Database Users

Benchmarks

Ok so the benchmarks on youtube I have been seeing for evo is average around 8 MFLOPS on linpack and 400 or below for quadrant.. When I get around 1166 for quadrant and 32-34 MFLOPS on linpack.. How is this because they do this testing evo with one or more devices and im on stock froyo.. Anyone have numbers for stock or overclocked or rooted? Just would like to see some numbers to compare..
sent from my Evo

2.2 increased linpaq scores because it is not JIT enabled. Also speeds up other benchmark tools.
also do a search for neifs rom comparison chart that is posted somewhere here.

engagedtosmile said:
2.2 increased linpaq scores because it is not JIT enabled. Also speeds up other benchmark tools.
also do a search for neifs rom comparison chart that is posted somewhere here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will do thanks
sent from my Evo

Quadrant benchmarks

Can someone explain exactly what it really means?
I know the higher the number the better your phone is working but beyond that i have no clue
I consistently get 2080 to 2250 on cm7 nightly 30 running ondemand governor min 368 max 1.3ghz. Im assuming thats respectable?
I ran it once on performance governor at 1.5ghz and got about 2500 on benchmark.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2

This is the best score out of a series of three I ran right after flashing Cm6.1.1 and cranking setcpu up to max. I'm sure that this would run perfectly well at these speeds for day to day on his kernel, but I usually only run at around 1113mhz. The g2 is plenty fast on its stock 800mhz with fantastic battery life, don't get me wrong. But what the hell is the point of all this rooting and rom flashing wagoonery if I don't give myself a slight performance bump.
*Epenis waving*

At 1.5ghz max and 368 min (on-demand governor) with CM7 and Pershoot's latest kernel (I believe he incorporated the new GPU drivers), I get 2700-2800. Quadrant tests your CPU, memory, and GPU performance.
As for Quadrant I tend to find it unreliable, for benchmarks I use Smartbench 2011. Seems a bit more reasonable. Makes you realize how underpowered our GPU's is compared to the PowerVR SGX540.

And what is the gpu?
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2

tackleberry said:
And what is the gpu?
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPU = Graphical processor unit
its the chip in the phone that draws polygons and renders graphics so games and graphic related things run smoothly

Thanks for that info, that's what I was thinking but wasn't positive.
I tried it on smartbench 2011 and got about a 1500.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2

tackleberry said:
Thanks for that info, that's what I was thinking but wasn't positive.
I tried it on smartbench 2011 and got about a 1500.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got 1500 for what specifically?
Smartbench 2011 outputs 2 bars after the test. One for Productivity Index (CPU performance) and another for Gaming Index (GPU performance). Top bar is Productivity Index and bottom bar is Gaming Index.

from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.

sodvs said:
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so what kernel you're using???...
Now I just got a 2301pt at 1.5Gperformance in Quadrant Advanced

sodvs said:
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow the Smartbench 2011 results for Liquid Villain are impressive. Might have to give that rom a try.

I think it might I been a fluke lol the cloest I got that again 1600/2400ish.
On all the screen shoots I was using pershoots kernal
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App

If u want to go big use flippys turbo kernel. A phone as fast as u want, lol.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

I have used flippy's kernal and oc'ed to 1.9 and got 2997 on quandrant but smartbench score was 1900ish productivity/ 1700ish gaming...phone got a bit hot as well...with pershoots kernal I can get almost the same results and phone stays at normal temp.

I got 3158 on quadrant running CM7rc2 with pershoots .34 kernel. Oc'd to 1516 with performance governor.
Currently on CM7rc3 with pershoots .36 kernel I'm getting high 2900's.
All I know is ›3000 on quadrant is FAST!
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

How do I get pershoot's latest kernel?

just over 3200+ on quadrant running the latest CM7 nightly and setting [email protected]
for quadrant, i have noticed its important to run it several times before you get an accurate measurement... personally, i've had the best score around the 3rd or 4th run.... anything more after that just plateau the score or even dips a bit at times. and kill heavy background services (ie: f/b, lookout, juice defender, DSP manager)
FYI: if i set CPU back to stock, i'm still @ 2700ish

Quadrant hasn't been updated for a long time and it is not exactly reliable when it comes to evaluating a phone's performance. You're much better off with Antutu Benchmark.
And this is almost a year old of a post

crestofawave said:
Quadrant hasn't been updated for a long time and it is not exactly reliable when it comes to evaluating a phone's performance. You're much better off with Antutu Benchmark.
And this is almost a year old of a post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

[Q] How do you get a linpack score above 45?!

Hey guys I was wondering, how do you guys get such high linpack scores! my hd2 is running hyperdroidcm7 version1.0.4 and i have my device's cpu oc'd to 1.19...... ghz and the best the thing can do on linpack is 44.something mflops and on pongsters thread... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=769026 , he shows a score of 52.051 mflops and how the F! ive tweaked and tweaked and the darn thing wont climb to 45 mflops ( which is still pretty damn decent considering the clock speed) Just wondered if anyone can help thanks!

Anybody?
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

I run both builds testing and always get around 40-45. You can get 50 but you won't notice a difference at all. Try using a kernel that supports 1.5mhz oc. Antutu benchmark is a much better indicator of overall system performance.
Sent from my HyperDroid powered HD2!

Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
I use linpack quadrant and that one and linpack tells just CPU megaflops. Why I used it for this.

[Q] Quadrant low score

Doing the complete benchmark i only get 700, with FroyoBread 21, almost all apps closed, and no undervolt. Is this normal?

I got only 768, almost everything closed/turned off. I haven't tried quadrant since v.12, but i used to have about 1100. Don't know why.
edit: With 3G off I get 893, but still...

With data, localization, 3g off i get 800..

With wifi on ~980 with undervolt, smatass and multitouch (without OC) froyobread v021b

I now got 1038 with very good 2d and 3d results but sometimes my phone became slow and low ram and system fc all time only reboot can fix this.

With Froyobread 12 i got a quadrant score about 1100, but with 21b i got only 780~...
Any Ideas ??

Why do you guys care about quadrant scores.
What really matters it's ROM speed
but... if you want very high scores, click here

D4rKn3sSyS said:
Why do you guys care about quadrant scores.
What really matters it's ROM speed
but... if you want very high scores, click here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome, 1594!!
Not real but funny xD
thanx

Well I've tried xGin 5.4 after doing a full wipe and i got about 800-900, so maybe the "problem" isn't in our ROMs, maybe there are just updated statistics of quadrant, because I haven't noticed any slowdown of my phone.

1150 with gingercruzt

Actually I found that if you are using Standard's Quadrant,the score will lower than Advacned's Quadrant.
For example,I'm using Floyo v1.0,the score are:
Standard:~850
Advanced:~1100

New Quadrant -> Support For Multiple Cores And ICS

A call for all the benchmark whores, this is your time to shine. Your e-peen will grow like no other. You can post your new quadrant scores, without anyone telling you that it's outdated!
Article link
Market link
AndroidPolice said:
When it comes to benchmarks, one name usually stands above all others: Quadrant. Even though it has been proven to be easily faked, there's just something about running it and see a 3000+ score show up at the end to make you feel your device is untouchable.
Despite its popularity, Quadrant has been missing one key feature: multi-core support. That all changes with an update that was pushed to the Market earlier today, which brings Quadrant up to version 2.0, though. Not only does Quadrant now support multiple-core chips, but the update also brings ICS support, GUI improvements, support for Polish, and a fix for slow frame rates on PowerVR SGX 540 GPUs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it would matter, mine would be 3547.
It also occurred to me, that I might have not posted in the correct subforum. If so, I kindly ask Scotty to beam me up and back down a bit to the left.
And in the meantime it also occurred to me, that someone else had posted a similar thread already. I can only blame the forums for not giving me relevant search results.

It's still crap, because it doesn't display per-test scoring so you can know WHAT changed a score.
For example, disabling per-file sync in the filesystem code gains you a few hundred points in Quadrant - in AnTuTu it's clear that this improvement is in database write tests. (It also doesn't skew the scores nearly as much. Quadrant's weighting sucks.)

With ICS 'LPB' i got 3914.

I got 4004 on i9100 with ICS XXLPB
However...
Quadrant reports that my device has only one core, which is quite an important mistake, and some of the graphics tests keep hitting the 60fps ceiling, which ruins the integrity of the test, assuming it is based on measuring the maximum possible framerate.

hedgepigdaniel said:
I got 4004 on i9100 with ICS XXLPB
However...
Quadrant reports that my device has only one core, which is quite an important mistake, and some of the graphics tests keep hitting the 60fps ceiling, which ruins the integrity of the test, assuming it is based on measuring the maximum possible framerate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The s2 framerate is capped at 60 fps because of vsync, it can't be changed..
And Quadrant results are more accurate on quallcomm device.. Other than that results may vary and could even be manipulated, CMIIW
I suggest you to run nenamark2 benchmark instead.. It's free on the market and gives a comparable results too..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Guys, is the planet part of the test scores only about 38+ fps?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

3875 on XLB remix 9.2

Using omega's ics rom...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Gorjess said:
The s2 framerate is capped at 60 fps because of vsync, it can't be changed..
And Quadrant results are more accurate on quallcomm device.. Other than that results may vary and could even be manipulated, CMIIW
I suggest you to run nenamark2 benchmark instead.. It's free on the market and gives a comparable results too..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 60fps limit can't be changed, but quadrants graphics test can be made more challenging so that the limiting factor is power rather than the arbitrary fps limit. It's not an accurate test if its hitting the 60fps ceiling.

ephraim033 said:
Guys, is the planet part of the test scores only about 38+ fps?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mine stuck @ 45 fps for the same test, are you in ICS rom?
edit:
between got 4285 in LPB

4346 here and planet test is at 38 fps.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

3510 on CM9 latest

bala_gamer said:
mine stuck @ 45 fps for the same test, are you in ICS rom?
edit:
between got 4285 in LPB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, i'm using Hyperdroid ROM
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Hmm... it seems to me that CM9 gets lower scores than other ICS ROMs. That, I think, can be explained by the lack of full kernel support. Let's hope for the better, when they will get their hands on the kernel sources.

Please don't discuss Quadrant scores in this forum. Search "quadrant" in GSII General for the 7 or 8 threads we've closed for the reasons why.
Thanks