Related
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
This is kp's rom.
UPDATE: Now im getting around 4200 on cm7 prebeta 2 with the built in oc and it feels alot smoother!
No! My highest was 303x!
My highest is always ~2900
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
4700, and only running one core!
TechnoNeto said:
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
How is it you were getting 4000 or 4700 on quadrant standard?
BravoMotorola said:
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is in beta so we could still see much improvement also you were getting that on quadrant or antutu?
mramirezusa said:
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as me is it saying that you are oc to 1.2 as mine does?
J-man67 said:
No! My highest was 303x!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you have set cpu to 1.1 min and max
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You felt the need to express this why? This wasn't in the Q&A section as do benchmarks mean anything. It's a post about your scores not about people trying to prove their tech hierarchy.
dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
I got a 3600 "in-use" benchmark, with max and min set to 1.1. With max at 1.1 and min still at .2, I still got 3200, which is not bad.
You seriously got 4000+ while on the phone's original stock system and everything??
Mine feels so much faster and snappier now on GB with the faux kernel and everything..
Tao_Man said:
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true and in response to first post i get around 3330+ with most of my apps going but i have both min and max set to highest in set cpu
As does mine feel faster on gingerbread
Tao_Man said:
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the way I test also. I'm around 3000 with all the normal apps running that I leave running and min and max CPU speeds kept where I use them. It feels very smooth!
I have an atrix benchmark thread!
\/
i can't seem to pass 2800 running stock
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
moulip said:
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 22,941
Here is mine stock
Sent from my LG-LS980 using xda premium
I don't know about everyone else, but I get better benchmarks running stock odexed vs deodexed roms.
moulip said:
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download trickster mod from playstore, change your governor to Performance. Put your phone in the freezer for about 10 mins, then run your Antutu test...you should get 35k+. My average score is 36k+ with a high of 37.6k. Im on pure stock with a few Xposed tweaks.
mistermidas said:
Download trickster mod from playstore, change your governor to Performance. Put your phone in the freezer for about 10 mins, then run your Antutu test...you should get 35k+. My average score is 36k+ with a high of 37.6k. Im on pure stock with a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume that could be a good trick, except that you have to be root and I don't want that. Plus, I am sure that people who get such high scores, are mostly full stock. That's why I wonder.
mchlbenner said:
Here is mine stock
Sent from my LG-LS980 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here it is how is it possible ? Really I don't see. Do you get this each time you run a benchmark ?
Maybe it is related to the fact that your phone is not the same as mine (I own a D802 from France) ?
just ran it on my stock rooted. 33.7k
Here is mine, stock and unrooted.
Sent from my LG-LS980
moulip said:
I assume that could be a good trick, except that you have to be root and I don't want that. Plus, I am sure that people who get such high scores, are mostly full stock. That's why I wonder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you consider full stock? Because Im full stock just rooted. Also before I even rooted my phone I was able to get 35k+ just from the freezer trick.
mistermidas said:
What do you consider full stock? Because Im full stock just rooted. Also before I even rooted my phone I was able to get 35k+ just from the freezer trick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Full-stock meant without anything non-genuine. Root included. Or with root but without any tweaks. Because, I don't see why being root could improve the results. Except if Antutu is able to alter the governor settings, while running ...
But from what you tell me, how can you get these scores and not me ?
Totally stock with no tricks involved.
34324 in Antutu.
That's after 1,30h of web browsing....
All your benchmarks just confirm the fact that I don't understand such differences. The only difference I see, is that this is not the same models than mine.
moulip said:
Full-stock meant without anything non-genuine. Root included. Or with root but without any tweaks. Because, I don't see why being root could improve the results. Except if Antutu is able to alter the governor settings, while running ...
But from what you tell me, how can you get these scores and not me ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said, I still scored 35k+ with just the freezer trick before I even rooted my phone. Just out of curiousity to see what a pure stock score what be. Only differences I see that would make a difference are the Carrier model. I have Sprint LS980 by the way.
mistermidas said:
Like I said, I still scored 35k+ with just the freezer trick before I even rooted my phone. Just out of curiousity to see what a pure stock score what be. Only differences I see that would make a difference are the Carrier model. I have Sprint LS980 by the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes that's what I think.
How much do you get in Quadrant ? Mine is 21k+
moulip said:
Yes that's what I think.
How much do you get in Quadrant ? Mine is 21k+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Quadrant is around 20k ish, but I only ran it a couple times. I dont really put much stock in Quadrant since it hasnt been updated in forever.
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
crzykiller said:
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beat me to it
crzykiller said:
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True that. But I have tested at different times, when it was empty or just reset to factory. I still get the same results. And by the way I have disabled thermal throttling.
Here's a link to recent benchmarks for the Galaxy Note Edge:
http://www.androidheadlines.com/2014/11/samsung-galaxy-note-edge-perform-benchmarks.html
Couple of screen shots from my device's benchmark results.
It says it is 64bit but currently set to 32bit.☺
I had 49850 on my 915k after root cm and freezing a few apps
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app
dennis nai said:
I had 49850 on my 915k after root cm and freezing a few apps
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which apps?
knox,some google apps and some samsung apps
Antutu = 49771 (N915S)
This is from the stock before root. Now I am running SkyHigh rom. Will test again soon.
Please can some xda expert help us to bring this beast above the 55000 mark? I truly belive it can be done.
Sent from my SM-T705 using XDA Free mobile app
Finally broke 50k!
SM-N915S
Antutu: 50480
SkyHigh Rom by UpInTheAir, Rooted, DVFS disabled
Can't wait until UpInTheAir has a working kernel for the 915S. Once I can properly overclock this beast I can easily see this device hitting 55k+
tospace2006 said:
Finally broke 50k!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
jafangie said:
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haven't tried Antutu 5.5 yet I'll try to top yours
jafangie said:
Mine.... Don't have overclok!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe still running no overclock as well: 51874
Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous in terms of score.
UpInTheAir just finished his kernel for 915S so finally time to get overclocking
tospace2006 said:
Hehe still running no overclock as well: 51874
Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous in terms of score.
UpInTheAir just finished his kernel for 915S so finally time to get overclocking
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I was annoyed few minutes... But yes you 're right : Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous.... in the morning!
On waking, it is still better!
Have a nice day!
Seriously, I think that 53000 should be the maximum without overclocking...
jafangie said:
Hi,
I was annoyed few minutes... But yes you 're right : Antutu 5.5 is definitely much more generous.... in the morning!
On waking, it is still better!
Have a nice day!
Seriously, I think that 53000 should be the maximum without overclocking...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
53000 would be quite a challenge I believe. Here is my one last attempt with stock.
Getting closer to 53000 but I think an extra 800 points without OC will be a bit of a stretch.
tospace2006 said:
53000 would be quite a challenge I believe. Here is my one last attempt with stock.
Getting closer to 53000 but I think an extra 800 points without OC will be a bit of a stretch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
jafangie said:
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am lucky if I can break 40,000! Nice scores.
jafangie said:
As French say : Impossible n'est pas français (impossible is not French!)!!
See my last attempt... 52 742!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Been trying... can't beat that man good job. It's -10 so maybe I'll give it another go later. OC is being tricky and seems to be degrading performance than gaining atm...
CreekDirt said:
I am lucky if I can break 40,000! Nice scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
UpInTheAir said:
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my first Snapdragon phone from Samsung. All of my previous versions were the Exynos builds since as far back as the S2. Stock unrooted it was around 38,000. Stock rooted it is only marginally better.
UpInTheAir said:
Depends on many factors.... a few are:
1. Devices vary and asv_group (explanation in SkyHigh kernel synapse). Mine is a mediocre 4.
2. Starting temp
3. Running background processes
4. OC can lead to earlier throttle and hence reduced benchmark.
5. Available RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4. I am observing this quite a bit after consecutive benchmarks.
5. My god even after debloating and freezing all unwanted proccesses the phone still requires 2GB or ram to run at all times and at max I only have less than 1GB of free ram. I feel like this is taking a hit on the scores too. My G3 I had it down to 1.3GB used RAM so effectively had about 1.7GB free at max. What could be taking up so much RAM at all times.
CreekDirt said:
This is my first Snapdragon phone from Samsung. All of my previous versions were the Exynos builds since as far back as the S2. Stock unrooted it was around 38,000. Stock rooted it is only marginally better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the G3 Cat.6 with SD805 and noticed very disappointing scores stock. The G3 also had very aggressive thermal throttling and the SD805 was a very hot running chip.
Once I got everything debloated and thermal turned off it hit almost 48,000.
I know that the S5 prime had better scores than the Cat.6 due to much better thermals and would expect the same out of the Note.
Try rooting and debloating your phone if you want to experiment and disable DVFS for better scores.
I also place my phone by an open window as it's -10 degrees Celsius now and low temp gives great boosts to your scores.
tospace2006 said:
4. I am observing this quite a bit after consecutive benchmarks.
5. My god even after debloating and freezing all unwanted proccesses the phone still requires 2GB or ram to run at all times and at max I only have less than 1GB of free ram. I feel like this is taking a hit on the scores too. My G3 I had it down to 1.3GB used RAM so effectively had about 1.7GB free at max. What could be taking up so much RAM at all times.
I had the G3 Cat.6 with SD805 and noticed very disappointing scores stock. The G3 also had very aggressive thermal throttling and the SD805 was a very hot running chip.
Once I got everything debloated and thermal turned off it hit almost 48,000.
I know that the S5 prime had better scores than the Cat.6 due to much better thermals and would expect the same out of the Note.
Try rooting and debloating your phone if you want to experiment and disable DVFS for better scores.
I also place my phone by an open window as it's -10 degrees Celsius now and low temp gives great boosts to your scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been rooted for almost a month now, but haven't gotten around to debloating since there isn't a need to. My phone flies. The only hesitation I see is if I actually use the menu key to see the task manager. Since I have the manager on my Edge bar I rarely even do that.
Debloating might be in my future just to see if I can finally reach that 6 hour screen on time. This phone has very few wake locks which has surprised me.
So I was wondering about the truth behind the risks of frying your cpu through overclocking or the chip itself degrading faster over time, and if there are such risks do they apply to a simple 2.5 ghz overclocking ?
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
devilsdouble said:
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
MohamedOMostafa said:
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
devilsdouble said:
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the first thing I did actually
MohamedOMostafa said:
That's the first thing I did actually
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
devilsdouble said:
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will do.
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
djak272 said:
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
devilsdouble said:
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Graffiti Exploit said:
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
devilsdouble said:
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it comes with 2 apps for customization. You apply frequency on the first one and open the other and select apply changes. I'm not sure if it was this kernel or was it AEL. Lol. Anyways good luck. Maybe your ROM doesn't support a certain "stuff". I'm sorry but I really forgot about those terminologies. You can read up on the closed thread if you want. I'm sure you'll have a clue or on that link I gave you. *Google Translate ftw*
I have Exynos Note 4 and it only scores 37k in Antutu. Gaming performance is not satisfactory as well. My phone is 910H with 6.0.1, Suemax kernel and rooted. Greenify is installed too.
I bet it's some settings in that kernel. Flash stock kernel and check score. That score is unbelievably low!
i recomend to install stock rom, actually i get sastifaced whit it, antutu score i got 68k+ very stable, only get some crash on apps outside from play store, all works great, only some battery drain but i think its time to change it
ithehappy said:
I bet it's some settings in that kernel. Flash stock kernel and check score. That score is unbelievably low!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had stock kernel and no root before and similar score. What to do I am sad with its performance.
MatiasETirimaco said:
i recomend to install stock rom, actually i get sastifaced whit it, antutu score i got 68k+ very stable, only get some crash on apps outside from play store, all works great, only some battery drain but i think its time to change it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have stock rom.
UnNaMeD__ said:
I have stock rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so are you sure your note 4 is not a copy? check whit CPUZ, i've seen an video of a clone 1:1 and you cant see any diference, only whit some programs. there is no wat to get an lower score whit this phone :/
MatiasETirimaco said:
so are you sure your note 4 is not a copy? check whit CPUZ, i've seen an video of a clone 1:1 and you cant see any diference, only whit some programs. there is no wat to get an lower score whit this phone :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not clone. I can flash its kernels, CPUz shows all legit info.