Ok,
I'm a psycho written it comes to putting phones on boost mobile, but without 4g it seems like a waste.
Since metro offers a 4g lte service, I'm thinking of switching.
Has anyone tried it yet, before i drop 700 on a project .
It's basically
Meid
Prl
& apns
Also does anyone know if it's possible to get metro pcs 4g lte running on a sprint note 2, that's the BIG question.
Would i require a doner micro sim, or does the rabbit hole go deeper
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
Sooo metro uses Verizon (for now, being bought out by TMob so that will ultimately change) you'll have a better chance using a Verizon gn2 as it will have the correct radios to use Verizon's lte already. Whether it will work is unsure as Verizon is notorious for not allowing their devices to be used on other networks easily
Sent from my quad core monster
J_apa_n said:
Ok,
I'm a psycho written it comes to putting phones on boost mobile, but without 4g it seems like a waste.
Since metro offers a 4g lte service, I'm thinking of switching.
Has anyone tried it yet, before i drop 700 on a project .
It's basically
Meid
Prl
& apns
Also does anyone know if it's possible to get metro pcs 4g lte running on a sprint note 2, that's the BIG question.
Would i require a doner micro sim, or does the rabbit hole go deeper
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. Sprint LTE is deployed on PCS band class 25. AFAIK metro's LTE is deployed on AWS spectrum. The two aren't compatible. Verizon's LTE is on 700MHz band class 13 so their Note II won't work either.
Sent from my PG86100 using xda app-developers app
Related
Lte requires sim cards right? So hopefully after sprint makes the upgrade to lte, we'll be able to buy sprint phones and use a sim card from any of the big 4! Dream come true in america, emirite?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Sorry, meant we can buy any lte phone unlocked*
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
That's what I heard. And supposedly it's not the micro ones either.
A_Flying_Fox said:
Lte requires sim cards right? So hopefully after sprint makes the upgrade to lte, we'll be able to buy sprint phones and use a sim card from any of the big 4! Dream come true in america, emirite?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really...AT&T and Verizon are both going FDD-LTE on the 700mhz band...Sprint will get TD-LTE on the 2.5ghz~ range....
T-Mobile is going on their own HSPA/LTE hybrid variant...
So while Verizon and AT&T phones might be interchangeable (assuming they dont lock them say via some other method)..Sprint and T-Mobile will not be part of that...
gTen said:
Not really...AT&T and Verizon are both going FDD-LTE on the 700mhz band...Sprint will get TD-LTE on the 2.5ghz~ range....
T-Mobile is going on their own HSPA/LTE hybrid variant...
So while Verizon and AT&T phones might be interchangeable (assuming they dont lock them say via some other method)..Sprint and T-Mobile will not be part of that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.......my heart.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
gTen said:
Not really...AT&T and Verizon are both going FDD-LTE on the 700mhz band...Sprint will get TD-LTE on the 2.5ghz~ range....
T-Mobile is going on their own HSPA/LTE hybrid variant...
So while Verizon and AT&T phones might be interchangeable (assuming they dont lock them say via some other method)..Sprint and T-Mobile will not be part of that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So which one would be better?
musclehead84 said:
So which one would be better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better in terms of?
musclehead84 said:
So which one would be better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Verizons lte is on par with wimax so i assume that sprints would be better when they get it
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
And higher spectrum means better building penetration, right?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
A_Flying_Fox said:
.......my heart.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well its not impossible for a device to support both TD-LTE and FD-LTE on a single chipset..but we would then have to buy international phones..cause knowing carriers they either won't include those bands or lock them :/
A_Flying_Fox said:
And higher spectrum means better building penetration, right?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
700mhz is better building penetration over 2.5ghz..BUT how TD-LTE is allows carriers to use more spectrum...right now AT&T and Verizon plan to run it in 20mhz worth of spectrum each..realistically speaking that would constrain quantity of users/amount of data...(hence the tiered data)
Sprint right now though is running wimax in 10mhz of spectrum though..and could run it in 30mhz if they please..
So realistically speaking its easier to run TD-LTE as more spectrum is available in comparison to FD-LTE running at the limited 700mhz spectrum..while 700mhz spectrum though will offer betetr building penetration/signal
gTen said:
Well its not impossible for a device to support both TD-LTE and FD-LTE on a single chipset..but we would then have to buy international phones..cause knowing carriers they either won't include those bands or lock them :/
700mhz is better building penetration over 2.5ghz..BUT how TD-LTE is allows carriers to use more spectrum...right now AT&T and Verizon plan to run it in 20mhz worth of spectrum each..realistically speaking that would constrain quantity of users/amount of data...(hence the tiered data)
Sprint right now though is running wimax in 10mhz of spectrum though..and could run it in 30mhz if they please..
So realistically speaking its easier to run TD-LTE as more spectrum is available in comparison to FD-LTE running at the limited 700mhz spectrum..while 700mhz spectrum though will offer betetr building penetration/signal
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So its basically the 3g story again lol sprint has the better and same constant speeds no matter the load, but the signal won't be as strong lol. I can deal with that
And buyingunlocked international phones isn't bad...my friend only uses unlocked ones and they always have extra features compared to a branded one... and all he would have to do to activate it was slide his sim card in it. I hate how att/tmo users can effectively use any phone they want...I want this freedom with sprint/verizon
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
A_Flying_Fox said:
So its basically the 3g story again lol sprint has the better and same constant speeds no matter the load, but the signal won't be as strong lol. I can deal with that
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint's LTE will act like the current Wimax implementation because it'll be running at 2.5ghz. We all know how spotty it is, especially when indoors.
Verizon and AT&T, at 700mhz will act their current 3G service because it's very close to 800mhz. They'll probably have an easier time getting better coverage because they know the 800mhz frequency.
Personally, I'd rather be at 700mhz for LTE, at 2.5ghz, you lose to much coverage and I'm sure Verizon already has the limited bandwidth figure out. If they didn't they could be throwing billions of dollars down the tube.
I can't wait for Verizon handsets to hit the market. My Sprint contract just expired so I'm looking to jump ship.
A_Flying_Fox said:
So its basically the 3g story again lol sprint has the better and same constant speeds no matter the load, but the signal won't be as strong lol. I can deal with that
And buyingunlocked international phones isn't bad...my friend only uses unlocked ones and they always have extra features compared to a branded one... and all he would have to do to activate it was slide his sim card in it. I hate how att/tmo users can effectively use any phone they want...I want this freedom with sprint/verizon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well yes and no..thing is most international phones dont have the AT&T 3g band and don't have AWS (most common t-mobile 3g band) on same band as T-Mobile
crabjoe said:
Sprint's LTE will act like the current Wimax implementation because it'll be running at 2.5ghz. We all know how spotty it is, especially when indoors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I said its spotty because right now..
1) sprint is using only 10mhz of spectrum...
2) They are doing minimum deployments..aka the need mroe towers but being cheap...
Verizon and AT&T, at 700mhz will act their current 3G service because it's very close to 800mhz. They'll probably have an easier time getting better coverage because they know the 800mhz frequency.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um..what?!?!
Personally, I'd rather be at 700mhz for LTE, at 2.5ghz, you lose to much coverage and I'm sure Verizon already has the limited bandwidth figure out. If they didn't they could be throwing billions of dollars down the tube.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes its called Tiered Data plans...not fun...
Anyway, wouldn't the first crop of Verizon LTE phones still rely on 1x for voice and 3G EVDO/LTE for data?
So basically we're going to have a scenario where a Verizon LTE phone would be something like this CDMA 2000 1x/1900mhz EVDO/700mhz LTE,
and
an ATT LTE phone might be like Quad band GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS 1900 (HSPA?)/700mhz LTE?
My 2 cents vzw & att are double what we pay for a premium phone service on sprint and not unlimited anything also have bad coverage. They nickel & dime the crap out of you on top of it. Also wimax has voice calling capabilities not just data. Lte for some reason can only do data. So maybe some new features with voice calling with wimax.
Viper Rom
jbadboy2007 said:
My 2 cents vzw & att are double what we pay for a premium phone service on sprint and not unlimited anything also have bad coverage. They nickel & dime the crap out of you on top of it. Also wimax has voice calling capabilities not just data. Lte for some reason can only do data. So maybe some new features with voice calling with wimax.
Viper Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wimax for voice calling? I find that scary. In its current iteration its flaky enough just for data. I shudder to think how crappy voice calling would be on it. They seriously need to build it out a ton more. I walk in my house signal disappears....not encouraging.
LordLugard said:
Wimax for voice calling? I find that scary. In its current iteration its flaky enough just for data. I shudder to think how crappy voice calling would be on it. They seriously need to build it out a ton more. I walk in my house signal disappears....not encouraging.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At least you are lucky enough to have coverage...
Wimax doesnt do voice.....on the other hand, att and tmo 3g is voice/data
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Yes, the specifications for Voice over LTE have not been finished yet.
LordLugard said:
Wimax for voice calling? I find that scary. In its current iteration its flaky enough just for data. I shudder to think how crappy voice calling would be on it. They seriously need to build it out a ton more. I walk in my house signal disappears....not encouraging.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint is working on making a seamless radio..aka unlike now where you need to enable/disable 4g it would work in a way that even if 4g is disconnected your session would not be interrupted...same for calls..
LTE doesn't require a SIM card...Verizon is CDMA
Just a thought... but if verizon was willing to upgrade all the xooms to 4G why doesn't AT&T do the same for our phones when they roll out their LTE? Just a thought since having a powerful device (even though its crippled) with awesome speeds would be nice.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
it's not that simple. there's no magic 'switch' or replaceable part that enables LTE.
That and the fact that the Xoom is a Google flagship device.
drock212 said:
Just a thought... but if verizon was willing to upgrade all the xooms to 4G why doesn't AT&T do the same for our phones when they roll out their LTE? Just a thought since having a powerful device (even though its crippled) with awesome speeds would be nice.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anyone who buys the Xoom now that wants LTE later has to send their device into Moto to have the hardware upgraded to support LTE
It's quite clear that the Xoom was designed with upgradability in mind while the Atrix wasn't. Actually if I remember correctly the Xoom has an open expansion slot. I'm sure ifixit would have the information. I know however that the Atrix radio chip is soldered in place. Realistically though, AT&T has no active LTE network and won't until probably after the T-Mobile acquisition is complete - they have started they want to use the AWS band for their LTE network. And by then we'll all be lining up to buy the next high end phone. Hexacore anyone?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
phobos512 said:
It's quite clear that the Xoom was designed with upgradability in mind while the Atrix wasn't. Actually if I remember correctly the Xoom has an open expansion slot. I'm sure ifixit would have the information. I know however that the Atrix radio chip is soldered in place. Realistically though, AT&T has no active LTE network and won't until probably after the T-Mobile acquisition is complete - they have started they want to use the AWS band for their LTE network. And by then we'll all be lining up to buy the next high end phone. Hexacore anyone?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, they're using T-mo's bands to help expand their pre-determined LTE rollout from 80% to 95%. They also want to use T-Mo to help support their H+, but AT&T already had spectrum set up for their LTE before this acquisition
When LTE on AT&T is out you are going to have already your next Android phone with quad core processor;-)
mgymnop said:
When LTE on AT&T is out you are going to have already your next Android phone with quad core processor;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We might be talking through biological implants in our ears
4g wimax/ LTE both?
Got the epic a few weeks ago and the display sheet for the phone showed wimax and lte but the evo didn't. So I asked the sale person if it is a typo and he said no. The phone would need just the software to enable the LTE. He asked a co worker and he said the same. Does the epic actually have a wimax/lte enabled chip or are they just going by a typo? Was just wondering as I know sprint is looking at LTE now.
Highly doubt it...there isn't much of a way to get a sim card in the phone...
A combination flustercuck of a typo and reps who don't know what they were talking about.
Epic has no LTE hardware.
I figured they were stupid. I figured if they really put both chips in here the cost would be more kinda like a global phone. Would be cool though if they would and allowed us to use verizons lte just like roaming on the 3g side.
Kcarpenter said:
Highly doubt it...there isn't much of a way to get a sim card in the phone...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lte doesn't need sim cards and he didn't say gsm say your response is not valid. I'm not 100% on this but all sprint has to do for lte is switch out very minor things. The only difference with our phones is the spectrum it is looking for. So since we have 4g and maybe the software can make it lte. Its possible I think.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
jbadboy2007 said:
Lte doesn't need sim cards and he didn't say gsm say your response is not valid. I'm not 100% on this but all sprint has to do for lte is switch out very minor things. The only difference with our phones is the spectrum it is looking for. So since we have 4g and maybe the software can make it lte. Its possible I think.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't LTE require a sim card though? I remember seeing a sim card on the thunderbolt
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
http://www.google.com/m/url?client=...YQFjAA&usg=AFQjCNGVHbjKzqjmuBU-GpssbLsI8KIueg
Lte is using sim cards...at least on verizon's implementation.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I bet that will allow lte roaming on att/tmobile one day then. Dang.
Txdaredvl said:
I bet that will allow lte roaming on att/tmobile one day then. Dang.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never. Different spectrum used and even then ATT and Verizon have no reason to sign roaming agreements when they are each others biggest competitors.
Texted while driving
jbadboy2007 said:
Lte doesn't need sim cards and he didn't say gsm say your response is not valid. I'm not 100% on this but all sprint has to do for lte is switch out very minor things. The only difference with our phones is the spectrum it is looking for. So since we have 4g and maybe the software can make it lte. Its possible I think.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uh Huh...show me an implementation for LTE that doesn't use a Sim card for network authentication.
I mean GSM doesn't "Require" a sim either, that can be spoofed with hardware...just sayin.
I mean at least in for me, I have put 32 Sim cards in Verizon Pantec UX260 USB Aircards for some reason....
They can configure these phones however they want. We have 4g with no sim card. 4g is almost exactly the same thing as lte just different frequency that's all.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
How about this article where they state what Sprint has said on the matter?
jbadboy2007 said:
They can configure these phones however they want. We have 4g with no sim card. 4g is almost exactly the same thing as lte just different frequency that's all.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm no...the entire protocol is different.
there are currently 3 popular 4g implementations.
HSPA+ with Extended Backhaul (ATT, Tmo)
LTE (VZW, Metro, non national carriers, EVENTUALLY ATT and Tmo on different freqs)
WiMax (Sprint)
The only thing these share is the 4G monicker. The technologies are enitrely different, the protocol is entirely different, the modems are entirely different.
Kcarpenter said:
HSPA+ with Extended Backhaul (ATT, Tmo)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FTFY. AT&T's HSPA+ is very slow - there's no additional capacity or speed to be had.
Gersonian said:
How about this article where they state what Sprint has said on the matter?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well...i wonder how true that article is...if it could just be a switch on the towers and a software patch it would be nice
imtjnotu said:
well...i wonder how true that article is...if it could just be a switch on the towers and a software patch it would be nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be nice cuz we paid a lot money for a 4g phone that some of us don't even have 4g like in San Diego I would be very mad cuz we where promise 4g by the end of this year
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
I saw. Some company announcing a dual lte/wimax chip about 6 months ago. Since the modem controls these chips it isn't a far stretch to have software that will switch modems as needed.
According to a seemingly knowledgeable manager I met with (he was down with rooting and xda lol) wimax is compatable with lte with a software update. But, honestly I doubt it.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
adrift02 said:
According to a seemingly knowledgeable manager I met with (he was down with rooting and xda lol) wimax is compatable with lte with a software update. But, honestly I doubt it.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what the 2 best buy employees said. Wasnt sure as most there are there for the money and know nothing. I asked if the evo had the LTE chip too as it wasnt listed and they said no but the Epic did. I couldnt imagine sprint leaving people hanging in today's phone battles. I will have to ask a store manager if they work there and see if they have any knowledge of it yet or if we will be able to roam. I thought LTE was near the same freq. for sprint and verizon with sprint just having the larger freq bandwidth due to LTE WIMAX.
This came up back when WiMAX was first being introduced. I remember the CEO for Clear said multiple times that the WiMAX infrastructure was software "swappable" to LTE. It wouldn't surprise me if phones were the same.
How is it Metro pcs already has 4G LTE, and AT&T does, Whats the hold up?
Mrniceguy0921 said:
How is it Metro pcs already has 4G LTE, and AT&T does, Whats the hold up?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's a completely different network to set up and unlike metro pcs, att has a whole nationwide network to think about rather than just a few metropolitan areas.
Metro uses Verizon towers IIRC.
So it's possible they have a lease deal for LTE usage.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
MetroPCS LTE is horrible! I tried it and got the ATT Atrix at the same time. A speedtest showed only getting 1.5MB over Metro LTE and im getting over 2MB on ATT HSPDA+ without backhaul....
Mark
rjohnstone said:
Metro uses Verizon towers IIRC.
So it's possible they have a lease deal for LTE usage.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Their LTE is actually VZW independent. They have had LTE before Verizon actually released LTE to anyone.
Hey guys. I Have a Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-I317M) and for some reason it fluctuates between HSPA+ and 3G signals rather than LTE. The device is originally locked to Rogers but I unlocked it and am now using it with MTS. I am running on jelly bean 4. 1.2 and CleanRom 4.0.5. Anybody have any ideas as to why I'm not getting LTE?
KR3W said:
Hey guys. I Have a Samsung Galaxy Note 2 (SGH-I317M) and for some reason it fluctuates between HSPA+ and 3G signals rather than LTE. The device is originally locked to Rogers but I unlocked it and am now using it with MTS. I am running on jelly bean 4. 1.2 and CleanRom 4.0.5. Anybody have any ideas as to why I'm not getting LTE?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you still getting fast data speeds? All LTE is 3.9 g and hspa is like 3.6 g lol..
http://tasel.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/lte-hsdpa-dc-hsdpa-explain-this-alphbet-soup-of-4g-to-me/
Since you only mentioned your phone model and not the important notion what your carrier is, what is it?
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
thlinx said:
Are you still getting fast data speeds? All LTE is 3.9 g and hspa is like 3.6 g lol..
Since you only mentioned your phone model and not the important notion what your carrier is, what is it?
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I'm getting fast speeds but I can't help but wonder why this is happening. I mentioned that I'm with MTS so I'm not sure if that's what you're looking for. I live in Canada so it's probably not familiar to you. They just started carrying S3's which are running on their LTE network and they show 4G at the top of them when activated rather than HSPA+.
KR3W said:
Yes I'm getting fast speeds but I can't help but wonder why this is happening. I mentioned that I'm with MTS so I'm not sure if that's what you're looking for. I live in Canada so it's probably not familiar to you. They just started carrying S3's which are running on their LTE network and they show 4G at the top of them when activated rather than HSPA+.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope not familiar with Mts. That's correct.. it all depends on the towers u are near .. if they haven't upgraded there towers sorry your sol lol
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
It is either the towers or your phone isn't compatible with the bands of LTE (there are multiple bands like there is with UTMS).
MrObvious said:
It is either the towers or your phone isn't compatible with the bands of LTE (there are multiple bands like there is with UTMS).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure it isn't the towers cause my friends iPhone 5 is running off LTE and he live about 5 minutes away from my house. I've also been at distances one minute away from his house and did not pick up LTE then either. I don't know much about bands or frequencies but my carrier just launched the Galaxy S3's and they run off LTE and I'm assuming the Note 2 has the same hardware. S3: 700 (Band 17), 1700/2100 (AWS) MHz , Note 2: 700(band 17) 850 AWS 1,900(band 2). I'm clueless as to what those numbers mean but i'm guessing the important thing is Band 17, right?
Try going near his house then. Or have you checked the network settings? You may have to flash something.
MrObvious said:
Try going near his house then. Or have you checked the network settings? You may have to flash something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have to no avail. I had a friend try to help me out over the phone with network settings and his phone appears to have a setting that mine does not. When he goes into settings > wireless and network more settings > mobile network there is an option for him to toggle between LTE, HSPA+ etc. My phone doesn't have that for some reason. All that's listed is Mobile data, data roaming, Access point names, and network operators. Nothing to toggle between networks, which is probably what I need to enable LTE. I have no idea why that setting would be absent from my device. My friend was using an S3 on the same operating system as me btw.
From what i can tell it's the frequencies . The frequencies your device have seem to be different than the frequencies the s3 have on your carrier. If it's not that then you can check your apn settings.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 01:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:05 AM ----------
Well i didn't realize how old the thread was, but i hope yes fixed your problem.
Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
What model is your phone, and what model is his phone. You said you brought your phone from a competing carrier who is likely using alternate frequencies that your phone might not be picking up either due to hardware or software limitations. Without knowing the hardware, and where it came from in the first place, we can't figure out what frequencies your phone is looking for and can't answer your question effectively.
download an app that will show you what is the type of connection you are actually on.
I think that maybe its the matter of incorrect icon.