I know is basically meaningless but still post your top score
just for grins
heres mine\/\/\/\/\/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CM7
Netarchy-nexus 1.3.0.2
max cpu 1300
min cpu 800
OC'd
miui 1.4.15
oc 1,4ghz performance
wuadrant scores actually do have meaning as long as you are comparind scores within the same device hardware (and not using any cheats or tricks) because it lets you compare how well your hardware is performing based on other people's harddware. but it does NOT have meaning comparind scores across different device models. at that point its meaningless.
company A could optimize a 500mHz phone to be smooth as butter, super optimized and efficient working on it for 3 years. while company B could not do crap, release a 2gHz phone, but not optimize it at all. so scores between those 2 devices would be meaningless.
RogerPodacter said:
wuadrant scores actually do have meaning as long as you are comparind scores within the same device hardware (and not using any cheats or tricks) because it lets you compare how well your hardware is performing based on other people's harddware. but it does NOT have meaning comparind scores across different device models. at that point its meaningless.
company A could optimize a 500mHz phone to be smooth as butter, super optimized and efficient working on it for 3 years. while company B could not do crap, release a 2gHz phone, but not optimize it at all. so scores between those 2 devices would be meaningless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theres no way to distinguish if they're cheating on the benchmark.. unless they're using Quadrant Advanced.
Related
as the title says i found it interesting Stock on I9000M JH2 runs faster than Stock I9000 according to this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
A speedup of 3%.... No offence, but I can do nothing but laugh when I see excitement over such a marginal speed increase (especially in a benchmark).
It's like comparing a 1.03GHZ processor over a 1GHZ processor.
that's the point, it seems like the JH2 stock ROM is better optimized, after all it's the same hardware
(Fixed the percentage). 3% isn't high enough to be of statistical value though. All firmware gets faster, but 3% isn't likely to be noticeable..
Furthermore, the speed increase may have come because a function which is heavily used by the benchmark program has been optimised, whilst real apps may use it less.
It's typical for firmware to get faster, but a 3% increase probably has no real-life impact on productivity on a phone (until they accumulate). And it doesn't really say the i9000M is faster in all situations. It might only be in the benchmark.
Btw, whilst I am no fan of quadrant, which version of stock rom are you comparing with? A late version, or the one shipped in the box originally?
Either way, let us know when there are MAJOR noticeable differences maybe (10% perhaps), because I wonder if simply turning on MobileAP (and streaming some traffic through) is enough to affect the scores by a few percent..
5% margin of error
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Just thought i'd try and find out what everyone's benchmarks are. And how your daily use is.
Daily usage for me is great there is a little bit of lag on auto rotate, I'm guessing that is why they did not use touchwiz 3.0 in the first place wen the epic came out. And bout the gps issue, I don't really use gps much at all so it is not a concern for me right now. My neocore is around 55fps, linpack is around 20 mflops, benchmarkpi is around 1200 and the unreliable quadrant is around 1024. I say unreliable because I have setcpu at 100-1ghz conservative, and my quadrant is reading my cpu at around 1300. Samsung epic. 2.2 froyo. benchmark tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Neocore was 55.7
Linpack was 13.something MFlops in 6 seconds
I feel like those should be higher
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
I have a filling that setcpu is only a gimmick doing nothing.
dito33
dito33 said:
I have a filling that setcpu is only a gimmick doing nothing.
dito33
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if the kernel supports 1300 maybe thats why quadrant sees it that way...As for setcpu you need an overclocked kernel that supports higher clocks,but this is also used to aquire better battery life...And it does work,period.
i think i have a problem.
i can only get a max of 1800 points in quadrant standard with revolution hd rom and setcpu with autodemand 245-1228.
why is this happening? i've done a factory default and the same.
Don't pay attention to these benchmarks... they tell you nothing. And noting wrong with that score, it's high enough, upgrading to ARHD 3.x might help.
If you are dumb enough to rate a phones performance on such bad benchmarks then..
Turn setCPU to performance
Restart your phone and kill all apps with task killer
Turn off sync/wifi
and update your rom maybe..
AR 2.0.11? AR 3.3 is already out...
quadrant scored really doesn't say a lot for the ROMS. you may have high 2000s scores but your battery lasts only have a day.. doesn't really means a thing
For me it was difficult to get consistent results with Quadrant.
Upgrading the app changed results dramatically.
You can run a benchmark now, and again in 5 minutes time and the results can be way different.
It was great at first but frustrating after a while.
For example: (on stock rom)
Original (2053)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Then I updated the app (1773)
Then 12 minutes later (1813)
Obviously many factors are involved but as Foladko and Baste07 suggest - I wouldn't pay too much attention. It's not as cut and dry as for example overclocking a desktop PC.
Just got my Nexus S the other day (for free! woo!) and I am loving it so far. Came from a Captivate to this phone and it is a lot nicer imho. I am currently running Brainmaster's MIUI ROM and Matr1x's Kernel.
Here are some awesome Quadrant Scores (Running 1.44GHz, stable but I'm running 1.2Ghz for daily user to save on battery life)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Loving it. This is a great piece of hardware. Was looking at the Atrix but figured this would be more fun until a dual core Nexus comes out
use paid version of quadrant and you will see why your score is so high
most of your high score has nothing to do with hardware performance you're using ext4 hack that comes with most kernels to trick people like you into thinking your phone is as fast if not faster than dual core phone when
its not
Never said it was as fast/faster as a dual core. Just comparing to other Nexus S quadrant scores and compared to my Captivate, it is much faster. I got it purely for the fact that it is easy to mod. And I do have the paid version, just need to redownload it.
Your making me jealous..
Haha.
What is this obsession with posting e-pen quadrant scores anyway?
Is it impossible for anyone to just say "Nice combo" or "Glad you are enjoying your phone!" instead of complaining like an emo high school kid. I mean, come on...
Running on stock N, with background services tweaking....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This should be in the same level of Galaxy S6/Note 5
Please share yours...
No interest here? Such a bummer. I was hoping to see 2.3-2.5K from those with custom ROM.
^_^
I ran this benchmark and scored worse than you running the ROM, kernel, tweaks, etc. all listed in my signature, so I decided to not even post them. I then tried running with performance governors on both clusters and the phone hotplugged the Big cluster before the benchmark was complete, ending up with even worse scores.
Alcolawl said:
I ran this benchmark and scored worse than you running the ROM, kernel, tweaks, etc. all listed in my signature, so I decided to not even post them. I then tried running with performance governors on both clusters and the phone hotplugged the Big cluster before the benchmark was complete, ending up with even worse scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, it could be the result of throttling. I usually run mine after idling it for a while. If I run it more than once, it will drop to 1600-1700-ish.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
Running on N DP2
Mine is much lower with DU + Elementalx
Traxex_ said:
Mine is much lower with DU + Elementalx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something is eating up resources, Mem and Web are really low. Close all apps and kill background services. N has about 200-300 better score than M.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
All stock, rootless....
Broke the 2K barrier