AnTuTu Benchmark from cm-10.1-20130908-NIGHTLY
Antutu score on stock.
Ye I also don't understand how I got that.
My scores usually hover between 19500 and 20500 though.
I added stock scores so people could have a reference atleast.
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
My benchmarks: CM10.1-20130915-Nightly
Antutu: 20492
Quadrant: 5948
-----------------
Antutu
Quadrant
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda premium
Thats odd. Mine turned out much lower than usual:
I read the other day that Samsung use higher clock speeds with benchmark apps, higher than the phone runs normally, which in my eyes means benchmarks on these phones means jack squat! I was going to buy the S4 Mini but because of this I have lost faith in Samsung and have just ordered the HTC Mini. Will post the link when I get back home with what I read.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
rofl. If you would read more about this topic, you would find out, that samsung isn't the only one doing this. But I don't see the problem, because first of all I don't really care about benchmarks and secondly I think the purpose of a benchmark is to test the phone on the highest settings.
BamRom 4.3.1
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda app-developers app
junkyde said:
rofl. If you would read more about this topic, you would find out, that samsung isn't the only one doing this. But I don't see the problem, because first of all I don't really care about benchmarks and secondly I think the purpose of a benchmark is to test the phone on the highest settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe others do, but its not right. I use benchmarks when purchasing a phone, so do some others and companies know this, why else would they ramp up scores? And fine if they want to show off their highest settings, but not if these high settings dont actually run for more than 10 minutes before frying your phone. These aren't real world stats which is what they should be showing. I mean who are these high settings benchmarks ment to be for if not everyday users? Personally I think its a scam and ANY company that goes by these rules is shameful...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
RuffBuster said:
Maybe others do, but its not right. I use benchmarks when purchasing a phone, so do some others and companies know this, why else would they ramp up scores? And fine if they want to show off their highest settings, but not if these high settings dont actually run for more than 10 minutes before frying your phone. These aren't real world stats which is what they should be showing. I mean who are these high settings benchmarks ment to be for if not everyday users? Personally I think its a scam and ANY company that goes by these rules is shameful...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't really understand this whine about specific settings on benchmarks?! People who want the highest score disable everything, use the highest settings, overclock, use fresh install, delete all useless apps etc. Clearly these newbie phone benchmarkers have never done pc benchmarks. And if someone buys a phone because of it's benchmark score then clearly those don't have any idea about real life usage vs benchmarking.
leripe said:
I can't really understand this whine about specific settings on benchmarks?! People who want the highest score disable everything, use the highest settings, overclock, use fresh install, delete all useless apps etc. Clearly these newbie phone benchmarkers have never done pc benchmarks. And if someone buys a phone because of it's benchmark score then clearly those don't have any idea about real life usage vs benchmarking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I myself have done many benchmarks both on PC and mobile phones and I myself use the scores I get and compare it against it's physical aspects. Everyone has their own way of buying a phone and you can't judge people for the way they do stuff.
RuffBuster said:
I read the other day that Samsung use higher clock speeds with benchmark apps, higher than the phone runs normally, which in my eyes means benchmarks on these phones means jack squat! I was going to buy the S4 Mini but because of this I have lost faith in Samsung and have just ordered the HTC Mini. Will post the link when I get back home with what I read.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A benchmark is not a good reason to buy a phone, I think you are a fanboy trolling
features man that's the real deal, battery life, network, camera, memory, screen, style construction, etc.
not only a benchmark if you want the best bench score buy the full one not the mini
Sent from my GT-I9192 using Tapatalk
Benchmarks mean something to me as well. They aren't guidelines to what phone I should choose, but the specifics can give me a good judgement for the aspect I'm intending to improve when upgrading my phone. I had an s3 mini before this and was disappointed by battery life versus performance. I could tell the difference by taking multiple benchmarks at different times during everyday use. I noticed when phones/ROMs have widely varying benchmarks then the battery life and performance would dwindle. The s3 mini on most ROMs would vary by approx 2000 points, and that's a lot.
It's worth noting that a custom ROM can affect the stability of a phones functioning a lot, but it is mostly due to the hardware used when a phone/computer has dwindling performance. The s4 mini for me, has had fairly stable performance and shows it with the battery life. My scores vary between approx 19800 and 20800 with moderate use.
Sent from the dark side of the moon.
Results with @proxuser's kernel:
Azariah Vidya said:
Results with @proxuser's kernel:
View attachment 2340182
View attachment 2340183
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get 21620 with oc 2ghz
Good!
Using Antutu for benchmarks on Samsung devices
You should not use Antutu to benchmark Samsung devices because they are unreliable as the stock ROM will score higher no matter what so if you want real benchmark results then use another program.
Using
cm - 10 . 2 - 20131018 -NIGHTLY - serrano 3 gxx after 30 sec reboot and limiting background processes to
2.
Result: 21140
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
Anyone yet tested OpenGL ES 3.0 on Antutu, what kind of scores are you getting
Mine: 3816
Sent from my GT-I9190 using xda app-developers app
View attachment 2348641
always aoperal
very good bencmarks, my mini duos is arriving, :laugh:
Here is screenshots of over clocked serrano-x kernel. It's still not stable but I can run 2ghz without reboots.
Sent from my GT-I9195 using xda premium
Related
A call for all the benchmark whores, this is your time to shine. Your e-peen will grow like no other. You can post your new quadrant scores, without anyone telling you that it's outdated!
Article link
Market link
AndroidPolice said:
When it comes to benchmarks, one name usually stands above all others: Quadrant. Even though it has been proven to be easily faked, there's just something about running it and see a 3000+ score show up at the end to make you feel your device is untouchable.
Despite its popularity, Quadrant has been missing one key feature: multi-core support. That all changes with an update that was pushed to the Market earlier today, which brings Quadrant up to version 2.0, though. Not only does Quadrant now support multiple-core chips, but the update also brings ICS support, GUI improvements, support for Polish, and a fix for slow frame rates on PowerVR SGX 540 GPUs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it would matter, mine would be 3547.
It also occurred to me, that I might have not posted in the correct subforum. If so, I kindly ask Scotty to beam me up and back down a bit to the left.
And in the meantime it also occurred to me, that someone else had posted a similar thread already. I can only blame the forums for not giving me relevant search results.
It's still crap, because it doesn't display per-test scoring so you can know WHAT changed a score.
For example, disabling per-file sync in the filesystem code gains you a few hundred points in Quadrant - in AnTuTu it's clear that this improvement is in database write tests. (It also doesn't skew the scores nearly as much. Quadrant's weighting sucks.)
With ICS 'LPB' i got 3914.
I got 4004 on i9100 with ICS XXLPB
However...
Quadrant reports that my device has only one core, which is quite an important mistake, and some of the graphics tests keep hitting the 60fps ceiling, which ruins the integrity of the test, assuming it is based on measuring the maximum possible framerate.
hedgepigdaniel said:
I got 4004 on i9100 with ICS XXLPB
However...
Quadrant reports that my device has only one core, which is quite an important mistake, and some of the graphics tests keep hitting the 60fps ceiling, which ruins the integrity of the test, assuming it is based on measuring the maximum possible framerate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The s2 framerate is capped at 60 fps because of vsync, it can't be changed..
And Quadrant results are more accurate on quallcomm device.. Other than that results may vary and could even be manipulated, CMIIW
I suggest you to run nenamark2 benchmark instead.. It's free on the market and gives a comparable results too..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Guys, is the planet part of the test scores only about 38+ fps?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
3875 on XLB remix 9.2
Using omega's ics rom...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Gorjess said:
The s2 framerate is capped at 60 fps because of vsync, it can't be changed..
And Quadrant results are more accurate on quallcomm device.. Other than that results may vary and could even be manipulated, CMIIW
I suggest you to run nenamark2 benchmark instead.. It's free on the market and gives a comparable results too..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 60fps limit can't be changed, but quadrants graphics test can be made more challenging so that the limiting factor is power rather than the arbitrary fps limit. It's not an accurate test if its hitting the 60fps ceiling.
ephraim033 said:
Guys, is the planet part of the test scores only about 38+ fps?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mine stuck @ 45 fps for the same test, are you in ICS rom?
edit:
between got 4285 in LPB
4346 here and planet test is at 38 fps.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
3510 on CM9 latest
bala_gamer said:
mine stuck @ 45 fps for the same test, are you in ICS rom?
edit:
between got 4285 in LPB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, i'm using Hyperdroid ROM
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Hmm... it seems to me that CM9 gets lower scores than other ICS ROMs. That, I think, can be explained by the lack of full kernel support. Let's hope for the better, when they will get their hands on the kernel sources.
Please don't discuss Quadrant scores in this forum. Search "quadrant" in GSII General for the 7 or 8 threads we've closed for the reasons why.
Thanks
Post your benchmarks from various roms here
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda premium
Anurag pandey said:
Post your benchmarks from various roms here
Sent from my HTC HD2 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm reasonably sure one of these already exists, plus benchmarks mean nothing really. If you feel your phone performs well, then just leave it at that. For example, my friend's brand new One X crashed twice when trying to turn on/off airplane mode today, it's quite unbelievable. I personally think there isn't much point in getting a 10000 score on quadrant if your phone can't function properly in the first place.
Having said that, my score is 1137 with NexusHD2 full HWA, which isn't bad seeing as it's only a small amount off the Nexus S which has an updated CPU vs the HD2 as far as I know. The difference in 3D performance vs GB is stunning, the FPS has almost doubled and there's a significant visual difference.
Did some testing with clock speeds today. If you're squeamish look away now lol. :laugh:
Flashed the 720p extremekernel as I said I would do and started testing the phone with extreme clocks.
Phone seems to be stable clocked at 2.3ghz. Eats the battery like anything though, Ran a few benchmarks, did some gaming, battery even goes down whilst on charge. So this isn't practical for everyday use, but it is an amazing achievement for the phone!!!
Here's some screenies. Bear in mind that mine is an everyday phone. I have multiple apps installed and running. With a fresh install of a speed focused rom, apps frozen etc these scores would be even higher! These scores were done without sd card speeds too as I had to have the phone connected to the pc to stop it dying lol. Also, this is the 720p version. 000p would be even more interesting.
Also took a pic of my storage status. You can see the extra internal memory with this kernel. I went from DoomKernel to this and everything works as it should which I was very shocked about!!!
Thanks to @extremetempz for this madness!!!
Anyway, enjoy....
What rom were u using? And did u have adreno booster installed as with it you would probably get like +2000 more points,
Also great achievement, I can oc to 2.3 ghz also but only when hooked up to mains, and without direct power I can get up to 2ghz,
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Pizza_Dox said:
What rom were u using? And did u have adreno booster installed as with it you would probably get like +2000 more points,
Also great achievement, I can oc to 2.3 ghz also but only when hooked up to mains, and without direct power I can get up to 2ghz,
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is the Xperia NXT V2 with AdrenoBoost installed. I wasnt that bothered about the score either way, more that it would run the whole benchmark without freezing. Mine was running fine without being plugged in but the battery was getting destroyed so had to plug it in before it died (you can see how low I was in the screenshots lol).
Did a test first without adreno booster, then with adreno booster. Same conditions, fresh reboot, and adreno booster bench marked lower.
Without adreno booster .7
With adrenobooster .7
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Just tested again with adreno and got 7194. Fluctuating by +/- 500 points under identical circumstances shows clearly benchmarks (antutu at least) are useless.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
korrectmethod said:
Just tested again with adreno and got 7194. Fluctuating by +/- 500 points under identical circumstances shows clearly benchmarks (antutu at least) are useless.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
adrenobooster only works better at lower cpu frequencies..as highest you put cpu,lower are the results..most of my bench are between 1.4/1.6 ghz.
smokerman said:
adrenobooster only works better at lower cpu frequencies..as highest you put cpu,lower are the results..most of my bench are between 1.4/1.6 ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All tests were done at 1.6ghz. Besides, why would CPU clock speed affect GPU performance?
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
This is my score with adreno booster and CPU stock speed.
Btw I'm using gin2jb, lupus v12. No tweaks besides adreno.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Why has this turned into a speed competition? I was just saying that I was surprised how well the phone copes at 2.3ghz finishing the benchmark. I posted my result as I was happy that it was higher than I previously had but I wasn't meaning it to be a competition of bragging?. Everyone's setup is different and everyone will get different results. Im happy with mine, that's all that matters to me!
Sent from my 1.9ghz Xperia PLAY!!
I'm not bragging. I'm showing how benchmarking is inconsistent and pointless, and various tweaks can often be placebo. What I'm saying is, what's the point in 2.3ghz if there's no real world gain.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
BensJammin said:
Why has this turned into a speed competition? I was just saying that I was surprised how well the phone copes at 2.3ghz finishing the benchmark. I posted my result as I was happy that it was higher than I previously had but I wasn't meaning it to be a competition of bragging?. Everyone's setup is different and everyone will get different results. Im happy with mine, that's all that matters to me!
Sent from my 1.9ghz Xperia PLAY!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for sharing. I wouldn't have the [email protected] to push my play to 2.3. But the fact you were able to achieve that is awesome. For the record I know youbare/were excited of your findings and only wanted to share. Just wish some people saw this for what it was, someone who was excited about their findings and wanted to share to the rest of the community instead of demeaning the significance of your findings.
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
korrectmethod said:
I'm not bragging. I'm showing how benchmarking is inconsistent and pointless, and various tweaks can often be placebo. What I'm saying is, what's the point in 2.3ghz if there's no real world gain.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The benchmark is used as a mini stress test. Quick way to just see how the phone gets on under various testing conditions. Believe me, I know all about benchmark results meaning nothing. I own an AMD CPU in my pc and going by benchmark scores you'd think that it was only good for the bin but real world its as good as any Intel CPU, it's just that most benchmarks are not optimized for use with AMD architecture, making the Intel's look better than they really are.
The overclocks do make a real world difference. Many people have reported framerate gains in games having an overclock. PPSSPP is reported to respond well to overclocking too. And as for saying what is the point, you could say what is the point of buying a faster car when you can only do 70mph. The answer is 'because I can'!
Sent from my 1.9ghz Xperia PLAY!!
ozzmanj1 said:
Thanks for sharing. I wouldn't have the [email protected] to push my play to 2.3. But the fact you were able to achieve that is awesome. For the record I know youbare/were excited of your findings and only wanted to share. Just wish some people saw this for what it was, someone who was excited about their findings and wanted to share to the rest of the community instead of demeaning the significance of your findings.
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks Ozzmanj1. That was literally only the reason I did it. As I said about the battery situation, it's totally useless for day to day use, just an experiment really.
Sent from my 1.9ghz Xperia PLAY!!
We've known 2.3ghz is possible, but that it depends on your board and it could and most likely will fry. The heat+battery drain is dangerous/unstable.
What you're doing isnt like buying a fast new car, its more like tuning your 100mph car to go 230mph, the engine will eventually explode.
Although we all like to watch a car go 230mph and can appreciate it, there should be a big "DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME" warning for All the kids who want to try it themselves.
I just want to warn others who read this, unless you value your xperia play, please do not try to replicate these results. You could very likely end up with a paper weight.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
korrectmethod said:
We've known 2.3ghz is possible, but that it depends on your board and it could and most likely will fry. The heat+battery drain is dangerous/unstable.
What you're doing isnt like buying a fast new car, its more like tuning your 100mph car to go 230mph, the engine will eventually explode.
Although we all like to watch a car go 230mph and can appreciate it, there should be a big "DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME" warning for All the kids who want to try it themselves.
I just want to warn others who read this, unless you value your xperia play, please do not try to replicate these results. You could very likely end up with a paper weight.
Sent from my R800i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok I can appreciate where you are coming from with that and I have edited the title accordingly. It just seemed like a bit of a personal attack on me at first for doing it. I have also lined the inside of my rear cover with a thick layer of Alu tape and it seems to dissipate heat across the whole cover but how much it helps I dont know.
Sent from my 1.9ghz Xperia PLAY!!
BensJammin said:
Ok I can appreciate where you are coming from with that and I have edited the title accordingly. It just seemed like a bit of a personal attack on me at first for doing it. I have also lined the inside of my rear cover with a thick layer of Alu tape and it seems to dissipate heat across the whole cover but how much it helps I dont know.
Sent from my 1.9ghz Xperia PLAY!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alu tape? Aluminum tape? Are you placing it on the inside under the battery cover?
Sent from my R800at using xda premium
ozzmanj1 said:
Alu tape? Aluminum tape? Are you placing it on the inside under the battery cover?
Sent from my R800at using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. I have checked and there are no components exposed for it to short out so thought I might as well try to draw heat away from battery. I just put a few layers the full length of the cover. It's a tighter fit now but you can feel it working as the heAt isnt centralised anymore!
Sent from my 1.9ghz Xperia PLAY!!
BensJammin said:
Yes. I have checked and there are no components exposed for it to short out so thought I might as well try to draw heat away from battery. I just put a few layers the full length of the cover. It's a tighter fit now but you can feel it working as the heAt isnt centralised anymore!
Sent from my 1.9ghz Xperia PLAY!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mind taking a photo or two? I might try that even though I don't overclock my phone beyond 1.2 often. It couldn't hurt.
Sent from my R800at using xda premium
Any chance you could make a video of your phone running PPSSPP at that clock speed?
Like with Monster Hunter, Soul Calibur, God of War and, say, one of the DBZ fighting games, for example.
Fenrir007 said:
Any chance you could make a video of your phone running PPSSPP at that clock speed?
Like with Monster Hunter, Soul Calibur, God of War and, say, one of the DBZ fighting games, for example.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me too...
Enviado desde mi R800i usando Tapatalk 2
hi i was so happy whit my phone and.. i mean i still am i LOVE IT!
anyway today i worried a little bit my n4 at Latest PA gives me score of 12500-12900 around it was under htc one x near s2
is it bad? it was lagging at gpu test i also have snapdragon gruu battery test wanna try it should i worry? or normal? or its coz anything? also the quality of test was HORRIBLE i mean pixels were so giant!!!! anyway should i worry?!!!! i played nfs no lag MC4 no lag something wrong whit my phone? gonna lag on other games?!!
edit: i jsut turned my phone again on while it was at antutu now it says score : 17271 !?!!! is it a bug or thats the real one?!!!! its same as nexus 4!!!!!!
Man just calm down, and forget about what the benchmark score is. Is your phone running smoothly when you normally use it? Im sure the answer is yes, so why does the benchmark score matter so much to you? Oh and I'd advise that you stop running benchmarks, as I've seen quite a few people have issues where their phone shuts off and won't turn back on while they were running benchmarks.
Sent using xda-developers app
Oh tell me more about your first world problems please? Your benchmark score is too low? Oh poor soul.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
High benchmark scores = bragging rights. Benchmarks doesn't mean anything, its more or less just numbers.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
mujikhalid said:
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does your device perform slow?No?Why the **** do you care about useless benchmarks....your device got a lower score than the S5 so what?Numbers don't equal performance...try doing a ful wipe if you already didn't...
There are already threads about this and you don''t care to search the forum before posting the same thread?
Woah dude, chill , dont be so pissed if you got to see a same thread on the forum lol
mujikhalid said:
Woah dude, chill , dont be so pissed if you got to see a same thread on the forum lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah..I'm not pissed lol...sorry if I sounded like that it's just that those benchmarks are useless.Judge the device by the way you see how it performs in everyday use not by a number you got from a benchmark app...and also as I mentioned there are already threads about this so use the search function
Your note 4 shipped with 4.4. Its built for 4.4. Use 4.4
The rampant lust for updates, and the subsequent disappointment that follows is draining
dannstarr said:
Your note 4 shipped with 4.4. Its built for 4.4. Use 4.4
The rampant lust for updates, and the subsequent disappointment that follows is draining
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have any problem with the 5.0.1 in Note 4. I'm coming from Galaxy S5 and there is no way the Note 4 is performing worse than the S5. Its way faster.
I agree that benchmark points is useless and says little about the performance of the device.
Man i have the same problem here it seems that the phone is always in power saving mode and the gpu is limited to 350 mhz instead of 700 mhz. Also the cpu runs at 1.3 ghz instead of 1.9 for the big cores thats why it has low score in antutu hope somebody figures out a solution and also this is a bug in this update
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
meh
You guys are just being paranoid, I even noticed that it got faster after the lollipop update, I would never care for benchmark numbers as long as I am satisfied with the performance in real world, benchmarks can be influenced by many factors and I barely trust them (and ofc I am talking about Android benchmarks)
Edit: I just tried running a benchmark in Antutu and got 37940, ran it again and guess what? I got 44304, how can I trust this? LOL (I knew it would be way different from a benchmark to another, as it used to happen with me on my old HTC One X, since then I never trust these benchmarks). Just enjoy your phone and stop looking for non-existent problems.
mujikhalid said:
Hello everyone, I just recently updated my note 4 N910C to lollipop, and I Tested it to see its benchmark score on Antitumor, but I'm really disappointed to see that it scored a total of 38738. Its even low than galaxy s5. Whats wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many places in xda I read about this antutu score, i want to know what will i get if my phone get 100000 score?we can win any price?
Thanks
its a bug
enable power saving mode and turn off cpu limit then turn off power saving mode back
go to developer option and reduce the animation to .5 sec
redo your test
Yathani said:
its a bug
enable power saving mode and turn off cpu limit then turn off power saving mode back
go to developer option and reduce the animation to .5 sec
redo your test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried all above, but still get 37K score. most degradation is in 3D graphics. Also in UX and single thread CPU.
Still can not understand why it happens.
I did the same thing nothing changed
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
so what were you expecting? A 75k + score after you updated?
Sent from my VZW LG G2
mrao said:
so what were you expecting? A 75k + score after you updated?
Sent from my VZW LG G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course not, we expected the score to be at least the same !
Except the score you can notice that fps has dropped in games.
It also has some problems definitely, I have hangouts crashing several times a day.
UX runtime is much lower in my case also.
Benchmark scores are 100% useless.
zerojay said:
Benchmark scores are 100% useless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no they are not useless and I can see that on practice, performance has slowed down just like benchmark scores got lower.
Benchmark can precisely tell and measure the performance, that's it's purpose. In my case I can feel the difference not only in benchmark scores bat in practice also.
Same for me. Tried fresh wipe, re-odin, etc
Benchmarks are 100% useful and in the fact the performance has gotten worse on the beastly note 4 it feels same as note 3 is that even called update anymore. The frames per second for big games is just arownd 20 fps its very disapointinf
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
sirwanesmail said:
Benchmarks are 100% useful and in the fact the performance has gotten worse on the beastly note 4 it feels same as note 3 is that even called update anymore. The frames per second for big games is just arownd 20 fps its very disapointinf
Sent from my SM-N910H using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly what I was talking about !
Is anyone concerned about it and planning something or has samsung officials made any comment about this issue ?
Try this method & let me know about gpu bug.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3075440