Database Users

nenamark scores

what kind of frames/sec. are you guys getting in nenamark from the market. just curious

di11igaf said:
what kind of frames/sec. are you guys getting in nenamark from the market. just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
32.4 FPS (Need more text to post)

32.7 for me

shibby80 said:
32.7 for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heh. galaxy s i got 49.5
but honestly. all games run fine on nexus. why are we getting extra GPU if no software is using it is beyond me.
just to brag on the net ?

ll_l_x_l_ll said:
heh. galaxy s i got 49.5
but honestly. all games run fine on nexus. why are we getting extra GPU if no software is using it is beyond me.
just to brag on the net ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.

joebobjoe said:
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude
i am not dissin the phone.
i think both phones have great positives and negatives.
all i am just saying that these scores dont mean anything. because there is no game that use this extra power on the galaxy S gpu.
so for whats worth. u can get a 100 fps on either devices. but if all the games have a nexus 1 dev standard. then whats the point?

Just got a 35.0
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

joebobjoe said:
I was thinking about responding to your post with something like, "Well, at least the G2 can actually hold a GPS lock." But then I thought of all the things you could say in return about the G2, and I thought best of it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMAO that is a funny azz post right there.

I just got 36.0 with it overclocked to 1.4ghz
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

39.9 FPS, G2 is overclocked at 1.2 GHz.

nenamark score
52.1 on Samsung Galaxy S running android 2.1 and lagfix.

39.7 fps with 1.4ghz overclock.

47.5fps
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fyeGhS624g
EDIT : Now getting 55.2 FPS. Pics coming
Some bastard got a 55.6 FPS score from Nexus S oc'd:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/16615951/nexuss1200nm.png

G2 CyanogenMod 6.1.1 Stable (1.8 GHz Overclock)
Test #1 49.2
Test #2 50.2

47.4 fps
Tmo G2 OC'd @ 1.5GHz (Performance) using baconbits 0.3

Tops out at 47.8 in Nenamark with a 1.5GHz OC.
Im wondering when Gingerbread comes out are we gonna see some performance gains? The Nexus S is getting ridiculous scores at 1.2GHZ.

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=10282290#post10282290

htc vision oc at 1.5 android 2.3 gingervillian rom
nena result at 45fps

47.6 FPS
SetCPU on performance while OC'd to 1.5ghz

Quadrant score

What rom has the highest quad score for the vibrant?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Depends on many factors, not just the rom. There's also the Kernel, OCing, UVing and even the launcher.

Highest I have had without an overclock was 2456, and that was on Simply Galaxy v3 RC3 (Port from i9000) with all the tweaks engaged. It was very very fast. Faster than any other ROM I have used, even with overclock. Hell, if I could OC with that ROM I would bet that I could break 3000+ quads easy. But quads are worthless. You just have to try using the phone with the speed of that ROM. I didn't know the vibrant could be that fast.

Running Trigger right now. Get anywhere from 1400-1600. Runs ok. Was just wondering what some of the other Rome were capable of. How is the Simply Galaxy rom? I personally don't know anyone who has used it.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

2750 Quadrant.
Darky 9.5 Froyo 2.2.1 base rom, 1.48Ghz Bullet Kernel linked in my sig.
Phone is FLYIN. Gingerbread 2.3.3 builds can go higher (but have bugs).

I got a Quadrant of 3300.....!!
I was using my TI-83 calculator with a tic-tac stuck in the DC in slot!

2000 flat w/ bi winning V2 no OC w/ voodoo. VERY FAST though. Quadrant doesn't give it justice.

}{Alienz}{ said:
2750 Quadrant.
Darky 9.5 Froyo 2.2.1 base rom, 1.48Ghz Bullet Kernel linked in my sig.
Phone is FLYIN. Gingerbread 2.3.3 builds can go higher (but have bugs).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get the same on darkys rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Quads dont mean anything.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App

I have a 3500 quadrant. On top of that, my battery increases 2% every hour as a result.

I'm running Android 3.3 on mine. 4700 quadrant score and when I plug my usb up to my laptop the phone charges it.

5000 with a V8 hemi under the hood!

With the battery in, I get around 16K but I only get 8K if I take the battery out.
I'm using the FBS ROM.

Speaking of Quadrant...It sucks

cashyftw said:
Speaking of Quadrant...It sucks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I second this.
So useless of an app, it has nothing to do with the actually smoothness and snapyness in any phone. Sometimes I feel it's scores are the other way around, the lowest you get the better your phone is

I'm a total lurker, but after "bricking" my vibrant about 3 weeks after getting it home last Fall and discovering the fix here, I've been tweaking, wiping, flashing, odining, and having a helluva lot of fun with it. I'll probably betray myself as still being a noob, but I see everyone kind of poo-pooing Quadrant as meaningless (and other benchmarks, it seems). Is there any objective measurement that you guys consider worthwhile?
I thought I was all hot **** for breaking the 2K mark, but I guess none of that matters?
Trigger 3.2 with Bullet 1.42...just added bullet, so currently OC'd to 1.2 while I get a feel for what the phone can handle.

anthonys2r said:
I have a 3500 quadrant. On top of that, my battery increases 2% every hour as a result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you currently on and what kernel are you using?

test4vibrant said:
What are you currently on and what kernel are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He was obviously being sarcastic. Can't believe someone fell for the increasing battery **** LOL.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk

On Biwinning with o.c. I am getting 2580 ....... but it does not perform ant better than leaving the clock @ 1000 so I leave unclocked ......... I get great battery life then...........

Quadrant is amusing...
but it's not always telling of how a rom actually performs. Back in the day when we were using the OCLF, quad scrores were in the 2k range and that was with 2.1
That being said, I felt compelled to post this anyway, mainly just to show the cpu score improvement that we get with gingerbread. My phone was running Cyanogenmod7 at stock speeds. Comparing quadrant scores between roms that are all based off of each other is pointless.
The 1815 score is from CM7
The 1755 score is from MIUI
MIUI performs great, but it's not as buttery smooth as CM7. But from the two scores you wouldn't see that. More importantly I think this also lends to what I said about comparing two scores between roms that are based off of each other.

Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored 4171! Beat stock I9100's Score!

Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171

The picture redirects to another picture. If you want to do sth, do it correctly... ffs What's the number? I've scored 4004 on stock i9100...

update already.. sorry for the mistake image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!

updated already.. sorry for the mistaked image link.. i score at 4171 at stock i9100G!

Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

MS. said:
Quadrant score means nothing. It means less then incorrectly posted pic and double posts.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...

well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.

rauschkugl said:
well my i9100 is cleverer than you. i think you didn't get it. quadrant sucks and nobody cares about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you saying stupid? then you how to measure the performance on one phone... you think u is god can measure yourself? Please be manner while using your word.. TQ

well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.

All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

donmarkon said:
All stock so you are noob?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
your one already modded bro... see your battery icon also know... =.=

Can I be noob too?

rauschkugl said:
well then don't spam the forum with stupid threads. quadrant wasn't updated for ages, it's not meant for testing dualcore chips and you always get completely different scores when running it different times. only noobs care about quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, i know that is different score on Quadrant... but let say why old Android phone like one year ago Xperia x10 always got lower score than samsung s2? tat y in fact samsung S2 is powerful than before phone... If you think this is Stupid thread, why not you just ignore and keep your mouth shut.. and please be manner while using word... what the religion you have? so rude are you!

TheSaw said:
Can I be noob too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you hiding a meaning behind?

i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?

rauschkugl said:
i was able to score more than 4000 points with my old hd2. and the builds in that time weren't even running stable. so my old hd2 is as good as your s2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, please provide your Evidence brother thank you because be manner

these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.

rauschkugl said:
these were the first builds that were running from sd card. i don't have these versions anymore because they were not stable and lot of things didn't work and i don't have my hd2 anymore. this should just show you that quadrant isn't reliable. the gpu isn't tested at all.
and who the hell does care about stock settings on xda? nobody here has a stock phone. antutu or smartbench if you care about numbers. they're at least able to test dualcore cpus. but a higher score still doesn't mean that your phone is better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
okok. Bro.. so, do you plan to move to Galaxy Note? or waiting New Galaxy S3?

serge327 said:
No, that is cause i am not familiar to make posting... i can swear that is 100% real! Or you not satisfied that your i9100 lose? i can make a video if you want to see...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hope your happy with your dev community
Sent from my GT-I9100

serge327 said:
Stock I9100G Quadrant Scored beat stock I9100's Score! i think it will get more score than mod i9100 once have mod with kernel oc to higher clock speed! so OMAP is powerful than Exynos
My I9100G scored 4171
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first of all, you are using a wrong benchmark to test. secondly, you are not comparing apple to apple. what i meant was your G version is most likely running on update3 source code. when i flash a kernel with update3 source code, my stock rom is able to hit more than 4300+

New Quadrant -> Support For Multiple Cores And ICS

A call for all the benchmark whores, this is your time to shine. Your e-peen will grow like no other. You can post your new quadrant scores, without anyone telling you that it's outdated!
Article link
Market link
AndroidPolice said:
When it comes to benchmarks, one name usually stands above all others: Quadrant. Even though it has been proven to be easily faked, there's just something about running it and see a 3000+ score show up at the end to make you feel your device is untouchable.
Despite its popularity, Quadrant has been missing one key feature: multi-core support. That all changes with an update that was pushed to the Market earlier today, which brings Quadrant up to version 2.0, though. Not only does Quadrant now support multiple-core chips, but the update also brings ICS support, GUI improvements, support for Polish, and a fix for slow frame rates on PowerVR SGX 540 GPUs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it would matter, mine would be 3547.
It also occurred to me, that I might have not posted in the correct subforum. If so, I kindly ask Scotty to beam me up and back down a bit to the left.
And in the meantime it also occurred to me, that someone else had posted a similar thread already. I can only blame the forums for not giving me relevant search results.

It's still crap, because it doesn't display per-test scoring so you can know WHAT changed a score.
For example, disabling per-file sync in the filesystem code gains you a few hundred points in Quadrant - in AnTuTu it's clear that this improvement is in database write tests. (It also doesn't skew the scores nearly as much. Quadrant's weighting sucks.)

With ICS 'LPB' i got 3914.

I got 4004 on i9100 with ICS XXLPB
However...
Quadrant reports that my device has only one core, which is quite an important mistake, and some of the graphics tests keep hitting the 60fps ceiling, which ruins the integrity of the test, assuming it is based on measuring the maximum possible framerate.

hedgepigdaniel said:
I got 4004 on i9100 with ICS XXLPB
However...
Quadrant reports that my device has only one core, which is quite an important mistake, and some of the graphics tests keep hitting the 60fps ceiling, which ruins the integrity of the test, assuming it is based on measuring the maximum possible framerate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The s2 framerate is capped at 60 fps because of vsync, it can't be changed..
And Quadrant results are more accurate on quallcomm device.. Other than that results may vary and could even be manipulated, CMIIW
I suggest you to run nenamark2 benchmark instead.. It's free on the market and gives a comparable results too..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Guys, is the planet part of the test scores only about 38+ fps?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

3875 on XLB remix 9.2

Using omega's ics rom...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Gorjess said:
The s2 framerate is capped at 60 fps because of vsync, it can't be changed..
And Quadrant results are more accurate on quallcomm device.. Other than that results may vary and could even be manipulated, CMIIW
I suggest you to run nenamark2 benchmark instead.. It's free on the market and gives a comparable results too..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 60fps limit can't be changed, but quadrants graphics test can be made more challenging so that the limiting factor is power rather than the arbitrary fps limit. It's not an accurate test if its hitting the 60fps ceiling.

ephraim033 said:
Guys, is the planet part of the test scores only about 38+ fps?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mine stuck @ 45 fps for the same test, are you in ICS rom?
edit:
between got 4285 in LPB

4346 here and planet test is at 38 fps.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

3510 on CM9 latest

bala_gamer said:
mine stuck @ 45 fps for the same test, are you in ICS rom?
edit:
between got 4285 in LPB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, i'm using Hyperdroid ROM
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Hmm... it seems to me that CM9 gets lower scores than other ICS ROMs. That, I think, can be explained by the lack of full kernel support. Let's hope for the better, when they will get their hands on the kernel sources.

Please don't discuss Quadrant scores in this forum. Search "quadrant" in GSII General for the 7 or 8 threads we've closed for the reasons why.
Thanks

AnTuTu Benchmark

AnTuTu Benchmark from cm-10.1-20130908-NIGHTLY

Antutu score on stock.
Ye I also don't understand how I got that.
My scores usually hover between 19500 and 20500 though.
I added stock scores so people could have a reference atleast.
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app

My benchmarks: CM10.1-20130915-Nightly
Antutu: 20492
Quadrant: 5948
-----------------
Antutu
Quadrant
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda premium

Thats odd. Mine turned out much lower than usual:

I read the other day that Samsung use higher clock speeds with benchmark apps, higher than the phone runs normally, which in my eyes means benchmarks on these phones means jack squat! I was going to buy the S4 Mini but because of this I have lost faith in Samsung and have just ordered the HTC Mini. Will post the link when I get back home with what I read.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

rofl. If you would read more about this topic, you would find out, that samsung isn't the only one doing this. But I don't see the problem, because first of all I don't really care about benchmarks and secondly I think the purpose of a benchmark is to test the phone on the highest settings.

BamRom 4.3.1
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda app-developers app

junkyde said:
rofl. If you would read more about this topic, you would find out, that samsung isn't the only one doing this. But I don't see the problem, because first of all I don't really care about benchmarks and secondly I think the purpose of a benchmark is to test the phone on the highest settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe others do, but its not right. I use benchmarks when purchasing a phone, so do some others and companies know this, why else would they ramp up scores? And fine if they want to show off their highest settings, but not if these high settings dont actually run for more than 10 minutes before frying your phone. These aren't real world stats which is what they should be showing. I mean who are these high settings benchmarks ment to be for if not everyday users? Personally I think its a scam and ANY company that goes by these rules is shameful...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

RuffBuster said:
Maybe others do, but its not right. I use benchmarks when purchasing a phone, so do some others and companies know this, why else would they ramp up scores? And fine if they want to show off their highest settings, but not if these high settings dont actually run for more than 10 minutes before frying your phone. These aren't real world stats which is what they should be showing. I mean who are these high settings benchmarks ment to be for if not everyday users? Personally I think its a scam and ANY company that goes by these rules is shameful...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't really understand this whine about specific settings on benchmarks?! People who want the highest score disable everything, use the highest settings, overclock, use fresh install, delete all useless apps etc. Clearly these newbie phone benchmarkers have never done pc benchmarks. And if someone buys a phone because of it's benchmark score then clearly those don't have any idea about real life usage vs benchmarking.

leripe said:
I can't really understand this whine about specific settings on benchmarks?! People who want the highest score disable everything, use the highest settings, overclock, use fresh install, delete all useless apps etc. Clearly these newbie phone benchmarkers have never done pc benchmarks. And if someone buys a phone because of it's benchmark score then clearly those don't have any idea about real life usage vs benchmarking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I myself have done many benchmarks both on PC and mobile phones and I myself use the scores I get and compare it against it's physical aspects. Everyone has their own way of buying a phone and you can't judge people for the way they do stuff.

RuffBuster said:
I read the other day that Samsung use higher clock speeds with benchmark apps, higher than the phone runs normally, which in my eyes means benchmarks on these phones means jack squat! I was going to buy the S4 Mini but because of this I have lost faith in Samsung and have just ordered the HTC Mini. Will post the link when I get back home with what I read.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A benchmark is not a good reason to buy a phone, I think you are a fanboy trolling
features man that's the real deal, battery life, network, camera, memory, screen, style construction, etc.
not only a benchmark if you want the best bench score buy the full one not the mini
Sent from my GT-I9192 using Tapatalk

Benchmarks mean something to me as well. They aren't guidelines to what phone I should choose, but the specifics can give me a good judgement for the aspect I'm intending to improve when upgrading my phone. I had an s3 mini before this and was disappointed by battery life versus performance. I could tell the difference by taking multiple benchmarks at different times during everyday use. I noticed when phones/ROMs have widely varying benchmarks then the battery life and performance would dwindle. The s3 mini on most ROMs would vary by approx 2000 points, and that's a lot.
It's worth noting that a custom ROM can affect the stability of a phones functioning a lot, but it is mostly due to the hardware used when a phone/computer has dwindling performance. The s4 mini for me, has had fairly stable performance and shows it with the battery life. My scores vary between approx 19800 and 20800 with moderate use.
Sent from the dark side of the moon.

Results with @proxuser's kernel:

Azariah Vidya said:
Results with @proxuser's kernel:
View attachment 2340182
View attachment 2340183
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 21620 with oc 2ghz

Good!

Using Antutu for benchmarks on Samsung devices
You should not use Antutu to benchmark Samsung devices because they are unreliable as the stock ROM will score higher no matter what so if you want real benchmark results then use another program.

Using
cm - 10 . 2 - 20131018 -NIGHTLY - serrano 3 gxx after 30 sec reboot and limiting background processes to
2.
Result: 21140
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app

Anyone yet tested OpenGL ES 3.0 on Antutu, what kind of scores are you getting
Mine: 3816
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
View attachment 2348641

always aoperal
very good bencmarks, my mini duos is arriving, :laugh:

Here is screenshots of over clocked serrano-x kernel. It's still not stable but I can run 2ghz without reboots.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda premium