Database Users

HTC DESIRE HD Benchmark results better than N1 by alot

Hey saw this over at GSMarena the HTC D'HD has been benchmarked with neocore and quadrant and the quadrant results are amazing much higher than the N1 have a look here http://www.gsmarena.com/htc_desire_hd_gets_benchmarked_its_rom_ported_to_the_hd2-news-1941.php

Here are other benchmarks: http://www.areamobile.de/handys/2591-htc-desire-hd/testbericht (german):
HTC Desire HD
Sunspider Benchmark 4261 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 420 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 1675 pts
Samsung Galaxy S
Sunspider Benchmark 16321 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 70,7 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 871 pts
Apple iPhone 4
Sunspider Benchmark 10804 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 85,4 Punkte
Quadrant Benchmark -

Oh yeah thanks Seems strange though GSMarena's model made almost 2000 (1974) in Quadrant Where as areamobile's HD only reached 1675 which is alot of difference because my overclocked Froyo Hero will only reach 294 which is the difference

oprisnik said:
Here are other benchmarks: http://www.areamobile.de/handys/2591-htc-desire-hd/testbericht (german):
HTC Desire HD
Sunspider Benchmark 4261 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 420 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 1675 pts
Samsung Galaxy S
Sunspider Benchmark 16321 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 70,7 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 871 pts
Apple iPhone 4
Sunspider Benchmark 10804 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 85,4 Punkte
Quadrant Benchmark -
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on that website it says that the htc desire hd has a front camera has it ?

Does it ?? i thinbk it doesnt but ...

faddys123 said:
on that website it says that the htc desire hd has a front camera has it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They made a mistake i suppose. It does not have a front cam.

i think they run quadrant more than one time to achieve these score

Thats excellent, even with HTC Sense enabled.
Also ALOT

eXDee said:
Thats excellent, even with HTC Sense enabled.
Also ALOT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep , imagine what some awesome devs could do with this

~1600 in quadrant seems resonable for the desire HD ..... anyone worrying it will be a beast ...... one more thing
768MB RAM !!!​

Quadrant scores are higher directly after reboot.
On lagfixed SGS it can be a difference similiar to this when comparing directly after boot results with results of some hours later.

I love to see all the SGS users coming on this board saying this beast is not gonna be that much better, this definitely proves otherwise, just accept it,
The SGS has rubbish battery life, crap build quality, non existant GPS... The best thing about the phone is the S-AMOLED screen, and thats it!
Desire HD FTW
lol
JD

Just For Comparison (the first SGS benchmark looks to have been on 2.1 so not a fair test)
---------------------------------------
GalaxyS (GT-i9000) on latest 2.2 build |
---------------------------------------
Sunspider Benchmark --- 8085 ms
Google V8 --- 259 pts
Quadrant --- 1005 pts
---------------------------------------
HTC Desire HD
Sunspider Benchmark 4261 ms
Google V8 Benchmark v5 420 pts
Quadrant Benchmark 1675 pts
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looking at that the desire HD is slightly ahead of the Galaxy S. But only time will tell only a few days to go now :-D eeek

The whole world is going to see either SGS froyo can beat nexus one with froyo on stock rom without lagfixes...
Out of the box or stock is a point for any phone, how much it can be pushed by developers is another point.. The one that wins on both point is the winner..
Hopefully samsung will do it right this time..

I have a GalaxyS atm and the H/W is top notch and i cant fault it ... but samsungs S/W team have a long way to go befor they are any real thret to HTC . . .

Apache14 said:
I have a GalaxyS atm and the H/W is top notch and i cant fault it ... but samsungs S/W team have a long way to go befor they are any real thret to HTC . . .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
indeed.. SGS is a superb powerhouse.. it lacks on userXP and UI.. Eventhough HTC does not grant phone with the best specs, but they balanced it up with a great software.. and the devs love HTC too

More results
img545.imageshack.us/img545/9767/benchmarkpro.jpg
youtube.com/watch?v=BJWOznNUfow

So is it true that froyo doesn't really have much different effect on SGS? Does anyone have a picture showing quadrant result for the Desire HD and SGS froyo stock?

Hakimy said:
So is it true that froyo doesn't really have much different effect on SGS? Does anyone have a picture showing quadrant result for the Desire HD and SGS froyo stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem here is Samsung totally cocked up the Froyo and yesterday removed it from the Scandinavian servers.
Part of the removal was they were not happy with the reg-hack but a lot is to do with Froyo underperforming on the SGS.
Samsung are letting the SGS down badly.

Beards said:
The problem here is Samsung totally cocked up the Froyo and yesterday removed it from the Scandinavian servers.
Part of the removal was they were not happy with the reg-hack but a lot is to do with Froyo underperforming on the SGS.
Samsung are letting the SGS down badly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung let the SGS down from the start - fix the lag, GPS, some other things I've forgotten, and you would have a great phone. They got the hard stuff right, and all the easier stuff completely wrong.

Gingerbread 3D Benchmarks?

Those with some of those unstable Gingerbread releases... has anyone run any 3d benchmarks?
I want to see what FPS the Quadrant 2D/3D benchmarks get.
Also, Nenamark, an3dBenchmark, Neocore, GL Benchmark (http://www.glbenchmark.com/)..
So yeah. If anyone can hint in on this please tell me. I want to know if Gingerbread improves 3d performance.

Linpack gets 40-42.
Quadrant i can get 1600 or so
On neocore i got 32fps.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk

sultan.of.swing said:
Linpack gets 40-42.
Quadrant i can get 1600 or so
On neocore i got 32fps.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
Any specifics on the Quadrant score? Specifically the 3d part? What FPS did you get generally from the First Person Shooter, Planets, and the Orange Pattern/Leaves?
I get around 12fps on the shooter, 40fps on the planets, and 17fps on the orange one. Froyo Myn's w/ Baked Kernel 6.
Thanks again.

I finally found my answer.
The answer is yes! Gingerbread does increase graphical performance.
http://translate.google.com/transla...osp-dandroid-gingerbread-2-3/&hl=en&prmd=ivns
It shows multiple 3d benchmarks with all the performance increases with the unstable Gingerbread builds.
Awesome!
Hope this helps sometone, lol.

bench score

Hello,
What is your bench score with QUADRANT BENCHMARK
the mine is 1550 with hc3.1 OTA, Villain_iconia_kernel_2.5 kernel

Quandrant Score : 3423
Acer Iconia A500
Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2
LightSpeed Rom
over clocked to 1.4ghz

MrTonyToca said:
Quandrant Score : 3423
Acer Iconia A500
Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2
LightSpeed Rom
over clocked to 1.4ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How does it get that high? Mine is oc. To 1.5 and my highest is 2100!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App

monkey10120 said:
How does it get that high? Mine is oc. To 1.5 and my highest is 2100!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know, It might be the Rom.....Its the newest version of the Light Speed Rom....OC'd to 1.4ghz using SetCPU Ondemand governer , with the Honey Villian_Iconia_Kernel 3.2, thats the highest I've gotten but since I've flashed both it has ranged from 2800-3300

[ROM][26/08]Lightspeed_1.0.2[HC3.2]
[KERNEL] Stock/HV/Taboonay V3.3 for HC 3.2 07-09 - 1.64Ghz/UV control

quadrant is very unreliable. to some searching on it, it is easy to manipulate I/O or other factors just get high scores. Doesn't really mean it is a great ROM/kernel combo. I've seen posts where people can get their quadrant score upwards of 20,000. All benchmarks apps have their pros and cons but from i've been told/seen in threads CF bench and vellamo seem to be the most reliable.

mburke178 said:
quadrant is very unreliable. to some searching on it, it is easy to manipulate I/O or other factors just get high scores. Doesn't really mean it is a great ROM/kernel combo. I've seen posts where people can get their quadrant score upwards of 20,000. All benchmarks apps have their pros and cons but from i've been told/seen in threads CF bench and vellamo seem to be the most reliable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've also tried Smartbench 2011, since it measures both cores instead of one and push around 4400 there.....Im loving the speed on this thing....

Fastest Benchmark Score For Your i9000

Using Antutu benchmark, I hit 3600+ running Codenameandroid 1.3.3
OC'ed to 1300MHZ
Sent every time I hit the submit button

Mine is 4205 ! (Quadrant )MY Own Cm9-16 and CNA HYBRID ROM

Awesome, is your phone oc'ed?

My Score is so Low
Your Score is so high ,my i9000 only 32XX!
now,i flash to codenameandroid 1.3.3
Only 14xx Oc to1.2 Ghz
my english is so pool.

I am gonna try quadrant next...see how it fares.

ddrulze said:
Mine is 4205 ! (Quadrant )MY Own Cm9-16 and CNA HYBRID ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try the new quadrant. It seems like it doesn't vary much anymore

Here's my quadrant score, seems its at 1400+ as well
Sent every time I hit the submit key

The new quadrant sucks ...yp my phns oc.ed at 1300 mhz step with 14% live oc and uv ofcource ....and people this score is not fake ..i hav submitted my scores .!

Know where I can get the older versions?

You know that Quadrant doesn´t show real speed of a phone?
I also get values like 3000 and above with some roms and still lagy
and scores below 2000 with others which are super smooth.
So I don´t care ´bout it.

dark_knight35 said:
You know that Quadrant doesn´t show real speed of a phone?
I also get values like 3000 and above with some roms and still lagy
and scores below 2000 with others which are super smooth.
So I don´t care ´bout it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody is forcing you to post your benchmark scores mate

Samsung i9000
ICS 4.0.3 MIUI ASNET 1.3.0 with Devil kernel
Antutu Score 4249
quadrant is 4 kids

ryandabao said:
Know where I can get the older versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
search quadrant 1.17 mediafire in google ..u.ll find it !

qrsky said:
Samsung i9000
ICS 4.0.3 MIUI ASNET 1.3.0 with Devil kernel
Antutu Score 4249
quadrant is 4 kids
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OC 1610 => hell yeah!
im currently on ICSSGS 4.0.3 RC4.2 with semaphore 0.8.1
Antutu gives me 3100 without any overclocking
its weird how different those results sometimes are but i got no lag at all running on 1000MHz and a sweeeeet battery life as well

This one on glitch 14 v3
This one on devil's kernel best thing is that cpu score is worse than one on 1610MHz :what:
My new max score:
my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

I'm on CM9 build 16 with semaphore 0.8.1 OC at 1150MHz this are my results :

So far i've only used basic overclocking on ICSSGS RC4.2 with Devil 1.1 CFS LED2 kernel. The rom works just amazingly and is super fast. I've not really tried to live oc this much because i need to manually set more voltages because the default ones crashes the phone. But i can say for example gta3 works fine with this rom without any serious issues and not many roms on sgs that game works even with oc...
i just now need to try and get the battery to live long and maybe after that i am trying to figure out how to enlarge my virtual penis with benchmark records
antutu is 3677 with oc'd to 1,4 ghz and quadrant is 1557.

ryandabao said:
Here's my quadrant score, seems its at 1400+ as well
Sent every time I hit the submit key
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 2.3k quadrant(latest version quadrant) using TeamIcssgs 4.2 rom with devil kernel 14.2..using smartassv2 cpu..no OC
Updated: 2289. under galaxy TAB

On ICS 4.0.4 with devil 14.2
Without anu UV or OV
Wysłane z mojego GT-I9000 za pomocą Tapatalk

I'm on ICSSGS 4.0.3 RC4.2 with devil 14.2
Sent from my GT-I9000

Overview of Jelly Bean (CM10) on the Galaxy S2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVML6Q1Qid4&feature=plcp

theandroidrooter88 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVML6Q1Qid4&feature=plcp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Must be in General Section Dont worry MODs ll move it

Prashanthme said:
Must be in General Section Dont worry MODs ll move it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for fixing it.

Might want to move this to the T-Mobile GS2 forum.

Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
High Quadrant scores aren't exactly a reliable standard for a ROM being 'good/bad' or 'slow/fast'. I've used CM10 for a few weeks and over 5 runs in a row Quadrant tested 2754, 2330, 2600, 3100 and 2982...
It's nothing more then a short and fast measurement, and the results aren't consistent at all.
I find daily usage of my phone with a smooth, responsive and reliable ROM far more important then the outcome of a few tests that took 1-2 min....
Sent from my GT-9100

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I actualled loled at your post. Why do mods let noobs make such lame posts? :S

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As the firm says many recognized developers:
However, if you put any trust in Quadrant scores you could use them to prove that dancing naked for 5 minutes in your garden affects device performance. By Chainfire
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:

DD-Ripper said:
Quadrant scores are too less. That stops me from using any Cyanogen Mod ROMS.
So far only F1 Galaxy Nexus ROM remains unbeatable in Quadrant scores (without overclocking or any other kernel) Scored around 3800 :good:
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Quadrant scores don't mean much. It doesn't really mirror the user experience fluency. It's pretty much just a number.
Just for the record, I've got the score of 4K on CM9.
Sent from my premium potato

ArmorD said:
I think Quadrant scores don't mean much. It doesn't really mirror the user experience fluency. It's pretty much just a number.
Just for the record, I've got the score of 4K on CM9.
Sent from my premium potato
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it affects gaming performance. I only bought Samsung Galaxy S2 for Gaming purposes not for development n other stuff....
Btw how did u got 4K on CM9..?? You probably must have Siyah or any other kernel and Overclocked ..I scored around 2800 on CM9 on all default settings..Just after I flashed that Rom
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

DD-Ripper said:
But it affects gaming performance. I only bought Samsung Galaxy S2 for Gaming purposes not for development n other stuff....
Btw how did u got 4K on CM9..?? You probably must have Siyah or any other kernel and Overclocked ..I scored around 2800 on CM9 on all default settings..Just after I flashed that Rom
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A high score during a short test doesn't have anything to do with gaming-performance.
Again: quadrant scores are useless when you're talking about overall performance
Sent from my GT-9100

siedus said:
A high score during a short test doesn't have anything to do with gaming-performance.
Again: quadrant scores are useless when you're talking about overall performance
Sent from my GT-9100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is. If you score less than 3000, heavy games like NOVA 3 gets too much laggy and unplayable (In Multiplayer) unless you over clock.
So I'm not saying that CM10/CM9 is useless, I'm only saying that those ROMS are not good for gaming purposes. You guys are taking my words wrongly.
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD

thats what i found

DD-Ripper said:
It is. If you score less than 3000, heavy games like NOVA 3 gets too much laggy and unplayable (In Multiplayer) unless you over clock.
So I'm not saying that CM10/CM9 is useless, I'm only saying that those ROMS are not good for gaming purposes. You guys are taking my words wrongly.
Sent From My Premium Potato 2 HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not taking your words wrongly, i think you don't understand what i'm trying to explain.
But i think this 'discussion' about quadrant scores is a bit off-topic, so maybe it's wise to end it
Sent from my GT-I9100

Aside from quadrant scores meaning absolutely nothing, it should probably be noted that this video is done on the T-Mobile USA model, the SGH-T989. Which has an inferior chipset/CPU. So of course the scores are low.