Considering, from a hardware standpoint, how similar the Note and the 7.7 are, has anyone thought to maybe make a Honeycomb 3.2 ROM for the Note based off of a 7.7 build?
Can this be done? What are the implications? What are the technical hurdles? Is it worth it?
Thoughts and comments appreciated, and perhaps developer intrigue would be a bonus!
Jade Eyed Wolf said:
Considering, from a hardware standpoint, how similar the Note and the 7.7 are, has anyone thought to maybe make a Honeycomb 3.2 ROM for the Note based off of a 7.7 build?
Can this be done? What are the implications? What are the technical hurdles? Is it worth it?
Thoughts and comments appreciated, and perhaps developer intrigue would be a bonus!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honeycomb was tablet-only, so at the very least, you'd likely lose all phone functionality.
dwboston said:
Honeycomb was tablet-only, so at the very least, you'd likely lose all phone functionality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you think so? As far as I know Galaxy tab 7.7 is capable of making phone calls too...
lxxxxxr said:
Why do you think so? As far as I know Galaxy tab 7.7 is capable of making phone calls too...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is!
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Exactly my point! Since the 7.7, specifically the P6800, (which I own btw and it is fantastic) is a fully functioning phone in every respect, why couldn't we make a Note compatible port of its ROM?
I mean, I'm sure that once the Note does officially receive ICS, it'll be 5 minutes before someone here changes the DPI setting so that we'll effectively have full blown tablet ICS running on the Note, which is going to be awesome of course! But who knows how long that will take before we actually get ICS?
Hence my whole reasoning behind creating this post in the first place.
With Honeycomb running on the 7.7, you really do have the best of both worlds; you have a true tablet (I say this because, having used both devices, I really feel that the Note is more of a huge phone than a small tablet), and it just so happens that that tablet can double as your phone! Brilliant!
Thus, I think it would be awesome to bring Honeycomb (assuming it's even possible) to the Note. You would be able to take advantage of native hardware acceleration for the UI, as well as getting the benefit of a full tablet OS on your device, and all without sacrificing your ability to make and receive normal phone calls and SMS/MMS.
The ics Cyano ROM came about only after a leak. I doubt we will see a leak of HC as all efforts of Samsung are on the ics. And no developer would build from scratch a ROM with the ics a few weeks.
Cool idea but it will not happen.
OTOH I would love to see ics parts transferred to out GB . Gmail and browser, but they are depending on kernel, so that will not happen either.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
geonahta said:
The ics Cyano ROM came about only after a leak. I doubt we will see a leak of HC as all efforts of Samsung are on the ics. And no developer would build from scratch a ROM with the ics a few weeks.
Cool idea but it will not happen.
OTOH I would love to see ics parts transferred to out GB . Gmail and browser, but they are depending on kernel, so that will not happen either.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but the CM9 ROM for the Note is an AOSP build, which is why so many things aren't working, due to hardware driver issues and such.
With a potential HC 3.2 port from the 7.7, considering the hardware similarities, that could be maybe easier and quicker to do? I'm not a dev, so I don't know... That's kinda why I was hoping for some thoughts and opinions from a ROM cooker or dev.
Here's to hoping!
Not worth it. Honeycomb is dead, and all tablets will get ICS. It's a waste of time, and we should concentrate on ICS.
LordManhattan said:
Not worth it. Honeycomb is dead, and all tablets will get ICS. It's a waste of time, and we should concentrate on ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess... At the very least, I wonder if it's possible to cannibalize the HC drivers from the 7.7 to work with the CM9 Alpha for the Note?
I have no idea, so someone else has to answer you on that one
Biggest problem I foresee is the same reason why there was no CM8. No HC source. But I don't know much just taking a guess.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium App
rquinn19 said:
Biggest problem I foresee is the same reason why there was no CM8. No HC source. But I don't know much just taking a guess.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they released HC source when they released ICS source.
JamieD81 said:
they released HC source when they released ICS source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My bad. I missed that
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
I don't think this is a good idea, HC was ridiculously difficult to port on Soc's other than TEGRA 2. I doubt it can be done before the official ics is released. What we should be putting more effort is on the CM9 port.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Related
Either through ota updates or unofficial ports?
sorry
I don't think officially we will get ics. But there standard a great chance of getting it on our tablets.If you need icecream right now I suggest doing as I do.Dairy Queen is close to most everyone.
Good luck
erica_renee said:
I don't think officially we will get ics. But there standard a great chance of getting it on our tablets.If you need icecream right now I suggest doing as I do.Dairy Queen is close to most everyone.
Good luck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh I love dairy queen
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
gmfeny said:
Ahh I love dairy queen
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On a serious note I do think it will be ported to our device.
OK take me for a blizzard. I just finished dinner.
Quit making me hungry
Because ICS will be optimized for both tablets and phones, I think we'll begin to see a lot more tablet support from Cyanogenmod.
Speaking of which, I'm looking at buying an a500, and I was trying to find out if there is either a beta, or an unofficial CM port, but when I searched this forum for cyanogenmod I got 0 hits. Is search broken, or am I missing something? From what I've read, the bootloader lock was cracked, so why is no one on the whole a500 forum talking about CM?
I am not 100 % sure but I think cm is still on 2.3.whatever whereas we are on 3.x.x
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
suomaf said:
I am not 100 % sure but I think cm is still on 2.3.whatever whereas we are on 3.x.x
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's bc honeycomb isn't open source but ICS will be so there should be cm support.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
No icecream that stuff will make you fat
I think that we may see an official update through Acer depending on the requirements Google has for the hardware part of ICS.
I also believe that CM will most likely stay exclusive to phones. Although ICS will support both phones and tablets, I don't see CM moving away from making custom Roms for phones.
However, I do hope that the CM team will be willing to try something new seeing as the ICS code should be very similar for both Tablets and Phones.
I guess we will just have to wait and see.
monkeychef said:
I think that we may see an official update through Acer depending on the requirements Google has for the hardware part of ICS.
I also believe that CM will most likely stay exclusive to phones. Although ICS will support both phones and tablets, I don't see CM moving away from making custom Roms for phones.
However, I do hope that the CM team will be willing to try something new seeing as the ICS code should be very similar for both Tablets and Phones.
I guess we will just have to wait and see.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm as you pointed out is a team so all it takes is for root on a tab and a team member to get that tab and I'm sure cm ICS will make it to tabs.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
After checking out the cm website they already support the b&n book and the g-tab
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
my favorite ICS is Maxibon
amidoingitrite?
cm did great work on the nook color, they did what they could to make 2.3 functional on the nook adding bluetooth, bottom status bar w/ buttons and much more. i cant wait for ICS to come out and im sure they will throw some tablet love our way.
It's official! CyanogenMod 9 is coming to the eeePad Transformer!
CM 9 Progress Update
We’ve been hard at work on CM9 since Google released Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich) into the wild last month, and things are slowly starting to come together. Google did a great job with ICS and added some really awesome features which in some cases replace or deprecate functionality that we had in CM7, so we are reevaluating all of our customizations. A number of devices are already up and running with CM9, and the focus is currently on getting as many devices ready as we can. The first devices (besides the Nexus S, which you can already get from Koush’s section on ROM Manager) that we’ll have ready will mostly likely be devices based on OMAP4, MSM8660/7X30, and Exynos. We also have some Tegra2 tablets in the pipeline such as the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and Asus Transformer. Our goal is to provide continued support to all CM7 devices back to the QSD8250 series of devices such as the Nexus One. I don’t want to make any promises at this time, but that is the plan. And sorry Droid1 owners, we’re dropping support for you. Time to upgrade
There are a number of challenges that we are up against. Google has made some pretty major changes to the Android framework that break compatibility with older proprietary camera and graphics drivers in order to achieve some pretty insane performance, but I am confident that the team will be able to overcome these issues like we have in the past.
For those of you who like to build CM from source yourself, you probably know that the spin-up time when starting a CM7 build is absurdly long due to the high number of devices in our repository. Koush and Arcee have put together a solution to this problem that adds new devices on-demand to your local repository, saving on both bandwidth and the long startup time. Some other great enhancements are coming too, like a completely overhauled music app, a new file manager, and a new launcher based on stock 4.0.
If you have a Nexus S, you can check out the code and build for yourself today. More devices are on the way, and I’ll send out these status updates as we make more progress
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
...I think I just came in my pants
Well.... Thats just f'ing awesome
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
I'm sorry Roach/Prime... you were great but the wife is callin' me home.
Sent from my Transformer TF101
very good news.
xufuchang said:
very good news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am so happy as soon as it is released I will donate to these guys!
Expected Release date ??
xMini said:
Expected Release date ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First rule of CM: do not ask for an ETA.
I hope they don't wait until it works on all devices to release this. They are nearly finished it, i would use it now.
see and wait.
Hopefully it takes not to long.
Gary13579 said:
I'm sorry Roach/Prime... you were great but the wife is callin' me home.
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly what I was thinking. I love Prime and the work roach has been doing, but when I can get CM on the tablet, I will go running.
what's the advantage of CM vs Prime rom ?
Its Vanilla ICS. Most stable best battery life and best performance.
You have to try it to actually realize the differance. Which is like day and night
Swyped from my blackice'd Desire HD using Tapatalk
Well, if Roach and Gnufabio can't get any Transformer love after CM9 hits, they should know the Acer A100 forum would hail them as gods...
I did not expect we would get an official, so much as one of our brillant devs would probably do it unofficially lol.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Expect a build of cm9 from Roach with his own tweaks and improvements
Sent from my HTC Vision using xda premium
Spidey01 said:
I did not expect we would get an official, so much as one of our brillant devs would probably do it unofficially lol.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It shouldn't be that shocking, the tablet sold *really* well. Xoom, GTab 10.1, and TF were basically the honeycomb tablets.
Sent from my Transformer TF101
Maybe we will see a tablet version of MIUI for us after CM9 hits.
I mean. The nook color got MIUI after it recieved official CM7 support. I dont see why we wouldnt. I cant wait
Sent from my Transformer TF201 using xda premium
the guys from Xiaomi (company behind MIUI roms) allready working on MIUI build on ICS so once they release first ICS MIUI it should not take long till we will see our first MIUI rom for TF
imitebewrong said:
Maybe we will see a tablet version of MIUI for us after CM9 hits.
I mean. The nook color got MIUI after it recieved official CM7 support. I dont see why we wouldnt. I cant wait
Sent from my Transformer TF201 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
othar said:
what's the advantage of CM vs Prime rom ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It'll be interesting to see what the difference is. CM is usually better than stock firmware sure so being as lean and cut-back as possible while still adding in extremely useful features.
Asus have done a great job of keeping their firmware bloat-free though, so it may not be too different, performance-wise. The biggest advantage will probably come from extended support. Asus probably won't upgrade the TF101 past 4.0 - having CM pretty much ensures that it will get every version of Android in the future so long as somebody is interested in getting it running.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
unfnknblvbl said:
It'll be interesting to see what the difference is. CM is usually better than stock firmware sure so being as lean and cut-back as possible while still adding in extremely useful features.
Asus have done a great job of keeping their firmware bloat-free though, so it may not be too different, performance-wise. The biggest advantage will probably come from extended support. Asus probably won't upgrade the TF101 past 4.0 - having CM pretty much ensures that it will get every version of Android in the future so long as somebody is interested in getting it running.
Sent from my Sensation using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A lot of the "bloat" Asus has added is incredibly useful. Polaris Office is really nice, and unavailable if Asus didn't include it. Same with Supernote, which is pretty good for free. Splashtop, again, expensive software included for free.
The **** I hate is them bundling things like Netflix... it's freely available on the market, and only available in select regions, why on earth would you bundle that?
Sent from my Transformer TF101
From SamMobile.com:
"Samsung has announced that both the Galaxy S and the Galaxy Tab can handle the upgrade to Android 4.0 when looking purely at speed of the device.
However the upgrade will not arrive on these devices simply because certain hardware features will not function.
The quantity of RAM and ROM in this is a big factor.
Some of the Touhwizz functions Samsung uses will not work when combined with Android 4.0 and one of these devices."
http://www.sammobile.com/2011/12/22/official-no-android-4-0-for-galaxy-s-and-galaxy-tab/
Let the discussions begin!
I wasn't really expecting ICS :/ I guess this just makes it official that we won't get it.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
So take off touchwiz samfail!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Everything they just listed as an issue why it can't get the upgrade is a load of ****.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
yup.. i'm running an early alpha of a CM9 based ICS on my Tab and it runs fine for not having hardware acceleration etc. So I know the same applies for the Epic. Sad that Samsuck just doesn't feel like putting the effort into supporting their devices.. Oh well, hooray capitalism! =P
So, here is their source for the story:
http://www.samsungtomorrow.com/2043
It's in Korean, and reading it through google translate of babelfish is good for a chuckle.
As I interpret it, they say that the Nexus S works because it requires no carrier customization , Touchwiz or region specific features.
Also, from the babel fish translation:
"The soluble memory dosage is insufficient and will provide a satisfied use environment
There is not a possibility.
This considers the hardware evening sunlight, use environment of optimum to the customers provision
Description below being a selection which is inevitable for to understand, wishes."
I think that may mean the phone is near end of life (hardware evening sunlight)
and customers wouldn't like how ICS runs on this hardware anyway.
Oh well, we'll see how CM9 runs.
I not surprise... That's why I didn't get the galaxy tab 10.1 because im tied of Samsung BS..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
txtmikhail said:
I not surprise... That's why I didn't get the galaxy tab 10.1 because im tied of Samsung BS..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems fair...
It's really quite sad- Samsung seems to *MAKE* good hardware, they just have a piss-poor software development team.
phdeez said:
Seems fair...
It's really quite sad- Samsung seems to *MAKE* good hardware, they just have a piss-poor software development team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes.. watch in six months when jelly bean come out.. sgs2 nor galaxy tabs will get it because of some bs with hardware/software(TW).. they gonna want us to upgrade to the sgs3 or galaxy tabs v2
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2398010,00.asp
pcmag confirms.
MTD roms.........the alternative future?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
sonarchist said:
MTD roms.........the alternative future?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe, if there is an ICS port in the next 6 months that's smooth and fully functional I'd go there. But I'm moving on to LTE asap.
Just means no "official" ICS, I'm sure devs will have something for it. I would imagine that most of the people that know what they're missing will be on to new phones by then anyway.
Hopefully they can pull off cm9 for the gs series.
Sent from my AOSP Epic 4G
Samsung just keeps on giving!
This is just Samsung being downright LAZY. Heck the Nexus S is getting ICS from them right? And that is most definitely a Galaxy S phone. They just don't want to be bothered to support the Galaxy S line as a whole anymore clearly.
If we didn't have to worry about touchwiz... it would be here by now... why do we need it when the UI of ICS is far superior. At the very least release the driver source files so that devs can do it for you... Samsung needs to be more open to developers in that regard.
txtmikhail said:
I not surprise... That's why I didn't get the galaxy tab 10.1 because im tied of Samsung BS..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to this. I skipped the Galaxy Tabs for the same reason...well, that and the fact that they left out micro SD!
avlon said:
+1 to this. I skipped the Galaxy Tabs for the same reason...well, that and the fact that they left out micro SD!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True. And hdmi....comes in handy over friends houses..
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Keep in mind that this isn't just Samsung's pickiness about having their TW branding. This is also a product of carrier demands. Carriers do NOT like (for the most part) unbranded, undifferentiated phones, and they especially don't like phones that aren't preloaded with software that represents services they provide.
Frankly, I was always convinced that arrangements such as VZN's with the NFL required them to have the app on all relevant phones. The NFL is anal like that.
IOW, it's a LOT of different factors coming together keeping ICS off of Galaxy S phones, many of which are problems with how the smartphone industry itself has come to work, and targeting one player while ignoring the bigger picture--though it sure makes life easier for journalists and bloggers--cheapens the whole conversation.
Anyone have any idea?
Anyone working in Samsung?
Let's discuss
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium
we have to wait...
evil_penguin said:
we have to wait...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course,
But the question is how long...
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium
edwinpang said:
Anyone have any idea?
Anyone working in Samsung?
Let's discuss
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is already an open thread discussing your inquiries , if you want to get more details and updates . http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1513457
edwinpang said:
Of course,
But the question is how long...
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
s2 already got ics,
now note will receive ics..
later tab 7.7,8.9 and 10.1 will receive ics
well exact time that samung knows
i hope it comes soon....
I'm expecting ICS on my 7.7 LTE by mid May and hopefully earlier, but there's no way of knowing short of an explicit announcement from Samsung/Verizon. The last word from Verizon was "... sometime this year ..."
Brian
April 34th
Raptor1956 said:
I'm expecting ICS on my 7.7 LTE by mid May and hopefully earlier, but there's no way of knowing short of an explicit announcement from Samsung/Verizon. The last word from Verizon was "... sometime this year ..."
Brian
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's like saying your mum is a woman haha
Sometime this year -_-
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium
edwinpang said:
That's like saying your mum is a woman haha
Sometime this year -_-
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe she isn't! .... dun dun dunnnnnn
Yo mamma's so fat she ate all our Ice Cream Sandwiches and now we're just sitting around with no update.
burhanistan said:
Yo mamma's so fat she ate all our Ice Cream Sandwiches and now we're just sitting around with no update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol funny
Using Galaxy Tab 7.7 P6800
evil_penguin said:
s2 already got ics,
now note will receive ics..
later tab 7.7,8.9 and 10.1 will receive ics
well exact time that samung knows
i hope it comes soon....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S2 came out a while ago and it sold a lot of units so it was always in first place to receive ICS. The Note should be next.
Supposedly the galaxy tab 2 (7 and 10) should be out in the UK by the end of march but I am not sure if they are on sale yet. They are already running 4.0 so I am not sure how hard it is to port that over to the old tabs.
April end off corse
Inviato dal mio GT-P6800 usando XDA Premium HD app
clodis said:
April end off corse
Inviato dal mio GT-P6800 usando XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds possible
But any evidence?
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium
Just curious...why the hurry for ICS? What would it realistically offer beyond the ability to run Chrome (whose feature set is already nearly entirely included in the stock browser)?
I know a lot of people seem to be expecting some sort of outrageous performance increase, but having seen the Gingerbread-to-ICS transition on the Nook Color, I have personally seen no evidence to suggest that ICS will be materially faster than Honeycomb (with the possible exception of slightly less lag in the stock launcher).
Has anyone had a different experience? We can't really compare against the S2 because it never ran HC.
rhester72 said:
Just curious...why the hurry for ICS? What would it realistically offer beyond the ability to run Chrome (whose feature set is already nearly entirely included in the stock browser)?
I know a lot of people seem to be expecting some sort of outrageous performance increase, but having seen the Gingerbread-to-ICS transition on the Nook Color, I have personally seen no evidence to suggest that ICS will be materially faster than Honeycomb (with the possible exception of slightly less lag in the stock launcher).
Has anyone had a different experience? We can't really compare against the S2 because it never ran HC.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Upgrading from GB to ICS on my S2 made the android experience much better. On GB, touchwiz kept crashing at times and it was annoying and while overall once on 2.3.5 it was more or less stable. But after a slight hiccup with the upgrade (battery drain, some touchwiz crashing), I reset the entire device and from then on ICS has been running quite nicely. The browser is faster, touchwiz is faster and battery life is a lot better than before.
videos of the 7.7 on HC suggest a slightly sluggish UI and sometimes the browser is sluggish according to some sites. I've used a 10.1 and a sony tablet s, and the sony's UI is much smoother.
In videos of the new galaxy tab 2 (both 7 and 10.1) running ICS, things seem a lot smoother, especially the UI. I am hoping that the ICS upgrade on the 7.7 will make it smoother with no jerkiness.
rhester72 said:
Just curious...why the hurry for ICS? What would it realistically offer beyond the ability to run Chrome (whose feature set is already nearly entirely included in the stock browser)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because HC on the 7.7 sucks. I haven't been so disappointed since going from 2.1 to 2.2 on the old Milestone. ICS is our only hope...unless you don't mind non stock ROM.
I am not looking for any fancy feature. Just the basic with speed.
I don't know what has come to make anyone believe ICS will be faster than HC on the same hardware.
Rodney
rhester72 said:
I don't know what has come to make anyone believe ICS will be faster than HC on the same hardware.
Rodney
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it comes from the fact that pretty much every post and hands-on experience with ICS on the same hardware has had very noticeable improvements.
Xoom ICS upgrade. I see a lot of posts about the dramatic improvement in responsiveness. A friend of mine says it's night and day.
Same with the Galaxy S II.
I've seen a noticeable improvement on the Asus Transformer as well.
All this points to improvements on the Tab 7.7 with an ICS upgrade.
rhester72 said:
I don't know what has come to make anyone believe ICS will be faster than HC on the same hardware.
Rodney
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Installing an ICS (AOKP) ROM on my 10.1 sped up the interface very noticeably. Aside from the brief blanking during screen rotation, it runs as smooth as an iPad. There are also lots of nice little touches like being able to flick an app closed (like in WebOS) from the open apps pane.
Now, all the clamoring for ICS is kind of silly, and Apple device users look at that as a reason not to bother with Android, but if done right it will be a worthwhile improvement over 3.x.
I really doubt it will comes true... but worth of dreaming....
I hope so :laugh:
Im guessing Sammy and Moto got the PDK beta a month or two ago, so while it is actually possible; in my mind, I know better to than to get my hopes up.
Careful gents its the hope that kills you. ;-)
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium
i wondered how you guys still trust and make hopes with this company!!
Samsung will not give you anything sir, it is just taking from you. don't kill your self by waiting the mirage
chrisrotolo said:
Im guessing Sammy and Moto got the PDK beta a month or two ago, so while it is actually possible; in my mind, I know better to than to get my hopes up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3 months according to google, but if anything is to arrive with Jellybean it will be the Note 2 or possibly a nexus successor.
Doubt it, they have announced ICS to be released between July and August, so why would they turn sround and decide to give us JB.
Sent from my GT-P6800 using xda premium
The only way to have JB on our tab is to help the only one developer that worked hard on a CM9 porting
He needs donation since his tab is broken:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1722634
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
furius said:
The only way to have JB on our tab is to help the only one developer that worked hard on a CM9 porting
He needs donation since his tab is broken:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1722634
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No disrespect but i think he was asking about stock JB not a modified ROM built from ICS/JB , not a lot of us are instered in mofied ROMS
Is that a trick question? Lets get ICS first
Sent from my GT-P6800 using XDA Premium HD app
Well there's another dev working at the tab that I know of, Sk806.
So Locera, SK806, that's two... Still not much but value both of them.
We should be happy we get ICS, it will just make us think we got a new device,
and the step to JB won't be that hard for the devs then.. I guess..I hope.. I don't care I want ICS now please, this HC feels sluggish.
ZhenMing said:
I really doubt it will comes true... but worth of dreaming....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The nexus 7 pretty much rendered the tab 7.7 obsolete when it comes to software (and speed due to software optimization alone) . There's no salesman in the world that could sell it to a customer instead of the nexus 7.
appelflap said:
The nexus 7 pretty much rendered the tab 7.7 obsolete when it comes to software (and speed due to software optimization alone) . There's no salesman in the world that could sell it to a customer instead of the nexus 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ours has a bigger better screen ,and waaay thinner... sold! :highfive:
Skip ics. I'm running jelly bean on my galaxy nexus and I can say unequivocally that it's hands down better. I can't believe the difference.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Nope, sadly. I'd like to keep this tab for awhile longer and it would be nice if Samsung showed up Apple and keeps updating it (and other recent Galaxy devices) for at least one more version. But, nah. Maybe it will be easier for someone to port 4.1 when the 4.0 source eventually gets out?
But if not...**** it, who cares. A few interface tweaks and some nice features, but the 7.7 will still be highly usable with ICS, I would say.
Theoretically the binary blob drivers that come with ICS source should be able to be used in JB builds? I'm guessing
The main obstacle in current ICS dev is lack of ICS drivers esp as they are closed sammy blobs
appelflap said:
The nexus 7 pretty much rendered the tab 7.7 obsolete when it comes to software (and speed due to software optimization alone) . There's no salesman in the world that could sell it to a customer instead of the nexus 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless of course he is traveling salesman. Travel with Nexus 7 is somewhat restricted to about 100 meters.
I see no technical reason why the 7.7 should not be able to run JB unless JB needs 2Gb of memory.
Gaugerer said:
I see no technical reason why the 7.7 should not be able to run JB unless JB needs 2Gb of memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jelly Belly (yes i ment to say belly and not bean) does not need to have 2 gb of RAM. I hope ICS helps out the 7.7 but i also ordered a nexus 7 to see what it can offer for the price.
wintermute000 said:
Theoretically the binary blob drivers that come with ICS source should be able to be used in JB builds? I'm guessing
The main obstacle in current ICS dev is lack of ICS drivers esp as they are closed sammy blobs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking the same thing. And hoping it is indeed the case.