Hi,
Using ElementalX 0.11 kernel, I have overclocked my HTC One to 2160 MHz CPU and 450 MHz GPU. It is perfectly stable running some benchmarks such as antutu, quadrant, 3dmark and velamo. Aluminum case rulz, playing like a heatsink!
See results (ROM and launcher stock, kernel ElementalX 0.11)
Wouldn't make a huge amount of difference in everyday use though. Stock ROM is pretty damn smooth as it is
Sure, in daily use I'm using stock frequencies. I've just wanted to see till where I could push up boundaries
under the elmental x kernel is it possible to turn off cores ?
I run 1.9 ghz with elementalX and it is perfect. Great battery, great speed.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
Yes but what is the point? The higher you go the faster or throttles
The vellamo score is lower than stock lol. My stock gives 2.6k score
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Thank you for your post, but this type of discussion needs to remain in the kernel's thread.
Closed
Related
Can someone explain exactly what it really means?
I know the higher the number the better your phone is working but beyond that i have no clue
I consistently get 2080 to 2250 on cm7 nightly 30 running ondemand governor min 368 max 1.3ghz. Im assuming thats respectable?
I ran it once on performance governor at 1.5ghz and got about 2500 on benchmark.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
This is the best score out of a series of three I ran right after flashing Cm6.1.1 and cranking setcpu up to max. I'm sure that this would run perfectly well at these speeds for day to day on his kernel, but I usually only run at around 1113mhz. The g2 is plenty fast on its stock 800mhz with fantastic battery life, don't get me wrong. But what the hell is the point of all this rooting and rom flashing wagoonery if I don't give myself a slight performance bump.
*Epenis waving*
At 1.5ghz max and 368 min (on-demand governor) with CM7 and Pershoot's latest kernel (I believe he incorporated the new GPU drivers), I get 2700-2800. Quadrant tests your CPU, memory, and GPU performance.
As for Quadrant I tend to find it unreliable, for benchmarks I use Smartbench 2011. Seems a bit more reasonable. Makes you realize how underpowered our GPU's is compared to the PowerVR SGX540.
And what is the gpu?
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
tackleberry said:
And what is the gpu?
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GPU = Graphical processor unit
its the chip in the phone that draws polygons and renders graphics so games and graphic related things run smoothly
Thanks for that info, that's what I was thinking but wasn't positive.
I tried it on smartbench 2011 and got about a 1500.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
tackleberry said:
Thanks for that info, that's what I was thinking but wasn't positive.
I tried it on smartbench 2011 and got about a 1500.
sent from the rooty tooty fresh and fruity cm7 nighly powered G2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got 1500 for what specifically?
Smartbench 2011 outputs 2 bars after the test. One for Productivity Index (CPU performance) and another for Gaming Index (GPU performance). Top bar is Productivity Index and bottom bar is Gaming Index.
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
sodvs said:
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so what kernel you're using???...
Now I just got a 2301pt at 1.5Gperformance in Quadrant Advanced
sodvs said:
from my understanding quadrant isn't all that accurate when it comes to benchmarking...hopefully i'm not wrong but I think it scores the phones ability to handle 2d/3d graphics, how fast it reads and write data, memory and cpu. If you are using the free version you won't be able to see how you score on each test. Even though its just numbers I can't help it...check out my latest and highest bench marks. I barely missed the 3k mark today on quadrant oc'ed to 1.8 got 2997...I just forgot to upload the screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow the Smartbench 2011 results for Liquid Villain are impressive. Might have to give that rom a try.
I think it might I been a fluke lol the cloest I got that again 1600/2400ish.
On all the screen shoots I was using pershoots kernal
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA Premium App
If u want to go big use flippys turbo kernel. A phone as fast as u want, lol.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
I have used flippy's kernal and oc'ed to 1.9 and got 2997 on quandrant but smartbench score was 1900ish productivity/ 1700ish gaming...phone got a bit hot as well...with pershoots kernal I can get almost the same results and phone stays at normal temp.
I got 3158 on quadrant running CM7rc2 with pershoots .34 kernel. Oc'd to 1516 with performance governor.
Currently on CM7rc3 with pershoots .36 kernel I'm getting high 2900's.
All I know is ›3000 on quadrant is FAST!
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
How do I get pershoot's latest kernel?
just over 3200+ on quadrant running the latest CM7 nightly and setting [email protected]
for quadrant, i have noticed its important to run it several times before you get an accurate measurement... personally, i've had the best score around the 3rd or 4th run.... anything more after that just plateau the score or even dips a bit at times. and kill heavy background services (ie: f/b, lookout, juice defender, DSP manager)
FYI: if i set CPU back to stock, i'm still @ 2700ish
Quadrant hasn't been updated for a long time and it is not exactly reliable when it comes to evaluating a phone's performance. You're much better off with Antutu Benchmark.
And this is almost a year old of a post
crestofawave said:
Quadrant hasn't been updated for a long time and it is not exactly reliable when it comes to evaluating a phone's performance. You're much better off with Antutu Benchmark.
And this is almost a year old of a post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When we got the stock GB upgrade, I found myself missing my ROOT and of course the BAUXITE Kernel.
Well we got the ROOT back quickly and now Thanks to Mr. Eui Woo Jeong we have overclocking. TEGRAK ULTIMATE overclock on the market website now supports the Sprint Tab w/GB.
Life is good.
What speed are you overclocking to?
DanielNTX said:
What speed are you overclocking to?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just cruising through at 1.2 no volt adjustment. Just "ONDEMAND".
No issues....
Did you mean the non ultimate version?
The ultimate version is $ 1.99
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA App
The ultimate version is not working for me. It does a checking stability for 300 seconds and never counts down for the Set on Boot option.
What are the best speeds to overclock to? I am over clocking to 1.1 ghz and it keeps locking up and freezing
I guess I can't support the widgets that I would like to without it being too slugish
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Tab
I've noticed that oc'd past 1.2 my performance drops. It runs laggy and 1.3 benchmark scores were half that of 1.0 UNLESS I plug it into the wall. Is the battery not able to keep up or it it being undervolted?
Also, using this app, any thoughts on undervolting at 1.0 to increase battery? I would imagine undervolting won't fry anything, just maybe lock up, so is ot safe to experiment?
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA App
throwback1718 said:
What are the best speeds to overclock to? I am over clocking to 1.1 ghz and it keeps locking up and freezing
I guess I can't support the widgets that I would like to without it being too slugish
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Tab
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.2 seems to be spot on for me.
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA App
I will be definitely trying 1.2... The reason I didn't try that before was because I feared it would Surely kill my battery life.
I'll give you guys feedback... I also wanna know how long you guys batt life lasts on 1.2?
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA App
Works amazing on my Sprint GTab! Runs at 1.2Ghz without a problem. I only got the free one. I'm stingy like that.
Sent from my SPH-P100 using XDA Premium App
My Tuppence
I've played around a lot with the paid version of tegrak.
Free version works fine at 1200mhz max for me and I got the following AnTuTu results
1000mhz stock (Gingerbread 2.3.3 and Odin root, 32gb micro sd installed too) - score = 2676 = rank 56752
1200mhz - score = 2676 = rank 51544
With paid Tegrak I've managed to tweak up to a max of 1228mhz before it got unstable and rebooted, here are my results.
1220mhz (core voltage increased to 1325mv from 1300mv) - score = 3097 = rank 40166
1224mhz (core 1325) - score = 3130 = rank 39620
1228mhz (core 1325) - score = 2890 = rank 47433. So a drop in performance at which point I gave up testing further.
I'm happy with these results for $1.99.... pretty substantial update in performance. Plus going from an AnTuTu rank of 56752 to 39620 an improvement of 17132 in the rankings I'm happy.
Hi,
as i'm using my iconia a500 i noticed some heavy Performance issues. i rooted and installed several Roms but my Quadrant score keeps being low. right now i am on lightspeed 1.0.1 with Richard's Kernel and my Quadrant score is only 656!!!
i'm really curious about this any suggestions?
thanks in advance
kiark
Just a guess, but the cpu probably is not running full during the test. Might have to use a app to force to 1000 during the test.
Running 2.4 kernel? If so, the default intersctive scaling governor is borked so either use setcpu to change to on demand or flash back to 2.3. Im personally running 1.6ghz as max speed with on demand.
thank u very much, setting the cpu up with setcpu worked!
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
IM using the xoom 3.2 rom
My acer is over clocked to 1.5 and here are my benchmark scores.
Useing Quadrant I got 3421 (best of three runs) and frame rates around 45
Useing Linpack I got 45.438 mflpos on single thread in 1.85 seconds and
71.53 mflops on multi-thread in 2.36 seconds again best of three runs
Useing AnTuTu Benchmark I got a score of 6159 and frame rates right at around 60 fps
Useing Vellamo (its new and a benchmark tool for a tablets browser to see how ell the browser performs does things like java and flash stress tests and load speeds of web pages) I got a score of 1072
naturallight said:
CPU really does not have much effect on quadrant score. It is the combination of the Rom and the kernel it self.
Sent from my SGS-t959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure on this. if it doesnt have much effect why do you see such a huge difference between 216 Mhz and 1.5 Ghz clock speeds in quadrant?
Okay I have been debating on which kernel to use for the CM10 ROM I use, some of them like m-kernel support CPU/GPU OC'ing up to like 1.7GHz then other kernels like franco support the same, but don't allow an OC above stock. How much performance gain for sacrifice of battery life do you truly get from OC'ing your CPU to a higher frequency, compared to just overclocking your GPU?
I can't notice a big difference in my use with the OC CPU . The GPU OC is more noticeable for me. I run trinity kernel at 1150 CPU 446 gpu and it runs great.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
I run motley plus a10 and I do notice faster installs on apps. If you want numbers flash a kernel and run it through quadrants benchmarks
sunman277 said:
I run motley plus a10 and I do notice faster installs on apps. If you want numbers flash a kernel and run it through quadrants benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd use something like AnTuTu over Quadrant just because I find it more reliable tbh.
Hello.this is my antutu result.please share opinion and screenshots.i use cm10 stable with marmite kernel.
Whats your score?
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?
Serris said:
My first run was 2700 something, then i rebooted and got this. Running latest cm10.1 nightly, with marmite 8.4. Stock freq.
Looks like cm10 is way faster than cm10.1. OP do you have any mods?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep i used oc 1400.I just flashed jellyshot with mermite kernel with 1.32 OC and smartass and got this
First two screens are result for cm-10.1-20130408-NIGHTLY rom with cm kernel.
The 3rd and 4th screenshot were made after updating to 20130416-NIGHTLY and flashing mermite-v8.5cm kernel.
Carbon ROM, no over clock and stock
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Over clocked 1300 Carbon ROM
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config
B33zal said:
Yesterday I've overclocked CPU to 1100mHz on marmite_8.5 kernel and got score around 3850 but forgot to take a SS :/
Today, I flashed Air_Kernel_Weekly_r341_JBN_BlueColor_CM, overclocked CPU to 1200mHz and then made the test again. Results in first ss. After that I was courious what are the results for normal CPU frequency. So the results for the same kernel, running at 1000mHz are in the second screenshot.
So the best results were using Air kernel with overclocked CPU. When CPU wasn't overclocked the best results were with latest marmite kernel.
so, I urge CM10.1 users to post their results and that way we'll find the best config
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On general (my experience) 3200-4000 is pretty normal without overclocking depending on rom/kernel/phone/battery level and temperature.. Two identical phones with the same set up will get different scores. Some mods/tweaks can increase this as well as having a good amount of free ram and no other programs running.
But these are just "fun" tests and not a true assessment of real performance..
With that said, Carbon rom is SOOOO much faster..
Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^
B33zal said:
Ofcourse But as you've said.. It's fun to test out different combinations and it also feels good when you out do the first score for 1000 points and make your phone as good as some more expensive phone ^^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed... And it is fun mopping the floor with slow ROMs (joking)...
This was set at only 800 mhz
Consider yourselves challenged..
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
burakgon said:
Why your 3D scores under 2k?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No matter what rom I've tried, I don't get much over 2k on 3d.. this test I was just a bit under, but still damn good for a Nexus S.. I saw you are trying to improve the graphics in your rom, I hope it works, but I really want a faster load time on apps and less lag in everything else. I have tried your rom, on this test as well, and you came up over 500 points below my score of 5300. I test all roms the same with multiple kernels (stock included as well) and different schedulers/ governors.. but as battery life goes you are towards the top..