Related
NOTE: PLEASE DON'T ASK FOR ETAs UNLESS YOU THINK YOU CAN BUILD A ROM MORE QUICKLY AND BETTER THAN TSM.
NOTE 2: THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL TSM THREAD, NOR DO I CLAIM TO SPEAK FOR TSM.
NOTE 3: GET THE LATEST UPDATES FROM TSM HERE: http://teamsbrissenmod.net/Upcoming.html
NOTE 4: if you've already tried one of the EC09 ROMs (stock, Nameless, TechnoROM), I have posted a survey and poll here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1150575. The more responses we get in the poll, the closer we could get to finding, isolating, and fixing this bug. Your participation is greatly appreciated
Landshark68 had a great idea when he started a thread where you could post all the things (speculation, thank you jt, great ROM, flashing now, bug reports w/o logcats, I'd flash if...) that you shouldn't clutter jt1134's CM7 thread with. Therefore, I thought it would be a good idea to apply this concept to the TSM Gingerbread ROM being developed now.
Our approach will have to be a little different, since as of 6/28/11, there is no ROM thread to post these kind of things in. Here, though, I encourage everyone to ask questions that hopefully TSM members can answer here (no "when" questions, though). You could indicate what features you'd like to see in this ROM. You also might want to indicate what custom themes you would like to have available for this ROM (including themes you've seen on other devices) - as for suggestions for the default theme, Nitsuj17 already has a thread for that here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1132266. As for thank-you posts (when the ROM thread is posted), please remember the "Thanks" button which you can click on the ROM's OP as viewed in the browser (it would be nice to see this feature available in the XDA app). If you want to give more detailed "thank you" posts, or thank-you posts directed at specific developers, I encourage you to post them here.
Another Fascinating post by my XDA app...
What do you think the name should be? My personal preference is UKGB: Ultimate Kang Ginger Bang
Another Fascinating post by my XDA app...
Note: When voting in the poll above, remember that there is no guarantee the themes voted on will be available. The themer in question is under no obligation to provide the themes indicated, and some may have already moved on to other devices. If you would like to carry on a theme for someone who has since moved on to another device, please PM that themer for permission.
Another Fascinating post by my XDA app...
Themes that come to mind:
Engraved Matted Blues
Honeycomb or variant there of
GS2 TW theme, frankenstein of some kind.
Some kind of clean minimalist theme.
A windows phone 7 style theme would be cool.
jmcintire said:
What do you think the name should be? My personal preference is UKGB: Ultimate Kang Ginger Bang
Another Fascinating post by my XDA app...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Win. +1
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
What Features Do You Want?
What features do you want included in this ROM?
Ideas to jump-start the imagination:
-Working Netflix app included with ROM (so you don't have to search for it elsewhere)
-Lockscreen with music controls that can be mapped to music player of choice
-MIUI Music Player (with visualizer and controls mapped to the MIUI lockscreen)
-AOSP-style calendar
jmcintire said:
What features do you want included in this ROM?
Ideas to jump-start the imagination:
-Working Netflix app included with ROM (so you don't have to search for it elsewhere)
-Lockscreen with music controls that can be mapped to music player of choice
-MIUI Music Player (with visualizer and controls mapped to the MIUI lockscreen)
-AOSP-style calendar
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is a great idea!
Ideas for questions to ask TSM members
What questions would you like to ask TSM members regarding this ROM?
Examples:
-Are there any Gingerbread-specific features that will set this apart from UKB 2.1?
-Will Gingerbread make this ROM faster or more battery-efficient than a Froyo ROM?
-Will Voodoo sound be available in this ROM? (AFAIK, there has been no kernel source leak for Gingerbread, so a better question might be if voodoo sound can be ported from a Froyo kernel)
jmcintire said:
What questions would you like to ask TSM members regarding this ROM?
Examples:
-Are there any Gingerbread-specific features that will set this apart from UKB 2.1?
-Will Gingerbread make this ROM faster or more battery-efficient than a Froyo ROM?
-Will Voodoo sound be available in this ROM? (AFAIK, there has been no kernel source leak for Gingerbread, so a better question might be if voodoo sound can be ported from a Froyo kernel)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. overscroll glow and crt screen off animation...hopefully the latter being controlled by tsm parts...we ll see
2. faster, no..probably not as its a buggy build and we dont have custom voodoo kernels....battery wise, my observations are that despite the lack of undervolting, the build does get very good batt life in general (nothing due to us though) probably because of less battery drain due to tws
3. if you buy the voodoo control plus (4 bucks) app in the market, it can inject a module for voodoo sound in (free cant)...
extras: -sbrissen has fixed (seems so, so far at least) the adb/usb debugging issue (wont stay on after a reboot bug) for the rfs kernel
-clean quickpanel (data instead of mobile data, rotation instead of auto rotation)
-*most* of the available tsm parts options for froyo...the first release may be lacking a few though
-NO WE HAVE NO FIX FOR SDCARD ISSUES....as of now if you want to flash the rom when its out, you do so with the same caveat as all other things ec09 related: your sdcard could crap out at any time
-netflix is a good idea to include in...we might just do that
-tw musicplayer is needed for lockscreen controls of a few of the lockscreens, as of now, no way around it
Thanks for the update! So... anyone planning to get the voodoo control plus app?
Obviously, when this ROM comes out, everyone make sure you back up your SD cards!
Could the SD card issue be related to the ext4 lagfix? As in, flashing EC09 over a lagfix-enabled card can cause these problems?
Another Fascinating post by my XDA app...
jmcintire said:
Thanks for the update! So... anyone planning to get the voodoo control plus app?
Obviously, when this ROM comes out, everyone make sure you back up your SD cards!
Could the SD card issue be related to the ext4 lagfix? As in, flashing EC09 over a lagfix-enabled card can cause these problems?
Another Fascinating post by my XDA app...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think the answer to any speculation with the sdcard stuff is: could be, dont know
jmcintire said:
Thanks for the update! So... anyone planning to get the voodoo control plus app?
Obviously, when this ROM comes out, everyone make sure you back up your SD cards!
Could the SD card issue be related to the ext4 lagfix? As in, flashing EC09 over a lagfix-enabled card can cause these problems?
Another Fascinating post by my XDA app...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt it, because I went back to DL09 and then flashed EC09 then GingerBang, and still got my sdcard eaten. So like nitsuj said, could be, don't know. :/
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Glad i'm not the only one with SD card woes. Really thought I did something wrong.
I think TSM should just make a GB rom that is similar to CM 7, but fixing all the issues that are currently on it.
As far as theming it, users can always get the theme they want.
Com Rom have been great. Some of the CM7 features would be great like profiles, quiet time.
fortesquieu said:
I think TSM should just make a GB rom that is similar to CM 7, but fixing all the issues that are currently on it.
As far as theming it, users can always get the theme they want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
modding/theming the existing touchwiz systems we have is one thing...building aosp roms is a whole nother game...
and really the purpose of comrom is to give a highly customized touchwiz system based rom, that has many options/changes to enhance what we have...an alternative for those who dont want to use aosp for whatever reason
TSM spam. http://teamsbrissenmod.net/Upcoming.html
good day.
Updating OP
chopper the dog said:
TSM spam. http://teamsbrissenmod.net/Upcoming.html
good day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updating OP to include this... thanks!
I'm just super excited for the screen on/off animation and the overscroll effect. Too bad those can't be ported to Froyo framework
Hello All,
Here is Drew Garin's ICS AOSP builds on his main site, it comes in two flavours:
No onscreen buttons and, onscreen buttons.
The onscreen buttons build is the same experience you will have on the Galaxy Nexus. Drew states that this build it more stable, and recommends this build if you want a solid ICS experience.
The no onscreen buttons build works as you would expect. It takes advantage of the Nexus S hardware buttons.
I will quote everything from his site below
What Works:
Nearly Everything!
USB and ADB
3G Data
Audio
Hardware Accel
Camera, Panorama
GPS (Unconfirmed currently I’m in a 13 story brick building)
Face Unlock
Wifi
Bluetooth
Tethering and Hotspot
Data Usage
NFC
Pretty much everything
Not Working:
Camcorder
Not all applications are currently compatible with ICS on Crespo. As a work around you can always use appbrain or download from the internet.
Download With On Screen Buttons (Overall Stable):
mirror 1: http://www.multiupload.com/BWE16F2YTH
mirror 2: dg-ics-on-screen
Download No Buttons (Experimental):
mirror 1: http://www.multiupload.com/TESISLS5MV
No Button Build Issues:
Tethering and Hotspot Does Not Work
There May Be Some Other Issues
On Screen Is More Stable
GITHUB: (link coming soon when all sources are up)
Kernel Credit Of: Kwiboo (for the time being until my kernel is done)
Wifi and Bluetooth Fix Credit: Kwiboo
Install Instructions:
Boot into Clockwork Recovery
-wipe data/factory reset
-wipe cache
-wipe dalvik
-install from zip
-reboot and enjoy!!
Notes:
Do not turn on 2D acceleration on in settings -> developer.
In spare parts turn off compatibility mode and restart for downloaded apps to work better in ics.
Need a root explorer like tool? I suggest using jrummy’s root browser.
The On Screen Button Version doesn’t lag as much and provides that ICS smooth scroll you wish to see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should be noted!!!
1.I did not have any part in creation of this, all credit goes to Drew Garin, I suggest you visit his site for full details (Linked above).
2.Lets keep this civil, I'm sharing here on XDA to give us full exposure of all ICS roms.
Spittal said:
Hello All,
Here is Drew Garin's ICS builds on his main site
http://drewgaren.com/DrewGaren.com/ICS/Entries/2011/11/21_ICS_FULL_AOSP_ALPHA_BUILDS_DOWNLOAD.html
Direct Download:
http://www.multiupload.com/TESISLS5MV
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh what fun. How long till this bad boy is shut down? Start a poll
I for one want to keep this thread civil.
If you don't like drew, don't donate, don't download his build, and don't post in this thread.
That aside I'm eager to see if scrolling has improved over kwiboo's version. Because other than that, kwiboo's is pretty damn near perfect.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
i dont 't understand, why the onscreen touchkey version should be more stable??? if just the systemui and framework is diffarent ... but anyway ... wasn't he banned from xda???
beamed in from my Nexus S on ICS using my brain
MultiCulti said:
i dont 't understand, why the onscreen touchkey version should be more stable??? if just the systemui and framework is diffarent ... but anyway ... wasn't he banned from xda???
beamed in from my Nexus S on ICS using my brain
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
really? why did he get banned?
Cool! Marathon of the ICS roms)
zadnica said:
Cool! Marathon of the ICS roms)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I'm excited to see which one works best. I'm thinking of compiling a poll in the General forum to see which one we all like the best.
what a f* , changelog and working and not working are the same as others , maybe another theft....
btw , do you want any beer Drew ?
X1111 said:
what a f* , changelog and working and not working are the same as others , maybe another theft....
btw , do you want any beer Drew ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said, lets keep this civil. If you want to flame keep it out of XDA. This is shared here just to give us FULL exposure to all ICS AOSP roms.
nearblack said:
really? why did he get banned?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah, he was banned from Android Central forums for not posting the sources of his SDK builds. He just doesn't post on XDA, presumably out of fear of being ostracized.
Been running this the last 15 minutes, a bit laggy (compare to Kwiboo's).
Now we have 7 buttons on the phone.
Anyone actually flashed it? kwiboo's version is working so well that I am not in the mood to change it
edit: havent seen lcchan1 post before posting it, thanks
juliano_q said:
Anyone actually flashed it? kwiboo's version is working so well that I am not in the mood to change it
edit: havent seen lcchan1 post before posting it, thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I flashed the hardware buttons version... Seems to run as you would expect.
Now time to try the on screen buttons version (even though it seems a bit redundant to me)
lcchan1 said:
Been running this the last 15 minutes, a bit laggy (compare to Kwiboo's).
Now we have 7 buttons on the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah ... thats what i thougt xD ... the screen is anyway so small compared to my DHD
may you make a screen?
beamed in from my Nexus S on ICS using my brain
Ok to stop the matrix confusion, I'm gonna post a link to the Ics specific versions in my thread.
I will investigate the reboot issues asap so you guys can run Franco until then haha
working Ics matrix kernels coming soon!
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
i'm loading it now. a version with on screen buttons, have to try that
juliano_q said:
Anyone actually flashed it? kwiboo's version is working so well that I am not in the mood to change it
edit: havent seen lcchan1 post before posting it, thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just got my first reboot after 15 minutes. No reboot from Kwiboo's for over 10 hours of running.
---------- Post added at 12:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:18 PM ----------
MultiCulti said:
yeah ... thats what i thougt xD ... the screen is anyway so small compared to my DHD
may you make a screen?
beamed in from my Nexus S on ICS using my brain
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Took a screen shot, looking a way to upload.
---------- Post added at 12:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:20 PM ----------
Spittal said:
I flashed the hardware buttons version... Seems to run as you would expect.
Now time to try the on screen buttons version (even though it seems a bit redundant to me)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
7 buttons (more like confuse to me)
Okay I know, but let's keep this civil and just take in the ice cream goodness?
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
lcchan1 said:
Just got my first reboot after 15 minutes. No reboot from Kwiboo's for over 10 hours of running.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which version? with or without buttons?
I like Kwiboo's better, but I have no choice but to use this - I had problem with Kwiboo's as I can't install any apps from sd card from file manager or TB nor my apps will auto restored. So I will continue to test drew's rom - is not that bad.
---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 PM ----------
sonothar said:
which version? with or without buttons?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with buttons
I'm now port ics to i9001 (galaxy s plus)
if it working i upload download to forum
I's port from i9100 galaxy s 2
Nice let us know if it's working, I hope this try will succeed
Sent from my GT-i9001 @ LionROM
Hope you will succeed
Awesome
Good Luck!
Hm too bad I've heard this so often
Anyway good luck
have you tried?
guys can you please tell me what is so cool about ics?
why everyone wants that?
xewier its very nice you will try that but it will never work 100% until there are more official ics roms!
I´ve tested with samsung gio and evo 3d ics and to be honest it isn´t so special...
don´t get me wrong I appreciate that all guys here would love that and I don´t have any problem with that but I think its wasted time...
you could see developing rom as a challenge
in my opinion it is fun to port something and afterwards you could say yeah i ported ICS to our device
so let the people do their work and dont criticise them
since its their time they can do with it what they want ;-)
and btw
good luck!
okay thanks for all
but in dsixda's kitchen have option port from another device and i try galaxy s 2 original ics and the porting ended and lost ported file :S please help sorry for my bad english
fabsau said:
guys can you please tell me what is so cool about ics?
why everyone wants that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1- a lot of new features and options (lockscreens, widgets, multitasking interface, swipe to remove notification etc etc etc ... )
2- gpu accelerated interface (unlike froyo nad GB that use CPU accelerated) , which obviously saves some cpu power.
3- if someone ports it, it would be AOSP , so more free RAM and less samsung crap =>better multitasking and performance in general.
4-better looking UI and theming
and a lot more, but i think these are enough to make a point
just write 99 at the main menu and get the ported rom at the "output zip" folder
xewier said:
okay thanks for all
but in dsixda's kitchen have option port from another device and i try galaxy s 2 original ics and the porting ended and lost ported file :S please help sorry for my bad english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the main problem would be the kernel itself, if you use the S2 kernel your phone will be bricked in no time. watch out
bogac94 said:
just write 99 at the main menu and get the ported rom at the "output zip" folder
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you man!
broodplank1337 said:
the main problem would be the kernel itself, if you use the S2 kernel your phone will be bricked in no time. watch out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
im try to change kernel to vitalityy kernel
thank for attention
keep up the good work. i hope it'll work and we'll reach ics forever !
Blumdum said:
you could see developing rom as a challenge
in my opinion it is fun to port something and afterwards you could say yeah i ported ICS to our device
so let the people do their work and dont criticise them
since its their time they can do with it what they want ;-)
and btw
good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the challenge arguement is funny and true =)
I didn´t and I don´t want to critize the people who are actually porting something for our phone, I just don´t get why ICS is so important for all people (excepted the challenge factor) The real big changes in ics are faceunlock (which we will maybe become with the next stock rom) a new launcher and new settings can be make...
Please don´t think I totaly against Ics, it would be nice to have it, but I think with the troubles we will have to face with ics we could instead build a stable cyanogenmod 7.2...
(just a little opinion from one lonely guy )
---------- Post added at 11:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 PM ----------
rayiskon said:
1- a lot of new features and options (lockscreens, widgets, multitasking interface, swipe to remove notification etc etc etc ... )
2- gpu accelerated interface (unlike froyo nad GB that use CPU accelerated) , which obviously saves some cpu power.
3- if someone ports it, it would be AOSP , so more free RAM and less samsung crap =>better multitasking and performance in general.
4-better looking UI and theming
and a lot more, but i think these are enough to make a point
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1,2,4 I dont disagree with this points....
3. ICS would have more performance as stock-rom, but I´m the opinion that cyanogenmod would be more quicker, because ics needs more ram then 2.3.7 does
-->Cyanogenmod quicker then ICS
If I´m wrong I would like to get corrected...
fabsau said:
3. ICS would have more performance as stock-rom,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes we all agree on that , but we are all aware the samsung will not give us an official ics rom, so there's nothing much we can do about it.
but I´m the opinion that cyanogenmod would be more quicker, because ics needs more ram then 2.3.7 does
-->Cyanogenmod quicker then ICS
If I´m wrong I would like to get corrected...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the answer to this is related to my first reply, of course when u have a stock rom, the hardware should work as it should, cyanogenmods (all versions) usually have issues with cameras for example, especially if they don't have the drivers for it. and this matter is not the only issue with cyanogen, they have other bugs too, but they also introduced a lot of tweaks and new stuff. so in the absence of an official rom (which we would tweak) , porting is our only option.
fabsau said:
1,2,4 I dont disagree with this points....
3. ICS would have more performance as stock-rom, but I´m the opinion that cyanogenmod would be more quicker, because ics needs more ram then 2.3.7 does
-->Cyanogenmod quicker then ICS
If I´m wrong I would like to get corrected...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then stick to CM9
Wish you best of luck i mostly like to use Stock rom because i don't like to play with the phone. hope that u will port the ICS.
Test install in cwm!!!
hi every one
i would like to open a thread about reviews on custom roms on ARC S
reviews made as ORDINARY USER
it is just about how you think of your device AFTER a custom rom
what you like or dislike.....
what you miss or need and didn't found ....(no need to tell how and what you do , because that's another subject)
NO NEED to post Q or BUGS or HOW TO or REQUESTS or DEEP DEVELOPER details JUST....USER OPINION!!!
AND please give credits to the developers of the ROMS by posting links to threads you found the custom rom in.
Starting form here:
Arc S with rooted GB (LT18i 4.0.2.A.0.62) and CWM installed
AtoMic GB 5.0 final (custom rom)
AtoMic Gb 5.0 Arc S patch!
Atomic mod system ui
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2083286
-device working fine no lags or errors ..until now
-installing apps &games and they are working good for me
-no file manager pre-installed
-don't like ring tones
my overall opinion it is GOOD rom to try!!!:good::good:
You should use the respective Rom threads to post reveiws about romS!
edit:
allright if everyone wants it
Well I think it's a good idea for a thread that could help people in finding ROM's with features they are looking for. I dislike posting off topic so here I go:
CyanogenMod 10
+Clean
+Stable
+Fast
+Not as bloated as stock ICS
+JB notifications are useful
+Supported and actively developed
+Open source
-Camera is awful
-Ringtones could be better but who really cares?
Oh and don't take XtremeSilencer seriously he's not so bright...
pypcier said:
Well I think it's a good idea for a thread that could help people in finding ROM's with features they are looking for. I dislike posting off topic so here I go:
CyanogenMod 10
+Clean
+Stable
+Fast
+Not as bloated as stock ICS
+JB notifications are useful
+Supported and actively developed
+Open source
-Camera is awful
-Ringtones could be better but who really cares?
Oh and don't take XtremeSilencer seriously he's not so bright...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont know why you want to pick up fights with everyone?
ya right i forgot.. you dont belong here
pypcier said:
Well I think it's a good idea for a thread that could help people in finding ROM's with features they are looking for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The way People can find what they're looking for is by reading the ROM threads in the development section, not by reading noobs opinions on one of the many variations of a "best ROM" thread, which this is, evident by the short summary of what the OP thinks about the ROM.
I can't agree more. Which ROM is the fastest? Which kernel is best? etc. etc. It's like walking into a bar and asking which drink is the best. You can't get your answer because every person around has a personal taste and looking for something different.
Going further. Telling that one ROM is better than another is quite disrespectful to developers. Most of them spent much time making their work for FREE and one guy can easily depreciate their work.
If you're looking for answer - try. It's easy and making it on your own is much funnier than looking for spoon feeding in every situations. Thinking is fun
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pypcier said:
Oh and don't take XtremeSilencer seriously he's not so bright...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Their signature shows they're a bit brighter, and bigger contributor than you're ever going to be.
Sorry ,,i try 3 or 4 rom,,,i think rom ULTIMATE HD 3.0.2 FROM JADDER IS BATTER,,,you must try it,,
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app
syahipul said:
Sorry ,,i try 3 or 4 rom,,,i think rom ULTIMATE HD 3.0.2 FROM JADDER IS BATTER,,,you must try it,,
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't see this as valid review, because every user is different and every user has its own needs. 2 people will not have totally same user experience on same ROM and kernel.
XtremeSilencer said:
You should use the respective Rom threads to post reveiws about romS!
edit:
allright if everyone wants it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes if we want to review a SPECEFIC ROM .This thread is about USER OPINIO about the custom Rom they tried...and any comments about that OPINION is welcomed
syahipul said:
Sorry ,,i try 3 or 4 rom,,,i think rom ULTIMATE HD 3.0.2 FROM JADDER IS BATTER,,,you must try it,,
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Need to know why it's better for you and why the others are not....
XperienceD said:
The wanoon pikople can find what they're looking for is by reading the ROM threads in the development section, not by reading noobs opinions on one of the many variations of a "best ROM" thread, which this is, evident by the short summary of what the OP thinks about the ROM.
Their signature shows they're a bit brighter, and bigger contributor than you're ever going to be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need to turn the thread into (picking on noobs)thread it's about USER OPINIONS NOOBS OR NON-NOOBS
No need mock or disrespect commenters just because YOU THINK YOU KNOW MORE THAN THEM
No need to tell any one where or how to find ROMS
As long as no forum rules is broken :
Don't tell any one what and what not to say
Don't turn commenting into PERSONAL.
And last thing;
IAM A NOOB AND NOOBS ARE WELCOME TO FEEL FREE AND SHARE COMMENTS here on this thread.....Cause that's what this forum is all about SHARE...FREE..COMMENTS
Wrong. XDA is a developers' site. If you're a noob, then make yourself not one, or leave
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium
Actually I have an Ultimate HD of course, with Ultimate HD Mod and I like it very much.
+almost no lags
+xperia z theme
+modded statusbar (better than stock, I think)
+configurable
+quite frequent updates
-few useless system apps
Grade: 5,5 (in Poland we have grading scale from 2-5 at universities )
Previously I had used several other ROM`s, for example Viper Xpieria (good, 4,5-5), Racing Bean (not so good, 3-3,5), CyanogenMod 10 (good, 4), MIUI (good, 4), Jelly Sandwich (very good, 5, but it`s no longer developed I think) and CAMPS+ (bad, 2,5-3).
So to sum up, in my opinion the best ROM actually is Ultimate HD + Ultimate HD Mod, cause of no lagging, stability, and almost no bugs.
I've been using Custom ROMs for about 6 months. So, didn't try too many of them. The reason why I switched to custom ROM was Sony Bloatware and the slowness of official ICS ROM. What I was looking for was more internal space and get the phone up to GB speeds.
First try was CM9.
+ Easy to install, best documentation out there,
+ Good customization options,
+ Frees up load of memory,
+ The GUI doesn't lag too much
+ Fast boot-up.
- Apollo player (hated it and due to regional issues, I couldn't install Google Music),
- WiFi issues
Next I tried racing bean with Fusion 4.4
+ The GUI is much more fluid than anything I tried on my Arc,
+ Customization is on the same level as CM9,
+ Same internal storage usage as CM9,
+ Includes good players/utilities,
+ Battery life didn't shorten despite the fact that the phone became more fluid and responsive,
+ WiFi locks very fast and stable,
+ No issues with 3G,
- There are 3 camera programs included. The panaroma one doesn't even launch (force close immediately). The other two are definitely below the Sony's original camera application,
- The kernel boot takes forever. I see the Fusion logo for about 40 seconds. Once the Nexus animation starts, the boot-up goes very fast. I get the feeling that the Fusion kernel is waiting for a timeout,
- The phone reboots occasionally. Especially when GPS is used (like with dedicated navigation programs). I think when the phone is under heavy load (you feel that the GUI starts stuttering and lag becomes apparent) almost immediately the Nexus X logo comes up.
I heard good things about the Ultimate HD ROM. Will try that one once I get some free time.
babkir said:
yes if we want to review a SPECEFIC ROM .This thread is about USER OPINIO about the custom Rom they tried...and any comments about that OPINION is welcomed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Each user will have different experience with each ROM. So an opinion from a certain user about a certain ROM may differ from another user. The only way to truly find the best ROM for your phone is to try it out.
僕のLT18iから送られてきた
tangosierra_ said:
Wrong. XDA is a developers' site. If you're a noob, then make yourself not one, or leave
Sent from my LT18i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know XDA is a developers' site it's on the TITLE..... but leaving is another thing,when i breaks a forum rule i think i will be forced to leave till that happen(if it could ever) i think i will STAY. after all WRONG or WRIHT depends on where you STAND and WHAT you are tallking about.
The NOOB-thing:
if the site admins don't LIKE noobs or don't WANT them to post they coud have made subuscrition rule that ANY ONE shoud POST some thing he actually DEVEOPED before posting
AND for GOD'S sake don't keep on posting anti-noobs or NO-use comments here...if you want it to die just wait for it....don't bother to replay..you'll just make it last longer!!!!
popthosegaskets said:
Each user will have different experience with each ROM. So an opinion from a certain user about a certain ROM may differ from another user. The only way to truly find the best ROM for your phone is to try it out.
僕のLT18iから送られてきた
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and that different experience we would like to share and not HOW to find BEST ROM
babkir said:
and that different experience we would like to share and not HOW to find BEST ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u should try by yourself. believe me buddy, its fun if you try by youself. This is not about how you install something that is inserted into your device, and you show people that you mostly have advanced technology. more than that comrade ... it's about development.
respect those who have tried to create a custom ROM and share it here...
X-gamer is SUPER FAST!!!
Sent from my sending thing..
Stupid Macbook Air can't fly
good room and very flixable but have 2 prob power sever axperia arc s 4.0.4 and restart phone
Best ROM's for Arc S (Stable only)
Well I don't have 10 post under my belt so I can not post on developer thread but am a hyper droid flasher. Rooted my phone the very next day and voided its warranty. Since then have used many many ROMs but only few are there to remember.
Let me just go by Droid OS versions:
1. ICS 4.0.4= Pureness ROMS, VIPER
2. JB 4.1.2 = Slim bean or Super JB
3. JB 4.2.2 = Paranod Android v3.6 (Rizal Lovins) My current ROM
(Sorry for bad English)
Before anybody ask me to fix things, i'm sorry, but i can't. These are "stable", so do a full wipe, and check if the problem solved.
You are doing this at your own risk
Hi guys.
I'm building daily CM13 for the OnePlus 3. Of course i can't guarantee that there will be a build every day, but that's the destination.
I know that there will be official cm13 soon, so i won't update this thread anymore, please delete it.
You can get my builds here.
(Nightly-nightlies: I uploaded them at about 7-8pm according to CEST UTC/GMT +2 hours)
Thanks @matssa for your guide
Known issues
Code:
- Dash Charging not working (OnePlus will release the source soon)
- CM bugs are exists
- You tell me :D
Changelog (Copy & paste from official 6P (angler) changelog, minus the specific 6P things)
20160722
(End of the night)
The last unofficial build by me. Big thanks to you guys
PackageManager: make protected-broadcasts permission aware (android_frameworks_base)
SysUI: Add first time use lock screen hints (android_frameworks_base)
Fix build (android_packages_apps_CMBugreport)
cm: Remove stray echo from extract_utils (android_vendor_cm)
Update iconography. (android_packages_apps_CMBugreport)
cm: Underp dumping of 64-bit only libraries (android_vendor_cm)
cm: Configure mmcblk1 IO on sys.io.scheduler prop (android_vendor_cm)
Special thanks to @Grarak, and @dianlujitao for their hard work!
All working fine seems like there is no more haptic feedback for alert slider why? /anyone able to switch to 5ghz wifi and find routers? Seems like i cant on any aosp build
_MartyMan_ said:
(Sorry for bad English)
Hi guys.
I'm building daily CM13 for the OnePlus 3. Of course i can't guarantee that there will be a build every day, but that's the destination.
I know that there are about 5 unofficial builds out there, so i will delete this thread when official cm13 appears.
You can get my builds here
(Nightly-nightlies: I'm uploading at 7-8pm according to CEST UTC/GMT +2 hours)
Thanks @matssa for your guide
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tnx buddy for that!!!All is working?Tnx!!!
nadejo said:
Thanks downloading...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome If you have a question, ask
Flamehell said:
Tnx buddy for that!!!All is working?Tnx!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome! Everything is working except Dash Charging, which will be implemented in the future
Can you post changelog? What is not working, like Dash charging etc.
Thanks
_MartyMan_ said:
You're welcome! Everything is working except Dash Charging, which will be implemented in the future
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tnx buddy!!!So all the updates from Grarak are there right?Also the new security patch?Tnx for that,please keep it on!!!
---------- Post added at 11:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:03 PM ----------
Pr0metheus2 said:
Can you post changelog? What is not working, like Dash charging etc.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only dash is not working....
Pr0metheus2 said:
Can you post changelog? What is not working, like Dash charging etc.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, sure
nadejo said:
All working finde seems like there is no more haptic feedback for alert slider why? /anyone able to switch to 5ghz wifi and find routers? Seems like i cant on any aosp build
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, it's a CM bug i think. :/
Flamehell said:
Tnx buddy!!!So all the updates from Grarak are there right?Also the new security patch?Tnx for that,please keep it on!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, @Grarak and @dianlujitao are the best!
_MartyMan_ said:
Yes, @Grarak and @dianlujitao are the best!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tnx a lot buddy!!!Rom is running perfect!!!Don t stop!!!
Flamehell said:
Tnx a lot buddy!!!Rom is running perfect!!!Don t stop!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks again, but keep in mind that i just built it from source Chill, i wouldn't like to stop until official nightly builds.
What's the point? How is this any different from the other unofficial builds? Seems like a waste of time and a clutter of the development section unless some how this is different?
kwkw480 said:
What's the point? How is this any different from the other unofficial builds? Seems like a waste of time and a clutter of the development section unless some how this is different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He will do a nightly build,every day untill the official CM....after than that,i m happy when someone want to build....better for us my friend....
kwkw480 said:
What's the point? How is this any different from the other unofficial builds? Seems like a waste of time and a clutter of the development section unless some how this is different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no difference from the other builds. I didn't say it's something special. Somewhere i agree with you. CM should be official now.
kwkw480 said:
What's the point? How is this any different from the other unofficial builds? Seems like a waste of time and a clutter of the development section unless some how this is different?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are several unofficial builds out there, but no one makes the builds every day, or at least shares them. The two CM devs don't really share their builds everyday, so it is nice to have several options where the ROM is updated daily. Furthermore, if one build has an issue, it is possible to use another build in order to check weither the ROM is bugged or is the builder the culprit (bad repo sync, etc...).
matssa said:
There are several unofficial builds out there, but no one makes the builds every day, or at least shares them. The two CM devs don't really share their builds everyday, so it is nice to have several options where the ROM is updated daily. Furthermore, if one build has an issue, it is possible to use another build in order to check weither the ROM is bugged or is the builder the culprit (bad repo sync, etc...).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup they don't, because they wanna wait till it's integrated into CM's Jenkins, auto/official builds. It takes too long to do by their own(It can take like an hour depending on the hardware)
BRiANj64 said:
Yup they don't, because they wanna wait till it's integrated into CM's Jenkins, auto/official builds. It takes too long to do by their own(It can take like an hour depending on the hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah I made a little guide on how to build, and my build only take 10-15mins depending of the changes. The first build took around 2-3hours, but when you enable CCACHE, you reduce it a lot since it uses stuff from the last build.
For the HW, I'm using a VMWare workstation (virtual machine) with Ubuntu 16.XX, OS and software on SSD, VM on HHD (1Gb 7200rpm), i5 6500, 8Gb of RAM (5 given to VM, but seems to use more). For the repo sync, got a 30Mb/s wire (download speed is at 3Mb/s). So as you can see, it's not really a big big computer, I'm not even using my SSD for the building ^^
matssa said:
Nah I made a little guide on how to build, and my build only take 10-15mins depending of the changes. The first build took around 2-3hours, but when you enable CCACHE, you reduce it a lot since it uses stuff from the last build.
For the HW, I'm using a VMWare workstation (virtual machine) with Ubuntu 16.XX, OS and software on SSD, VM on HHD (1Gb 7200rpm), i5 6500, 8Gb of RAM (5 given to VM, but seems to use more). For the repo sync, got a 30Mb/s wire (download speed is at 3Mb/s). So as you can see, it's not really a big big computer, I'm not even using my SSD for the building ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yet it is a pain to do builds everyday on the same day. If you forget a day, people will complain and flame the hell out of you.(that's the XDA forums after all) This guy is really brave.
It's also hard to support people running 100's of different builds(Remember; CM doesn't even support their own official nightlies on their forums, you'll get your topic locked and/or downright ignored).
BRiANj64 said:
Yet it is a pain to do builds everyday on the same day. If you forget a day, people will complain and flame the hell out of you.(that's the XDA forums after all) This guy is really brave.
It's also hard to support people running 100's of different builds(Remember; CM doesn't even support their own official nightlies on their forums, you'll get your topic locked and/or downright ignored).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe yeah true, you forget one day and BOOM, got everyone on your back. And CM doesn't support it yet because they may have issues with the number of servers or even in terms of stability, trademark, etc...