LG has surprised just about everyone this evening, and released the Ice Cream Sandwich kernel source for the Optimus 2X.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.androidcentral.com/lg-optimus-2x-ics-source-code-released
Both devices have the Nvidia Tegra 2 AP20H, is this of any use to Atrix developers?
http://www.gsmarena.com/lg_optimus_2x-3598.php
http://www.gsmarena.com/motorola_atrix-3709.php
DIRECT LINK TO LG:
http://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensource-detail.jsp?detailCustomerModelCode=LGSU660
LGSU660(Optimus-2X)_Android_ICS_SU660v30C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LG Nexus does wonders!
If this ends up working, I'm probably going to only buy LG devices.
Tho I hated my last one.
OFF -
For me, it's marketing.
They give source because they want to have better image for the next LG Nexus.
Well, it has got to come out someday anyway, 'cause they'll be violating the GPL otherwise.
*Russian accent * this is good for us no?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
quetzalcoatl2435 said:
Well, it has got to come out someday anyway, 'cause they'll be violating the GPL otherwise.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly, that has never stopped anyone before.
Deggy said:
*Russian accent * this is good for us nyet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FTFY.
jisse44 said:
OFF -
For me, it's marketing.
They give source because they want to have better image for the next LG Nexus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. This is just to start cleaning the image.
We don't care if LG wants to clean the image, it's a new hope for atrix users and devs ! :victory: :good:
Manzing said:
We don't care if LG wants to clean the image, it's a new hope for atrix users and devs ! :victory: :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Motorola should also clean the image
I have both devices and I was happy with the news!
I dropped one tear here.
I would like to hear what the devs think about this...
Aphador said:
I dropped one tear here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. That was funny.
Why is this posted in an Atrix 4g forum?
Congratulatons! This will definetely help to build full-working ICS build for the Atrix. This kernel is 2.6.39, the same as the ICS leaked rom for the Atrix. Now we have kernel sources from LG and proprietaries for a kernel with the same version from the leak. I hope the developers can easily put them together
hanji1 said:
Why is this posted in an Atrix 4g forum?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must be new here....
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
This has so much potential! Here's to a stable JB ROM with HW. That's all I want. Couldn't care less about FP or Camcorder, just HW and it's godsend!
Cheers
hanji1 said:
Why is this posted in an Atrix 4g forum?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read the OP or just the topic title?
I don't know if I must be happy or just... meh!
Why? "That ROM" got around more than two weeks ago and no improvement have been made from it to another ROMs, in fact "that ROM" have been worse that those ported.
Now the kernel is a good thrust, but... What about drivers (camera, fingerprinter, webtop)? AFAIK, LG Optimus 2X doesn't have that hardware which will continue relegated.
Related
Urgent!! Android Honeycomb 3.0 Kernel Needed! Kenia and Chile in i9000 forums have done it. Actual Android 3.0 on galaxy S. We need a compatible kernel. Anyone interested?
Link to the New Honeycomb 3.0 Thread!! It's Real!!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1116161
All I see in that forum is Sense 3.0 being ported over to the galaxy S... not Android 3.0... besides, no source for Android 3.0 has been outed yet because "its not ready yet" according to Google.
Considering that there is no Honeycomb sources, they're probably just using my kernel to boot it (same as they are doing for the sense roms).
Kenia1234 said:
I see HONEYCOMB in the air guys!!!!
Maybe tonight!!
by K&C!!
STAY TUNED and LOOK AT THE NEW THREAD tonight before going to bed...
PS K&C stands for Kenia and Chile!! LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kenia1234 said:
I already did it...
testing and uploading right now...
PS Thanks to the powerful kernel of Chile of course!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From the mouth of the Creators themselves!!
Escapist! I think its time to work your serious magic tonight. hahah.
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA App
I thought Honeycomb was for tablets? ... why would we want it on our Captivates?
redeuxx said:
I thought Honeycomb was for tablets? ... why would we want it on our Captivates?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is android man. The answer to all "why" questions is because we can!
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
Link to their honeycomb thread in Original Post.
insaneturbo13 said:
This is android man. The answer to all "why" questions is because we can!
Sent from my SGH-I897 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it would be pointless since none of the phone functions work. Now if I can get Honeycomb with working phone functions then I'll take that, but until then -- not interested.
Ice Cream > Honeycomb
Kyuta Syuko said:
But it would be pointless since none of the phone functions work. Now if I can get Honeycomb with working phone functions then I'll take that, but until then -- not interested.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im pretty sure once they figure out data on their sense rom then theyll be that much closer to data on honeycomb also.
AdamNimrod said:
Ice Cream > Honeycomb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha well once you begin to port Ice Cream to captivate then go and talk all the crap you want about honeycomb. Until that time has come, we should sit back and enjoy this year old device's constant development. The grass is always greener!
C'mon guys... Yeah, this'll probably never be a usable ROM, just like the Sense port, but it's cool as hell that they can even get it to boot. Let us nerds enjoy it .
ls377 said:
C'mon guys... Yeah, this'll probably never be a usable ROM, just like the Sense port, but it's cool as hell that they can even get it to boot. Let us nerds enjoy it .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
plus, the sgs touch rom makers may think this is pretty neat, make voodoo run on this and make it into a honeycomb mp3 player
+1 for the honeycomb player
You don't need a kernel. Everything is broken anyway.. the i9000 kernel will do for now.
any news for captivate?
Croxz said:
any news for captivate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, Honeycomb is designed for tablets. Enjoy the hard work the devs have put into the Froyo/Gingerbread ROMS and wait patiently for Ice Cream Sandwich sometime in the future.
http://phandroid.com/2011/06/20/android-3-2-detailed-supports-7-inch-displays-qualcomm-cpus/
That's good news it will support smaller displays 7 is a lot closer to 4.3 then before
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
its funny how everyone was b**ching about froyo taking too long....then people couldn't wait for GB. Now that its been leaked and is working for our phone, people want honeycomb.
can anyone be happy with what they have? just curious - lol
What do you guys think? can it run on the G2/DZ?
i think it might be able to. looking at the code, it might be able to run some things. plus, the galaxy nexus has only a 5mp camera. the G2 has a 5mp camera as well, so it could be capable of some ICS camera features, maybe all of it. i am keeping my fingers cross that ICS can work on this phone!
If it can run on both Nexus S and Nexus One, i don't see why not on G2?
Hawon said:
If it can run on both Nexus S and Nexus One, i don't see why not on G2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you get this info?
there was a basic honeycomb port a while back, and thats before we had a real source for honeycomb. Now that we'll have the ICS source, we should be able to run it. It'll just take time to get developers (and google) to have a working release.
c00ller said:
Where did you get this info?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its already been shown running on the Nexus S.
If it can run on the Nexus S, it will definitely run on here. I'm ready for it.
honestly from looking at it id be willing to run just stock rooted ICS, without any sort of special ROM on top, it looks fantastic and if it happens ill at least make it one of my boots in boot manager, looks to be top notch and im so excited for devs to get it working on the G2! they have all of my support!
of course it can run on our visions and it will...........soon!!!!
noneabove said:
honestly from looking at it id be willing to run just stock rooted ICS, without any sort of special ROM on top, it looks fantastic and if it happens ill at least make it one of my boots in boot manager, looks to be top notch and im so excited for devs to get it working on the G2! they have all of my support!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock would just be fine with me! My guess is anything above stock, like a sense version of ICS, it will take up too much memory and perhaps slow the phone down.
I hope whoever (cyanogen? ) can get it running. That would be a great thing! I want my G2 to last one more year with the latest software. After that, the next nexus is what I will be aiming for
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
c00ller said:
Where did you get this info?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There were browser comparisons during the presentation that showed Nexus S with 2.3 and 4.0, compared to Galaxy Nexus on 4.0
who is waiting for a sdk port
where would we go to follow the progress on it being ported for DZ???
noneabove said:
where would we go to follow the progress on it being ported for DZ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess you'll see if any threads pop up in the coming weeks.
martonikaj said:
Its already been shown running on the Nexus S.
If it can run on the Nexus S, it will definitely run on here. I'm ready for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its confirmed that nexus s is going to get it. also, according to Cohen and Engadget who asked him, any 2.3 device can run it (theoretically).
http://www.engadget.com/2011/10/19/google-confirms-nexus-s-will-get-ice-cream-sandwich-for-real/
if that is true, then for sure the G2/DZ will have it working!! dont want to get my hopes up though
martonikaj said:
Its already been shown running on the Nexus S.
If it can run on the Nexus S, it will definitely run on here. I'm ready for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
C.Flat said:
There were browser comparisons during the presentation that showed Nexus S with 2.3 and 4.0, compared to Galaxy Nexus on 4.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, I knew about the Nexus S, but Hawon also said it can run on the Nexus One. I was wondering where he heard that.
Unfortunately, we're all going to have to wait until sometime after the source code is released and the CM team can get it working. As far as an official update, I don't think so unless HTC itself posts an update.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
heybobitsme said:
Unfortunately, we're all going to have to wait until sometime after the source code is released and the CM team can get it working. As far as an official update, I don't think so unless HTC itself posts an update.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source code is released!!
and damn who needs sense anymore LOL.... i only used sense cos of the auto contacts linking...but now that ICS has it already....
btw...what is bootmanager that someone mentioned above?
deaththeorist said:
source code is released!!
and damn who needs sense anymore LOL.... i only used sense cos of the auto contacts linking...but now that ICS has it already....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you may be confusing the source code with the SDK. The SDK for ICS is out now, but the source code is not.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
steviewevie said:
I think you may be confusing the source code with the SDK. The SDK for ICS is out now, but the source code is not.
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my bad
*hides head in hole
ohcanada said:
who is waiting for a sdk port
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, SDK ports always blow but it will be fun to tinker with. That's the point of it though
sino8r said:
Well, SDK ports always blow but it will be fun to tinker with. That's the point of it though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh crud...I thought the sdk was what is used to the build the rom. Looks like, based on what everyone said, it will take awhile before we see a ics rom out
Sent from my T-Mobile G2
https://plus.google.com/10027530749...msvrx#100275307499530023476/posts/hVw7ykmsvrx
Said cyanogen!!
ck_looi said:
https://plus.google.com/10027530749...msvrx#100275307499530023476/posts/hVw7ykmsvrx
Said cyanogen!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes we've seen this. Just wondering. Where's the development part of this thread? This should be in general considering there isn't any development going on in here. Thanks.
task650 said:
Yes we've seen this. Just wondering. Where's the development part of this thread? This should be in general considering there isn't any development going on in here. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree post should be moved to General, but it's pretty exciting news to know an official CM build of ICS is imminent for our 10.1's ....
paulshields said:
Agree post should be moved to General, but it's pretty exciting news to know an official CM build of ICS is imminent for our 10.1's ....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also agree, except I never check general and wouldn't have known. This is definitely very good news. It's nice seeing my purchase decision affirmed by continued support, upgrades, etc.
Awesome News
Can't wait. At least I will get a little ICS on something, since the Galaxy Nexus only exists in our imagination and the UK.
Just saw it reposted on Android Police:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/11/21/aww-yea-cyanogen-ics-coming-soon-to-the-galaxy-tab-10-1/
I can't wait! Kondik made my whole week with that post!
This.
GarciaM25 said:
Just saw it reposted on Android Police:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/11/21/aww-yea-cyanogen-ics-coming-soon-to-the-galaxy-tab-10-1/
I can't wait! Kondik made my whole week with that post!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah it made my week too. I am really upset with Verizon, but that's not new, about the whole world having the Galaxy Nexus but not here. So, ICS on my Galaxy tab heals my wounds.
So hopefully in a couple of weeks we may see ICS on our tabs it will be great
Wondering if he will post here
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
anyway to merge this with the two other ics posts in general...?
The only question that remains for me now is:
Which will come first: ICS on SGT10.1 or the Asus Transformer Prime?
I also hope they get flash working however limited its lifespan is i still visit a lot of sites that use flash
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
animatechnica said:
I also hope they get flash working however limited its lifespan is i still visit a lot of sites that use flash
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
flash is still going to be around bro. they have just stopped supporting mobile devices. we still have what is left behind and that will last us a lifetime.
task650 said:
flash is still going to be around bro. they have just stopped supporting mobile devices. we still have what is left behind and that will last us a lifetime.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Adobe announced that they have one more build release to add support for 4.0, but that will be it (aside from standard bug and security fixes I suppose).
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/21/flash-for-android-not-quite-dead-yet-will-land-on-ice-cream-san/
Who knows if this will change in the future, but if any Android release in the future breaks this compatibility that might be it for Flash on mobile devices altogether.
lostinbeta said:
Adobe announced that they have one more build release to add support for 4.0, but that will be it (aside from standard bug and security fixes I suppose).
http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/21/flash-for-android-not-quite-dead-yet-will-land-on-ice-cream-san/
Who knows if this will change in the future, but if any Android release in the future breaks this compatibility that might be it for Flash on mobile devices altogether.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
too many devs will make up for them leaving. dont worry about that. we will always have flash on our devices.
ck_looi said:
ICS CM BUILD COMING SOON to galaxy tab 10.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please show me where Steve stated that it is a CyanogenMod build. All he has said is that ICS is coming. Not CM9.
Also, this does not belong in the Development section. Double-fail.
gravis86 said:
Please show me where Steve stated that it is a CyanogenMod build. All he has said is that ICS is coming. Not CM9.
Also, this does not belong in the Development section. Double-fail.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS CM build coming soon.
so, about that fail?
gravis86 said:
Please show me where Steve stated that it is a CyanogenMod build. All he has said is that ICS is coming. Not CM9.
Also, this does not belong in the Development section. Double-fail.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
slack04 said:
ICS CM build coming soon.
so, about that fail?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You both fail.
The quote from Steve is
ICS on the Galaxy Tab 10.1 is pretty great. Coming soon to a CM mirror near you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.
So no mention of "ICS CM build".. BUT why would the eventual build be on a CM mirror if it weren't actually a CM build?
|flyte| said:
You both fail.
The quote from Steve is
.
So no mention of "ICS CM build".. BUT why would the eventual build be on a CM mirror if it weren't actually a CM build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol! i can't believe we are arguing over minute details. What are we politicians? Lets just all sit back and enjoy some ice cream sand which once it comes.... hats off to the CM team.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
How did I fail?? I quoted the title of this thread, and then said it was wrong.
|flyte| said:
You both fail.
The quote from Steve is
.
So no mention of "ICS CM build".. BUT why would the eventual build be on a CM mirror if it weren't actually a CM build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
huynhc said:
Lol! i can't believe we are arguing over minute details. What are we politicians? Lets just all sit back and enjoy some ice cream sand which once it comes.... hats off to the CM team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually a huge detail. I for one will be happy just to see ICS, but ICS will pale in comparison to CM9.
Why wouldn't it be a cm build? The only reason we don't have one right now was because of the source not being released for honeycomb and cm doesn't downgrade devices. Shoot, cyanogen now works for Samsung, so they'd have a business incentive to get ics on the gt10.1 fast (albiet unofficially) considering it's their flagship tablet.
I have spoke with some people from motorola and asked some questions related to general business but also for upgrading Atrix with ICS.
I'm pasting here some answers without mentioning names, I think that this may show that motorola is doing more than they are ready to publicly say in this moment. To be on safe side You can think about this as rumor.
On Software upgrades, I wasn't aware of an announcement regarding ICS and ATRIX. Although Motorola tends to announce what it will do, not what it won't do, it doesn't mean it won't happen. You may be right, but I don't know the current status... The challenge we have with ATRIX however is Webtop, the full linux OS which sits within Froyo/Gingerbread... I imagine this has delayed any comment. The ideal scenario would be to upgrade all phones to the latest software, and I see that almost all high-end (non web top) phones have had ICS upgrade confirmed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Official ics would probably suck too. Motorola would probably put blur on top of it.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
stumpyz9 said:
Official ics would probably suck too. Motorola would probably put blur on top of it.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, but..... If they actually release a version of ICS for the atrix, it can be DEblurred and retain the webtop. So if one carrier actually releases ICS for the atrix we would be set..
nate_benji said:
Agreed, but..... If they actually release a version of ICS for the atrix, it can be DEblurred and retain the webtop. So if one carrier actually releases ICS for the atrix we would be set..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What we need are drivers, webtop and kernels, and they will give us these if this is true
thats a lie dude ;D
Motorola's problem in releasing ICS is not WebTop's fault, is nvidia's! they will not release ICS drivers and sources, not until motorola pays them some good money.
So, our hope for now is that motorola pays for ics on xoom and then make a "hacked driver" of it to the phones with tegra2....
Please close or more the thread to general.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Us GB members JUST got the 2.3 update...
If we think optimisticly, then MAYBE 2014 could be a safe bet.
But ONLY if... - If Motorola are faster than usual
Son of a *****. I got really excited.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
somebody should move this thread away from this section and/or append "-RUMOR" to its name . I was having an heart attack.
Its been stated by Nivida that they will be releasing the ics drivers and binarys for there terga 2 and 3 chip sets in the new year. That thread was in the general section awhile ago. So we will get ics through other channels.
drvon said:
Its been stated by Nivida that they will be releasing the ics drivers and binarys for there terga 2 and 3 chip sets in the new year. That thread was in the general section awhile ago. So we will get ics through other channels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are we talking about 2011 or 2012 ?
OP,
wrong place dude, but who depends on Moto for ICS when you have some awesome devs in here ..
damn, i almost having a heart attack after reading this thread's title
da fuq
munchy_cool said:
are we talking about 2011 or 2012 ?
OP,
wrong place dude, but who depends on Moto for ICS when you have some awesome devs in here ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They had sad early 2012
Here's the post...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1371486
I'm not sure that drivers are anymore issue since we saw from google ICS
for xoom which is same platform as atrix.
guidoido004 said:
thats a lie dude ;D
Motorola's problem in releasing ICS is not WebTop's fault, is nvidia's! they will not release ICS drivers and sources, not until motorola pays them some good money.
So, our hope for now is that motorola pays for ics on xoom and then make a "hacked driver" of it to the phones with tegra2....
Please close or more the thread to general.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a tease!
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Sorry for tease it was not my intention, I just wanted to share some inside knowledge which I gain trough unofficial channels, anyway I will try to make it up for that
zexbig said:
Sorry for tease it was not my intention, I just wanted to share some inside knowledge which I gain trough unofficial channels, anyway I will try to make it up for that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perfectly acceptable titles:
- Unofficial information from Motorla regarding ICS for the Atrix
- I contacted Motorola regarding ICS for the Atrix, here's the answer
- If you were wondering about Motorola's stand on ICS for the Atrix, here it is
- So I decided to contact Motorola about ICS for the Atrix
Do you understand how the title is misleading enough for it to pass as obvious trolling? Don't apologize, just change the god damned title so people won't read it and get excited over some unofficial comments that do not really say ANYTHING at all about current development for the Atrix.
Thank you and have a good one.
hoodlikegaza said:
This does not belong in dev you IDIOT.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I gave you a thanks for this post for being an outstanding contribution to humanity. If there were only more like you in the world, what a wonderful place it would be.
dicksteele said:
I gave you a thanks for this post for being an outstanding contribution to humanity. If there were only more like you in the world, what a wonderful place it would be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why don't you give me thanks you idiot!?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Since motorola needs to upgrade RAZR to ICS (they publicly committed that they will do it) it means that webtop will be rewrite for ICS so it's possible that they will
user webtop for RAZR in ICS for atrix.
Only after Google's control.
Hi!
Like the title, is someone working on a custom rom with JB for nexus s?
Ok,ok.... i can't wait XD
probably. Cyanogen will start when they have the source code
mike.b93 said:
probably. Cyanogen will start when they have the source code
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source code is not just aviable? Oo galaxy nexus and htc one x have the rom XD
ubas90 said:
source code is not just aviable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.
debaj said:
No.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mmm so why sgn and htc one x have the rom? T_T i wonan try it T_T
just be patient ok? or pay someone to do it for you.
ubas90 said:
mmm so why sgn and htc one x have the rom? T_T i wonan try it T_T
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy nexus has a System Dump from the OTA which was rolled out to the developers at i/o
As far as the One X goes I have no idea why they have a rom. Is it a SDK Port? 'cause you don't want a SDK Port, believe me!
Be Patient. Just 2 Weeks. In 3 Weeks we will have dozens of Jelly Bean Roms!
Why porting an i9250 rom? Jelly Bean is coming for Nexus S in "mid july".
A port is wasted time.....
mike.b93 said:
Galaxy nexus has a System Dump from the OTA which was rolled out to the developers at i/o
As far as the One X goes I have no idea why they have a rom. Is it a SDK Port? 'cause you don't want a SDK Port, believe me!
Be Patient. Just 2 Weeks. In 3 Weeks we will have dozens of Jelly Bean Roms!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ty a lot for information, i'm asking why they have it and we no ^_^
however, this is a free community, each people that do this make for passion and not for money!
(but u have to donate if developer is great )
Sneed is absolutely right.
Sneed said:
Why porting an i9250 rom? Jelly Bean is coming for Nexus S in "mid july".
A port is wasted time.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this upcoming half month is going to feel like years
ubas90 said:
ty a lot for information, i'm asking why they have it and we no ^_^
however, this is a free community, each people that do this make for passion and not for money!
(but u have to donate if developer is great )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You want to know why they have it and we don't?
Because there's no system dump for the Nexus S. Developers at i/o got an Galaxy Nexus not and Nexus S.
And like I said, IDK about the One X
ubas90 said:
mmm so why sgn and htc one x have the rom? T_T i wonan try it T_T
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Y u no not read about when the source will be released from any one of tech sites/blogs that cover this stuff.
And about the question why the One X has JB: I wanna quote the Dev. :
" This rom is now based off the GNex system image by Koush.
It's booting, but its largely unstable for the moment. I havent tested too thoroughly, but this definitely isn't a daily driver."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This should answer the Question
CooLoserTech said:
this upcoming half month is going to feel like years
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I know right?!
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Im doing the port, please, if you can find a developer or someone who know this bug, please pm me immediately and so we all can have a Jelly Bean port. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=28006269#post28006269
Sorry. Not stable enough for daily use doesn't get my vote. I'd gladly wait a few weeks for the OTA and then reroot.
Sent by pocket technology.
Google are working for it...