Related
Samsung Galaxy S II Tegra (Galaxy Royal) i9103
Available in Europe from at least 104 Online shops:
http://skinflint.co.uk/eu/670691
Telecoms are selling the "i9103 Samsung Galaxy S II Tegra" for 300 US$ less then the i9100 Samsung Galaxy S II. So many customers buy the i9103.
Some of the custom telecom versions out there:
Hutchinson 3 Samsung Galaxy R i9103
O2 Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Vodafone Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Mobilcom Debitel Samsung Galaxy R i9103
T-Mobile/Telekom Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Telco Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Base Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Talkline Samsung Galaxy R i9103
E-Plus Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Hope we soon get our own forum or we will have to use the i9100 forum.
Click picture to enlarge:
tegra now?...why so late???omg...
Its already available in India since a month. Its more like a Dual Core version of Galaxy S rather than S2. It has almost same features of Galaxy S except for dual core. 5 MP cam, 512 Mb Ram, 4.1 inch SLCD screen etc.
http://www.flipkart.com/mobiles/sam...qw--&ref=16a7bad0-7777-4e16-b755-cc8f2840eccc
it has 1GB RAM 4.19" and SLCD and flash LED.
I don't think this counts as a Galaxy S II, or even a Galaxy S device...
The closer aproach would be like an S2 SCL. S is i9000 and S SCL I9003, this is I9103 and S2 is the original I9100, so more or less like S2 SCL.
But it's Galaxy R (with different hw)...not Galaxy S2...though the code is I9103...very strange...
I have a Galaxy R (i9103) and a Galaxy S (i9000).
Galaxy R is a nice phone. Very very fast and good looking. I think it is very similar to the S2 (i9100) because it looks like it has the same crap implementation of the Yahama DAC. Galaxy S sounds waaay better with Voodoo Sound and I am still using it as my personal phone.
If the only difference is the CPU+GPU part, S2 ROMs may be kind of "compatible". Changing the kernel and other details could be the only needed actions to get some proper ROMs for this phone.
Endoran said:
I don't think this counts as a Galaxy S II, or even a Galaxy S device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
legion1911 said:
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol? Mali plus exynos is a way more faster than tegra crap.
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.
Tegra 2 is Android reference design for Android tablets. So it is not crap.
The Galaxy Tab 10.1 is also Tegra 2.
The Galaxy R does everything a Galaxy Tab 10.1 does, but it fits into the pocket of your Jeans.
"The Samsung Galaxy R I9103 is an Android smartphone that was announced by Samsung on August 10, 2011 as a variant to the Samsung Galaxy S II."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_R
"The Samsung Galaxy R is one of the currently available variants of the Galaxy S II."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II
legion1911 said:
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol its very well documented that Mali is (a lot) faster than tegra II...
please don't start this again and do your researches before posting random benchmarks trying to prove something that's not true...
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
The back of the phone looks better than our Exynos models... we still blow every phone out of the water though in terms of performance .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Teio said:
Lol its very well documented that Mali is (a lot) faster than tegra II...
please don't start this again and do your researches before posting random benchmarks trying to prove something that's not true...
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
King Shady said:
The back of the phone looks better than our Exynos models... we still blow every phone out of the water though in terms of performance .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a lot (by hair)
Blow (blow job)
truth to be told it's not worthy upgrade to original SGS wahahahahahaha
you'r just trying to justify great amount of cash spent
you too
thought i was the only one with an s2 and still using my galaxy s as my daily phone.. for same reason. crap sound chip, also slow gps lock times.
josjator said:
I have a Galaxy R (i9103) and a Galaxy S (i9000).
Galaxy R is a nice phone. Very very fast and good looking. I think it is very similar to the S2 (i9100) because it looks like it has the same crap implementation of the Yahama DAC. Galaxy S sounds waaay better with Voodoo Sound and I am still using it as my personal phone.
If the only difference is the CPU+GPU part, S2 ROMs may be kind of "compatible". Changing the kernel and other details could be the only needed actions to get some proper ROMs for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats faster S2 tegra or exynos? I haven could to test the tegra ...
-Nane- said:
whats faster S2 tegra or exynos? I haven could to test the tegra ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search?
Sent from my GT-I9100
Can someone check the DAC on this phone? Also, does it support USB OTG and MHL?
samsung galxy r i9103 usb on the go!!!
can u tell me if this device supports usb on the go just lyk its big brother s2?????????
Teio said:
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On custom roms for sure Come on, why should you overclock if you have originally faster cpu (1,2 vs 1,0) ?
I tested both handsets (stock roms) and results of quadrant, smartbench, cf... were almost the same, little higher in favor of sgs2 (1,2 ghz ex compared to tegra's 1 ghz). Clocked to 1.2 ghz tegra had slightly better scores in every test.
No need to argue about that, I know what experts say about exynos' and tegra's performance. The thing is that for average user is really hard to notice which of those two handsets is snappier.
which is better ((galaxy S)) OR ((S plus)) OR ((SL)) ??
fathyazhary said:
which is better ((galaxy S)) OR ((S plus)) OR ((SL)) ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want good community support and planty of xda activity Galaxy S is unbeatable.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I9000 of course
I9001 > I9000 > I9003
Personally like I9000.....
If you are into Modding and flashing, then go for S. If you want performance go with S+. If you want the phone to cost less ,choose SL.
Sent from my Galaxy S running MIUI ICS!
The original Samsung Galaxy S i9000.
i9000 (PowerVR SGX540) > i9001 (Adreno 205) > i9003 (PowerVR SGX530).
Galaxy s. As said, better community, more stuff and custom roms
SGS i9001 (the quallcomm one) is supposed to be faster - i think i 've read somewhere that it's based on a single fast memory chip and don't have i9000's lag problem. i9003 is the worse than both.
Why don't u even consider the galaxy r in ur list ???
From the choices given, i9000 is still MUCH better than the Plus and SL version.
Just exclude the SL from that list because its ... frankly ... Teh ****zz from company. A lame attempt to sell the name "Galaxy" i.e. Their Flagship Device.
Galaxy S Plus has a faster CPU. It'll be a better performer in day to day tasks than i9000.
However, i9000 is still has a better hardware OVERALL. Becaues it also has a better GPU i.e. SGX540. While rest of the specs are same as Plus version.
Conclusion: From the above given choices, choose the i9000.
BUT ... If you can consider other options say Galaxy R, look into it as well. (If you can live without a SuperAMOLED display ... well, i cant )
i9001 is better, but no one making roms for it.
no
no..i9000 is way better than i9001
inozako said:
no..i9000 is way better than i9001
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you just compare hardware i9001 is of course better, but the Android community of i9000 is awesome, so it is just a matter of taste
yaya, this is what i meant, cause there are more custom roms out there..
Galaxy S in terms of support of course
specs-wise= sgs+
short on $$$= sgsl
dev support=sgs
you choose.
aakaashjois said:
If you are into Modding and flashing, then go for S. If you want performance go with S+. If you want the phone to cost less ,choose SL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly what I wanted to write I still prefer I9000 S cause it was my first phone but the S+ is a beast
I9003 is highest but I love my I9000!
S and S+ rocks
I personally have a Galaxy S , with its CPU at 1.3Ghz , more or less equalling CPU performance with the S Plus.
They would have done better if they had given the S+ with 1.4Ghz CPU + PowerVR SGX540 , that would really be killer. When I bought my S , it was priced at 22k INR and the SL was 18k . The SL was much laggier in general operation, but thats debatable cause the S was using 2.3.3 , whereas the SL was 2.2.1 . I saw the S+ too , 24k , was more or less same in performance with the S.
I went with the S due to much higher GPU performance, with value pack XXJW4 , Semaphore 2.7.4sc , 1.3GHz CPU i get 33.2fps in Nenamark2 , with 1Ghz , i get 32.8fps
I9000 as it has more support
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
the sgy is better than lg gt 540 tell me i whant to buy but Im not decided
Lg GT 540 or Samsung Galaxy Y
alin2011 said:
the sgy is better than lg gt 540 tell me i whant to buy but Im not decided
Lg GT 540 or Samsung Galaxy Y
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy y just take a look on the specs..
But I don't know how much development is there for it.
Sent from my GT540
yeah galaxy y specs :
OS Android OS, v2.3.5 (Gingerbread) (stock gb hmm good)
CPU 830 MHz ARMv6 (armv6 too but 800mhz on default??)
Type TFT capacitive touchscreen, 256K colors (eh this is kinda different.....)
Display resolution is just to small 240x320 for that size. CPU is faster, but no flash support, in my opinion not wort changing. I your place i would save money for something with armv7 or better and with higher resolution.
Sent using Tt.
hmm aint that ldpi? i dint see that
Yes, me sister want to bay it so i chack it before. Chack out xperia mini pro. That is gr8 small phone, my sis have it for some time and i like it.
Sent using Tt.
er thats the one with the keyboard right? i bit confused they look the same to me lol. did you install gingerdx for her?(cm7)
Yes, it is this model m.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_mini_pro-3713.php
1GHz cpu, adreno 205, gr8 hardware.
It come with ginger, and shuld get ics. lol, no flashing cm7, rooting, oc, etc... no need for that. She use it for voice calls, sms, internet, music and photos. And she would probable kill me if i broke something. :-D
Sent using Tt.
wow just wow 1ghz?? put this phone to shame
If I have to choose between swift and galaxy Y, i would take a swift becouse of screen size in px. If you're thinking about any other low end phone you should look at the xperia live with walkman - 1gHz, 512 rom, 512 ram, fast as hell, mdpi,, and phone is not very larger than his screen.
or the wildfire s is good too
I think Galaxy Gio is better than Galaxy Y and GT540, and the price is similiar.
lg gt540 is a low-end smartphone from lg ang galaxy y is a low-end smarthpone from samsung. With stock rom and internal storage galaxy y wins and it has multi-touch screen too (which lg gt540 doesn't) but lg gt540 has ics (beta) and galaxy y doesn't (yet) so... if u look into the future i think u should choose the galaxy y but if u want to play with ics right now u should choose lg gt540. Or u could do as what the above say: save the money and buy a super smartphone like samsung galaxy SII or nesus
How mach is g s2? I would't never give more than 200-250 euro for phone.
Sent using Tt.
@bataya i think that would depend if you buy with 2 year contract or something like that. http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9100_galaxy_s_ii-3621.php (see below) in
Singapore a sgsII with a 2 year contract (bundled with data and stuff cost more then 30 SGD a month) and still need to pay more then 200 SGD for the phone itself.....
SGD? How much is that in euro?
Sent using Tt.
What about galaxy w? What's the price if it in your country?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
320-360 euro in shop, for now non of mobile operator offer this model.
Sent using Tt.
well SGD = singapore dollar. close to us dollar
as of now the conversion is
1.00 SGD = 0.600692 EUR
I would take a look at the HTC wildfire s or galaxy ace. For HTC, you get a great looking ui, galaxy ace gets a silky smooth hardware accelerated browser.
Neither LG gt540 or galaxy y are recommended be me for basic smartphone task(s).
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Hello everyone,
Samsung is releasing DUAL SIM card phone Galaxy S Duos phone (S7562).
Specs:
Additionally, the phone has Android 4.0, 1GHz CPU, 512MB RAM, 3G, 4-inch 800×480 display, 5 megapixel camera, Wi-Fi, GPS, microSD card slot and 1500mAh battery.
The same specs as our SGS have. With only 512 RAM and it will be ICS out of the box.
So our SGS capable of running Touchwized ICS.
http://www.sammobile.com/2012/07/30/samsung-to-launch-dual-sim-galaxy-s-duos/
The I9000 (SGS Amoled with Samsung SoC) is advertised as 512Mb Smartphone, like the I9003 (SGS LCD with Texas Instrument SoC) also. The I9000 have physically 512Mb RAM in the SoC, the 9003 have 640Mb, and you can see this difference between Stock Samsung ROM in 2.3.6 and the 128 Mb make a difference with LMK usage. End of story.
.Slane. said:
The I9000 (SGS Amoled with Samsung SoC) is advertised as 512Mb Smartphone, like the I9003 (SGS LCD with Texas Instrument SoC) also. The I9000 have physically 512Mb RAM in the SoC, the 9003 have 640Mb, and you can see this difference between Stock Samsung ROM in 2.3.6 and the 128 Mb make a difference with LMK usage. End of story.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does i9003 getting official ICS? If not, than samsung is lying about the i9003
Samsung doesn't care about customers on long term stages the only interesed that you buy new deveices every year.Apple is much better at this stage they care about it that their devices are updated and users satisfided.
So If you don't like apple you can buy nexus device this device is also up to date.
zmagas1 said:
Does i9003 getting official ICS? If not, than samsung is lying about the i9003
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sales of i9003 are very different of i9000. And people who doesn't care to have a 9003 (SLCD, less powerful GPU, etc. etc. than i9000) mainly doesn't care to have Android 4.x instead of 2.3.x because their smartphone WORKS in 2.3.x. If you want a bleeding edge smartphone, go with the Nexus line, not a consumer line. Period.
http://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_duos_s7562-4883.php
Incoming new galaxy s model...yet one in a million of galaxies ... But this one coming with official ics rom and poor hardware... So Sammy dont tell us bad excuses about our hardware cant handle ics...
sent from the other side of my Galaxy
Gusta_HR said:
http://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_duos_s7562-4883.php
Incoming new galaxy s model...yet one in a million of galaxies ... But this one coming with official ics rom and poor hardware... So Sammy dont tell us bad excuses about our hardware cant handle ics...
sent from the other side of my Galaxy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes yes we all know but we can`t do anything about it
Has more RAM than Galaxy S. They were both advertised as 512 MB but Galaxy S had 512 physical memory while Duo probably has 640 MB physical. Think i9000 and i9003.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
ballsofsteel said:
Has more RAM than Galaxy S. They were both advertised as 512 MB but Galaxy S had 512 physical memory while Duo probably has 640 MB physical. Think i9000 and i9003.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
130 mb cant be that hard to overcame if they wanted.
Pezmet said:
130 mb cant be that hard to overcame if they wanted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is true for high RAM devices like Galaxy S II, as there is still plenty of RAM left, but 128 MB is actually a significant difference for low RAM devices like ours. The HTC Desire with 576 MB RAM (64 MB more than Galaxy S) couldn't even get a proper Gingerbread update due to RAM shortages as they had to fit Sense in. Imagine Galaxy S with 4.0 and Touchwiz? It's "impossible", by that I mean you won't even be able to multitask and run the device properly with all that Samsung bloat on top of it.
Galaxy S would run an AOSP properly because it is nowhere near as bloated as Touchwiz but no manufacturer (except google) has released such an update.
Also, keep in mind the issues we just ran into with our phones' jellybean update. The faster NAND on the device is limited; I guess this is just bad foresight on samsung's part. Raw ICS/Jellybean was already too big to fit onto the NAND. Put in Touchwiz apps and customizations and you need a much bigger NAND to fit it all in.