were to buy a $1000 smartphone it better be great in every aspect and i know if i bought a smartphone for half that price, i'm not expecting it to be perfect but i want to have a good performance. That's exactly what motorola does, it gives you a great performing phone for the price.
For example, the Moto G. It has a low price point but does everything you need it to do. If I want a super powerful gaming machine of a smartphone, I'm not going to buy the Moto G. Then give a bad review for not being able to do what i wanted it to. I'm gonna buy a smartphone with a powerful chipset. At the end of the day we Moto owners stand out. Other people don't seem to understand our taste in smartphones value. Im not saying if you own a super expensive phone you're a bad person or anything. I'm just saying you get what you pay for. All of you Moto owners, good job in picking a smartphone. It doesn't matter if you have a Moto E, a Moto G or a Moto X. We all are equal and unified. #Teammoto
Proof that price doesn't matter
So much wall of text. So many extra words...
TL;DR how bout a paragraph break?
I have a Moto X 2013 and I had recently acquired a Samsung Galaxy S4. The S4 ran hotter, slower, and had screen issues. I ended up selling it for less than it cost for me to buy and repair the Galaxy S4. Custom rom support for the samsung galaxy S4 was amazing. I really look forward to seeing how the Moto X 2013 handles with lollipop.
Mods. Please ask the OP to change the title. This was simply wrong.
I would really like sd card slot.
This thread is full of win.
the phone sucks and people posting threads like this are idiots.
andTab said:
the phone sucks and people posting threads like this are idiots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're just jealous you didn't have the idea to create a badass thread like this.
Attention: Mods
andTab said:
the phone sucks and people posting threads like this are idiots.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jizzylax said:
You're just jealous you didn't have the idea to create a badass thread like this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mods, please do everyone a favor and close this thread. While I truly appreciate someone trying to start something positive here about the Moto X, after the last couple of posts, I can see exactly where this thread is going and it's not a nice place. I'm all for people expressing their opinion but I think that it may be better for everyone that's on this forum to nip it in the bud. It's already starting to go downhill and this thread was started earlier today.
By the way, I do own a Moto X (2013) Developer Edition and think that it's a wonderful phone. The screen went black on the one that I owned all of a sudden a week and a half ago. I called Motorola and got a warranty replacement within one week. Thank goodness I had a Samsung Galaxy S3 that I could use as a backup but when I got my Moto X back, I realized the exact reason why I love the Motorola smartphones. Samsung Galaxy S3 drags when you compare it to the Moto X (2013) Developer Edition.
Glad to have my little speed demon back.
Coming from a proud Motorola Moto X owner.
Motorola is lame in case of updating moto x to lollipop while other phones are being updated as soon as new firmware is available.
Sent from my XT1052
ajsonofgod said:
Motorola is lame in case of updating moto x to lollipop while other phones are being updated as soon as new firmware is available.
Sent from my XT1052
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's odd. The only Android phones that I know of that get the updates as soon as the new firmware is available are the Nexus line of smartphones. All of the other ones, you do have to wait a little while before the update rolls out. You know, sometimes it is not the phone manufacturer's fault that the update is delayed. Sometimes it can be because of something on your wireless phone carrier's end. I know Verizon is famous for delaying the releases until all of their bloatware will work with the phone's update. I've experienced it on multiple phones with them (Samsung and Motorola) and that part is very frustrating. There is no need in throwing Motorola under the bus on this.
cindylike24 said:
That's odd. The only Android phones that I know of that get the updates as soon as the new firmware is available are the Nexus line of smartphones. All of the other ones, you do have to wait a little while before the update rolls out. You know, sometimes it is not the phone manufacturer's fault that the update is delayed. Sometimes it can be because of something on your wireless phone carrier's end. I know Verizon is famous for delaying the releases until all of their bloatware will work with the phone's update. I've experienced it on multiple phones with them (Samsung and Motorola) and that part is very frustrating. There is no need in throwing Motorola under the bus on this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As you see for moto x didnt get the update yet but my s4 got it. M not criticising moto i love my moto x but they are slow in contrast to updates..
Sent from my XT1052
ajsonofgod said:
As you see for moto x didnt get the update yet but my s4 got it. M not criticising moto i love my moto x but they are slow in contrast to updates..
Sent from my XT1052
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, that's just an anomaly. Normally, Samsung is slow as molasses about their updates. I have a Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 Wi-Fi model and it hasn't received the Lollipop update yet. My sister has the S5 and she got her Lollopop update fairly quickly but her phone doesn't work as well as my Moto X does now. Wonder if Samsung pushed it out too quickly and didn't get all of the bugs out. Some of my friends have the Samsung phones that got the Lollipop update and while it runs okay, they also have issues with this new update.
Something to ponder. Maybe we ought to be patient and wait for the parties involved to get all the little kinks worked out of this update before they roll it out to everyone.

All Moto X 2014 Owners Please Read

Hello, i just wanted bring all of you together to read this thread. Ok so i know since you've been a Moto owner, you've heard or seen at least once insulting comment about your device or the Motorola company. For example, "Anything that Motorola makes sucks" "People only get them because they're cheap" "That phone is crappy". I know that those people are ignorant to other people's liking. I'm tired of hearing the same thing. A lot of people that own super expensive high end- flashy smartphones say things like that about devices like the Moto series. Well that really offends me, just because they might not be the most high-end smartphones or the most expensive smartphones doesn't mean they are worthless. We Moto owners take great pride in our device, we appreciate what we have and we value our smartphones.
If someone offered me a brand new Galaxy S6 and a brand new Moto X and said i could only pick one. I would pick the Moto X hands down without a doubt in my mind. Because I know, We know what matters in a smartphone. What is that? User experience and performance for the price. That's what a review comes down to at the end of the day. A company could make a super spec'd out smartphone but get the same review score as a phone a fraction of its cost. I know if i were to buy a $1000 smartphone it better be great in every aspect and i know if i bought a smartphone for half that price, i'm not expecting it to be perfect but i want to have a good performance. That's exactly what motorola does, it gives you a great performing phone for the price.
For example, the Moto G. It has a low price point but does everything you need it to do. If I want a super powerful gaming machine of a smartphone, I'm not going to buy the Moto G. Then give a bad review for not being able to do what i wanted it to. I'm gonna buy a smartphone with a powerful chipset. At the end of the day we Moto owners stand out. Other people don't seem to understand our taste in smartphones value. Im not saying if you own a super expensive phone you're a bad person or anything. I'm just saying you get what you pay for. All of you Moto owners, good job in picking a smartphone. It doesn't matter if you have a Moto E, a Moto G or a Moto X. We all are equal and unified. #Teammoto
Proof that price doesn't matter
Moto has shunned a lot of former owners myself included l...while I love this phone Moto can still lick my berries.
Sent from my XT1096 using Tapatalk
It cost me over $1000 to get a MotoMaker Moto X into my country.
Worth every cent!
Beautiful design, Better features and Better performance than all my friends IPhones and Shamsungs.
Agreed !
Most people I talk to in my cell phone repair shop are ignorant to Motorola smartphones. They see my phone and ask what it is. Then they say that it looks nice.
Let those say whatever they want to because they are not aware of the fact that Motorola is the one who created mobile industry, rest are just parts of this industry. Real innovator is Motorola, rest just follow up whatever is left out by Motorola. Even today no other phone can beat a MotoX in terms of 'smartness', rest just feel dumb phones in front of a Moto X.
Motorola users don't need to frequently change their devices because they are more durable, can keep going for few generations of OS versions, come at cheaper price point. A 2-3 years Moto can easily keep going till the next Moto replaces it. You hardly see other brand's phones over 2 years old in anyone's hands. Others just fight needless specs war whereas specs is not everything. so called small battery and poor camera of my MotoX never miss the chance of surprising me by their performance, thats engineering, not just putting useless counts of cores or big spec battery or a high pixel density display which unnecessarily eats up the additional CPU power or battery.
Offcourse there are flaws in the Moto devices also but others are much more flawed. I am currently fighting a consumer court case against poor after sales service provided by Motorola when they took forever to repair a defective MotoE under warranty but that bad incident isn't enough to reduce my love and respect towards the Motorola brand.
Their strong comeback in the market after going completely dead is one more reason to buy their devices because it motivates to wake up and fight in the life, doesn't matter whatever trouble life throws on us. :good:
Let the ignorant people go gaga over whatever they want to, it doesn't changes the reality, does it?
the sad thing is that we are on a new level of "low" on the Dev part of our community.. only a few roms and most of them 5.0.x, only one custom kernel and only for CM based roms.. id love to have a custom kernel on my stock but rooted to be able to play with synapse to tamper with settings to "beast-out" ok gaming and more out of battery for everyday use..
about the talk.. heh I've been experiencing these kind of things at work when they see me use the my phone.. waving my hand over it to check my notifications.. they are so jealous [emoji13]
Motorola is still a great manufacturer, designer, innovater of awesome phones! The X series are the living proofs of this! Many users hate the company now because motorola promised them faster updates and has been really slow and non transparent in terms of updates!
I think motorola has done a great job in terms of updates and phones in general! Leaving the S6 which had 5.0 out of the box, no other manufacturer has provided 5.1 update to any of their phones yet other than the nexus line! People would never understand that 5.0 to 5.0.2 were buggy! They just want an update so they could think less of it and start complaining about the next version of android not being given to them in time! I say such people should buy nexus phones to get timely updates and stop the ranting!
For other people who have a higher price higher spec phones dont know much about android. They just buy a high spec phone thinking its future proof and later understand that there are many more newer innovations at a lesser price. Such people always keep wasting money in those high specs! Motorola doesn't provide high specs. But it provides the perfect balance of specs and working and useful features in their phones which are more useful in daily use and thus it makes the phones a daily driver.
The only problem with their phone is the fragile screen. Its glass and glass tends to break when it takes a hit. But the cost to replace it is too much! In India we need to pay 75% of the purchase cost to get the screen replaced! That's what is keeping people from buying motorola!
I love Stock Android on the Moto X 2014 ?
I miss the development of roms
That is because the source is still stuck back at 5.0.2. It would be great if we could get more up to date source.
I got my s3 when it was a flagship device and had a Samsung phone earlier. The primary reason I got the moto X was the price due to the cyber Monday sale. I saved up anticipating that the nexus 6 would be around the same price as the 5 but it turned out to be very expensive for me.
I had a few apprehensions before getting this device as I had never owned a moto device, but the X has exceeded my expectations! For the price, I don't think any other phone offers similar build quality and specs. Sure a bigger battery or a SD card slot would have been sweet but I feel that this is the perfect blend of stock plus nifty Moto features. I'm so used to active display now that I don't think I can actually use a device without it!
As far as updates are concerned, I'd rather have a fully functional 5.1 build rather than a messed up quickly released and buggy one. The delay has been a little annoying with multiple soak tests but if it results in a near bug free build then I'd rather wait!
All in all very satisfied with the phone.
#teammoto
Sent from my XT1095 using XDA Free mobile app

#MotoShame campaign for 2 year OS update guarantee - Feb 26

The point is to embarrass Motorola for offering no update policy after their MWC presentation by making #MotoShame trend when they're trying get coverage for their new stuff.
Needed between now and then: People to post everywhere motorola users, in particular Moto Z users are. People to make example images or memes to post with their tweets. Maybe a good, clear infographic about what to do when would be nice if you're good at that. And really anything you think of to get more people on board.
Original post from Moto Z subreddit
Would anyone be interested in a twitter campaign to embarrass Motorola for failing to have an upgrade policy for their Premiere Moto Z line? They keep doing it because we keep putting up with it. I say we embarrass them for cheaping out on us with #MotoShame.
1) We need to trend on Twitter, which means we need to coordinate a large group to post at the same time at a future date. That means we need people to go to every forum where moto z users are and inform and recruit.
2) We need to do it at an ideal moment to get their attention, preferably when they are trying to generate good press. That's when we can get the most attention and the most earned coverage from the blogosphere. Instead of their new gear trending, we make #MotoShame trend.
They are unveiling hardware at MWC on February 26. Hitting them with this will distract from their earned coverage and possibly break through their unwillingness to hear customer complaints on the matter.
3) The tweets need a visual element. Pictures get attention on Twitter. A couple of options:
a) Post pictures of our Moto Zs being sad about Motorola's absentee parenting. quick example of Marvin the Hitchhiker Android speaking for my Z Play
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
b) think of those pet shaming posts people put up, except this time we memeify sad-faced motorola logos or other promotional material with a sign purportedly from Motorola confessing its bad behavior in re: updates.​4) We need a clear demand. We should demand 2 years of guaranteed updates to Moto's premium line matches the cheapo Android One line guarantee. Suggested Tweet text "We made Moto Z a success, now Moto needs to match bargain Android One's 2 year OS upgrade guarantee #MotoShame" [attach image]​I'm not going to press the matter if no one is interested. But I like my Z Play, and I'd like to receive a reasonable amount of support. When I complain to moto alone, they ignore me. Only hope of making a difference is if we complain together. Is anyone interested? If so, how would you contribute (memifying moto shaming logos for people to add to their tweets, posting info and reminders on other forums, tweeting on Feb 26, etc)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, not interested.
Shaming and memes? It's my only meaning in life.
Hey, I don't really know about the update policy . But I wanted to ask one thing. Are we going to get ANDROID O? OR is nougat the last update for Moto z play? Btw , I'm interested #motoshame
Dont really care much for updates
rajdeep2435 said:
Hey, I don't really know about the update policy . But I wanted to ask one thing. Are we going to get ANDROID O? OR is nougat the last update for Moto z play? Btw , I'm interested #motoshame
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The whole point is that there is no update policy, ergo, we'll never know what our last upgrade will be, or when it will be. We get cut off whenever moto gets sick of us.
So does that mean Android 7 is our last update or are we going to get Android 8(O) as well!?
It means if you want an answer to that question, you're going to have to demand one... from Motorola. "No policy" means they won't answer or even decide until they feel like it. Thus: #MotoShame.
Hi my friend, as I told you in MZP Group, this thread could be a lot like spam. And here is why i think that:
1.- You can not force Lenovo (or motorola) to give you an update, because they did not signed anything, they are not forced to give you an update, they just sell you their phone.
2.- Motorola has a 2 year warranty, if you want a signed document you will better make a request in change.org or something like that, and thats why Moto Z series users we dont have to be worried about updates but if you Remember the Moto G3 will not have the nougat update, and a lot of users claimed the update if you want 2 years warranty you will better make it for all moto devices.
3.- Its a terrible idea to make noise in the MWC days, because the only thing you will achieve is to give even more fame to lenovo, a lot of politicians makes this to be even more recognized, and the only thing you will achieve is raise the lenovo's shares of stock. If you want to take some attention then make DDoS attack to their servers.
4.- I do not care about updates, in less than a year im sure that i will have unlocked my bootloader and ill be trying the amazing roms of the XDA's people, im sure that you will have Android P or even Android Q thanks To XDA.
5.- I had the Moto G 1st Gen and let me tell you that Moto did an amazing job with the updates policy, mine was in Android 4.3, later 4.4 and finally 5.0 ... and thanks to the devs Moto G 1st Gen has android 6.0, if that was with a moto g, dont mind about a Moto Z Play ...
6.- I think it is better to make a polite request to lenovo than to make a lot of noise and hitting 'em to their mark image, as we say in Mexico "en el pedir está el dar" (in the asking is the giving).
Think about it mate.
As others here have said, you're alone in this view. Many of us are thrilled that Motorola updates phones like the Z Play as quickly as they do. The Axon 7 and Honor 8 both got nougat the same week we did, and those are ZTE/Huawei's flagships. The Z Play is a budget phone (albeit a very good one), the fact that it has nougat already is impressive. They tell you which phones will be updated, give you an idea of when they think it will happen, and then actually do it. They're no OnePlus, but they've got carriers to deal with and far more SKUs. For a company that size, Motorola is one of if not the best when it comes to updates.
People have been politely requesting a clear policy for years. Motorola and others have ignored it. If users are ok with that, I'm not looking to convince them otherwise. Just offering a platform for those that want to to finally be heard from.
I asked Motorola specifically about the length of support for the Z Play (future updates, not the speed of current ones which has nothing to do with thread), they said it was unknowable. Android One support isn't unknowable, and those phones are half the price of the Z Play.
The Bankshooter said:
Hi my friend, as I told you in MZP Group, this thread could be a lot like spam. And here is why i think that:
5.- I had the Moto G 1st Gen and let me tell you that Moto did an amazing job with the updates policy, mine was in Android 4.3, later 4.4 and finally 5.0 ... and thanks to the devs Moto G 1st Gen has android 6.0, if that was with a moto g, dont mind about a Moto Z Play ...
Think about it mate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The G has 7.1.1
uberano26 said:
The G has 7.1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it does not. He was talking about the first gen Moto G, which got 5.1 officially. The Moto G gen 3 got 6.0. Only the 4th gen Moto G gets Nougat.
I only count Official update from Moto.
Yeah because what a shame it would be if a device got its update not from the manufacturer but from other sources.
uberano26 said:
Yeah because what a shame it would be if a device got its update not from the manufacturer but from other sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be fair, custom ROMs don't include features like Moto actions, active display, and touchless controls, which are all pretty useful. But if someone released a ROM with Moto features working that was relatively bug-free, who cares if it's official or not?
xxBrun0xx said:
To be fair, custom ROMs don't include features like Moto actions, active display, and touchless controls, which are all pretty useful. But if someone released a ROM with Moto features working that was relatively bug-free, who cares if it's official or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the same time, the people on forums like XDA are a tiny fraction of phone purchasers and know about rooting, ROM-ing, etc. Most people purchase phones without a desire to or knowledge of modding and would appreciate concrete and adhered-to policies ahead of the launch of a phone so that they know what they're getting in to.
Personally, I'd much prefer reliable info from the manufacturer and not have to root/ROM each phone that I get. I used to root before getting the MZP, but now I like the fact that I can use Android Pay again. The older I get, the more responsibilities I have, the less time I have to play around with my phones (although I personally enjoy it). I now want devices that just work and get updated in a timely, predictable manner.
pkadavid said:
At the same time, the people on forums like XDA are a tiny fraction of phone purchasers and know about rooting, ROM-ing, etc. Most people purchase phones without a desire to or knowledge of modding and would appreciate concrete and adhered-to policies ahead of the launch of a phone so that they know what they're getting in to.
Personally, I'd much prefer reliable info from the manufacturer and not have to root/ROM each phone that I get. I used to root before getting the MZP, but now I like the fact that I can use Android Pay again. The older I get, the more responsibilities I have, the less time I have to play around with my phones (although I personally enjoy it). I now want devices that just work and get updated in a timely, predictable manner.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To that point, most people don't know what security updates are. Most people choose not to update when they have an update. So again, kind of a moot point.
xxBrun0xx said:
As others here have said, you're alone in this view. Many of us are thrilled that Motorola updates phones like the Z Play as quickly as they do. The Axon 7 and Honor 8 both got nougat the same week we did, and those are ZTE/Huawei's flagships. The Z Play is a budget phone (albeit a very good one), the fact that it has nougat already is impressive. They tell you which phones will be updated, give you an idea of when they think it will happen, and then actually do it. They're no OnePlus, but they've got carriers to deal with and far more SKUs. For a company that size, Motorola is one of if not the best when it comes to updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be clear, the MZP does not have Nougat already, at least not in the US and not rolled out by Motorola.
---------- Post added at 17:05 ---------- Previous post was at 17:03 ----------
xxBrun0xx said:
To that point, most people don't know what security updates are. Most people choose not to update when they have an update. So again, kind of a moot point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a source for that?
pkadavid said:
To be clear, the MZP does not have Nougat already, at least not in the US and not rolled out by Motorola.
---------- Post added at 17:05 ---------- Previous post was at 17:03 ----------
Do you have a source for that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have any friends? Family members? Co-workers? Anyone you can ask? I bet more people than not have no idea the software on their phone is out of date. Go talk to non-technical people, I'm always amazed when I talk to "normal people" how little they know or care about their phones.
I'm not saying your wrong that Moto should have an update policy in place because it's pretty obvious that they should. My point is that they're not alone: no other phone manufacturer except OnePlus, blackberry, and google have a solid update policy that they stand behind and deliver on regularly. And unfortunately the majority of people are fine with that. Trying to humiliate a company for following an industry standard is pretty crazy, imo. Those of us who have had lots of Motorola's over the years, have called tech support, have gotten updates, have torn our hair out trying to unlock bootloaders that we're never meant to be unlocked, we see the current Motorola working harder than it ever has before to get us quick updates. Bashing them for that just isn't right.
xxBrun0xx said:
Do you have any friends? Family members? Co-workers? Anyone you can ask? I bet more people than not have no idea the software on their phone is out of date. Go talk to non-technical people, I'm always amazed when I talk to "normal people" how little they know or care about their phones.
I'm not saying your wrong that Moto should have an update policy in place because it's pretty obvious that they should. My point is that they're not alone: no other phone manufacturer except OnePlus, blackberry, and google have a solid update policy that they stand behind and deliver on regularly. And unfortunately the majority of people are fine with that. Trying to humiliate a company for following an industry standard is pretty crazy, imo. Those of us who have had lots of Motorola's over the years, have called tech support, have gotten updates, have torn our hair out trying to unlock bootloaders that we're never meant to be unlocked, we see the current Motorola working harder than it ever has before to get us quick updates. Bashing them for that just isn't right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You misconstrued my earlier opinion as supporting the bashing. I never said that.
Asking my friends, family, and coworkers would not result in statistically significant data on whether or not the general phone user is aware of or installs updates when presented to them by their OS. In the few minutes I had, I was neither able to find data that would support nor refute your hypothesis. This is also why I did not say that I believe that most users know about or install updates, because I have no data to support that. It was simply a statement from my point of view.

Categories

Resources