Related
The Note 3 Scored 27337 in Antutu benchmark.
PhoneGuru1015 said:
The Note 3 Scored 27337 in Antutu benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's pretty low, stock they score from 31k to 36k usually. Btw there's a thread on this already.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481673
Quickvic30 said:
That's pretty low, stock they score from 31k to 36k usually. Btw there's a thread on this already.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481673
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all he has to do is turn off battery saving. Mine was the same way.
Post for this already opened here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=46425460
There is no need for 2 threads on the same subject.
Search is your friend
Thread closed
EFM
Have a great day!
Here is the new Antutu 5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNESfShgAp8
light19940120 said:
Here is the new Antutu 5
Is the final output of the bench-marking written anywhere? It hard to read it from the video.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is obviously not a gaming device or a high end device but still performance might be different in different ROMs or kernels so
Mine is 19198 (Not impressive)
Current ROM : CM 12.1 Snapshot Latest Builds
KERNEL: CM
StarTrek1 said:
This is obviously not a gaming device or a high end device but still performance might be different in different ROMs or kernels so
Mine is 19198 (Not impressive)
Current ROM : CM 12.1 Snapshot Latest Builds
KERNEL: CM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app did you use to benchmark?
Ragarianok said:
Which app did you use to benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu Bench 5.7.1
StarTrek1 said:
Antutu Bench 5.7.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting 18404 on CM12.1 10/8 nightly. Honestly, I think a benchmark is pointless on a low-end device.
Ragarianok said:
I'm getting 18404 on CM12.1 10/8 nightly. Honestly, I think a benchmark is pointless on a low-end device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not actually pointless but atleast we know what ROM is better in term for that low end device
StarTrek1 said:
Not actually pointless but atleast we know what ROM is better in term for that low end device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suppose that's true. I wish I had taken a benchmark when I was using Exodus.
Antutu Benchmark: 18022
I'm at Minimal OS without changing the kernel. Personally I thought it would be a little higher, but anyway lets see in a few weeks if Android Marshmallow really improves this score!
Vicioxis said:
Antutu Benchmark: 18022
I'm at Minimal OS without changing the kernel. Personally I thought it would be a little higher, but anyway lets see in a few weeks if Android Marshmallow really improves this score!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Marshmallow won't improve score very much but let's see if RAM performance changes in M
StarTrek1 said:
Marshmallow won't improve score very much but let's see if RAM performance changes in M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now THAT'S something to hope for.
Ragarianok said:
Now THAT'S something to hope for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup :good:
Of course RAM is the most important for our Moto G because we only have 1GB of RAM and with Lollipop my device is sometimes enraging to use because it hangs for a lot of time and some apps close in the backgroud. Fingers crossed!
Minimal OS 3.0 and decipher kernel v7
Sent from somewhere
Minimal OS and latest decipher kernel.
However, in CM13 with halogen kernel I scored about 21k. I know that benchmark do not depict the real life conditions, but 10k less in MM must mean something also.
Last CM12.1 NIightly with decipher kernel. 25016 on Antutu
Only the 4 at 1.69 Ghz works
The 4 at 2.1 Ghz never used
Try CPU-Z to show activity.
Sent from my MX4 using XDA Premium HD app
Cpu-z will never show all 8 working cores. For that app no need such performance. To check it out try use some cpu freq recorder an launch some heavy app.
Sent from my LG-P710 using XDA Free mobile app
richish said:
Cpu-z will never show all 8 working cores. For that app no need such performance. To check it out try use some cpu freq recorder an launch some heavy app.
Sent from my LG-P710 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like antutu ?
He show me ~20 000. On flyme i have arroud 50 000. Wtf?
bobslesbricoleurs said:
Like antutu ?
He show me ~20 000. On flyme i have arroud 50 000. Wtf?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u are on Cm 12.1???
for that u must ask for CM12.1 delevopers
as i know antutu is not optimazed for android 5.1
Okay
works 4 at 1,69 and 4 at 2,2 ...install an kernel modifier
Any link ? Or name?
Ok... Don't work only show 4 cores
Don't works all time like little.. when the system need more power he use it
Naphtha said:
Don't works all time like little.. when the system need more power he use it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So tell me why with flyme i have 50 000 point with antutu and with cm12.1 only 20 000?!
bobslesbricoleurs said:
So tell me why with flyme i have 50 000 point with antutu and with cm12.1 only 20 000?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When MX4 in flyme have 50 000 score? In Meizu tests? are you kidding? LOL. When the MX4 come in my hands gimme 32000 - 38000 max scores . If you need good score on antutu and not good stable rom with durable battery can go back to the flyme
Naphtha said:
When MX4 in flyme have 50 000 score? In Meizu tests? are you kidding? LOL. When the MX4 come in my hands gimme 32000 - 38000 max scores . If you need good score on antutu and not good stable rom with durable battery can go back to the flyme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Serious? If you wan't i flash flyme test with antutu i screen and i show you...
See that
http://www.androidworld.it/2014/08/...d-53-000-punti-antutu-mediatek-mt6595-243695/
21 agosto 2014 go home bro, this is an fake test of Meizu. Don 't be stupid.
---------- Post added at 07:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:20 AM ----------
Are you mad? No one have this score with flyme. If you want can go back to the flyme.
Naphtha said:
http://www.androidworld.it/2014/08/...d-53-000-punti-antutu-mediatek-mt6595-243695/
21 agosto 2014 go home bro, this is an fake test of Meizu. Don 't be stupid.
---------- Post added at 07:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:20 AM ----------
Are you mad? No one have this score with flyme. If you want can go back to the flyme.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay i'll flash flyme and do a bench...
Naphtha said:
When MX4 in flyme have 50 000 score? In Meizu tests? are you kidding? LOL. When the MX4 come in my hands gimme 32000 - 38000 max scores . If you need good score on antutu and not good stable rom with durable battery can go back to the flyme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
52K on flyme 4.2.8.2 I and 48 K in 4.5.6 I
Its normal score if u never had it so your phone is suck.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwZsiYdqvq4 sad people here
I confirm around 49000 with flyme 4.5.6i in performance mode. Even if a AnTuTu test does not reflect the fluidity of the device.
ouigo said:
I confirm around 49000 with flyme 4.5.6i in performance mode. Even if a AnTuTu test does not reflect the fluidity of the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know it's really great like that but...
It say Meizu Mx4 8 cores i want 8 cores xDD and i can't revert to flyme so no bench for me.
Thanks all they do the benchs ^^
And Naphta if you had 20 000 it's because you choose eco mode ^^
Under cm12.1 I was around 36,000 points. Without special handling. But I have not checked if the 8 cores working properly.
Without any doubt we could say that the snpadragon 800 and 801 is perhaps the best processor or one of the best manufactured by Qualcomm ... as you see this at the height of the snapdragon 808, do not take much, what do you think? a greeting
Sony xperia z3
60000 points in antutu 6, LG g4 63000 points and Xiaomi mi4s 57000...
I cant post images now
Sorry, i duplicate my user with tapatalk...
Here the images
Not sure how you manage to get 60000 there.
Yes, on KK was <50000, on LL/MM was about 50000, and on NougatPreview4 saw it even 52000, but your number is way out there.
Can you show us a PCMark Work 2.0 result and a 3DMark ES 3.0 result too?
Licaon_Kter said:
Not sure how you manage to get 60000 there.
Yes, on KK was <50000, on LL/MM was about 50000, and on NougatPreview4 saw it even 52000, but your number is way out there.
Can you show us a PCMark Work 2.0 result and a 3DMark ES 3.0 result too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi friend, im in stock marshmallow 6.0.1
kevin233333 said:
Hi friend, im in stock marshmallow 6.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes friend, that's great for you, we need more proof though.
I got 64000 on ExistenZ rom and Elite kernel. (without OC)
Don't know if 801 is better than 808 (I don't think it's more powerful, differences may be related to software, screen resolution...) but it has more than enough power and is really trustworthy. I haven't see many problems on this chips on any phone.
i also got 60-62 on marshmallow with my z3 stock android ill be uploading a vid on youtube,
ayocuan said:
i also got 60-62 on marshmallow with my z3 stock android ill be uploading a vid on youtube,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, that's nice, but, if a higher (than usual) score is seen only in one particular app, it sounds like an error, that's why I was asking for another test in another app (PCMark, GeekBench, Basemark, whatever), that will show a higher score too, hence proving that the device (or Android version) is indeed faster.
Licaon_Kter said:
Again, that's nice, but, if a higher (than usual) score is seen only in one particular app, it sounds like an error, that's why I was asking for another test in another app (PCMark, GeekBench, Basemark, whatever), that will show a higher score too, hence proving that the device (or Android version) is indeed faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i did geekbench4 and got 987 single/ 2697 multi
I was going to post some numbers, but...
* last week AnTuTu 6.2.7: 52912
* today AnTuTu 6.2.7: 58133
Yes, looks like all those that point out that this app is flawed were right all along, hence my skepticism in the above posts.
That being said, other apps are more consistent:
* GeekBench 4: ~1000/~2600 (yeah there's a slight variation per run but it's <3%!)
* 3DMark: ~1100 (again, slight variations)
Just to confirm,
See attached screenshot.
Z3 running stock 6.0.1
mcraeally44 said:
Just to confirm,
See attached screenshot.
Z3 running stock 6.0.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, does 3DMark confirm this greater than average performance? Eg. You have 1500 points or something.
Antutu Benchmark z3-ExistenZ 5.6.5
Antutu Benchmark-z3 d6603 with ExistenZ Rom from today
Weky2306 said:
Antutu Benchmark-z3 d6603 with ExistenZ Rom from today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And a 3DMark for confirmation please. Thanks
Licaon_Kter said:
And a 3DMark for confirmation please. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weky2306 said:
3DMark: 1215
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, as expected, similar score.
That's the problem with AnTuTu, while your score there is way over Z3 average (your 65000 vs 52000 or 58000 that I and others get), your 3DMark is at the Z3 average. :-\
If you find time try a GeekBench too. Thanks.
Licaon_Kter said:
Yeah, as expected, similar score.
That's the problem with AnTuTu, while your score there is way over Z3 average (your 65000 vs 52000 or 58000 that I and others get), your 3DMark is at the Z3 average. :-\
If you find time try a GeekBench too. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
---------- Post added at 06:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:26 PM ----------
Weky2306 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like only Antutu is different like you said
Weky2306 said:
It looks like only Antutu is different like you said
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep and when a new product advertises an AnTuTu score first I get the "they try to hide something vibe".
Don't get me wrong, I like big scores, I want users to share their setup that helped them, but usually I see some test somewhere (say, new device), so I go and try to compare it to my own, and "hey, surprise", most of the time benches on my device in hand will have a lower score than the same device from their test, so what does that leave me with?
My device was scoring 49000 on KK, then 52000 on LL, now it's 53000 or 58000 on NDP4, what does that tell me? Nothing much about my device.
Now, going to PCMark (general performance), 3DMark (GPU), GeekBench (CPU) gives you a better image of the device.
This whole thread can now be shorten to: "OMFG huge score in AnTuTu that does not reflect any performance improvement in any other benches, yay"