i think i have a problem.
i can only get a max of 1800 points in quadrant standard with revolution hd rom and setcpu with autodemand 245-1228.
why is this happening? i've done a factory default and the same.
Don't pay attention to these benchmarks... they tell you nothing. And noting wrong with that score, it's high enough, upgrading to ARHD 3.x might help.
If you are dumb enough to rate a phones performance on such bad benchmarks then..
Turn setCPU to performance
Restart your phone and kill all apps with task killer
Turn off sync/wifi
and update your rom maybe..
AR 2.0.11? AR 3.3 is already out...
quadrant scored really doesn't say a lot for the ROMS. you may have high 2000s scores but your battery lasts only have a day.. doesn't really means a thing
For me it was difficult to get consistent results with Quadrant.
Upgrading the app changed results dramatically.
You can run a benchmark now, and again in 5 minutes time and the results can be way different.
It was great at first but frustrating after a while.
For example: (on stock rom)
Original (2053)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Then I updated the app (1773)
Then 12 minutes later (1813)
Obviously many factors are involved but as Foladko and Baste07 suggest - I wouldn't pay too much attention. It's not as cut and dry as for example overclocking a desktop PC.
Related
I know some people don't believe in benchmarks for Android, so take it for what it's worth. To me, the results have been somewhat on point, in terms of the speed of the ROM. I will be updating this as more ROMs come out, but if anyone wants another ROM tested, just let me know.
About the benchmarks...
- All test were done after a clean flash of the ROM.
- ROM was never signed into Google.
- Only apps installed were Advanced Task Manager, SetCPU and Swapper(and benchmark apps).
- All test were done while in Airplane Mode(to cut down on background network activity).
- Ended all processes before running each test.
- Alls ROMs(except the Hero ROMs) had Swap/Compcache disabled and CPU set at 384min/528max.
- Hero ROMs were set with 96MB swap and CPU set at 384min/528max.
- The results here are from the best of 5 runs. I did not want to take the average because there were some inconsistent results that would have thrown it off.
Lower = Faster only for the first test.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
nice. Can't say I would of had the patience to do this, lol. Very interesting to see though, thanks for sharing.
Klyentel said:
nice. Can't say I would of had the patience to do this, lol. Very interesting to see though, thanks for sharing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It really doesnt take that long. Just flash the new test ROM, batch install a few apps, run the test, then nandroid back to my everyday ROM.
Updated
10char
Is faster lower on all 3 tests or just on the first one?
billygoat555 said:
Is faster lower on all 3 tests or just on the first one?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just the first one is lower=faster.
as the title says i found it interesting Stock on I9000M JH2 runs faster than Stock I9000 according to this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
A speedup of 3%.... No offence, but I can do nothing but laugh when I see excitement over such a marginal speed increase (especially in a benchmark).
It's like comparing a 1.03GHZ processor over a 1GHZ processor.
that's the point, it seems like the JH2 stock ROM is better optimized, after all it's the same hardware
(Fixed the percentage). 3% isn't high enough to be of statistical value though. All firmware gets faster, but 3% isn't likely to be noticeable..
Furthermore, the speed increase may have come because a function which is heavily used by the benchmark program has been optimised, whilst real apps may use it less.
It's typical for firmware to get faster, but a 3% increase probably has no real-life impact on productivity on a phone (until they accumulate). And it doesn't really say the i9000M is faster in all situations. It might only be in the benchmark.
Btw, whilst I am no fan of quadrant, which version of stock rom are you comparing with? A late version, or the one shipped in the box originally?
Either way, let us know when there are MAJOR noticeable differences maybe (10% perhaps), because I wonder if simply turning on MobileAP (and streaming some traffic through) is enough to affect the scores by a few percent..
5% margin of error
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
There are two current ICS Sense Kernel for DHD, as what I know.
BeastMode
Virtuous
I had comparison with few benchmark tools.
wifi on, mobile off, auto-sync, gps ..etc are off.
max freq selected most near to 1.5GHz (1.498 or 1.517GHz). governor performance(always Max freq). none altered.
omittted first result. these are 2nd and 3rd. also scores could vary with configurations, apps, receptions etc. this is just n00b's comparison.
While benchmarking, No FC or error found except Linpack for Android.
(found Inaccurate Result in both 3 of them not always.. wish It had no advertisement while "Testing.." ad could poison this.)
Stability and Battery Life is not in my concern.
needed to save battery from wear is highly expected.. its 2yrs old now..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
site resized that chars may visible. numbers with red are Average.
BeastMode1.5 linaro compiled by p2pjack
BeastMode1.5 gcc compiled by p2pjack
Virtuous 3.0.43 Kernel by chrisch1974
Beast Mode Kernel links are dead mate. any chance of re linking please.
Because those are posted on Sabsa Prime thread, and it was invisible for a while. Now links are back!.
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda app-developers app
Running on stock N, with background services tweaking....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This should be in the same level of Galaxy S6/Note 5
Please share yours...
No interest here? Such a bummer. I was hoping to see 2.3-2.5K from those with custom ROM.
^_^
I ran this benchmark and scored worse than you running the ROM, kernel, tweaks, etc. all listed in my signature, so I decided to not even post them. I then tried running with performance governors on both clusters and the phone hotplugged the Big cluster before the benchmark was complete, ending up with even worse scores.
Alcolawl said:
I ran this benchmark and scored worse than you running the ROM, kernel, tweaks, etc. all listed in my signature, so I decided to not even post them. I then tried running with performance governors on both clusters and the phone hotplugged the Big cluster before the benchmark was complete, ending up with even worse scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, it could be the result of throttling. I usually run mine after idling it for a while. If I run it more than once, it will drop to 1600-1700-ish.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
Running on N DP2
Mine is much lower with DU + Elementalx
Traxex_ said:
Mine is much lower with DU + Elementalx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something is eating up resources, Mem and Web are really low. Close all apps and kill background services. N has about 200-300 better score than M.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
All stock, rootless....
Broke the 2K barrier
Hey,
so I did research for like 3 days but I can't find any solutions relating to my problem. My G6 ist running on v30b so its updated to the newest version. But at easiest tasks it is so laggy and stuttering. Playing games you can forget about, also apps like Snapchat are a disaster. I deleted or disabled all bloatware I could find.
So I tried this CPU "benchmark" and it seems like the CPU is kinda locked or limited at 1GHz. The performance is dropping to red but the CPU still stays at the excactly same level, why? (Screenshot) The max CPU clock also says 1,59 GHz there first. The G6 wasnt hot at all ans not charging.
I was irritated and like 10 minutes later I started a new test. Now the Max clock was correct and it also started at 2Ghz but after 1 minute it dropped all the way down to 1GHz and stays there at the same level. The performance is completely red. I really cant unterstand why this is happening, hoping some of you can help me.
Thank you so much in advance!
First test
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Second test
Virus/trojan - run bitdefender or kaspersky scan.
Some adware/bitmining program. Full backup, then full reset of phone to factory fresh.
Something broken with the hardware - eg the cooling pipe inside the phone.