which is better ((galaxy S)) OR ((S plus)) OR ((SL)) ??
fathyazhary said:
which is better ((galaxy S)) OR ((S plus)) OR ((SL)) ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want good community support and planty of xda activity Galaxy S is unbeatable.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I9000 of course
I9001 > I9000 > I9003
Personally like I9000.....
If you are into Modding and flashing, then go for S. If you want performance go with S+. If you want the phone to cost less ,choose SL.
Sent from my Galaxy S running MIUI ICS!
The original Samsung Galaxy S i9000.
i9000 (PowerVR SGX540) > i9001 (Adreno 205) > i9003 (PowerVR SGX530).
Galaxy s. As said, better community, more stuff and custom roms
SGS i9001 (the quallcomm one) is supposed to be faster - i think i 've read somewhere that it's based on a single fast memory chip and don't have i9000's lag problem. i9003 is the worse than both.
Why don't u even consider the galaxy r in ur list ???
From the choices given, i9000 is still MUCH better than the Plus and SL version.
Just exclude the SL from that list because its ... frankly ... Teh ****zz from company. A lame attempt to sell the name "Galaxy" i.e. Their Flagship Device.
Galaxy S Plus has a faster CPU. It'll be a better performer in day to day tasks than i9000.
However, i9000 is still has a better hardware OVERALL. Becaues it also has a better GPU i.e. SGX540. While rest of the specs are same as Plus version.
Conclusion: From the above given choices, choose the i9000.
BUT ... If you can consider other options say Galaxy R, look into it as well. (If you can live without a SuperAMOLED display ... well, i cant )
i9001 is better, but no one making roms for it.
no
no..i9000 is way better than i9001
inozako said:
no..i9000 is way better than i9001
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you just compare hardware i9001 is of course better, but the Android community of i9000 is awesome, so it is just a matter of taste
yaya, this is what i meant, cause there are more custom roms out there..
Galaxy S in terms of support of course
specs-wise= sgs+
short on $$$= sgsl
dev support=sgs
you choose.
aakaashjois said:
If you are into Modding and flashing, then go for S. If you want performance go with S+. If you want the phone to cost less ,choose SL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly what I wanted to write I still prefer I9000 S cause it was my first phone but the S+ is a beast
I9003 is highest but I love my I9000!
S and S+ rocks
I personally have a Galaxy S , with its CPU at 1.3Ghz , more or less equalling CPU performance with the S Plus.
They would have done better if they had given the S+ with 1.4Ghz CPU + PowerVR SGX540 , that would really be killer. When I bought my S , it was priced at 22k INR and the SL was 18k . The SL was much laggier in general operation, but thats debatable cause the S was using 2.3.3 , whereas the SL was 2.2.1 . I saw the S+ too , 24k , was more or less same in performance with the S.
I went with the S due to much higher GPU performance, with value pack XXJW4 , Semaphore 2.7.4sc , 1.3GHz CPU i get 33.2fps in Nenamark2 , with 1Ghz , i get 32.8fps
I9000 as it has more support
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Related
So I just bought my girl a G2, and I am waiting for the tab. I was very impressed with teh speed of the g2 and its perfomance in all games. I was really wondering since the galaxy s scored even below the nexus one with 2.2 on it in a benchmarking review. how do you think the tab will do?
Everything seems to be the same from the galaxy s to the tab... so does anyone expect the tablet to perform slower than say the g2? Or what about aleast better than the Galaxy s?
Also is the chipset in the tab the same as the one in the galaxy s? Or are their minor differences?
I can assure you that the galaxy tab will be plenty fast on 2.2 I have a samsung galaxy s (captivate) running 2.2 and I never have lag you cannot compare the galaxy s series though quadrant scores as that benchmark is biased to the snap dragon processor which the galaxy s does not run on.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
laxwillsch said:
I can assure you that the galaxy tab will be plenty fast on 2.2 I have a samsung galaxy s (captivate) running 2.2 and I never have lag you cannot compare the galaxy s series though quadrant scores as that benchmark is biased to the snap dragon processor which the galaxy s does not run on.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant scores dont count for everything, and its hardly biased, snapdragon does better at the I/O tests more than anything. My Desire on a myTouch 4G port is quicker than stock Android roms according to quadrant.
Make sense of that
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
laxwillsch said:
I can assure you that the galaxy tab will be plenty fast on 2.2 I have a samsung galaxy s (captivate) running 2.2 and I never have lag you cannot compare the galaxy s series though quadrant scores as that benchmark is biased to the snap dragon processor which the galaxy s does not run on.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, No it's not.
Stock vs Stock The G2 beat the Galaxy S at every bench mark I've put on them
(5 total) except CPU benchmark and those scores were 812 for the G2 vs 799 on the Galaxy S ( lower the better )
The g2 has the latest snapdragon, it will be a little faster than the galaxy s in cpu benchmarks once overclocked. This is what happens when google coded froyo optimization's for only one cpu type, before that we kicked snapdragon ass
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
siberslug said:
lol, No it's not.
Stock vs Stock The G2 beat the Galaxy S at every bench mark I've put on them
(5 total) except CPU benchmark and those scores were 812 for the G2 vs 799 on the Galaxy S ( lower the better )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JIT.
RFS.
go read up on those before you go around correcting people on what's better than what. Benchmarks don't mean a thing. There's a reason why people like Cyanogen don't trust them.
It's kinda hard or weird (or pointless) to compare SGS and Tab CPU and GPU wise, since they both have THE EXACT SAME HARDWARE as long as those are concerned... They both run on the Samsung-built 1GHz Hummingbird chip (that includes the PowerVR GPU). So as long as only CPU/GPU are benchmarked, hardware-wise the SGS and Tab are identical.
Now, comparing those two on a general level makes more sense as they are bound to have small software differences. (At least my Tab does not have the 'SGS-lag' present at all and generally feels smoother to operate)
tl;dr: Basically Galaxy Tab = SGS with different screen, no real point comparing these two extensively
But they must have done a lot of tweaking on the tab that has yet to be ported to the S(if it ever does....).
Seriously, the Tab is smooth as silk, runs like you'd want and as we all know, essentially the same hardware, 2.2 and even RFS.
Also, benchmarks are worthless. My Galaxy S, with Docs JPO 7.5 ROM, ULF ext4 lagfix (no overkill here, not a score whore) gets around 1500 on quadthingy. My Tab, stock, gets around 900-1000. Yet the Tab is sooo much smoother, even with all my tweaks on the S. linpack is pretty much the same (as you'd expect) and I can't be bothered after that.
The only test that matters, usability, favours the Tab.
If I could get the stock Tab rom/fw/whatever onto my S, I'd be a happy camper.
That and a decent browser (dolphin doesn't do it for me either, just don't like it, gotta try the firefox alpha/beta/whatever)
I think the galaxy tab gpu is clocked at higher speed than the s,using neocore it gives same fbs as. Galaxy s although tab has higher resolution and also tab is announced with 1080p playback while galaxy s is anounced with 720 p correct if im wrong
Both equally good. If size does matter, big and small screen, your choice. For me, tab is best.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
tab performs significantly worse as it has a bigger screen to power + more pixels.
But the tab 8.9 and sgs 2 (dual cores) will be a good match!
spekesel said:
But they must have done a lot of tweaking on the tab that has yet to be ported to the S(if it ever does....).
Seriously, the Tab is smooth as silk, runs like you'd want and as we all know, essentially the same hardware, 2.2 and even RFS.
Also, benchmarks are worthless. My Galaxy S, with Docs JPO 7.5 ROM, ULF ext4 lagfix (no overkill here, not a score whore) gets around 1500 on quadthingy. My Tab, stock, gets around 900-1000. Yet the Tab is sooo much smoother, even with all my tweaks on the S. linpack is pretty much the same (as you'd expect) and I can't be bothered after that.
The only test that matters, usability, favours the Tab.
If I could get the stock Tab rom/fw/whatever onto my S, I'd be a happy camper.
That and a decent browser (dolphin doesn't do it for me either, just don't like it, gotta try the firefox alpha/beta/whatever)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my tab isnt smooth at all!
I preffer sgs.
Samsung Galaxy S II Tegra (Galaxy Royal) i9103
Available in Europe from at least 104 Online shops:
http://skinflint.co.uk/eu/670691
Telecoms are selling the "i9103 Samsung Galaxy S II Tegra" for 300 US$ less then the i9100 Samsung Galaxy S II. So many customers buy the i9103.
Some of the custom telecom versions out there:
Hutchinson 3 Samsung Galaxy R i9103
O2 Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Vodafone Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Mobilcom Debitel Samsung Galaxy R i9103
T-Mobile/Telekom Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Telco Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Base Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Talkline Samsung Galaxy R i9103
E-Plus Samsung Galaxy R i9103
Hope we soon get our own forum or we will have to use the i9100 forum.
Click picture to enlarge:
tegra now?...why so late???omg...
Its already available in India since a month. Its more like a Dual Core version of Galaxy S rather than S2. It has almost same features of Galaxy S except for dual core. 5 MP cam, 512 Mb Ram, 4.1 inch SLCD screen etc.
http://www.flipkart.com/mobiles/sam...qw--&ref=16a7bad0-7777-4e16-b755-cc8f2840eccc
it has 1GB RAM 4.19" and SLCD and flash LED.
I don't think this counts as a Galaxy S II, or even a Galaxy S device...
The closer aproach would be like an S2 SCL. S is i9000 and S SCL I9003, this is I9103 and S2 is the original I9100, so more or less like S2 SCL.
But it's Galaxy R (with different hw)...not Galaxy S2...though the code is I9103...very strange...
I have a Galaxy R (i9103) and a Galaxy S (i9000).
Galaxy R is a nice phone. Very very fast and good looking. I think it is very similar to the S2 (i9100) because it looks like it has the same crap implementation of the Yahama DAC. Galaxy S sounds waaay better with Voodoo Sound and I am still using it as my personal phone.
If the only difference is the CPU+GPU part, S2 ROMs may be kind of "compatible". Changing the kernel and other details could be the only needed actions to get some proper ROMs for this phone.
Endoran said:
I don't think this counts as a Galaxy S II, or even a Galaxy S device...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
legion1911 said:
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol? Mali plus exynos is a way more faster than tegra crap.
Sent from HydrOG3N MOD S2.
Technology Evolves, Android Evolves.
HydrOG3N is THE Revolution.
Tegra 2 is Android reference design for Android tablets. So it is not crap.
The Galaxy Tab 10.1 is also Tegra 2.
The Galaxy R does everything a Galaxy Tab 10.1 does, but it fits into the pocket of your Jeans.
"The Samsung Galaxy R I9103 is an Android smartphone that was announced by Samsung on August 10, 2011 as a variant to the Samsung Galaxy S II."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_R
"The Samsung Galaxy R is one of the currently available variants of the Galaxy S II."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_II
legion1911 said:
S II Tegra is one of its names. And it is faster then SII:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=19879762
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol its very well documented that Mali is (a lot) faster than tegra II...
please don't start this again and do your researches before posting random benchmarks trying to prove something that's not true...
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
The back of the phone looks better than our Exynos models... we still blow every phone out of the water though in terms of performance .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Teio said:
Lol its very well documented that Mali is (a lot) faster than tegra II...
please don't start this again and do your researches before posting random benchmarks trying to prove something that's not true...
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
King Shady said:
The back of the phone looks better than our Exynos models... we still blow every phone out of the water though in terms of performance .
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a lot (by hair)
Blow (blow job)
truth to be told it's not worthy upgrade to original SGS wahahahahahaha
you'r just trying to justify great amount of cash spent
you too
thought i was the only one with an s2 and still using my galaxy s as my daily phone.. for same reason. crap sound chip, also slow gps lock times.
josjator said:
I have a Galaxy R (i9103) and a Galaxy S (i9000).
Galaxy R is a nice phone. Very very fast and good looking. I think it is very similar to the S2 (i9100) because it looks like it has the same crap implementation of the Yahama DAC. Galaxy S sounds waaay better with Voodoo Sound and I am still using it as my personal phone.
If the only difference is the CPU+GPU part, S2 ROMs may be kind of "compatible". Changing the kernel and other details could be the only needed actions to get some proper ROMs for this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats faster S2 tegra or exynos? I haven could to test the tegra ...
-Nane- said:
whats faster S2 tegra or exynos? I haven could to test the tegra ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search?
Sent from my GT-I9100
Can someone check the DAC on this phone? Also, does it support USB OTG and MHL?
samsung galxy r i9103 usb on the go!!!
can u tell me if this device supports usb on the go just lyk its big brother s2?????????
Teio said:
If benchmark scores were to be taken seriously, I can have higher scores than yours without overclocking my phone as you did to get those scores...
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On custom roms for sure Come on, why should you overclock if you have originally faster cpu (1,2 vs 1,0) ?
I tested both handsets (stock roms) and results of quadrant, smartbench, cf... were almost the same, little higher in favor of sgs2 (1,2 ghz ex compared to tegra's 1 ghz). Clocked to 1.2 ghz tegra had slightly better scores in every test.
No need to argue about that, I know what experts say about exynos' and tegra's performance. The thing is that for average user is really hard to notice which of those two handsets is snappier.
the sgy is better than lg gt 540 tell me i whant to buy but Im not decided
Lg GT 540 or Samsung Galaxy Y
alin2011 said:
the sgy is better than lg gt 540 tell me i whant to buy but Im not decided
Lg GT 540 or Samsung Galaxy Y
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy y just take a look on the specs..
But I don't know how much development is there for it.
Sent from my GT540
yeah galaxy y specs :
OS Android OS, v2.3.5 (Gingerbread) (stock gb hmm good)
CPU 830 MHz ARMv6 (armv6 too but 800mhz on default??)
Type TFT capacitive touchscreen, 256K colors (eh this is kinda different.....)
Display resolution is just to small 240x320 for that size. CPU is faster, but no flash support, in my opinion not wort changing. I your place i would save money for something with armv7 or better and with higher resolution.
Sent using Tt.
hmm aint that ldpi? i dint see that
Yes, me sister want to bay it so i chack it before. Chack out xperia mini pro. That is gr8 small phone, my sis have it for some time and i like it.
Sent using Tt.
er thats the one with the keyboard right? i bit confused they look the same to me lol. did you install gingerdx for her?(cm7)
Yes, it is this model m.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_mini_pro-3713.php
1GHz cpu, adreno 205, gr8 hardware.
It come with ginger, and shuld get ics. lol, no flashing cm7, rooting, oc, etc... no need for that. She use it for voice calls, sms, internet, music and photos. And she would probable kill me if i broke something. :-D
Sent using Tt.
wow just wow 1ghz?? put this phone to shame
If I have to choose between swift and galaxy Y, i would take a swift becouse of screen size in px. If you're thinking about any other low end phone you should look at the xperia live with walkman - 1gHz, 512 rom, 512 ram, fast as hell, mdpi,, and phone is not very larger than his screen.
or the wildfire s is good too
I think Galaxy Gio is better than Galaxy Y and GT540, and the price is similiar.
lg gt540 is a low-end smartphone from lg ang galaxy y is a low-end smarthpone from samsung. With stock rom and internal storage galaxy y wins and it has multi-touch screen too (which lg gt540 doesn't) but lg gt540 has ics (beta) and galaxy y doesn't (yet) so... if u look into the future i think u should choose the galaxy y but if u want to play with ics right now u should choose lg gt540. Or u could do as what the above say: save the money and buy a super smartphone like samsung galaxy SII or nesus
How mach is g s2? I would't never give more than 200-250 euro for phone.
Sent using Tt.
@bataya i think that would depend if you buy with 2 year contract or something like that. http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9100_galaxy_s_ii-3621.php (see below) in
Singapore a sgsII with a 2 year contract (bundled with data and stuff cost more then 30 SGD a month) and still need to pay more then 200 SGD for the phone itself.....
SGD? How much is that in euro?
Sent using Tt.
What about galaxy w? What's the price if it in your country?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
320-360 euro in shop, for now non of mobile operator offer this model.
Sent using Tt.
well SGD = singapore dollar. close to us dollar
as of now the conversion is
1.00 SGD = 0.600692 EUR
I would take a look at the HTC wildfire s or galaxy ace. For HTC, you get a great looking ui, galaxy ace gets a silky smooth hardware accelerated browser.
Neither LG gt540 or galaxy y are recommended be me for basic smartphone task(s).
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Hello everyone,
Samsung is releasing DUAL SIM card phone Galaxy S Duos phone (S7562).
Specs:
Additionally, the phone has Android 4.0, 1GHz CPU, 512MB RAM, 3G, 4-inch 800×480 display, 5 megapixel camera, Wi-Fi, GPS, microSD card slot and 1500mAh battery.
The same specs as our SGS have. With only 512 RAM and it will be ICS out of the box.
So our SGS capable of running Touchwized ICS.
http://www.sammobile.com/2012/07/30/samsung-to-launch-dual-sim-galaxy-s-duos/
The I9000 (SGS Amoled with Samsung SoC) is advertised as 512Mb Smartphone, like the I9003 (SGS LCD with Texas Instrument SoC) also. The I9000 have physically 512Mb RAM in the SoC, the 9003 have 640Mb, and you can see this difference between Stock Samsung ROM in 2.3.6 and the 128 Mb make a difference with LMK usage. End of story.
.Slane. said:
The I9000 (SGS Amoled with Samsung SoC) is advertised as 512Mb Smartphone, like the I9003 (SGS LCD with Texas Instrument SoC) also. The I9000 have physically 512Mb RAM in the SoC, the 9003 have 640Mb, and you can see this difference between Stock Samsung ROM in 2.3.6 and the 128 Mb make a difference with LMK usage. End of story.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does i9003 getting official ICS? If not, than samsung is lying about the i9003
Samsung doesn't care about customers on long term stages the only interesed that you buy new deveices every year.Apple is much better at this stage they care about it that their devices are updated and users satisfided.
So If you don't like apple you can buy nexus device this device is also up to date.
zmagas1 said:
Does i9003 getting official ICS? If not, than samsung is lying about the i9003
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sales of i9003 are very different of i9000. And people who doesn't care to have a 9003 (SLCD, less powerful GPU, etc. etc. than i9000) mainly doesn't care to have Android 4.x instead of 2.3.x because their smartphone WORKS in 2.3.x. If you want a bleeding edge smartphone, go with the Nexus line, not a consumer line. Period.
Like the titel already says is this device good for gaming like Mc 5 Black Out etc etc because may i gonna trade it for my iphone that i dont use it any more but lots of research and looking on Google didnt find any good review about this device soo i hope a little some of u guys could give some advice or ur own review about the device
Elite-Radium said:
Like the titel already says is this device good for gaming like Mc 5 Black Out etc etc because may i gonna trade it for my iphone that i dont use it any more but lots of research and looking on Google didnt find any good review about this device soo i hope a little some of u guys could give some advice or ur own review about the device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope,GT9305 is even worse for gaming than GT9300. S3 is getting old and it's not smooth in gaming anymore. MC series were always laggy and stuttery,so if you want to be gamer of that game,then you will have some trouble. Other than that,S3 still handles games like Most Wanted,Asphalt 7 and 8 (medium) pretty well. MC5 has some constant FPS drops,maybe that will be fixed in future. But if you have some money,I recommend you to buy a better,newer device.
Hey jup i noticed that the graphics sucks but Unforgivable i dont have tje money to get a better device because i am young father of a son soo the extreemly nice game performance must wait for me
Elite-Radium said:
Hey jup i noticed that the graphics sucks but Unforgivable i dont have tje money to get a better device because i am young father of a son soo the extreemly nice game performance must wait for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing that a bit of... overclocking can do [emoji41]
Look, S3 is old, but, with the fact being old there is another fact, it can be tweaked good.
Install a custom rom by your choice and pair it up with a good kernel, play a bit with the clock speeds and governors and you will have a speedy phone.
FYI, MC5 on everything stock for me works on 15-20 fps, wich is good, but stuttery, but with OC beeing buffed it can top on 35 fps, wich is uncomparable to the stock, no freezes and works like a charm.
But, the drawback is, battery will run down preety fast so have a charger by your side.
Cheers
Oke thnx thats a bit more info then the first yea because the money is a problem in these times with kids in Euro zones soo gonna look for it for the rom when the phone arrive
Elite-Radium said:
Oke thnx thats a bit more info then the first yea because the money is a problem in these times with kids in Euro zones soo gonna look for it for the rom when the phone arrive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tottaly got you, kids or college, you need money, like me, for stuff that are more important
AssassinGEO said:
Nope,GT9305 is even worse for gaming than GT9300. S3 is getting old and it's not smooth in gaming anymore. MC series were always laggy and stuttery,so if you want to be gamer of that game,then you will have some trouble. Other than that,S3 still handles games like Most Wanted,Asphalt 7 and 8 (medium) pretty well. MC5 has some constant FPS drops,maybe that will be fixed in future. But if you have some money,I recommend you to buy a better,newer device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, lol, even i dont own a GT-I9305, but u sayed that is worse than GTI9300 !!, LOL how is that possible, I9305, have 2gb ram, and other sapecs are the same,, but with better ram, how can it be worst that I9300 ?!
Xhemal1325 said:
ok, lol, even i dont own a GT-I9305, but u sayed that is worse than GTI9300 !!, LOL how is that possible, I9305, have 2gb ram, and other sapecs are the same,, but with better ram, how can it be worst that I9300 ?!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GT I9305 has Snapgdragon Dual Core processor and Adreno 220 GPU.
GT I9300 has Exynos Quad Core processor and Mali-400 GPU.
So,no,there's pretty big diffrerence.
AssassinGEO said:
GT I9305 has Snapgdragon Dual Core processor and Adreno 220 GPU.
GT I9300 has Exynos Quad Core processor and Mali-400 GPU.
So,no,there's pretty big diffrerence.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you have mistaken i9305 with some other device
OP asked about i9305, so I have to tell that it has the same gaming performance as i9300, however for everyday use (it is important then) it has 2GB of RAM instead of just 1GB (as i9300).
Hbohd said:
I think you have mistaken i9305 with some other device
OP asked about i9305, so I have to tell that it has the same gaming performance as i9300, however for everyday use (it is important then) it has 2GB of RAM instead of just 1GB (as i9300).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No mistakes,lol. GT I9305 has Snapdragon processor because Exynos doesn't contain LTE support and Snapdragon does.
There's a chinese version of Galaxy S3 which has Exynos processor and 2GB of RAM,but GT I9305 has that specs. You should google it,as it seems like you don't know about both S3's much.
AssassinGEO said:
No mistakes,lol. GT I9305 has Snapdragon processor because Exynos doesn't contain LTE support and Snapdragon does.
There's a chinese version of Galaxy S3 which has Exynos processor and 2GB of RAM,but GT I9305 has that specs. You should google it,as it seems like you don't know about both S3's much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GT I9305 has exynos quad core 1.4ghz processor with 2GB RAM. U can check with GsmArena website.
AssassinGEO said:
No mistakes,lol. GT I9305 has Snapdragon processor because Exynos doesn't contain LTE support and Snapdragon does.
There's a chinese version of Galaxy S3 which has Exynos processor and 2GB of RAM,but GT I9305 has that specs. You should google it,as it seems like you don't know about both S3's much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
---------- Post added at 03:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:31 PM ----------
AssassinGEO said:
GT I9305 has Snapgdragon Dual Core processor and Adreno 220 GPU.
GT I9300 has Exynos Quad Core processor and Mali-400 GPU.
So,no,there's pretty big diffrerence.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL, u may take a look here : http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9305_galaxy_s_iii-5001.php
HOWEVER I DONT OWN THE I9305, I OWN A shv-e210s (korean version ) LTE, BUT my korean version has 4 cores, and MALI-400 MP, and ofc 2 gb ram, which that should be better than original I9300 !?
phone gets very hot when playing games
:crying:
AssassinGEO said:
Nope,GT9305 is even worse for gaming than GT9300. S3 is getting old and it's not smooth in gaming anymore. MC series were always laggy and stuttery,so if you want to be gamer of that game,then you will have some trouble. Other than that,S3 still handles games like Most Wanted,Asphalt 7 and 8 (medium) pretty well. MC5 has some constant FPS drops,maybe that will be fixed in future. But if you have some money,I recommend you to buy a better,newer device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AssassinGEO said:
GT I9305 has Snapgdragon Dual Core processor and Adreno 220 GPU.
GT I9300 has Exynos Quad Core processor and Mali-400 GPU.
So,no,there's pretty big diffrerence.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AssassinGEO said:
No mistakes,lol. GT I9305 has Snapdragon processor because Exynos doesn't contain LTE support and Snapdragon does.
There's a chinese version of Galaxy S3 which has Exynos processor and 2GB of RAM,but GT I9305 has that specs. You should google it,as it seems like you don't know about both S3's much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just shup up please...
That's the Galaxy S3 Neo which have a Snapdragon A7... Check out http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9300i_galaxy_s3_neo-6289.php
_____________________________________________________________________
About performance of the I9305, i can run all the market at full speed, emulate PSP(with PPSSPP), N64, PS1, etc
I can also run Monster Hunter Unite 3rd(HD version for PS3) at full speed, incredible.
More ram daily is much appreciated. Fast Multitasking and no "lag" load in games.
matyas69 said:
Just shup up please...
That's the Galaxy S3 Neo which have a Snapdragon A7... Check out http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9300i_galaxy_s3_neo-6289.php
_____________________________________________________________________
About performance of the I9305, i can run all the market at full speed, emulate PSP(with PPSSPP), N64, PS1, etc
I can also run Monster Hunter Unite 3rd(HD version for PS3) at full speed, incredible.
More ram daily is much appreciated. Fast Multitasking and no "lag" load in games.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Just shup up please"
Damn, you hurt me so much : (
Hey guys back from the busy hard life now I got just the S3 and laltly I updated to 4.3 and the apps are eating my ram and battery drains like hell normaly I did like 1.5 hour to play a game mow its much less like 45min or something like that are there any romd that kills a lot of craps apps on the s3 ?
thnx for the comments guys and ur all was very nice and kind to me to being helpfull cya all
i have now for a cheap price a S4 soo its already better then the s3
ps can any admin close this topic :good: