[ NEWS/UPDATE ] ARmv6 ICS Drivers. Download here! - XPERIA X10 General

GUYS GOOD NEWS!
NOTICE ! THIS IS NOT FLASHABLE WITH CWM. (some actually flashed it with cwm) This is for DEVELOPMENT SOURCE
guys??????? GREAT NEWS FOR US
maybe this calls for a celebration !
drivers are here.. wahahahahaha!

Nice One but I found something interesting too here it is SONY
Hope Someone of the developers will notice this......

XGr7078 said:
Nice One but I found something interesting too here it is SONY
Hope Someone of the developers will notice this......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hope we can have floating technology

static28 said:
hope we can have floating technology
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would really be awesome!!!!!

Pull to the limit

Sorry for n00b question but...what does exactly mean? What happens now?
Cooks can make more stable kernel & ROM?
Thanks in advance
Greetings from Italy

sith.warrior said:
Sorry for n00b question but...what does exactly mean? What happens now?
Cooks can make more stable kernel & ROM?
Thanks in advance
Greetings from Italy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that means a chance for real hardware acceleration for ICS roms

matmutant said:
that means a chance for real hardware acceleration for ICS roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow, cool news! Thanks for explanation

great news!

ics here we come

a golden age comes to us , I can't wait for it

OMG!!! This is the best notice in last months!

muchb3tt3r said:
OMG!!! This is the best notice in last months!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah it is.
as you can see. because of these ICS is now having a massive PROGRESS..
we now have kernel for ICS by nAa. and lots of ROM porting
we can now taste a real ice cream.
all that we need to do is to WAIT haha

ICS-KERNEL
I found out that nAa has built a kernel for the x8 which is ICS compatible.
So lets hope that we too get a ICS kernel very soon. You all can have a look here... ICS-KERNEL

XGr7078 said:
I found out that nAa has built a kernel for the x8 which is ICS compatible.
So lets hope that we too get a ICS kernel very soon. You all can have a look here... ICS-KERNEL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nAas rom supports robyn and mimmi and shakira. we just need to wait

He made miniCM9-3.0.0 for X8 so we´ll get it, too. I hope. And its android 4.0.4

But the X10 mini will meet the minimum requeritments to performance??
Because ics is resources dog :/
More info about this:
http://www.ozandroid.info/?p=2831
Sumarizing more operations of native kernel linux are moved to virtual machine :/ and is known that virtual machine are slow compared to binaries.
ICS-> cool interface , resource DOG = x10 mini killer, the main problem is the ram, not as the cpu.
Gingerbread-> not as cool as ics, but less resources
Froyo->less fingerfriendly, but less resources and way faster than 2.1, little more than 2.3

alecuba16 said:
But the X10 mini will meet the minimum requeritments to performance??
Because ics is resources dog :/
More info about this:
http://www.ozandroid.info/?p=2831
Sumarizing more operations of native kernel linux are moved to virtual machine :/ and is known that virtual machine are slow compared to binaries.
ICS-> cool interface , resource DOG = x10 mini killer, the main problem is the ram, not as the cpu.
Gingerbread-> not as cool as ics, but less resources
Froyo->less fingerfriendly, but less resources and way faster than 2.1, little more than 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem, already tested other builds of ICS for our X10 Mini's. Performance its great, same as Gingerbread. UI seems smoother. Ics it's a better OS overall, and Ram also seems to be enough.
When the devs compile or reuse a working camera driver, we'll have a FULL rom... every other thing works like a charm now.
cheers.

alecuba16 said:
But the X10 mini will meet the minimum requeritments to performance??
Because ics is resources dog :/
More info about this:
http://www.ozandroid.info/?p=2831
Sumarizing more operations of native kernel linux are moved to virtual machine :/ and is known that virtual machine are slow compared to binaries.
ICS-> cool interface , resource DOG = x10 mini killer, the main problem is the ram, not as the cpu.
Gingerbread-> not as cool as ics, but less resources
Froyo->less fingerfriendly, but less resources and way faster than 2.1, little more than 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, there are ways of overcoming the out-of-memory problems most old devices have. Compcache or zram, kernel samepage merging and purging of assets.

TrissyGE said:
He made miniCM9-3.0.0 for X8 so we´ll get it, too. I hope. And its android 4.0.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm looking forward for this release. ICS on X10 mini could be a good second mobile.

Related

People I have big hopes in miui now!

And once again a thread about miui by the same person blah blah bl..
Yes fine but i do actually have something this time!!
As shown here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1hVXPiuo6Q&feature=related
does the acer liquid thing run miui
Tere the blade's specs http://www.gsmarena.com/zte_blade-3391.php
And
The liquid's specs http://www.gsmarena.com/acer_liquid-2968.php
The screen is the same the cpu of the acer is faster but the blade has the double ram (i have the 5mp/512mb ram version)
So why not?
I would love to help and i wont say that i don't have time since that would be a lie.
I'm willing to help everywhere i can.
Acer have snapdragon CPU, blade have arm v6 CPU, MIUI not supporting arm v6
acmerw said:
Acer have snapdragon CPU, blade have arm v6 CPU, MIUI not supporting arm v6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That shouldn't be a problem.
Its still android and if we find a supported kernel will it work.
a cpu is a cpu. android is android. a kernel is a kernel. Three simple things that will make it possible.
Moon
Moonystorm said:
That shouldn't be a problem.
Its still android and if we find a supported kernel will it work.
a cpu is a cpu. android is android. a kernel is a kernel. Three simple things that will make it possible.
Moon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miui is compiled for armv7 it wont work unless miui devs release source
Sent from my ZTE-BLADE using XDA Premium App
Plus there doesn't seem to be many people that interested in it now (at least from what I've seen on Modaco).
:C
Oh yea i forgot it was closed.
****..
anyone up for a kingdom sense port ?
No really. would that work?
or does it only support arm7 cpus too :/
because if will we just port sense 2.1 (2.3.3) from the desire s c:
i would do it! even if sense is a little sucky
we would spend some time on something then :3
anyone up for it?
Moon
If it possible, it would be excellent !
cartmanotfat said:
If it possible, it would be excellent !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes c: i think it will be possible we can use stuff from the wildfire s since it has an arm11 or whatever cpu too :3
i know a little about porting i've helped with the GT540 sense port (which never worked out :/)
If a portage is possible, the base would that of HTC Salsa, or maybe the Desire ?
Sense defiantly will not port, miui may. i am not too sure. I can try give it a go once im done with porting the 2x
carlos118 said:
Sense defiantly will not port, miui may. i am not too sure. I can try give it a go once im done with porting the 2x
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not?
It worked fine on the P500 GT540 SGS DROID Defy But Look the P500 and GT540 (have/had them both) Have the same cpu and less ram than the blade so why not.?

[Q] Android 3.0 on Xperia X8?

I have heard that some guys managed to port Android 3.0, better known as Honeycomb, to the G1, HTC Magic and to the Nexus One.
This are of course very beta versions, but the phones boot with it.
So, I wonder if someone could port 3.0 to our Xperia?
The HTC Magic and G1 were the first phones with Android, so our Xperia must be much better than them and, theoratically, it could work on it with just fewer lags than on the G1.
There are so many 2.2 and 2.3 ROMs available for our Xperia, so why not try to port 3.0?
If you think this is a stupid thread, just remove it, but I just wanted to know it.
Thanks in advance for your answers.
USE SEARCH FEATURE ON XDA AND YOU WILL FIND IT. Don't be lazy
You must be new here!
you will get burned at the stake by the guys here for opening such thread xD we are struggling to get a 100% bugless working android 2.2 and you bringing up android 3.0 which is meant for tablets with big screens xD lol
Edit : also such question is not meant to be in the dev section....
It was just a noob question...I also said that the versions for Nexus One, G1 and Magic are very beta versions.
There used to be an early version of Honeycomb somewhere here but the project has been abandoned. And no wonder - our kernel cannot even run Gingerbread without bugs, not to mention higher versions...
Even the kernel supports it, maybe phone will be too much laggy, as the HoneyComb suggests the need of 1.0Ghz processor, that is not our Case
So why they can run it on G1?
Does it have an unlocked bootloader, so you can flash a custom kernel?
codfreak said:
So why they can run it on G1?
Does it have an unlocked bootloader, so you can flash a custom kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably yes, Xperia stills locked and cannot boot custom kernels
Some dev are trying to make the bootloader bypass, but is not easy. :/
biscoitu said:
Probably yes, Xperia stills locked and cannot boot custom kernels
Some dev are trying to make the bootloader bypass, but is not easy. :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not easy and i think they already gave up
Graveir and aldee_s are right: someone has already ported it, but development is currently down.
here is the thread to it:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=982384&highlight=honeycomb
Blagus was disappointed with that, the only one that i saw making some progress was maxfron, but I didn´t saw him anymore
That had it ported but far to laggy m8 r CPU 2 slow at the min but I think I may still have that download ill cheack for u and upload it if so
my civic
Is because our phone is not ARMv7 & above and the processor speed is not super fast..if u port it into x8 it will buggy & lags in all of the function
Lets wait for 2. 4 but google need so much time : #
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App
There are already a few phones with Android 2.4 (not for sale, but someone somehow managed to get some)
Here is a youtube video, where you can see Xperia arc running 2.4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYbBQMERacQ
codfreak said:
There are already a few phones with Android 2.4 (not for sale, but someone somehow managed to get some)
Here is a youtube video, where you can see Xperia arc running 2.4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYbBQMERacQ
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is fake he just editted the build.prob file!
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App
You can edit this in build.prop?
Do you mean the line:
Code:
ro.build.version.sdk=8
, so you would only have to change the number?
I think new Android will be 4.0 "Ice Cream Sandwich"
Not 2.4
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
your new here arent ya? hahaha! its not very impossible to port 3.0 in our x8 just wait and see

What features the X10 misses after Gingerbread (what do we need from developers)

I am just trying to combine all the required things in here so that it is easy for a developer or a newcomer to the world of the Xperia X10 to know what the phone really lacks.
1)Real Multitouch:
After the debate whether the chip of the X10 is Cypress or Clearpad, no progress was made in that direction even fixing the buggy dual touch we have (cross-axes problem) giving us a full dual touch.
2)16 million color:
yes, it may not be so crucial to anyone, but really why don't we get a puppy while we can unleash a dragon, and who doesn't want an extra feature in his phone?
(Thanks Z for the Bravia Engine and the FPS uncap).
3)Unlocked Bootloader:
This is the big deal and the door to unleashing the X10, Custom ROMs and Kernels will be much better, features that SE don't want us to get will be easily achieved (MT, 16M, even porting other OS like WP7 or MeeGo or ice cream sandwich :O), developing for the X10 will be easier and more open, and we would really get a phone that can compete with the Arc.
P.S.: I would like to thank the developers working on the X10 now Z, J, Ericwill, Achotjan, Wolfbreak, Cobrato, Doomlord, kxhawkins, Androxyde, ThJap, viousAD, & Trip.
Guys, without you the X10 would have been a bulk of **** staying in the eclair era with one touch and nothing would have improved, your work has saved us a lot, and we are asking you not to leave us because we really like you.
Please if you have a feature or anything that you feel missing from the phone you can post it, it is just a collection of the flaws in the X10.
I agree with op as well. We certainly need the bootloader its what keeps us from unleashing the beast heck I wouldn't be surprised if x10 is faster than arc
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
couldn't we achieve the custom kernels on gingerbread using the bootloader bypass thing?
I think the devs are waiting for se to release kernel sources
OP
I Agree.
I think the problem is and always has been having a developer who can write the drivers. Until then, I don't think it matters.
agentJBM said:
I think the problem is and always has been having a developer who can write the drivers. Until then, I don't think it matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's much more complex that it seems.
Not even OEMs (SE, HTC, Motorola, you name it) write the device drivers for themselves.
Most of the source is provided by the hardware manufacturer (qualcomm, atheros, broadcom) - and a huge part of it is under NDA (non-disclosure agreement).
Without the thorough documentation and source code examples, it's highly unlikely to write any device driver by your own
Obviously, you could try to reverse-engineer stuff, but it's a "rocket science", even for experienced developers/companies.
Cheers,
z
zdzihu said:
It's much more complex that it seems.
Not even OEMs (SE, HTC, Motorola, you name it) write the device drivers for themselves.
Most of the source is provided by the hardware manufacturer (qualcomm, atheros, broadcom) - and a huge part of it is under NDA (non-disclosure agreement).
Without the thorough documentation and source code examples, it's highly unlikely to write any device driver by your own
Obviously, you could try to reverse-engineer stuff, but it's a "rocket science", even for experienced developers/companies.
Cheers,
z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, would you agree that none of this stuff will ever happen without help from the manufacturers or a "Rocket Scientist" Developer?
Edit: Not that you aren't a genius. Just clarifying that we don't have the resources, no matter what.
agentJBM said:
we don't have the resources, no matter what.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree
Cheers,
z
Stop calling developers some glorified copy pasters of cyanogen mod files.
True.. without source code it becomes string theory.
Rocket science is too easy.
@op you forgot fps cap removal
Sent from my x10 on official gingerbread
Lion3494 said:
@op you forgot fps cap removal
Sent from my x10 on official gingerbread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no he didnt,FPS cap is already removed, just see the android section!!
kunalgahlot said:
no he didnt,FPS cap is already removed, just see the android section!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to 54 frames buddy. Thats just on stock the 34
Sent from my x10 on official gingerbread
Lion3494 said:
Not to 54 frames buddy. Thats just on stock the 34
Sent from my x10 on official gingerbread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No what he means is its already been achieved with custom kernels.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
I meant to mention things that aren't yet developed for the X10.
A feature that was exciting but was pulled back is the ability to dual boot two roms using xrec 1.0, I liked it despite never using it because it would be beneficial for the future usage :]
At least I thought that in future devs can make dual touch fully working but Z says its not possible without sources
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App
Wifi Proxy
I thought this new GB will include the support proxy setting. I have seen in some ROM I forget which one it was that have the proxy setting in it.
I know, this is sad, for lots of school, and corporate that have proxy server, most android phone/tablet are not able to connect to the net. This is a big thing if the android want to get to some of corporate and the education sectors of the market.
I hope the DEV would do something that could enable this proxy feature.
Since day one that I have the X10, I have been disappointed with the lack of this feature.
Not to mention that it also lack of the Cisco IPSEC VPN setting as well.
i did'nt ask for a dual core implement or 32 finger multi touch i just asked for a precise dual touch which SE Fails to provide me with!
KInG GaME said:
i did'nt ask for a dual core implement or 32 finger multi touch i just asked for a precise dual touch which SE Fails to provide me with!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All of us do want that
Sent from my X10i using XDA App

ICS or not ICS: that is the question

As in title, can we hope to see Ice Cream Sandwitch on our Tattoo sooner or later (maybe through CyanogenMod)? The Android team said that EVERY phone that had Gingerbread can have ICS: it's the same for the Tattoo or it's not doable due to the limited hardware (I also mean screen size)?
Ieracos said:
As in title, can we hope to see Ice Cream Sandwitch on our Tattoo sooner or later (maybe through CyanogenMod)? The Android team said that EVERY phone that had Gingerbread can have ICS: it's the same for the Tattoo or it's not doable due to the limited hardware (I also mean screen size)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i really hope we can see this happen
but for now i think it's to early to say. high end phones have no info yet, so we gotta be very patient ICS source is not out yet...
so for now, we are happy that we have 2.3.7 which isn't on many high end devices
this is a nice read
http://www.androidcentral.com/ice-cream-sandwich-what-happens-next
We have to wait until Google releases the source-code. After that, we can see if our device will be able to run ICS
I have actually given up the hope to upgrade my tattoo further than 2.3.7, because I don't feel that my phone can use the new features in 4.0 so what's the point ^^ GPU Accelerated UI and better dual core support isn't very much for the tattoo. The ride with my tattoo has however been really nice, and it was a really good way to get introduced to android Galaxy Nexus here I come?
windmark said:
I have actually given up the hope to upgrade my tattoo further than 2.3.7, because I don't feel that my phone can use the new features in 4.0 so what's the point ^^ GPU Accelerated UI and better dual core support isn't very much for the tattoo. The ride with my tattoo has however been really nice, and it was a really good way to get introduced to android Galaxy Nexus here I come?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's sad to say this, but I think you're right :')
Consider that the Nexus S is now almost the price I payed my tattoo 2 years ago: maybe it's time to switch in the near future...
In the meanwhile... ICS IS OUT IN THE WILD RIGHT NOW, GUYS!! So, let's see if there's some more juice to squeeze out from our little tattoo!
Ieracos said:
It's sad to say this, but I think you're right :')
Consider that the Nexus S is now almost the price I payed my tattoo 2 years ago: maybe it's time to switch in the near future...
In the meanwhile... ICS IS OUT IN THE WILD RIGHT NOW, GUYS!! So, let's see if there's some more juice to squeeze out from our little tattoo!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think there will be ICS to our tattoo!
let's just sit here and wait for something
ICS running on G1, there's still hope for Tattoo...
dakitj87 said:
ICS running on G1, there's still hope for Tattoo...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great news!
lets keep waiting
The alpha build look slow on the G1. Hopefully some tweaking could cause performance improvements.
Sent from my HTC Tattoo using XDA App
Hi Guys,
What do you think about this?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1511495
Looks like there's a chance to get ICS in our Tattoos
I have checked it yesterday.
stelios97 has ported it to both X10 mini and wildfire,
so there is very good chance that we can have ics miui for tattoo.
But then I wonder, is there any dev still holding a Tattoo to help us.
Would be really nice to have MIUI on our tattoo.
It would even be better than having ICS!
.dot said:
Would be really nice to have MIUI on our tattoo.
It would even be better than having ICS!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The other day I read that 2.3.7 source for MIUI was released
http://shrewdgeek.com/2012/02/04/xiaomi-makes-miui-gingerbread-2-3-7-open-source/
all we need is to get it compiled for ARM v6
Where are the developers for tattoo roms?
Arco? Kalimocho? rallapag? you've also done some ports, didn't you?
can someone port MIUI to our tattoo?
i don't know much about android rom development, but i think it wouldn't be much more work to port this miui rom than port some sense roms. a wildfire version is already available.
Its more some driver related things, i think
can someone try it please?
Hi .dot
You know, I am not a dev.
What ever I do, I am afraid it will be incomplete like my sense 2.3 rom port.
We need a real dev, unfortunately Arif-ali as well gave up working on Tattoo yesterday has indefinitely stopped android development.
ics
i really hope that there will be a new rom.cause i´m a little bored with my tattoo and the nfinity-rom. i hope that the dev will start to work on it..it would be fantastic!PLEASE
There you go guys,
A test version of CM9 is here for Tattoo
Checkout following post
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=23161100&postcount=42
rallapag said:
There you go guys,
A test version of CM9 is here for Tattoo
Checkout following post
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=23161100&postcount=42
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could help to port MiuiV4 as i did on my u8150 as well and other upcoming
And regarding the post u linked..i looked into it and found that the touchscreen are not working as is still a pointer...i doesn't have the phone but this thread may help you in fixing it... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328515
Zackconsole said:
I could help to port MiuiV4 as i did on my u8150 as well and other upcoming
And regarding the post u linked..i looked into it and found that the touchscreen are not working as is still a pointer...i doesn't have the phone but this thread may help you in fixing it... http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1328515
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe you should check this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1530370
aiwenor said:
Maybe you should check this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1530370
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Zackconsole is the dev, who is helping me fix most of the issues with my CM9 port
and we are working together on CM9 port and also on MIUI project.

[Gen8] ICS on Gen8 (A70S) preview

Hi All,
Here is a quick preview of my first ICS build running on my A70S:
It's smoother than my initial run, I figured that 3D drivers were not kicked in when I made the comment on my other thread.
It's quite smooth even though there is some slowness from time to time. As it is, it's not usable, there are some crashes because network and sound are not working, but it's quite encouraging.
I may focus on Gen8 more than Gen9 finally as Gen9 will have Archos upgrade. Currently, only 3D and touchscreen are working... Don't expect much, I don't have enough time to work on this to make significant progress quickly.
Great...finally is something!!!
I you want some help, tell me....ok?
Looks great, that launcher is really smooth and it looks like a completely new OS.
Is there any chance that other talented developers working on the Archos will also jump on this with you? $aur0n, divx118, chulri?
God i cant wait for this give me wifi and i will be happy whats ram usage like?
for the buzz
http://www.jbmm.fr/?p=24894
Well, as expected, ram usage is sky high but it's almost untuned... I don't know yet if we can make progress regarding this.
I want first to have wifi and audio working, it should give enough stability to start playing with it. Then, todo list is huge...
Things that are going to be difficult is hdmi, ics doesn't like much the current clone model, and supporting other tablets as kernel changes are required for touch screen.
We'll see... Too bad that I have a job
Awesome!
Great work man! Looking forward to a full release_
-------------------------------
Sent from my HTC Desire S
YES!
This... Is amazing.. I never thought I'd see the day where even Honeycomb was running on the tablet. I really hope the main devs here see this and maybe combine. It's awesome having such a fine-tuned and packed UrukDroid, and it's pretty great finally seeing Gingerbread on our devices, but I think this is the true goal now!.. But that's just me
Hey letama,
now i know what you meant with good news coming...
letama said:
It's smoother than my initial run, I figured that 3D drivers were not kicked in when I made the comment on my other thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you tell, which driver set you integrated?
I also searched for ICS distributions for OMAP3630 base devices.
Couldn't find any 3D libraries yet...
letama said:
It's quite smooth even though there is some slowness from time to time. As it is, it's not usable, there are some crashes because network and sound are not working, but it's quite encouraging.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Am i right by assuming you used the 2.6.35 kernel sources?
I guess we'll need some efforts in the drivers, especially the tiwlan stuff, which should be build externally.
letama said:
I may focus on Gen8 more than Gen9 finally as Gen9 will have Archos upgrade. Currently, only 3D and touchscreen are working... Don't expect much, I don't have enough time to work on this to make significant progress quickly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a start... and a pretty amazing one!!!
Hopefully i'll find some time the next weeks to look into the kernel sources more intensely.
Anyway, it will be no easy task to add the missing parts.
For the HDMI i guess there is a dead end, because there's still one proprietary module which might not work with newer kernel.
Maybe it could work on top of the GPL'ed parts which where published and might get compiled for newer kernel.
But who cares now...
Really impressive work!!!
Congratulations and best regards,
scholbert
Can you upload the rom just for testing features of ics ? It looks very good, great job !
Hi Scholbert!
scholbert said:
now i know what you meant with good news coming...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
scholbert said:
Could you tell, which driver set you integrated?
I also searched for ICS distributions for OMAP3630 base devices.
Couldn't find any 3D libraries yet...
Am i right by assuming you used the 2.6.35 kernel sources?
I guess we'll need some efforts in the drivers, especially the tiwlan stuff, which should be build externally.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, in fact, this is 2.6.29 with Archos 3D binaries. ICS is patched to support old drivers, partly the same way it has been done in cm9 for other devices. I didn't test the .35 yet, I suspended my work on it in the middle, I'm not even sure touchscreen was working.
.35 would be good, I'm having few crashes in 3D drivers currently. I'm not sure yet if they're related to memory or bad interaction somewhere, still trying to get audio and wifi first.
Wifi should be relatively easy, i'm not very far. Audio is more complex, I tried simple solutions and it won't cut it, but with TI and Nexus S sources, we should be able to do something. Could take time though.
For the HDMI i guess there is a dead end, because there's still one proprietary module which might not work with newer kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, with the new A70s coming with Honeycomb, we may be able to steal some binaries for 2.6.35 (or even 3.0 if Archos upgrade them to ICS). They're also 3630, and we should get the kernel source code someday.
scholbert said:
Congratulations and best regards,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
arkade91 said:
Can you upload the rom just for testing features of ics ? It looks very good, great job !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, as it is, it's not usable. It crashes a lot and you can't do much without network.
I'd like to have at least wifi and if I can sound. Wifi to be able to do something with the tablet, sound because lots of crashes and slowness are coming from missing sound.
If it takes too much time, I'll release it but be warned that it's worthless currently.
letama said:
Well, as it is, it's not usable. It crashes a lot and you can't do much without network.
I'd like to have at least wifi and if I can sound. Wifi to be able to do something with the tablet, sound because lots of crashes and slowness are coming from missing sound.
If it takes too much time, I'll release it but be warned that it's worthless currently.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you're right, i hoped never get honeycomb or ICS on our tablet... take your time, it's already a very good news that ics running on our old archos gen8 ... THANKS !
Sent from my A101IT using xda premium
Where can I donate?!?
Very good work, I never thought that this would happen.
Honeycomb was not realistic but now I have hope for something better
Thanks GPhenom for thinking about donation, but I can't accept for now, I'm not even sure I'll be able to release something.
We'll see, but there is lots of work before having something usable.
Promising start man! Kudos for getting it running at all
Sent from my openAOS Build of Android 2.3 (cyanogenmod edition) using xda premium
This look cool
Can you make source repo (git) for this please
I would like to build it and test to get wifi and so working
and good work
Cool! Hope to see a first alpha
Sweet, buying a Archos 70 (hopefully Gen8, got to look that up first) today. Just awesome work dude!
AlphaTime said:
Can you make source repo (git) for this please
I would like to build it and test to get wifi and so working
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take a look here, I'm not having structured git yet...

Categories

Resources