Database Users

Stock Quadrant Score with 2.2?

Hello ladies and gents of the Vibrant forum. I'm a G2 user thinking about returning his G2 tomorrow for a Vibrant. What is the Vibrant stock Quadrant score with the OTA 2.2 update? Already tried search.

The OTA was not 2.2, it was an update to 2.1.

rembonjaski said:
The OTA was not 2.2, it was an update to 2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh.
Nevermind then.

Hmmm
There's no 2.2 update yet... sorry

Are you guys serious?! Eugene released a stable 2.2 ROM this morning!
With just a stock 2.2 flash youre looking @ 980 on quad & 14.xx @ 5.9 sec on linpack.
As always though... Benchmarks dont mean jack! From personal experience this phone is awesome! If I stopped flashing it so damn much I'd be able to get 20+ hours on the battery too!

I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

disturkis4u said:
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think what the OP wanted was a 2.2 vibrant score w/ JIT enabled... eugenes ROM has it.
Stable means usable & will not die or cause nuclear war. Perfect ROM? No... Only working 2.2 ROM working (minus GPS & a few other things not working) on the vibrant, yes.
exactly what does stability & usability have to with a mathematical bench mark test? are you referring to hacks & mods vs. hard code? Stability wise? # wise??

I just got 1903 after using the z4mod (ext2) on JI6:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quite happy with that - but more happy with a somewhat useable phone!
-bZj

All~G1 said:
Are you guys serious?! Eugene released a stable 2.2 ROM this morning!
With just a stock 2.2 flash youre looking @ 980 on quad & 14.xx @ 5.9 sec on linpack.
As always though... Benchmarks dont mean jack! From personal experience this phone is awesome! If I stopped flashing it so damn much I'd be able to get 20+ hours on the battery too!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, I don't like when people put benchmarks down. I happen to believe that some of the benchmarks, including Quadrant Professional are accurate and reflective of real performance. Then again everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

disturkis4u said:
I believe the 'stable' rom you're referring to has broken GPS still.
Also, I think the op thought that the recent update was an official stock 2.2...
Anyway, the quadrant score is around 819 stock but with different mods, a good stable score is around 1600
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just flashed bionix final team whiskey ,oc n everything its really really fast but I just ran a 790! Why did our run so slow? I barely have any apps on here in the first place...?

i get 900-910 with JI6 everything stock.
edit
sorry OP wants Score with 2.2

down8 said:
I just got 1903 after using the z4mod (ext2) on JI6:
Quite happy with that - but more happy with a somewhat useable phone!
-bZj
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly what i was about to say. who cares about 2.2 when you can flash a bionix rom and hit up to 2600 on quadrant. not that quadrant really means anything more than a benchmark.

I think OP is looking for a official froyo 2.2 rom...Sorry OP, no official froyo, but there is a ported version eugene has done.
Click here
Although this is a "froyo", no one is sure if this can be an accurate representation of how our vibrants will run when we get the official OTA, but if you want "froyo" now, by all means go ahead and flash it. Its still missing a few kinks and has bugs.

GB Quadrant Scores

Whats quadrant scores are you getting with your 2.3.3 rom?
Quadrant Score: 1030
Rom: WB-XPERIA TW Gingerbread Hotfix 3
That was with Quadrant Standard.
[Edit] Please state if you're using Quadrant Advanced or Quadrant Standard.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1228
(first run, didn't bother to run the tests twice)
Stock pre-rooted ROM, I haven't removed anything, no tweaks applied apart from fixed xRecovery and Bravia Engine by Z.
No lag, no bugs, awesome camera... Life is good again!
Xperia X10i via Tapatalk

here's mine all stock GB

Think my highest was 1330 or something like that.
That is on Doom's prerooted ROM, with a few apps removed, and Z's FPS uncap.

1k 1st run
1.1k 2nd run

1467, second run.
Stock 2.3.3 with SPB Shell.

Around 1200 in first run and 1430 in 2nd !!

1st run 930, 2nd run 1109, 3rd run 1030.
How are you guys getting 1400+?
I'm using the prerooted ROM, but thats it.

Here's my best using Ewjet ginger rom.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=16136301&postcount=65

1st run 1300+ 2nd 1492
The GB update has tweak the I/O from 500-600 on 2.2roms to 700+ in GB

1st run 990
2nd run 1230
With basically everything I need installed.
Seems about right. I always got a bit lower scores than the rest of you whichever ROM I used. I'm guessing it's component imperfections

I always get higher score in Quadrant Advanced(1.1.6 and below) than in Quadrant Standard. I have got 1800+ in Quadrant Advanced using MIUI 1.7.22 with DooMLorD's kernel. Better use Quadrant from Market to report the scorers ?
In Wolf's 2.3:
Quadrant Advanced : 1450
Quadrant Standard : 1121

1020-1040 for 4 times of trying, never get below 1k but also never get above 1.1k.....using WB TW GB 2.3.3

1004 first run
1176 second run
Quadrant Standard

1450 first run.

Using WB 2.3, I got ~950 the first run. By the 4th run, I got 1304. Linpack is between 36-37.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

3rd run 1307 !! Didn't see that coming

Highest I got is 1377..
with some tweaks from Z, and 2.1 teaks (im pretty sure it doesnt work, but i added it anyways lol)

quadrant stnd - 1683 with some of my tweaks, but i go back to my miui, on this backstab lags like hell , after my tweaks , it doesnt , on my miui all games without lags. I tried asphalt 6 is so laggy on stock 2.3.3 after my tweaks not on mtt miui to. The stock 2.3.3 is good but after very good tuning, but customs will better than 4 ever, maybe, . On miui i have a lot of more points in quadrant, but for me these all quadrant score testers are one **** of falses. I use them only for checking how many fps i have on my kernel, nothing more.
Send from my own MIUI Final by Oskar.K X10

Always between 1430 and 1480 on 2nd run (WB 2.3.3). Quadrant advanced.

Best ROM Based On The ICS Beta?

Like the title says, what is the best ROM based on the ICS Beta from Sony + What kernel are you using & whats it clocked at?
Sent from my R800i using xda premium

AwaisKhan said:
Like the title says, what is the best ROM based on the ICS Beta from Sony + What kernel are you using & whats it clocked at?
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Biased Question,
There is No best or worst ROM They side On preference Try them Yourself Doing this will Point rage at you.!..

Xperia4life said:
Biased Question,
There is No best or worst ROM They side On preference Try them Yourself Doing this will Point rage at you.!..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was asking it to people who have experienced the different ROMS, which one 'they' find best, i only want peoples opinions.
Sent from my R800i using xda premium

The best for me was the darkforest
Ice rom and kernel I'm clocked at 1.2ghz and is using smartassv2 almost no bugs but camera sometimes force closes and getting data to work is a pain.
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk

I'm using Darkforest as my daily driver
Out of all the other ICS ROMs, this one is the top of the cake for me.
Sent from R800x

Best rom?
FXP115- CM9.0 FreeXperia Project is a rom im looking at right now. i looked under the development forum post for it but I need more posts apparently in order to ask questions. So does anyone know what the Rom is, is it stable, and what is not working with this rom? Plz and thanks

Tried both Darkforest and JJ's rom
Both had bugs glitches (part of the screen was cut off)
also battery life was shorter than gingerbread
switched back to gingerbread until / if ics as good

Darkforest seems good, ill try it later;D
Sent from my R800i using xda premium

Could you post screenshots?
Sent from my R800i using xda premium

AwaisKhan said:
Could you post screenshots?
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KeiranFTW said:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Enjoy

I've noticed a small battery decrease as well from switching from GB. I had to underclock Darkforest to get the same amount.
Still great tho. Just a little slow.

I've only tried regular beta and Darkforest, but I did try 3 different kernels. I found the Darkforest kernel had better battery life than the ICS doomkernel, but worse than advanced stock (when they haven't been tweaked)
The difference in battery life for me between ICS and gingerbread is immense. And as you can see in the Darkforest thread, I had severe graphic errors, lockups.. I thought maybe my hardware was screwed but;
Went to jokawild with doomkernel 11 and all the glitches went away. And my battery life is 2x longer at LEAST. Hour and a half of use took me down to 60%. On ICS the same amount of time killed the battery completely. And I haven't even finished tweaking this gingerbread yet..
Also, ICS was laggy. Constant slight lag, occasional large spikes. Gingerbread when configured right is really fast. If you mostly want ICS for the way it looks and not features, get an ICS theme and stick with gingerbread. The new features, especially changes to system menus and browser, and gapps were great, but simply not worth it IMO.
As time goes on and things speed up, I'm sure it'll become more worthwhile, but not right now
Sent from Asgard

Definitely Sony's ROM and kernel.
Sent from my R800i using XDA

I'm having a hard time switching back to Gingerbread

There is another ROM than Darkforest??

The fastest ROM (GB or ICS)

If there is a topic about this, ban me, but show me.
If not, only show me.
I've tried ROCKET ROM and it's ok, but I wonder if there is another faster ROM somewhere...
I don't care if is based on GB or ICS and I don't care if your suggestions don't offer all the facilities of the phone, I just want the fastest ROM possible for Note.

I like Midnote ICS.

I'm on Kingdroid Deluxe v 7.0 and it is really quick. I like all the customizations too. It is based off Gingerbread

I'm on AlBa ROM and I hafta see, it does certainly feel and seem faster than GB on CheckROM, even though ICS ROMs are limited to 1.2GHz due to kernel.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Try Imilka CM9-v01 , thats perfect ICS or Cassie's XtraLiteRom Version X LC1 for Gingerbread base rom.

It's hard to say which is the absolute fastest but try Imilka's CM9 or ICS Stunner. Both are super quick. Personally I feel CM9 is quicker of the two, it's lighter as well. Stunner has A LOT of tweaks though! Best ICS ROMs IMO!

ICS roms are the fastest and CM9 and ICS Stunner are the best. Stunner is a slightly quicker I think but CM9 is better overall.

I've tried both CM9 and Stunner extensively, and have found stunner to be the smoothest =). Just remember to use flash fix, and enjoy euphoria!
YMMV though because many people seem to be reporting issues with 4.5, but I'm having zero issues. Love it.

Gb its checkrom. For me its been the fastest. V5.

Gb is cassys xtralite rom
Ics is neobudds stunner
Done ha ha

CM9 for sure..n if u believe in benchmarks then here are the screenshot
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Galaxy Note with Blazing CM9

N the vellamo score is 1300 !!!!
Sent from my Galaxy Note with Blazing CM9

Alba is fastest but using imilka cm version for the features
Sent from my GT-N7000

I find GB roms generally are less buggy and have less audio distortion. Can't comment much on speed since I have a fast phone and both run fine, but audio distortion is less apparent in gb roms.

supernova457 said:
I find GB roms generally are less buggy and have less audio distortion. Can't comment much on speed since I have a fast phone and both run fine, but audio distortion is less apparent in gb roms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird.
I use sip calling and I was told output was better by other party.
On my end I do hear more static, also volume levels are higher.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

Im just curious, fast rom? What does it stands for? Is it how fast you scroll screens, fast in benchmarks, or something else?
Im using chrack v18 rom with speed mod kernel and i find it fast, stable and battery friendy:-D
Sent from my N-7000 using hands...

dekky18 said:
Im just curious, fast rom? What does it stands for? Is it how fast you scroll screens, fast in benchmarks, or something else?
Im using chrack v18 rom with speed mod kernel and i find it fast, stable and battery friendy:-D
Sent from my N-7000 using hands...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha this is exactly what I was go III Ng to ask open.
Fast in benchmark or UI smoothness or App/game running speed?
Anyway I love checkrom been using all of the version since checkrom,never let down once. Too bad my ICS gas gone hot, gotta jump ship.
Tried ics stunner and teamrocket. Both are MUCH faster and smoother in every single area. Overall ics just have the slick feel that no any GB can deliver, not even close!!
didn't do benchmark though, my opinion solely based on user experience, not benchmarking .
I really love ics stunner ,very fast and stable but u lose Samsung apps and full function spen.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA

Fastest gb rom is in my signature with the linked uninstalled apps.
http://db.tt/v8c98UdT
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10486200/Note/SC20120414-042945.png
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10486200/Note/SC20120414-042953.png
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

I just flashed 5.0 Stunner by neobuddy
its just unbelievably fast! cant believe that note could be sooo freakin fast!

Is it Imilka's CM9 ICS faster than Stunner? Can somebody make a good comparison
Thanks

ICS On Galaxy SII

I just managed to get ICS on my SII! Waited for so long and a little disapointed... There isn't that much of a difference from what I can see.

What were you expecting?

ICS is good as a secondary rom. This goes for official samsung releases as well as cm9/aosp/aokp.
Stick with gingerbread. It's still the best.

victorator said:
ICS is good as a secondary rom. This goes for official samsung releases as well as cm9/aosp/aokp.
Stick with gingerbread. It's still the best.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find some of the ICS roms very polished and functional. I don't think I could go back to GB. Just curious why you think GB is better?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA

Well for a start, you don't get this on gingerbread.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

thinkharry said:
I just managed to get ICS on my SII! Waited for so long and a little disapointed... There isn't that much of a difference from what I can see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this Samsung ICS or Android ICS as Samsungs ICS is terrible and htey have destroyed it, the Android Stock ICs is much better

Yeah stock ics with touchwiz must be pretty depressing... But I would always prefer a good ics custom rom to one with GB! I love the ICS design
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA

thinkharry said:
I just managed to get ICS on my SII! Waited for so long and a little disapointed... There isn't that much of a difference from what I can see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try Omega_v3.0_AOKP_build_36_ICS_4.0.4
Beautiful ICS rom. You will see difference from GB.

Roman5 said:
Well for a start, you don't get this on gingerbread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive never had it on ics so where do we go from here?

MrPeel said:
I find some of the ICS roms very polished and functional. I don't think I could go back to GB. Just curious why you think GB is better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not going to compare AOSP/AOKP roms with Samsung ICS. They are a joke compared to what you get in a stock samsung firmware.
Comparing samsung ics and gb... GB has less gestures and small polished features (contacts, dialer) however it offers the best browser on any phone. As a comparison, install flash player and open up youtube.com, scroll down and switch to the desktop version. Compare scrolling. zooming in. Now try to play a video using the browser. GB is super smooth never lags. Same goes with big websites that have lots of ads and flash content.
GB never force closes. It's super stable. It doesn't eat as much battery with screen on. It doesn't have the data usage info, nor the fancy task switching.
Also the stock samsung gallery is awful compared to what you get in aosp ics...
However, overall I rate it the highest for stability, functionality and great battery life. I'm sorry but ICS just doesn't cut it for me. To be honest I wish they would put out an anniversary gingerbread build with everything maxed out (like they do for the I9001 for example).
I'm not hating on ics. It's a step forward, it's just it hasn't reached the level of GB in terms of daily usage. Maybe one day.

if it wasnt for this free community android would be a mess or the manufacturers may feel obliged to make a better rom,
when you think about it samsung must use thier Android phones stock i wonder if they think its sufficient

go with hydrog3n-ICS ROM

pepe2909 said:
are the most sarcastic and also the smartest of all, if you do not like that man posted, skip ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this 'Skip' function a new feature of ICS?

Android always rules whatever the system..every system has its flaws...the perfection is in the communtity that we have..the hard work of rom makers..
and we are thankfull to them.. but my wife don't...lool ics rules on my 9100 with batista foxhound ...PEACE...

Have U looked at SlimICS?
Great fast, stable

This thread is pretty bad and now we're just recommending ROMs
Closed