Related
Previously with GB:
Browsermark - 99,857
Sunspider - 1826ms
ICS after this mornings update:
Browsermark - 124,672
Sunspider - 1488ms
Wow, roughly 25% improvement in both
Could you please try a full benchmark with Quadrant?
Quadrant standard full benchmark - 3748 (3871 on second run)
straxusii said:
Quadrant standard full benchmark - 3748
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
So a little bit higher than the score with ICS Stunner. Hope NeoBuddy updates it soon.
No real difference with quadrant, I think that was roughly the same as my GB score
oh ........great benchmarks .....why are people obsessed with synethetic benchmarks?
CF Bench 1.2 - Overall score 7601
Richy99 said:
oh ........great benchmarks .....why are people obsessed with synethetic benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a geek thing methinks. Tried Quadrant on my Note running stock UK GB just now it got a score of 3977 & 3668 & 3732 which is faster than anything I ever owned...but it still lags like ****.
Quadrant Full Benchmark Results -
Stock GB 2.3.6 - 2684
Current Stock ICS 4.0.3 (German release) - 3445
Antutu?
Castellano2 said:
Antutu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bungaga
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
I am getting around 3800 in Quadrant on ICS LiquidSmooth and I was getting about 3200 on official GB.
zen123 said:
Its a geek thing methinks. Tried Quadrant on my Note running stock UK GB just now it got a score of 3977 & 3668 & 3732 which is faster than anything I ever owned...but it still lags like ****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep my turbo ricer pimped Honda makes 430hp on the dyno but still sucks in the 1/4 mile.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Can someone please post a Nenamark 2 and GLBenchmark Egypt or Pro offscreen?
Thank you!
Castellano2 said:
Antutu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu 2.7.3 - 6769
MindBlank said:
Can someone please post a Nenamark 2 and GLBenchmark Egypt or Pro offscreen?
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GLBenchmark 2.1.4, Egypt 2.1 standard - 46fps (was vsync limited at times)
Can you please try the offscreen bench for Egypt?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
MindBlank said:
Can you please try the offscreen bench for Egypt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
60 fps
48 fps on stock GB. Very nice increase of 12 fps. I'm running an OC'ed GPU on GB (400Mhz) and it gives 68 fps. So the increase in case of ICS + 400Mhz GPU would be 85 fps. Can't wait to flash it.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
straxusii said:
Previously with GB:
Browsermark - 99,857
Sunspider - 1826ms
ICS after this mornings update:
Browsermark - 124,672
Sunspider - 1488ms
Wow, roughly 25% improvement in both
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very, very good scores. These best everything AnandTech has ever benchmarked, with the exception of the Lava XOLO and SGS 3. Absolutely dusts the iPhone 4S, wow.
The Note 3 Scored 27337 in Antutu benchmark.
PhoneGuru1015 said:
The Note 3 Scored 27337 in Antutu benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's pretty low, stock they score from 31k to 36k usually. Btw there's a thread on this already.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481673
Quickvic30 said:
That's pretty low, stock they score from 31k to 36k usually. Btw there's a thread on this already.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481673
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all he has to do is turn off battery saving. Mine was the same way.
Post for this already opened here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=46425460
There is no need for 2 threads on the same subject.
Search is your friend
Thread closed
EFM
Have a great day!
Only the 4 at 1.69 Ghz works
The 4 at 2.1 Ghz never used
Try CPU-Z to show activity.
Sent from my MX4 using XDA Premium HD app
Cpu-z will never show all 8 working cores. For that app no need such performance. To check it out try use some cpu freq recorder an launch some heavy app.
Sent from my LG-P710 using XDA Free mobile app
richish said:
Cpu-z will never show all 8 working cores. For that app no need such performance. To check it out try use some cpu freq recorder an launch some heavy app.
Sent from my LG-P710 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like antutu ?
He show me ~20 000. On flyme i have arroud 50 000. Wtf?
bobslesbricoleurs said:
Like antutu ?
He show me ~20 000. On flyme i have arroud 50 000. Wtf?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u are on Cm 12.1???
for that u must ask for CM12.1 delevopers
as i know antutu is not optimazed for android 5.1
Okay
works 4 at 1,69 and 4 at 2,2 ...install an kernel modifier
Any link ? Or name?
Ok... Don't work only show 4 cores
Don't works all time like little.. when the system need more power he use it
Naphtha said:
Don't works all time like little.. when the system need more power he use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So tell me why with flyme i have 50 000 point with antutu and with cm12.1 only 20 000?!
bobslesbricoleurs said:
So tell me why with flyme i have 50 000 point with antutu and with cm12.1 only 20 000?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When MX4 in flyme have 50 000 score? In Meizu tests? are you kidding? LOL. When the MX4 come in my hands gimme 32000 - 38000 max scores . If you need good score on antutu and not good stable rom with durable battery can go back to the flyme
Naphtha said:
When MX4 in flyme have 50 000 score? In Meizu tests? are you kidding? LOL. When the MX4 come in my hands gimme 32000 - 38000 max scores . If you need good score on antutu and not good stable rom with durable battery can go back to the flyme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Serious? If you wan't i flash flyme test with antutu i screen and i show you...
See that
http://www.androidworld.it/2014/08/...d-53-000-punti-antutu-mediatek-mt6595-243695/
21 agosto 2014 go home bro, this is an fake test of Meizu. Don 't be stupid.
---------- Post added at 07:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:20 AM ----------
Are you mad? No one have this score with flyme. If you want can go back to the flyme.
Naphtha said:
http://www.androidworld.it/2014/08/...d-53-000-punti-antutu-mediatek-mt6595-243695/
21 agosto 2014 go home bro, this is an fake test of Meizu. Don 't be stupid.
---------- Post added at 07:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:20 AM ----------
Are you mad? No one have this score with flyme. If you want can go back to the flyme.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay i'll flash flyme and do a bench...
Naphtha said:
When MX4 in flyme have 50 000 score? In Meizu tests? are you kidding? LOL. When the MX4 come in my hands gimme 32000 - 38000 max scores . If you need good score on antutu and not good stable rom with durable battery can go back to the flyme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
52K on flyme 4.2.8.2 I and 48 K in 4.5.6 I
Its normal score if u never had it so your phone is suck.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwZsiYdqvq4 sad people here
I confirm around 49000 with flyme 4.5.6i in performance mode. Even if a AnTuTu test does not reflect the fluidity of the device.
ouigo said:
I confirm around 49000 with flyme 4.5.6i in performance mode. Even if a AnTuTu test does not reflect the fluidity of the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know it's really great like that but...
It say Meizu Mx4 8 cores i want 8 cores xDD and i can't revert to flyme so no bench for me.
Thanks all they do the benchs ^^
And Naphta if you had 20 000 it's because you choose eco mode ^^
Under cm12.1 I was around 36,000 points. Without special handling. But I have not checked if the 8 cores working properly.
Without any doubt we could say that the snpadragon 800 and 801 is perhaps the best processor or one of the best manufactured by Qualcomm ... as you see this at the height of the snapdragon 808, do not take much, what do you think? a greeting
Sony xperia z3
60000 points in antutu 6, LG g4 63000 points and Xiaomi mi4s 57000...
I cant post images now
Sorry, i duplicate my user with tapatalk...
Here the images
Not sure how you manage to get 60000 there.
Yes, on KK was <50000, on LL/MM was about 50000, and on NougatPreview4 saw it even 52000, but your number is way out there.
Can you show us a PCMark Work 2.0 result and a 3DMark ES 3.0 result too?
Licaon_Kter said:
Not sure how you manage to get 60000 there.
Yes, on KK was <50000, on LL/MM was about 50000, and on NougatPreview4 saw it even 52000, but your number is way out there.
Can you show us a PCMark Work 2.0 result and a 3DMark ES 3.0 result too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi friend, im in stock marshmallow 6.0.1
kevin233333 said:
Hi friend, im in stock marshmallow 6.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes friend, that's great for you, we need more proof though.
I got 64000 on ExistenZ rom and Elite kernel. (without OC)
Don't know if 801 is better than 808 (I don't think it's more powerful, differences may be related to software, screen resolution...) but it has more than enough power and is really trustworthy. I haven't see many problems on this chips on any phone.
i also got 60-62 on marshmallow with my z3 stock android ill be uploading a vid on youtube,
ayocuan said:
i also got 60-62 on marshmallow with my z3 stock android ill be uploading a vid on youtube,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, that's nice, but, if a higher (than usual) score is seen only in one particular app, it sounds like an error, that's why I was asking for another test in another app (PCMark, GeekBench, Basemark, whatever), that will show a higher score too, hence proving that the device (or Android version) is indeed faster.
Licaon_Kter said:
Again, that's nice, but, if a higher (than usual) score is seen only in one particular app, it sounds like an error, that's why I was asking for another test in another app (PCMark, GeekBench, Basemark, whatever), that will show a higher score too, hence proving that the device (or Android version) is indeed faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i did geekbench4 and got 987 single/ 2697 multi
I was going to post some numbers, but...
* last week AnTuTu 6.2.7: 52912
* today AnTuTu 6.2.7: 58133
Yes, looks like all those that point out that this app is flawed were right all along, hence my skepticism in the above posts.
That being said, other apps are more consistent:
* GeekBench 4: ~1000/~2600 (yeah there's a slight variation per run but it's <3%!)
* 3DMark: ~1100 (again, slight variations)
Just to confirm,
See attached screenshot.
Z3 running stock 6.0.1
mcraeally44 said:
Just to confirm,
See attached screenshot.
Z3 running stock 6.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, does 3DMark confirm this greater than average performance? Eg. You have 1500 points or something.
Antutu Benchmark z3-ExistenZ 5.6.5
Antutu Benchmark-z3 d6603 with ExistenZ Rom from today
Weky2306 said:
Antutu Benchmark-z3 d6603 with ExistenZ Rom from today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And a 3DMark for confirmation please. Thanks
Licaon_Kter said:
And a 3DMark for confirmation please. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weky2306 said:
3DMark: 1215
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, as expected, similar score.
That's the problem with AnTuTu, while your score there is way over Z3 average (your 65000 vs 52000 or 58000 that I and others get), your 3DMark is at the Z3 average. :-\
If you find time try a GeekBench too. Thanks.
Licaon_Kter said:
Yeah, as expected, similar score.
That's the problem with AnTuTu, while your score there is way over Z3 average (your 65000 vs 52000 or 58000 that I and others get), your 3DMark is at the Z3 average. :-\
If you find time try a GeekBench too. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
---------- Post added at 06:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:26 PM ----------
Weky2306 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like only Antutu is different like you said
Weky2306 said:
It looks like only Antutu is different like you said
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep and when a new product advertises an AnTuTu score first I get the "they try to hide something vibe".
Don't get me wrong, I like big scores, I want users to share their setup that helped them, but usually I see some test somewhere (say, new device), so I go and try to compare it to my own, and "hey, surprise", most of the time benches on my device in hand will have a lower score than the same device from their test, so what does that leave me with?
My device was scoring 49000 on KK, then 52000 on LL, now it's 53000 or 58000 on NDP4, what does that tell me? Nothing much about my device.
Now, going to PCMark (general performance), 3DMark (GPU), GeekBench (CPU) gives you a better image of the device.
This whole thread can now be shorten to: "OMFG huge score in AnTuTu that does not reflect any performance improvement in any other benches, yay"
Drop your antutu benchmarks!want to compare.
My phone was at 43k points on MM stock.Flashing
RR 6 64bit,I have 62k!
anhoxhrs said:
Drop your antutu benchmarks!want to compare.
My phone was at 43k points on MM stock.Flashing
RR 6 64bit,I have 62k!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's already a thread mate https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-g4-plus/how-to/rom-benchmarks-t3575807
No need to create a new one :good: