Do you guys think the vibrant could handle this? But I'm sure the development here will someday get it working. Your thoughts?
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
It can handle it easily nexus S is pretty much same hardware an y wouldn't u want it its the future
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Personally Im a little let down if that really is ics. We were told it'd be a whole new ui no? Plus blue is not my color anyways.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Alex530 said:
Personally Im a little let down if that really is ics. We were told it'd be a whole new ui no? Plus blue is not my color anyways.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not even close to being done do the kernel is not even updated do an the person who leaked it said its a work in process it's alpha they got something up there sleeve
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Alex530 said:
Personally Im a little let down if that really is ics. We were told it'd be a whole new ui no? Plus blue is not my color anyways.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's Gingerbread missing that you want so bad from IceCreamSandwich?
playonline53tms said:
Do you guys think the vibrant could handle this? But I'm sure the development here will someday get it working. Your thoughts?
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh... i thought you meant like... you know.. a real ice cream sandwich... im disappointed :\
The Nexus S supports ICS so our Vibrants should run it just fine. A Nexus S is basically the same hardware as a Galaxy S with NFC support. Unfortunately I don't think we'll be getting any official ICS from Samsung. We have yet to even see Gingerbread, although Tmobile also has a say in it. I've already decided to either get the Samsung Hercules or Nexus Prime to replace my age old Vibrant. I'm leaning towards the Nexus Prime simply for first-served updates directly from Google.
Looking at the leak that could have just been edited GB, I mean any of the devs here could have made that.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Danstek said:
The Nexus S supports ICS so our Vibrants should run it just fine. A Nexus S is basically the same hardware as a Galaxy S with NFC support. Unfortunately I don't think we'll be getting any official ICS from Samsung. We have yet to even see Gingerbread, although Tmobile also has a say in it. I've already decided to either get the Samsung Hercules or Nexus Prime to replace my age old Vibrant. I'm leaning towards the Nexus Prime simply for first-served updates directly from Google.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What really sucks is I just started 2year plan I thought this was a new phone lol so who knows what they will have in 2 years.
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
playonline53tms said:
What really sucks is I just started 2year plan I thought this was a new phone lol so who knows what they will have in 2 years.
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol that sucks but this phone is not too bad compared to new phones ive had mine for a while but im still satisfied with it, ive had honeycomb run on my vibrant, not fully functioning but it runs so why not ice cream
gamikzone said:
lol that sucks but this phone is not too bad compared to new phones ive had mine for a while but im still satisfied with it, ive had honeycomb run on my vibrant, not fully functioning but it runs so why not ice cream
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exatly
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
We dont even have (official) GB fully functioning, so I wont think about any further for vibrant
I could really care less about Ice Cream Sandwhich for the Vibrant. Update is released in December, we wait at least 6 or so months for CM8 to be stable, the new update may pose new problems upon the existing ones, and by then the phone is 2 years old already. Touchwiz already offers GPU-acceleration in its launcher and browser, and for the most part, the current Honeycomb GPU acceleration is still lacking compared to that of iOS or WP7 (app drawer, screen rotation, and homescreen animation still lags a little). Not really expecting much of ICS.
XPLANE9 said:
I could really care less about Ice Cream Sandwhich for the Vibrant. Update is released in December, we wait at least 6 or so months for CM8 to be stable, the new update may pose new problems upon the existing ones, and by then the phone is 2 years old already. Touchwiz already offers GPU-acceleration in its launcher and browser, and for the most part, the current Honeycomb GPU acceleration is still lacking compared to that of iOS or WP7 (app drawer, screen rotation, and homescreen animation still lags a little). Not really expecting much of ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I don't expect alot either but they could surprise us.
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
XPLANE9 said:
I could really care less about Ice Cream Sandwhich for the Vibrant. Update is released in December, we wait at least 6 or so months for CM8 to be stable, the new update may pose new problems upon the existing ones, and by then the phone is 2 years old already. Touchwiz already offers GPU-acceleration in its launcher and browser, and for the most part, the current Honeycomb GPU acceleration is still lacking compared to that of iOS or WP7 (app drawer, screen rotation, and homescreen animation still lags a little). Not really expecting much of ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No uhh not really its suppose to make android one cross all platforms so transition to new version should be much better than it was for CM7 an there still gonna update international galaxy s we will see ICS soon cuz u can port over since its so similar an Google yet to fail me except for Gingerbread
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Emama said:
We dont even have (official) GB fully functioning, so I wont think about any further for vibrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
actually its pretty much fully functioning ever since they got gps somewhat fixed last month now its really good compared to build 1 when i used that
gamikzone said:
actually its pretty much fully functioning ever since they got gps somewhat fixed last month now its really good compared to build 1 when i used that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me gps works when it wants not when i want, its not what i called fully fixed. I always get back to froyo after using cm7 for a week.
Jasonhunterx said:
No uhh not really its suppose to make android one cross all platforms so transition to new version should be much better than it was for CM7 an there still gonna update international galaxy s we will see ICS soon cuz u can port over since its so similar an Google yet to fail me except for Gingerbread
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is going to make Android the same across all Nexus branded platforms. Touchwiz, Sense, and Blur are not going anywhere and the manufacturers still have to modify ICS for each individual device. The Galaxy S is done for official support, period. Samsung is not making any more money from the original Galaxy S compared to the SII; most owners of the original have or will already have switched devices so Samsung has no true need to update the international version. Google's 18 month update suggestion was what it was, a suggestion, and by the time December comes, the Galaxy S is about 18 months old anyways.
gamikzone said:
actually its pretty much fully functioning ever since they got gps somewhat fixed last month now its really good compared to build 1 when i used that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried multiple builds and just couldn't get reasonable battery life. I got tired of charging through usb at work. With my usage and location I get about 24 hours on undervolt 2.2 builds.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
XPLANE9 said:
Yes, it is going to make Android the same across all Nexus branded platforms. Touchwiz, Sense, and Blur are not going anywhere and the manufacturers still have to modify ICS for each individual device. The Galaxy S is done for official support, period. Samsung is not making any more money from the original Galaxy S compared to the SII; most owners of the original have or will already have switched devices so Samsung has no true need to update the international version. Google's 18 month update suggestion was what it was, a suggestion, and by the time December comes, the Galaxy S is about 18 months old anyways.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really only time can tell what they do
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Related
Oh come on Samsung, its big time we get to taste the Android Gingerbread OS for our Galaxy S Vibrant. I have a Galaxy S I9000 and I got Gingerbread update in the month of Apr-May. But Samsung has not even released Android 2.2.1 for Vibrant. Did they forget this model?
Edit: No doubt I love the amazing Cyanogenmod 7 on my Vibrant but I'd love to see the 2.3 update from Samsung (some TouchWiz love LOL).
basically they abandoned us after froyo lol
Mann get over its not coming if they promise ICS I'm good
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
Jasonhunterx said:
Mann get over its not coming if they promise ICS I'm good
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't hold your breath on that one. I think the Vibrant is dead, at least in samsung's eyes. There have been multiple leaks for Galaxy S4G, another today for the Epic and i believe the others have also seen leaks, and and still nothing for the Vibrant.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
What really pisses me off, is samsung email is MUCH better than stock.
Email http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5001/5345412768_415ac72a2c_z.jpg
I think they forgot about us, or stopped caring.
Z-Boy said:
I think they forgot about us, or stopped caring.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
T-Mobile doesn't want to cut into upgrades. Since the Vibrant 4G is out and is the current model, the original Vibrant is deprecated. It is pretty obvious, as no other carrier has been denied a Gingerbread version for the Galaxy S except for T-Mobile.
Although GB would have been nice, I am not missing anything on 2.2.1. What about you guys? Any killer apps or features that makes GB more desirable? Don't tell Crt animation and over scroll glow
archie53 said:
Don't hold your breath on that one. I think the Vibrant is dead, at least in samsung's eyes. There have been multiple leaks for Galaxy S4G, another today for the Epic and i believe the others have also seen leaks, and and still nothing for the Vibrant.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ikno but its great how similar our phones are so we should be able to port or help devs make roms 4 uz
Sent from my T959 using XDA Premium App
rakeshchn said:
Although GB would have been nice, I am not missing anything on 2.2.1. What about you guys? Any killer apps or features that makes GB more desirable? Don't tell Crt animation and over scroll glow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its the little thing like a faster, smother scrolling and improved gps no needs to use lag fix etc that make it worth upgrading. And ofc we all love to upgrade that why we are on XDA .
lotherius said:
T-Mobile doesn't want to cut into upgrades. Since the Vibrant 4G is out and is the current model, the original Vibrant is deprecated. It is pretty obvious, as no other carrier has been denied a Gingerbread version for the Galaxy S except for T-Mobile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 4G isn't much of an upgrade for current Vibrant owners imo. I don't see why we couldn't get the software it's not like it would give us a FFC or 4g(maybe). I guess for those of us smart enough to root and flash that we survive with better roms anyway. We probably should have seen this coming. I mean the only way possible to get froyo was to update via kies which hopefully won't brick your phone.
Flash miui or cm7
probably better than stock gb anyway
Vibrant+MIUI
Why complain about what you dont have when what we do you have available to us great.( no not perfect but still great)
Sent from my T959 using XDA App
JettyLife said:
Flash miui or cm7
probably better than stock gb anyway
Vibrant+MIUI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Way ahead of you buddy.
The only thing is that the developers need the GB source to make it more stable :/
Tigerbalm306 said:
The only thing is that the developers need the GB source to make it more stable :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
right, I dont really use official roms,
but it is still needed for our great dev.
Emama said:
right, I dont really use official roms,
but it is still needed for our great dev.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't matter if you use official roms or not.
without the source, battery is ****.
Conspiracy nut time lol. Maybe it's a way for samsung to keep the devs here from making a perfectly stable rom so we would have to upgrade later . End Conspiracy.
xriderx66 said:
It doesn't matter if you use official roms or not.
without the source, battery is ****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what he said...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
i have had so many phones including real gb phones and i always go back to my vibrant. who cares. just rock your vibrant for another 6 months and upgrade to whats new
unless sgs2 drops
http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/23/samsung-no-room-for-ics-on-galaxy-s-galaxy-tab-touchwiz-to-bl/
TROLOLOLO
This kind of stuff just pushes more users to buy a nexus instead of a "modified" Android device.
I know that is all I'll be buying in the future.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Mine handles it pretty well.
my phone can't handle ICS, but can i have GB at least???
rogerchew said:
my phone can't handle ICS, but can i have GB at least???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know right? They already said no gb so isnt it kind of a given were not gonna get ics.
I have ics running smooth as butter on my phone thanks to Neo.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
The thing is that there saying ics an touch wiz won't mend well most likely all the old touch wiz 3 won't get ics
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
xriderx66 said:
I have ics running smooth as butter on my phone thanks to Neo.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes totally. The word goes out to NB. He is the man. In termed if my next phone. Well I can say that even though galaxy s is almost 2 years old it still has good support from xda because of the awesome hardware. So next phone will have to have hardware just as good or it won't get much support.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Bring Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich To The Galaxy S Family http://t.co/o66h7AUL
They mean Samsung Touchwiz ICS.
They bloat and put a hell more features and the package is about twice what AOSP ROM is.
Look at CM7 size and compare to Froyo Stock.
Need I say more?
Sent from my Surround.
VeryCoolAlan said:
They mean Samsung Touchwiz ICS.
They bloat and put a hell more features and the package is about twice what AOSP ROM is.
Look at CM7 size and compare to Froyo Stock.
Need I say more?
Sent from my Surround.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
alan, we are sorry it had to come to this but GTFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO back to your Windows phone. ATLEAST you couldve gotten a iphone or something!!!! but a WINDOWS PHONE? thats as bad as blackberry
xriderx66 said:
alan, we are sorry it had to come to this but GTFOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO back to your Windows phone. ATLEAST you couldve gotten a iphone or something!!!! but a WINDOWS PHONE? thats as bad as blackberry
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awww
Nah I got it to take a break from Android and other big OS'.
WinPhone7 is really simple and that's it.
Sent from my Surround.
VeryCoolAlan said:
Awww
Nah I got it to take a break from Android and other big OS'.
WinPhone7 is really simple and that's it.
Sent from my Surround.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm joking hah anytime soon ur coming back??
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
It's amazing what our phones can do when they're not bogged down by a bloated piece of **** like TouchWiz. Running ICS perfectly fine here, no thanks to Samsung.
Lol "ice-creammy goodness"
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
you know i hate to say it, but i'm kinda curious what the 4.0 variant of TW will look like. and actually surprised with the sgs II 4.0.1 leaks no ones ripped that launcher over to the vibrant since the TW launcher does have a cult following.
boystuff said:
you know i hate to say it, but i'm kinda curious what the 4.0 variant of TW will look like. and actually surprised with the sgs II 4.0.1 leaks no ones ripped that launcher over to the vibrant since the TW launcher does have a cult following.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks well... the same.
The same ol' icons, the same noti. bar probably the only difference would be minor ones and "transitional effects"
xriderx66 said:
It looks well... the same.
The same ol' icons, the same noti. bar probably the only difference would be minor ones and "transitional effects"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i still want to play with it, cause all i've seen is the video and it didn't give me enough details. i myself have no experience in porting proprietary system .apks and wouldn't even know where to start.
xriderx66 said:
I'm joking hah anytime soon ur coming back??
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol im looking at a Galaxy S2 from ATT.
Just not now.
Sent from my Surround.
Cant wait for the galaxy s3 then after that the galaxy s5 my cuz got her htc vivid lol n my screen trmpled it lol
I just wanted to know if Google releases the ics ota for the nexus s 4g should I just stick with it instead of upgrading fully to Mac daddy galaxy nexus. I hope they release it on the sale date of the GN or before. Just want to hear some thoughts.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
I'm getting the galaxy nexus.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
But what if the ota comes before that. Essentially the Nexus S 4g will become a baby galaxy nexus. Oh yeah and CM9! Big tings agwon!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
treyweez11 said:
But what if the ota comes before that. Essentially the Nexus S 4g will become a baby galaxy nexus. Oh yeah and CM9! Big tings agwon!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already have ics on my nexus s4g. I just want the bigger screen and HD superamoled display
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium
treyweez11 said:
But what if the ota comes before that. Essentially the Nexus S 4g will become a baby galaxy nexus. Oh yeah and CM9! Big tings agwon!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The official ota isn't going to make ICS any better. The only thing it will do is add the word official to ICS.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Yeah I get what you guys are saying because I have been flashing ics roms all week. But doesn't Google do a better job at building ics and optimization
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
being paid to do something you enjoy doesnt necessarily make you better at it...
from my experience stock roms run the best. i always have some kind of issue that brings me back to stock. i would love an official ics build soon.
louderstill said:
being paid to do something you enjoy doesnt necessarily make you better at it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with this, but the amount of resources and testing at google's disposal far outweighs that of your average rom builder.
Not only that, but I'm positive that Google has specification and performance information on the phone's hardware that the average ROM developer will simply never have. I agree, custom ROMs are fun to play with, but for everyday use, you'll never beat a stock ROM.
supralover72 said:
I agree with this, but the amount of resources and testing at google's disposal far outweighs that of your average rom builder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so....
their rollout stopped
and the rom avalanche started
hmmmm
...you are
obviously correct tho...
and i'm sure they havnt looked at any
of the code floating around here
the official ICS for our phone has been out for months... OP needs to catch up on the old news
lol when the official ics gets here we will have nothing to look forward to lol.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
just install it, you'll like it
it's on the Stickies
Oh yeah, btw this cm9 with the matrix kernel is graaaaaaaavvvvyyyyyyyy
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
AllGamer said:
the official ICS for our phone has been out for months... OP needs to catch up on the old news
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By months, you mean less than a month. And there is no official ICS for the NS 4G.
bozzykid said:
By months, you mean less than a month. And there is no official ICS for the NS 4G.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL well i was thinking it was released last year
but technically it's only 5 days short to a month
treyweez11 said:
Oh yeah, btw this cm9 with the matrix kernel is graaaaaaaavvvvyyyyyyyy
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's not stable enough for my taste yet
stock original ICS from google is currently running better
AllGamer said:
LOL well i was thinking it was released last year
but technically it's only 5 days short to a month
that's not stable enough for my taste yet
stock original ICS from google is currently running better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on kang 15 and steve.garons latest kernel. You and I have very different opinions of stable. Mine is top notch. No hiccups. If u want to wait, by all means, I was...then broke down and the current roms are fantastic.
It takes less than 5mins to root, make a backup, copy that backup yo PC, then unlock boot loader and flash a new rom. If u don't like it, there always that backup you can restore. Too easy to sit around and complain when there are alternatives
I'm always finding things that don't work on custom kernels and it drives me insane!! I'll try to show someone something cool, and it takes me 15 minutes just to get it working, then I just look stupid because the rom I have isn't compatible with ___, or it's missing ___ (fill in the blank)
Yeah, they are fun to play with, and it's nice to have the cool mods & tweaks that come with them, but when you want your phone to "just work" then there's nothing better than a nice stable official rom that does everything you throw at it. speed & extra performance is great, but stability and compatibility outweigh those every single time, imho
hp420 said:
I'm always finding things that don't work on custom kernels and it drives me insane!! I'll try to show someone something cool, and it takes me 15 minutes just to get it working, then I just look stupid because the rom I have isn't compatible with ___, or it's missing ___ (fill in the blank)
Yeah, they are fun to play with, and it's nice to have the cool mods & tweaks that come with them, but when you want your phone to "just work" then there's nothing better than a nice stable official rom that does everything you throw at it. speed & extra performance is great, but stability and compatibility outweigh those every single time, imho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't help but agree that ota is most stable But I feel the same way as you. Stability first. Yet I myself am not suffering from any issue. I find my self surround by multiple galaxy nexus owners daily and I am showing them stuff w my oG. Vice versa, just throwing it out there. I have been lucky when I have been flashing phones, many many manyphones hahaha. They all take well to me. I hate a screwed up glitchy phone
So I sold my GS3 for a Galaxy Nexus because I wanted to experience Jelly Bean. Well after a week I'm back and heres why.
1. Screen bigger and better
2. Camera much better
3.phone felt much snappier(although I wasn't on Jellybean)
4.volume much louder and crisp
5.GSM Nexus had no LTE and below standard HSpa+ never over 6 mbps
So if your in to specs I say the Gs3 is the place for you.
Also if buying the Nexus off craigslist make sure it's able to receive the update the one I bought was on the wrong radio and was told it would not which Is why I sold it too.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Well, not to be bashful or anything, but I figured going with the GSIII was a given. Jelly Bean may be great, but it's not going to do anything to get the GNex up to GSIII standards. And no worries, GSIII will get it's fill of Jelly Bean goodness soon enough.
I had the galaxy nexus, I want on JB, I have no regrets switching.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
JB will come for GS3 soon enough
Love the nexus but sold it last week. Jelly bean will soon hit roms so not a huge loss and I'll definitely be picking up the new nexus when ever it comes out.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Tapatalk
Nickel Dime Bay said:
JB will come for GS3 soon enough
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it won't. Official ics only just now rolled out for some sgs2 phones.The SDK was released in October of last year.
You might get some carrier leaks (buggy asz shiz) or cm10 (less buggy) but that will probably be many months.
nabbed said:
No it won't. Official ics only just now rolled out for some sgs2 phones.The SDK was released in October of last year.
You might get some carrier leaks (buggy asz shiz) or cm10 (less buggy) but that will probably be many months.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me personally I can wait, I never run stock and the amount or ROM's the international version has will keep me busy for a long time.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
We will be rocking cm10 in very little time.
Or at least beta of it.
Since pics to jellybean isn't a major overhaul. Like froyo to gingerbread or ginger to pics.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
humdrum2009 said:
We will be rocking cm10 in very little time.
Or at least beta of it.
Since pics to jellybean isn't a major overhaul. Like froyo to gingerbread or ginger to pics.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very little time = many months?
If you mean like a month or so, where do you come up with that bs?
The numbers speak clearly - look up froyo to gb, or gb to ics timeline.
nabbed said:
Very little time = many months?
If you mean like a month or so, where do you come up with that bs?
The numbers speak clearly - look up froyo to gb, or gb to ics timeline.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look up the change log and structure between those earlier android versions then go look at jelly bean compared to ics. Believe it or not the change isn't a complete overhaul, they meant for it to be that way.
Ps. there is already a beta jellybean on the international version, and we got cm9 and aokp within the first few weeks of the phone being out, the s3 is a whole nother beast compared to the s2
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
mastarifla said:
Look up the change log and structure between those earlier android versions
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Enlighten me. Where can I find a "change log and structure" for Gingerbread/ICS and ICS/JB?
And how do those relate to programming an aosp rom?
Please.
nabbed said:
Enlighten me. Where can I find a "change log and structure" for Gingerbread/ICS and ICS/JB?
And how do those relate to programming an aosp rom?
Please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here's a little info on what's being worked for CM10 if you haven't seen I already.
https://plus.google.com/117962666888533781522/posts/BMQiaHhSMte?hl=en
masaidjet said:
Here's a little info on what's being worked for CM10 if you haven't seen I already.
https://plus.google.com/117962666888533781522/posts/BMQiaHhSMte?hl=en
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really wasn't interested, if you haven't guessed yet.
I was making a point about JB not being easily ported compared to ics or gb.
Im no dev but the majority of ICS porting applies to JB. Under the hood they are very similar. Google Now, the new voice software, and the triple buffering (kernel level stuff) are the major differences. Google now is an APK and the voice isn't requiring a lot of work either I'm sure.
If we don't have a fairly strong jb aosp in a month I would be surprised.
Sent from my AT&T Galaxy SIII (SGH-i747)
I kept my GNex as my backup to my GSIII. Praying for some AOKP love over here in Verizon GSIII land, lol.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
I think it's pretty obvious that the jump from GB to ICS is what took so long. imagine trying to get all your current apps and data and customization to work with a new OS with zero hiccups and nothing lost. ICS is so completely different from GB, I'm not surprised it took so long. The jump to JB from ICS isn't nearly as large, as some people have pointed out. I'm banking on us getting it early Q4.
jbzcar said:
I kept my GNex as my backup to my GSIII. Praying for some AOKP love over here in Verizon GSIII land, lol.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha right? The only thing that bothers me about the gnex is the screen and camera, the screen for some reason on my GS3 looks much better
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
jgalan14 said:
Ha ha right? The only thing that bothers me about the gnex is the screen and camera, the screen for some reason on my GS3 looks much better
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup and it's spec wise not much bigger but the Gs3s screen just looks much nicer and bigger.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
CM 10 doesn't require a bunch of new drivers or official blobs from Samsung so it should be rewrite of code and implementing the apps and such. If the SGS III got AOSP ICS in weeks I'd say cm 10 might be weeks away from the point source was released. I'm not positive cause I'm not on a computer, but I think Steve Kondik (Cyanogen) has the SGS III for T-Mobile. I'm no where near a PC (just my phone til Monday)... if he is on the device as the main team member, we are looking at great nightlys and then some.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
mt3g said:
CM 10 doesn't require a bunch of new drivers or official blobs from Samsung so it should be rewrite of code and implementing the apps and such. If the SGS III got AOSP ICS in weeks I'd say cm 10 might be weeks away from the point source was released. I'm not positive cause I'm not on a computer, but I think Steve Kondik (Cyanogen) has the SGS III for T-Mobile. I'm no where near a PC (just my phone til Monday)... if he is on the device as the main team member, we are looking at great nightlys and then some.
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree he actually has post in the nightly build topic, so he most likely is working on it
Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2
Hopefully T989 will be too...
http://www.youmobile.org/blogs/entr...alaxy-S2-to-get-Android-4-1-Jelly-Bean-Update
jazzytofu said:
Hopefully T989 will be too...
http://www.youmobile.org/blogs/entr...alaxy-S2-to-get-Android-4-1-Jelly-Bean-Update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be nice, but this means nothing to us. Almost 2 completely different phones with the same name.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Smh... lol
Mr.Knitty said:
Smh... lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please, share your input. Enlighten us
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
jazzytofu said:
Hopefully T989 will be too...
http://www.youmobile.org/blogs/entr...alaxy-S2-to-get-Android-4-1-Jelly-Bean-Update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After not getting gingerbread on the vibrant (the only galaxy s1 variant that didn't), it wouldn't surprise me if they didn't update this variant of the gs2 beyond ICS just to keep the streak alive of not fully supporting updates for Samsung phones on T-Mobile.
Exhibit A: behold 2
Exhibit B: galaxy s vibrant
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
HeavyA said:
After not getting gingerbread on the vibrant (the only galaxy s1 variant that didn't), it wouldn't surprise me if they didn't update this variant of the gs2 beyond ICS just to keep the steak alive of not fully supporting updates for Samsung phones on T-Mobile.
Exhibit A: behold 2
Exhibit B: galaxy s vibrant
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention the sales they make on people upgrading for new software alone.
Whether we see it officially or not, we will see a stable version for our phones from the devs here.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Towle said:
Not to mention the sales they make on people upgrading for new software alone.
Whether we see it officially or not, we will see a stable version for our phones from the devs here.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, this is my first samsung phone so I didn't know such sad history existed. Well, whatever will be, I hope cm10 will be stable by then. I'm not a big fan of TouchWiz myself. My next phone will be a Google device phone. OS support is more important to me than specs
Towle said:
Please, share your input. Enlighten us
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its no point... So o well
Towle said:
Not to mention the sales they make on people upgrading for new software alone.
Whether we see it officially or not, we will see a stable version for our phones from the devs here.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amen Bro ! Thats why I love this site so much. It doesn't really matter what T-Mobile does so its kind of a pointless conversation. I would't really even take the KIES update or OTA update from T-Mobile anyways. I will wait untill someone here gets a good stable JB Release. I am reluctant to change because my ICS rom is so smooth and stable but I know within a few months it will be worth it. It's like a slap in the face to the slow and bloated T-Mo. Rom.
jcnbama said:
Amen Bro ! Thats why I love this site so much. It doesn't really matter what T-Mobile does so its kind of a pointless conversation. I would't really even take the KIES update or OTA update from T-Mobile anyways. I will wait untill someone here gets a good stable JB Release. I am reluctant to change because my ICS rom is so smooth and stable but I know within a few months it will be worth it. It's like a slap in the face to the slow and bloated T-Mo. Rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't do a kies update either. My hope is for Samsung to release source so that the devs here have more to work with. That was what dogged the vibrant. They eventually released Froyo for it, but nothing further. The GB/ICS/JB releases for it were all ported from either the i9000 or the Nexus S, and had to be tweaked since there was no actual source to work with for the vibrant itself. That's why the GPS was so spotty on it on any version of android after Froyo. I'm glad that my insurance replacement for my busted Vibrant was the Hercules, which is still in the window of time (was it 18 months?) that they pledged to support upgrades to android. Whether we actually see it is another story. At least the devs here really kick some butt on the ROMs they release.
Just got JB on my tf300 2 days ago
Asus updates waaaay quicker than Samsung! Maybe later on I could get an Asus Phone.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1736726
There's already a Jelly Bean discussion thread that has been hidden away at the top of this forum
Closed