Hey I would like to compare the 3 phones:
Goo phone's N3,
and,
Goo Phone's S4 MAX
- They all have the 8 CPU processor and good clock speeds for each core for fast and smooth apps and processing. They all have good RAM: 2gb and also have a 13MP rear camera and 5MP front camera.
The N3 and S4 MAX have both got the same screen resolution: , 1920*1080pixel but the screen size for the S4 MAX IS 6.4 inch and the N3 is 5.7 inch.
I think that the S4 MAX beats every other phone in goo phones market but I am not sure please help me out.
Related
Hi i have found galaxy S3! here are the details:
CPU: Exynos 4212 1.4Ghz (my note has Exynos 4210)
Memory: 1GB RAM
Screen Size: 4.7inches
Resolution: 1280x720
Camera: front camera 2MP and Rear camera 12MP
System: Android OS 4.0
Name: (of course) Galaxy S III
here are the details of the mobile with the pics as i saw them on the antutu benchmark results while i was checking my Note's results.
how is it slower than the S2..
Lol you mean to say once we get official ICS on Note our phablet will be on top of the table with S3
DaRkMyk said:
how is it slower than the S2..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man look at the last screen shot. it THE FASTEST!!! and F*** S2 my note beats that!
sangalaviral said:
Lol you mean to say once we get official ICS on Note our phablet will be on top of the table with S3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no i dont think thats gonna happen but yeah note will retain the third position (at least on antutu lol )
aami.aami said:
Hi i have found galaxy S3! here are the details:
CPU: Exynos 4212 1.4Ghz (my note has Exynos 4210)
Memory: 1GB RAM
Screen Size: 4.7inches
Resolution: 1280x720
Camera: front camera 2MP and Rear camera 12MP
System: Android OS 4.0
Name: (of course) Galaxy S III
here are the details of the mobile with the pics as i saw them on the antutu benchmark results while i was checking my Note's results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow - seems a lot of gullible fools actually fell for that one. What a load of BS.
aami.aami said:
Hi i have found galaxy S3! here are the details:
CPU: Exynos 4212 1.4Ghz (my note has Exynos 4210)
Memory: 1GB RAM
Screen Size: 4.7inches
Resolution: 1280x720
Camera: front camera 2MP and Rear camera 12MP
System: Android OS 4.0
Name: (of course) Galaxy S III
here are the details of the mobile with the pics as i saw them on the antutu benchmark results while i was checking my Note's results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
emmm exynos 4212 has 1.5ghz and it is fake for sure, how quad core cpu can be slower then galaxy s2 with dual core 1.2ghz? no logic
Lol.. I think u all looking at the wrong pic..
The first pic is for his device..
Last pic is the galaxy s3 that show score higher than asus prime...
nameejokerx said:
Lol.. I think u all looking at the wrong pic..
The first pic is for his device..
Last pic is the galaxy s3 that show score higher than asus prime...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So why the hell did he post the first pic if he doesn't have the s3? Just confuses everyone and noone gives a crap about his score.
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Zamboney said:
So why the hell did he post the first pic if he doesn't have the s3? Just confuses everyone and noone gives a crap about his score.
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe want to show how he get that score
But still no individual score on antutu for s3.
Hope the note2 will dominate and use new 5xxx exynos with new mali gpu..
Saw new game with tegra3 and totally a whole lot new improvement..
Something very wrong...It shows Exynos 4212 and not 4412. 4212 is a dual core SoC, not quad-core.
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/minisite/Exynos/news_10.html
Photoshop! What a loser
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
This is OFFICIAL "Exynos" web site !
So if you will go to the products you will see:
Exynos 3 single 1Gz (Galaxy S, Nexus S.)
Exynos 4 dual 45nm 1.2-1.4Ghz (Meizu MX, SGSII , G-Note)
Exynos 4 dual 32nm 1.5Ghz (???)
Exynos 5 dual 2Ghz (???)
So I will get mad if SGSIII will be dual-core A15
These are the "supposed" S3 photos leaked from Taiwan NCC (the FCC equivalent in the US).
http://imgur.com/3uYjk
http://imgur.com/5NRlH
http://imgur.com/G3g99
http://imgur.com/T0sCa
Samsung had already announced officially that the GSIII will have the Exynos 4 quad core 4412.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/...exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/?m=false
Sent from my GT-N7000 Samsung Galaxy Note "Go big or go home" using XDA app
sutekidane said:
These are the "supposed" S3 photos leaked from Taiwan NCC (the FCC equivalent in the US).
http://imgur.com/3uYjk
http://imgur.com/5NRlH
http://imgur.com/G3g99
http://imgur.com/T0sCa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats just Ugg lee !!!
Oha, bettEr stay with gnote
send with GT-N7000 n Tapatalk
DOGSofDOOM said:
Photoshop! What a loser
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its not photoshop.
run antutu, go into the bar charts. the galaxy s3 shows up there.
looks like samsung let the cat out of the bag.
edit: on mine it doesnt say 4212. it says 4x12, i'll upload the pics.
That's a major disappointment if those pics are true. The supposed ones from the ad agency were beautiful but this feels cheap.
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
okie, i've attached the pics i see with my phone.
exynos 4x12 processor. screen res 1280x720. im assuming the camera thing is bugged, but it should be 2mp and 12mp.
edit: theres a pic of the s3 on there. dunno if its real or not, but its there. for some reason, it only shows the s3 in the list chart, and not in the bar chart. this means that we cant see whether or not the performance improvement over the asus transformer prime is because of the CPU optimisations or GPU.
edit 2: although this is not the exact way of determining the score, i've done a rough estimate of what the s3 scores based on the list view.
for my galaxy note, i score 6522 points in antutu, which roughly lines up with the galaxy note standard in the antutu bench. so if i count the amount of pixels in my bar using mspaint (line up the end of the bar with the edge of the work area and point my mouse at the end of the bar while zoomed in), i get 216 pixels.
so 6522 points / 216 pixels = 30.19444444 points per pixel.
now if you measure the length of the the galaxy s3 bar, its 402 pixels.
30.1944444 points per pixel = 12138.166666 points as the rough score for the galaxy s3 (give or take 30 points per pixel). thats pure awesome!
I currently Have the GS4, but have been looking at videos of the Note 3 and have found a new love. I have never toyed around with or entertained the idea of a Note device before. Should I make the jump to the Note 3?
Joell27 said:
I currently Have the GS4, but have been looking at videos of the Note 3 and have found a new love. I have never toyed around with or entertained the idea of a Note device before. Should I make the jump to the Note 3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's going to be faster with the additional S-Pen features.
If you can handle the size go for it - that's the only debatable thing if money is not an issue.
make the jump. i sold my s4 weeks ago for note 3. i think the note 2 is just as fast as s4. Note 3 will be so much better then s4. Size could be your only issue
oneandroidnut said:
make the jump. i sold my s4 weeks ago for note 3. i think the note 2 is just as fast as s4. Note 3 will be so much better then s4. Size could be your only issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note 2 is def not as fast as gs4....that said the n3 will be that much faster then the s4.im keeping my n2 and s4 as well as getting n3...should be interesting comparing them all hands on
sent from my S3, S4 or Note2
You know the differences are all easy to see. Just buy what fits your budget, and realize the Note 3 is better in every way, except if it's too big for your needs. I don't know of many people who even care about the size, in fact believe it's a benefit because of the larger screen.
Previously covered by many websites, it has the following improvements over the Galaxy S4:
Instead of 16-bit 48kHz sound, it has 24-bit 192kHz HD hardware. Thus superior sound playback and recording.
Instead of just 1080p video recording (1920x1080), it has 4K HD video recording (3,840 x 2,160)
Instead of just 1.9GHz quad core and Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 chipset, it has Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset w/ 2.3GHz quad-core
Instead of Adreno 320 graphics chipset, it has Adreno 330 for faster graphics and other features improvements.
There is the addition of the S Pen and ability to detect pen pressure on the screen, which the S4 lacks.
Instead of the 5" screen 1920x1080 screen, it has a 5.7" 1920x1080 screen. There is loss of pixels per inch, in trade off for larger screen.
Instead of plastic body, it has metal bezel and faux leather backing "premium" style.
Instead of Android 4.2 stock, it has Android 4.3.
Instead of USB2 interface, is has USB3 for faster data transfer with PC and faster charging ability.
It should have other improvements, like faster internal storage, and perhaps a change in the Super AMOLED display, which might compensate for the loss of pixels per inch. The S4 has diamond pentile pixel layout, some people hope the Note 3 has something else which results in clearer display or more subpixels (but nobody knows yet, as these specifications have not yet been released)
Pretty much you are getting a much better device for your money with the Note 3. It has no downsides, unless you don't want the larger screen/device size.
Just when it looked as Samsung will be the first, or even Oppo who boasted they will do it first just yesterday, Vivo, at Beijing's Water Cube event center in China, has finally released the world's first mobile phone with 2560x1440 pixels resolution.
The Vivo Xplay 3S features a massive 6" 2560x1440pixels QHD(not the same as qHD) display with a PPI sum of 490 — though huge, but unfortunately not crashing through the 500 PPI barrier as expected(if it came with a 5.5-inch screen).
The phone is powered by's Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974AB SoC, 2.3GHz Krait 400 CPU, 3GB of RAM and Adreno 330 GPU. The power juice is supplied by a 3200mAh battery. The Xplay 3S sports a 13MP camera with f/1.8 aperture, and can record 1080p motion pictures.
Now, away from the basics, the Vivo Xplay 3S is the model of a 2014 flagship. A fingerprint sensor just below the flash and stereo speakers at the back makes you wanna wish Santa for one right away.
Is the 2K resolution a bad-ass feature or a gimmick?
Source: bestmobs.com/vivo-xplay-3s-finally-breaks-the-worlds-first-2k-phone/
jacide said:
Just when it looked as Samsung will be the first, or even Oppo who boasted they will do it first just yesterday, Vivo, at Beijing's Water Cube event center in China, has finally released the world's first mobile phone with 2560x1440 pixels resolution.
The Vivo Xplay 3S features a massive 6" 2560x1440pixels QHD(not the same as qHD) display with a PPI sum of 490 — though huge, but unfortunately not crashing through the 500 PPI barrier as expected(if it came with a 5.5-inch screen).
The phone is powered by's Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974AB SoC, 2.3GHz Krait 400 CPU, 3GB of RAM and Adreno 330 GPU. The power juice is supplied by a 3200mAh battery. The Xplay 3S sports a 13MP camera with f/1.8 aperture, and can record 1080p motion pictures.
Now, away from the basics, the Vivo Xplay 3S is the model of a 2014 flagship. A fingerprint sensor just below the flash and stereo speakers at the back makes you wanna wish Santa for one right away.
Is the 2K resolution a bad-ass feature or a gimmick?
Source: bestmobs.com/vivo-xplay-3s-finally-breaks-the-worlds-first-2k-phone/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not quite sute if our eye will be able to catch the difference of such a display. Personally I can't tell the difference between a galaxy S3 and galaxy S4...
Check out this video by MKBHD. He has a very good point about this 2K displays.
http://youtu.be/E0_JrUNevdc
Note also
That Vivo is Made under OPPO's umbrella so technically speaking well you know the rest they are the first lol I want this phone so bad just for its advanced audio for wired music I cant find it anywhere I can trust to purchase it so ill wait some time it will be this the S5 or the find 7 another Oppo device! excited for either or mainly this one my last resource will be to ask a college friend who lives in china right now to go look for it for me lol
vivo xplay 3s seller
hey there,
here is the link for a trusted seller,he had problems shipping before but is now using TNT to ship and all is going smoothly,once you click on the vivo button you can scroll down to the bottom of the page and post questions to the seller,he will also put google on it for you before shipping
and i must say it is an awesome device...the antutu benchmark blows everything else out of the water,the only two cons are you cannot replace the battery and no ex sd other than that it just rocks...oh and you have to learn the os because there is no manual for it:good:
http://www.liaow.com/huaweilist.php
Does any body knows what kind of custom ROM used on Chinese fake Samsung Note 4
I had a high copy "replica" of Samsung NOTE 4
here is the link
Here are the specs (All are faked)
CPU: Actual Dual core 1.2GHZ MT6572 >> Showing in CPU-Z as 3GHZ Octacore
RAM: Actual 1GB >> Showing in CPU-Z as 3GB RAM
ROM: Actual 8GB >> Showing as 64GB
CAM: real 8MP (shooting at max 720p video / 3264 x 2448 pixels photo >> Showing as 16MP in most Cam apps even google cam, cam 360, retro cam
Front CAM: 2.1 MP camera ............ showing as it is
sensors: faking heart rate monitor, actual using heart rate apps using cam flash
the body is metal with hardened plastic, battery has the same Diameters as original
all of this and they cam with the same TouchWiz UI as real NOTE 4 with support to S-pen
even in about phone it says real info about Samsung even real IMEI !!
they even had a hacked Antutu version which shows a score of more than 41000, F!!K
how they can do such a thing, I 'm actually amazed, because some one can get really deep in this **** and people deceive him and steal his money
I bought the fake NOTE 4 with 120 US $ worthy
while the real one equals roughly 655 US $ worth
the only program to spot real component is Passmark and 3D mark
Can any one upload these Custom roms for devices like LG p715 or other Geniune devices
to give them the feel and look of NOTE 4
I guess you get what you pay for..Good luck finding a custom recovery or ROM for that. And remember, if you brick it, its a $120 paperweight
Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk
What device is better in terms of performance?
Snapdragon 650 vs Snapdragon 430
3GB vs 3GB
32GB vs 32GB
I currently have the Redmi Note 3 Pro but thinking of getting the 3S as I want a smaller phone that fits in my hand better.
syl0n said:
What device is better in terms of performance?
Snapdragon 650 vs Snapdragon 430
3GB vs 3GB
32GB vs 32GB
I currently have the Redmi Note 3 Pro but thinking of getting the 3S as I want a smaller phone that fits in my hand better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a price difference first but IMO, RN3 performs better because of the two performance cores out of the six cores, GPU also outperforms the one on 3SP. But, due to the smaller screen size, larger battery and more power efficient processor, 3SP is a good choice.
I bought the 3SP because I prefer phones with screen size less than 5.5 inches, I have medium sized hands plus coming from a 4.7 inch screen (Redmi 2), 5.0 inches seemed like the next best thing because I had some trouble handling the 5.5 inch phone (Moto G4 Plus).
Long story short, if you want a device that lasts longer on battery, smaller screen size and is a bit cheaper, go for 3SP. If you want more power, a bigger screen and a better GPU but is a bit costlier, go for RN3.