Found this benchmark suite, looks neat, lots of tests, should be a good stress test app IMO. Man this Fascinate is stupid fast now.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
It's not a great stress test as it really seems to be CPU focused and doesn't test the GPU at all
DL'ing now to give it a try...
not that it matters, but regardless of the app, the logo is kick-ass IMO.
It may not be a true stress test, but it did a better job for me than quadrant. Thinking of trying Smartbench next. Got any recommendations for a true stress test?
drnihili said:
It may not be a true stress test, but it did a better job for me than quadrant. Thinking of trying Smartbench next. Got any recommendations for a true stress test?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been using stabilitytest from the market, but I believe setcpu has a stress test feature as well.
drnihili said:
It may not be a true stress test, but it did a better job for me than quadrant. Thinking of trying Smartbench next. Got any recommendations for a true stress test?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better job than quadrant? How so?
cesium said:
It's not a great stress test as it really seems to be CPU focused and doesn't test the GPU at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what are all those graphic test are doing?
*coughs*Rendering score*coughs*
Related
I know some people don't believe in benchmarks for Android, so take it for what it's worth. To me, the results have been somewhat on point, in terms of the speed of the ROM. I will be updating this as more ROMs come out, but if anyone wants another ROM tested, just let me know.
About the benchmarks...
- All test were done after a clean flash of the ROM.
- ROM was never signed into Google.
- Only apps installed were Advanced Task Manager, SetCPU and Swapper(and benchmark apps).
- All test were done while in Airplane Mode(to cut down on background network activity).
- Ended all processes before running each test.
- Alls ROMs(except the Hero ROMs) had Swap/Compcache disabled and CPU set at 384min/528max.
- Hero ROMs were set with 96MB swap and CPU set at 384min/528max.
- The results here are from the best of 5 runs. I did not want to take the average because there were some inconsistent results that would have thrown it off.
Lower = Faster only for the first test.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
nice. Can't say I would of had the patience to do this, lol. Very interesting to see though, thanks for sharing.
Klyentel said:
nice. Can't say I would of had the patience to do this, lol. Very interesting to see though, thanks for sharing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really doesnt take that long. Just flash the new test ROM, batch install a few apps, run the test, then nandroid back to my everyday ROM.
Updated
10char
Is faster lower on all 3 tests or just on the first one?
billygoat555 said:
Is faster lower on all 3 tests or just on the first one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just the first one is lower=faster.
Just thought i'd try and find out what everyone's benchmarks are. And how your daily use is.
Daily usage for me is great there is a little bit of lag on auto rotate, I'm guessing that is why they did not use touchwiz 3.0 in the first place wen the epic came out. And bout the gps issue, I don't really use gps much at all so it is not a concern for me right now. My neocore is around 55fps, linpack is around 20 mflops, benchmarkpi is around 1200 and the unreliable quadrant is around 1024. I say unreliable because I have setcpu at 100-1ghz conservative, and my quadrant is reading my cpu at around 1300. Samsung epic. 2.2 froyo. benchmark tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Neocore was 55.7
Linpack was 13.something MFlops in 6 seconds
I feel like those should be higher
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I have a filling that setcpu is only a gimmick doing nothing.
dito33
dito33 said:
I have a filling that setcpu is only a gimmick doing nothing.
dito33
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if the kernel supports 1300 maybe thats why quadrant sees it that way...As for setcpu you need an overclocked kernel that supports higher clocks,but this is also used to aquire better battery life...And it does work,period.
i think i have a problem.
i can only get a max of 1800 points in quadrant standard with revolution hd rom and setcpu with autodemand 245-1228.
why is this happening? i've done a factory default and the same.
Don't pay attention to these benchmarks... they tell you nothing. And noting wrong with that score, it's high enough, upgrading to ARHD 3.x might help.
If you are dumb enough to rate a phones performance on such bad benchmarks then..
Turn setCPU to performance
Restart your phone and kill all apps with task killer
Turn off sync/wifi
and update your rom maybe..
AR 2.0.11? AR 3.3 is already out...
quadrant scored really doesn't say a lot for the ROMS. you may have high 2000s scores but your battery lasts only have a day.. doesn't really means a thing
For me it was difficult to get consistent results with Quadrant.
Upgrading the app changed results dramatically.
You can run a benchmark now, and again in 5 minutes time and the results can be way different.
It was great at first but frustrating after a while.
For example: (on stock rom)
Original (2053)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Then I updated the app (1773)
Then 12 minutes later (1813)
Obviously many factors are involved but as Foladko and Baste07 suggest - I wouldn't pay too much attention. It's not as cut and dry as for example overclocking a desktop PC.
I know is basically meaningless but still post your top score
just for grins
heres mine\/\/\/\/\/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CM7
Netarchy-nexus 1.3.0.2
max cpu 1300
min cpu 800
OC'd
miui 1.4.15
oc 1,4ghz performance
wuadrant scores actually do have meaning as long as you are comparind scores within the same device hardware (and not using any cheats or tricks) because it lets you compare how well your hardware is performing based on other people's harddware. but it does NOT have meaning comparind scores across different device models. at that point its meaningless.
company A could optimize a 500mHz phone to be smooth as butter, super optimized and efficient working on it for 3 years. while company B could not do crap, release a 2gHz phone, but not optimize it at all. so scores between those 2 devices would be meaningless.
RogerPodacter said:
wuadrant scores actually do have meaning as long as you are comparind scores within the same device hardware (and not using any cheats or tricks) because it lets you compare how well your hardware is performing based on other people's harddware. but it does NOT have meaning comparind scores across different device models. at that point its meaningless.
company A could optimize a 500mHz phone to be smooth as butter, super optimized and efficient working on it for 3 years. while company B could not do crap, release a 2gHz phone, but not optimize it at all. so scores between those 2 devices would be meaningless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theres no way to distinguish if they're cheating on the benchmark.. unless they're using Quadrant Advanced.
After 48H of using this new leader in phone industry from Oppo need to test performances on mine phone, for this i test using the app Antutu Benchmark 3D .
Mine phone is up to date, android 12 using wifi 6 home fiber connection and 4G+ connection in france
After several tests mine Oppo is said to have a result score of 870713 .... 5 position on the list of phones
May some of you test this value on yours ?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Mine
franagan75 said:
Mine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impressive score
Anyone can test his phone thanks for reply to both replyers
franagan75 said:
Mine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
huge difference with mine
reverantjo said:
huge difference with mine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you have high performance mode turned on? I had it activated
Will have this available and retest thanks @franagan75
After last test improvement immediatly
948125
Seems every phone i've possessed over past 3 years has under-performed compared to many others... Never getting above 895k even on high-perf mode ... so that's still a good 5% under what others are posting
Here s new benchmark i made using Pc Benchmark Android results on the way
Antutu is not quite good today 916391
why such difference between test on same phone ?