Hey!
I've tested both kernels already.. i want to know if there is anything that one perform better the other or something like that..
What do you think:
IMO Glados is more stable than matrix ATM also i think matrix is built off glados it has all its features but tweaked by matchkid
matrix reboots regardless of OC and glados im able to OC up 1.4 without increasing voltage without reboots. Once Pete tweaks his kernel with OC and voodoo colors ill be jumping ship. i used his his GB with absolutely no issues
Edit
Too be fair I haven't tested new matrix
I see.. and what abt CFS vc BFS?
And btw on every rom i've tested, when im at lockscreen and press the power button to turn screen off, there is some green flash on any kernel but stock.. anyone has the same? no big deal but just wondering..
guitmz said:
And btw on every rom i've tested, when im at lockscreen and press the power button to turn screen off, there is some green flash on any kernel but stock.. anyone has the same? no big deal but just wondering..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This problem is related to Voodoo Colors. Stock kernel does not have it.
so with a stock kernel, there isn't the "green flash" problem, right?
currently I use the Matr1x v13 kernel. If I install GLaDOS, I'll have the same problem?
juliano_q said:
This problem is related to Voodoo Colors. Stock kernel does not have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure that it's the kernel 100%. On GB when I ran CM7 with a voodoo kernel I had the green/yellow flicker (if the brightness wasn't at 100%). But when I switched to the GWK74 stock rooted OTA with a Voodoo kernel, that flicker was completely gone at any brightness.
pastikk said:
so with a stock kernel, there isn't the "green flash" problem, right?
currently I use the Matr1x v13 kernel. If I install GLaDOS, I'll have the same problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
using Matr1x v13 on a 4.0.3 stock rom and have no green flash problem. i9023
ah ta, valeu! nao sabia que era por causa disso a telinha verde...
yeah if u change the kernel the screen remains
i9020A here... with no brightness and with brightness the screen is the same on matr1x and glados
clocker66 said:
using Matr1x v13 on a 4.0.3 stock rom and have no green flash problem. i9023
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?!?!?!?!?
try turning on and off the screen quickly for a couple of times...
Other thing: I'm noticing a problem with the automatic brightness using the rom Neapolis (but I still can not write in that thread because I've not reached 10 posts)
guitmz said:
I see.. and what abt CFS vc BFS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using CFS
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
juliano_q said:
This problem is related to Voodoo Colors. Stock kernel does not have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get this on every single ics available for ns4g, even before installing any apps or changing the kernel.
pastikk said:
?!?!?!?!?
try turning on and off the screen quickly for a couple of times...
Other thing: I'm noticing a problem with the automatic brightness using the rom Neapolis (but I still can not write in that thread because I've not reached 10 posts)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope, no green flashes at all...
trying now glados 2.3
demo23019 said:
... i think matrix is built off glados it has all its features but tweaked by matchkid
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer GLaDOS to Matr1x but Matr1x is not built off GLaDOS. The other kernel devs have accepted Ezekeel's MODs. That's GPL, open source.
I'm running GLADOS @ the moment. Everything looks good, but I do get the green flicker but I'm sure this is normal on every Kernel w/ Voodoo.
However, when I correct my colors through Voodoo, it's not saving upon reboot. It goes back to the default 2.3.3 crap colors. Any words of advice or anyone sharing similar experiences?
phone_user said:
Matr1x is not built off GLaDOS. The other kernel devs have accepted Ezekeel's MODs. That's GPL, open source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup
i misread something in his thread
l don.tee l said:
I'm running GLADOS @ the moment. Everything looks good, but I do get the green flicker but I'm sure this is normal on every Kernel w/ Voodoo.
However, when I correct my colors through Voodoo, it's not saving upon reboot. It goes back to the default 2.3.3 crap colors. Any words of advice or anyone sharing similar experiences?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure why it doesn't save but have you tried changing your bright ness it bring to dim caused the green flicker for alot if people
If so try different settings in voodoo that will remove it I could pm you my settings if your intrested
Sent from my Crespo4G using Tapatalk
From what I've seen CFS is more stable than BFS.
Most devs request you swap back to CFS if BFS is FC-ing a lot.
Pretty sure it's only more stable because it's more common.
From what I've read CFS has more gradual performance increases while BFS relies on more peaks of performance.
What BFS is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_Fuck_Scheduler
Update
Glados 2.3... quicker than previous builds even though no mention of performance increase
this kernel is noticeably quicker than his other kernel and IMO quicker thann other kernels and smooooth also got rid of the occasional slight lag when accessing launcher
BTW im using cfs
Related
Any help would be awesome.
desairs said:
Any help would be awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you may get an answer faster by doing a search as there are several threads with this exact same question with inputs from users already.
Calkulin's current, whatever it may be.
King's 11CFS/BFS
King's 9CFS/BFS
Netarchy 4.2.1 BFS/CFS nohavs or more aggressive
Try all 6 kernels and see which you like most.
Calk's roms are always bleeding edge, most current, and he is a real dev that makes real advances, not someone that throws some **** together in a kitchen, removes a program, adds a program and calls it special.
skydeaner said:
Calkulin's current, whatever it may be.
King's 11CFS/BFS
King's 9CFS/BFS
Netarchy 4.2.1 BFS/CFS nohavs or more aggressive
Try all 6 kernels and see which you like most.
Calk's roms are always bleeding edge, most current, and he is a real dev that makes real advances, not someone that throws some **** together in a kitchen, removes a program, adds a program and calls it special.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i concur. see my sig
MYN RLS3 with King Kernel CFS11
desairs said:
Any help would be awesome.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Myn/Calkulin/Fresh (or any non-kitchen kiddie rom) with Baked Snack Kernel #6.
Miui
.............................
MikFroyo v3.2 with ziggys newest kernal= pure awesomeness!
Myn w/ stock
Where can I get these kernels(link) and do they increase the SIGNAL for your phone or just battery/make your phone run smoother?
noob_2010 said:
Where can I get these kernels(link) and do they increase the SIGNAL for your phone or just battery/make your phone run smoother?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search through the development forum. Youll find everything you need there. And no, kernels do not boost signal.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
I agree with pwnst*r. Myn's w/stock kernel.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
i like azreal with net's 4.2 bfs more aggresive uv with more smartass but not everyone can use that kernel
Calks 1.5.1 + nets 4.2 cfs agressive undervolting = EVO Perfection
2 kernels for galaxy s froyo has recently intrigued me, namely [KERNEL][OC-UV-TINYRCU-BFQ-RAMZSWAP] Super Optimized Kernel (4_2 STABLE) (2010-10-19) by laststufo, and [KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo 341MB RAM [K7 Test] [I1.2 Stable] by hardcore.
This is the speedmod kernel
and this is the super optimized kernel
I know speedmod sets the minimum clock speed to 250/300/500 depending on which one you flash and includes some fixes from voodoo and also the ULK, while the super optimized kernel includes ramzswap which decreases ram usage virtually, while adding the same implementations such as voodoo fixes and ULK.
So which one is better in your opinion? Do state your reasons.
-PS: I didn't really understood the meaning of Hz but now i kinda do thanks to Bos$. The 250/300/500 is not minimum clockspeed.
None of which. I prefer YA-OK, which gives me the most snappy feeling with a slight OC/UV that does not degrade system stability or battery life.
fraencko said:
None of which. I prefer YA-OK, which gives me the most snappy feeling with a slight OC/UV that does not degrade system stability or battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, YA-OK, smooth, fast and stable,
Poxit said:
Same here, YA-OK, smooth, fast and stable,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, loving the Ya ok!!!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
artyte said:
I know speedmod sets the minimum clock speed to 250/300/500 depending on which one you flash and includes some fixes from voodoo and also the ULK, while the super optimized kernel includes ramzswap which decreases ram usage virtually, while adding the same implementations such as voodoo fixes and ULK.
So which one is better in your opinion? Do state your reasons.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK, SpeedMod doesn't set the minimum clock speed like what you said. Read the thread for more info.
I would go for SpeedMod, haven't tried the other one yet.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
artyte said:
I know speedmod sets the minimum clock speed to 250/300/500 depending on which one you flash and includes some fixes from voodoo and also the ULK, while the super optimized kernel includes ramzswap which decreases ram usage virtually, while adding the same implementations such as voodoo fixes and ULK.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thnik you should read more about linux HZ parameter In this case HZ doesn't mean Hertz.
Great topic!
Guys tell me... Which one is better for better battery life?
YA-OK, SpeedMod or Super Optimized? (and best lag fix for stable and fast) all tweaks on?
artyte said:
2 kernels for galaxy s froyo has recently intrigued me, namely [KERNEL][OC-UV-TINYRCU-BFQ-RAMZSWAP] Super Optimized Kernel (4_2 STABLE) (2010-10-19) by laststufo, and [KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo 341MB RAM [K7 Test] [I1.2 Stable] by hardcore.
This is the speedmod kernel
and this is the super optimized kernel
I know speedmod sets the minimum clock speed to 250/300/500 depending on which one you flash and includes some fixes from voodoo and also the ULK, while the super optimized kernel includes ramzswap which decreases ram usage virtually, while adding the same implementations such as voodoo fixes and ULK.
So which one is better in your opinion? Do state your reasons.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think you're getting the concept wrong about hardcore's hz lol
Raol3k said:
Great topic!
Guys tell me... Which one is better for better battery life?
YA-OK, SpeedMod or Super Optimized? (and best lag fix for stable and fast) all tweaks on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same question from me either...
guys pls put some light here..
Which one is better for using with Doc Froyo 8.0.1 ...
better in quadrant scores also...
thanks in advance..
Bo$s said:
I thnik you should read more about linux HZ parameter In this case HZ doesn't mean Hertz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
would you please explain this, then? it may be helpful to quite a few of us
alimur_r said:
same question from me either...
guys pls put some light here..
Which one is better for using with Doc Froyo 8.0.1 ...
better in quadrant scores also...
thanks in advance..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, here's mine for the day:
loads of emails, about 8 blutetooth phone calls, combination of 3g, wifi etc. i think the key is using superpower app which really makes a huge difference. mine is set to enable data every 30mins for 3 mins. also using BLN and noLED.
but most important is i've never had a crash or freeze with this combination of rom, kernel and baseband:
Samsung Galaxy S 8GB GT-i9000 (UK unbranded version), Class 10 16gb microSD
Baseband: ADJP3
Firmware: DocRomV8_Nude&Raw.ADJP5 (rev 4)
Kernel: zenkinz YA-OK build 30 OC 1.2ghz, Hardcore Tweaks, BLN ON, Overkill lagfix without binds, NoLED
Theme: JPA_V7_Androdena_Galassia_Proper_Optimised_AOSP_Ex tended_Circle
Battery App: SuperPower XDA (3 days unplugged)
aatifahmad said:
would you please explain this, then? it may be helpful to quite a few of us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=9301613&postcount=2305
tokyogtr said:
well, here's mine for the day:
Kernel: zenkinz YA-OK build 30 OC 1.2ghz, Hardcore Tweaks, BLN ON, Overkill lagfix without binds, NoLED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry.. could U state exactly which lagfix U used in ULF?
There's 2 overkills.. JFS and EXT4.
I used JFS overkill and has freezes twice and moved down to JFS advanced.
I don't really like ya-ok. Looks like a more basic version of super optimized kernel.
artyte said:
I don't really like ya-ok. Looks like a more basic version of super optimized kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't just look, feel it
Thx to tokyo, it's my fav kernel now.
Probarly the best kernel out there
Came from SpeedMod kernel from Hardcore, which is also extremely well functioning (I1.2 stable verison). However, on my SGS, the YA-OK kernel is way faster and the feel of the phone is simply astonishing.
I'm on DOC's 7.6.2 (WXJPA) and with adv. ext4 lagfix + IOsched tweak. Phone is truly flying and finally faster than I can press the buttons - awesome!
Can't say much about battery for YA-OK, but with Hardcore's SpeedMod my SGS typically lasted 2 days (best 2,5 day). And that is push email (work and gmail), 3G on, no wifi, no gps, no bt.
Let's see how this YA-OK will do on battery? I'll report back later on...
So far - extremly well done work Zenkinz
teriemer said:
Can't say much about battery for YA-OK, but with Hardcore's SpeedMod my SGS typically lasted 2 days (best 2,5 day). And that is push email (work and gmail), 3G on, no wifi, no gps, no bt.
Let's see how this YA-OK will do on battery? I'll report back later on...
So far - extremly well done work Zenkinz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Speedmod K7-300Hz and with lagfix voodoo. (because of battery life)
There seems be a little laggy on my phone, I may think about other kernel, like YA-OK.
But battery lif is what I concern about.
Please let us know how about YA-OK on battery. Tks!
I've jumped to ya-ok, tried all the optimized kernels available. ya-ok feels the most smooth and balanced out, of course that's just me. you guys try it for yourself! lol
can't test battery yet until tomorrow
ps. shouldn't really post this in dev though.
tokyogtr said:
well, here's mine for the day:
loads of emails, about 8 blutetooth phone calls, combination of 3g, wifi etc. i think the key is using superpower app which really makes a huge difference. mine is set to enable data every 30mins for 3 mins. also using BLN and noLED.
but most important is i've never had a crash or freeze with this combination of rom, kernel and baseband:
Samsung Galaxy S 8GB GT-i9000 (UK unbranded version), Class 10 16gb microSD
Baseband: ADJP3
Firmware: DocRomV8_Nude&Raw.ADJP5 (rev 4)
Kernel: zenkinz YA-OK build 30 OC 1.2ghz, Hardcore Tweaks, BLN ON, Overkill lagfix without binds, NoLED
Theme: JPA_V7_Androdena_Galassia_Proper_Optimised_AOSP_Ex tended_Circle
Battery App: SuperPower XDA (3 days unplugged)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
awesome man....great..
thanks for the info...
everything explained by the screen shots..
Thanks again..
The poll needs YA-OK and Raspdeep's Mod...
At the moment im on YA-OK as it has similar overclocks to raspdeep with the tweak of color and sharpness
YA-OK is a winner for me at the moment
This is a kernel based on Captivate (i897) KB1 source.
I consider this kernel still in beta as I haven't run it as a daily driver much yet. I did do some testing with it though and it's been stable so far.
Normal disclaimer about you flashing at your own risk <here>.
What's in it?
Boosted in call volume
Applied hardcore's mic bias tweaks
Jhash updated to jhash3
Lowmemorykiller upgraded for TinyRCU compatability from http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/common.git;a=commitdiff;h=5545554aac04918ece318270d63cbfcb015577a9
ext4 patched and upgraded from http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/
Kernel hz set to 100
Tiny RCU patched and upgraded from http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/common.git;a=commit;h=9b1d82fa1611706fa7ee1505f290160a18caf95d
Supercurio's voodoo lagfix
Supercurio's voodoo sound v6
Neldar's backlighnotification 2.3 built in from https://github.com/project-voodoo/backlightnotification/tree/master/kernel_patches/
Compiled using codesourcery 2010.09.51 tool chain which should be faster and more battery efficient
Android_Logger (Logcat) disabled by default - enable via adding an empty file on the internal sd card named enable_debug
TUN support (needs tested)
CWM v2.5.1.3 (from voodoo lagfix)
10 point multi touch support
enabled CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT for fugu tweaks compatability
Memory configs:
CONFIG_ANDROID_PMEM_MEMSIZE_PMEM=2048
CONFIG_ANDROID_PMEM_MEMSIZE_PMEM_GPU1=4096
CONFIG_ANDROID_PMEM_MEMSIZE_PMEM_ADSP=1500
CONFIG_WLAN_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_BCM=256
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_FIMC0=12288
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_FIMC1=1024
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_FIMC2=12288
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_MFC0=32768
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_MFC1=32768
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_TEXSTREAM=10240
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_FIMD=3072
Source will be in github as soon as i can get it there.
Thanks to:
supercurio
chrisryn
existz
xcaliburinhand
hardcore
for either the help with source or the help with questions.
If I've missed anyone I apologize and will add you if you remind me.
One last thing I guess... I do this as a hobby, it's not my life.
Reserved for updates.
Was literally just about to reply in your other skullcap kernel thread that I'd be willing to check out your KB1 kernel. Figured I'd search your posts first and lo and behold...
Downloaded.
Definitely looks good, downloaded and will flash soon. I like it! Battery efficient?
Haloruler64 said:
Definitely looks good, downloaded and will flash soon. I like it! Battery efficient?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should be, there are battery saving tweaks in the code and the init files.
Let me/us know how it does for you.
Flashed
Voodoo app says kernel doesn't support extended sound controls
Weird behavior in Quadrant: froze on CPU 0/12, jumped to 10/12 on first run (probably anomaly)
You might wanna remove the FPS cap, just because
Quadrant scores hover around 1450.. bit low. eXistZ gets 1500, OverStock 1600. Not important, more like IDGAF, just saying though
Phone got a bit laggy, not sure if it's the kernel though. Animations are laggy....
For now back to eXistZ for Voodoo Sound... will flash an update
Just tried flashing this, but when opening up Voodoo Control it says that the Kernel doesn't support Voodoo Sound.
Anyone else having this issue?
EDIT: ^ ^ must have been posting at the same time...
pinoymutt said:
Just tried flashing this, but when opening up Voodoo Control it says that the Kernel doesn't support Voodoo Sound.
Anyone else having this issue?
EDIT: ^ ^ must have been posting at the same time...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uh ohh..that may just be my inability to upload the right file
checking now
I cleared RAM, i had 155 used. Under eXistZ, I have 129MB RAM after clear. Just bringing this up.
Sorry x 1000 guys
I modified my build script while I was testing today and it wasn't updating the kernel in the flash.
The zip in the OP is the correct one WITH voodoo sound now.
Haloruler64 said:
I cleared RAM, i had 155 used. Under eXistZ, I have 129MB RAM after clear. Just bringing this up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I can take a look at what all is in mem and see what I can trim.
Thanks for your work man!
great kernel so far very smooth and great call quality. only bug i noticed is when i was in recovery i went to flash another kb1 build rom (fusion) i wiped dalvik and then i got a message my back button was disabled and also i could not highlight any options i had to 3 button back into recovery then all was well. not a big deal to me but it might freak some people out just letting u know. good work man
Nice work.. i'm currently running Existz kernel and get great results with it...
Does this kernel have Voodoo Color & Sharpness ? if not, any plans to put it in ?
second question, with Existz kernel that already has voodoo lagfix, i can just flash this kernel without disabling lagfix right ?
Thanks !
TheGrub said:
Nice work.. i'm currently running Existz kernel and get great results with it...
Does this kernel have Voodoo Color & Sharpness ? if not, any plans to put it in ?
second question, with Existz kernel that already has voodoo lagfix, i can just flash this kernel without disabling lagfix right ?
Thanks !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do plan on taking a look at the color and sharpness. I just never "needed" it for myself so it was low on my list.
You don't have to disable lagfix. Since both kernels support it each one will recognize it no problem.
Cool... good to know as it does make a nice difference on our beautiful amoled screens!!
Looking forward to this new kernel!!
Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I896 using Tapatalk
Hey, so eXistZ kernel doesn't provide the best battery life, and I REALLY wanna hit up your kernel! Can you do me a favor and add a lower minimum brightness tweak? Also take a look at OverStock for FPS limit remover and such? OverStock seems to have great performance, and I haven't used your kernel enough to compare The min brightness tweak would make this a MUST have!
Also I know this is the wrong place for this, but does anyone know anything about something I heard about KB1 kernels being compatible with i9000 modems? You always needed to pair i9000 modem and kernel, but I heard somewhere you can use i9000 modems with KB1 kernels for some reason.
Haloruler64 said:
Hey, so eXistZ kernel doesn't provide the best battery life, and I REALLY wanna hit up your kernel! Can you do me a favor and add a lower minimum brightness tweak? Also take a look at OverStock for FPS limit remover and such? OverStock seems to have great performance, and I haven't used your kernel enough to compare The min brightness tweak would make this a MUST have!
Also I know this is the wrong place for this, but does anyone know anything about something I heard about KB1 kernels being compatible with i9000 modems? You always needed to pair i9000 modem and kernel, but I heard somewhere you can use i9000 modems with KB1 kernels for some reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for the minimum brightness tweak.
The Overstock 1.0 KB1 kernel had a bug that let it work with i9000 modems, but not Captivate modems. It was fixed in 1.1, but cmenard supposedly was researching to see if he could get it working with any modem. That was a while ago, haven't seen anything on it for almost 2 weeks.
I have moved from CM7 to Hombase 5.4, and found that setcpu no longer seems to do anything. on CM7 it worked as i had hoped, underclocking the phone when i was doing low intensity stuff like texting, and pushing it up to full power for videos etc. now it does nothing but tell me core temps, which are always high as its always running at 1Ghz.
Can anyone explain how to get it back to underclocking?
Many Thanks
Try a different kernel.
Sent from my CM860
ishamm said:
I have moved from CM7 to Hombase 5.4, and found that setcpu no longer seems to do anything. on CM7 it worked as i had hoped, underclocking the phone when i was doing low intensity stuff like texting, and pushing it up to full power for videos etc. now it does nothing but tell me core temps, which are always high as its always running at 1Ghz.
Can anyone explain how to get it back to underclocking?
Many Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a known issue with the OC faux kernel. I was running into the same problem with his enhanced stock kernel after using webtop. After reflashing the enhanced stock 0.2.0 it would still get stuck at max 1Ghz after using webtop, but a reboot would get the underclocking working again.
I only tried the webtop hack to see if I could get it working. I haven't gone back into it at all so I don't know if this is something that will reoccur. Although I will say that with my day to day use I have not run into any clocking issues since.
Thanks, is there a page somewhere which details which kernels do what and which would work with my rom?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ishamm said:
Thanks, is there a page somewhere which details which kernels do what and which would work with my rom?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is the page for faux's kernels. As far as details, start reading and searching through that thread as well as the threads for any ROMS you are using. 99% of the time people will either have the same problem (and possible fix), the other 1% of the time they will identify a bug (i.e. maxed out CPU).
Keep in mind faux does have different kernels for Froyo, GB, and CM7.
For some reason even if I move the slider from 1300my to 1000, when I touch the screen with at least 3 fingers for a few seconds it pegs out at 1300. I read our cpu's are daisy chained so to speak
so the 2nd core kicks in when needed. I tried cpu tuner and it gives the option to powersave and only use one core or if you choose performance it will allow Both cores. Just might be setcpu isn't designed fully for our dual core setup.
thanks for the link to kernels, but i cant find one for HomBase, or a Kernel only download on the homebase thread. i have the Version2, which has some blur, but only the 1.0Ghz clock kernel. where could i get the 1.3GHz download by itself, to see if that might help, as its the one CM7 had iirc
Thanks
ishamm said:
thanks for the link to kernels, but i cant find one for HomBase, or a Kernel only download on the homebase thread. i have the Version2, which has some blur, but only the 1.0Ghz clock kernel. where could i get the 1.3GHz download by itself, to see if that might help, as its the one CM7 had iirc
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Get the 1.3 from the faux thread that I linked to. They're in the very first post...
CM7 is the only ROM that has its own custom faux kernel. For all other ROMS just match the kernel to the build the ROM is based off of (Froyo or GB). If you're using V.2 of Homebase then use the GB one.
Update: Also, there are other kernels out there. I was only using faux's as an example since you were using CM7 and Homebase.
thanks, ive now got the 1.3Ghz kernel installed successfuly, but it still seems like setcpu will not underclock. i dont know if its normal, but the "Scaling" option is greyed out, and i cant get access to the Advanced tab. is there something im doing wrong in setcpu itself?
thanks again
ishamm said:
thanks, ive now got the 1.3Ghz kernel installed successfuly, but it still seems like setcpu will not underclock. i dont know if its normal, but the "Scaling" option is greyed out, and i cant get access to the Advanced tab. is there something im doing wrong in setcpu itself?
thanks again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lack of underclocking is a known issue with the latest OC kernel. I'm unclear whether it's actually a bug with the kernel or with setCPU not supporting dual core devices. But yeah, there's a problem with it right now. I'm on the stock enhanced, and other than the webtop issue I mentioned above, it works fine.
Scaling/advanced are not available, this is something that is determined by the kernel you are using not the app.
ok so if i understand you right i would be best off using the stock enhanced kernel (for now), as it will underclock fine?
ishamm said:
ok so if i understand you right i would be best off using the stock enhanced kernel (for now), as it will underclock fine?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's working perfectly for me, except after webtop use (which I don't normally use).
I'm still having the same issues regardless of weather I choose power save or performance it will not underclock, and those are the only governors I get the option of :s
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Hey guys..
I am a kind of guy who likes to test all kernels myself to decide which one is best for my usage..
I notice a lot of people using "Hell's Core" kernel on their nexus..
I googled and did not find a english forum for hell's core..
I generally go through the last 3-4 pages of a kernel thread to get to know the issues in that kernel.. but as I cannot do so for hell's core kernel.. I request hell's core kernel users to please mention your issues and expereances of using that kernel..
This can be a good english reference for people wanting to know more about hell's core..
and yeah google translate sucks..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2435797
simms22 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2435797
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much for your effort towards helping.. But I think you are a bit confused. I am talking about "Hell's Core" and not ultimate hell's core... For your information if you do not already know, its mentioned in the UHC thread
This Kernel is a rework of Hells-Core !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also for you and anybody else the German thread is here -> http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ss15j-jwr66v-hells-core-b38-19-09-2013-a.html
I've been using it for about 4 days now. I have noticed improved battery life. With regular usage, and not a lot of gaming, it extends the time I need to connect to a charger by about 1.5 - 2 hours (vs stock kernel).
As far as speed goes I haven't noticed any improvement but the nexus 4 is already quite fast. Also the kernel doesn't allow overclocking so you should expect about the same performance as the stock kernel.
I'm using intellidemand cpu governor at 192Mhz min value.
den5o said:
I've been using it for about 4 days now. I have noticed improved battery life. With regular usage, and not a lot of gaming, it extends the time I need to connect to a charger by about 1.5 - 2 hours (vs stock kernel).
As far as speed goes I haven't noticed any improvement but the nexus 4 is already quite fast. Also the kernel doesn't allow overclocking so you should expect about the same performance as the stock kernel.
I'm using intellidemand cpu governor at 192Mhz min value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like to try this kernel as well (on NEO 013 now) Is there not a English thread for it? I am running latest PA rom and want to give it a shot, where can I find it?
nixie2121 said:
I would like to try this kernel as well (on NEO 013 now) Is there not a English thread for it? I am running latest PA rom and want to give it a shot, where can I find it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am on pa 3.99-rc2 running hells core b38.
everything works fine, very smooth - battery drain is ok - better than stock.
here is the link
http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j...4mXLcIpMkgXEFXZuRyRyt4Q&bvm=bv.53217764,d.Yms
thanks for the link.. which do we need for PA?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
nixie2121 said:
thanks for the link.. which do we need for PA?
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PA is jwr so use anykernel.zip for jss based roms use AOSP.zip
If you choose wrong kernel,you won't brake anything,but you'll have screen tearing.
I'm using hellscore for a while,great balance on baterry live and performance.
My recommendations for hellscore.
did you say hells kernel?
simms22 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2435797
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh k i see.