Database Users

Post your Quadrant(bench) results & screens

Yeah the title is pretty much self explanatory.
Just post your Quadrant results and screens here.
Don't know what Quadrant is ? > Link
Rom : ReflexTSense 1.8 with A2SD+ = 1521
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(i know there is an already existing thread,but it's dead,so if hoping the mods will give this one a chance)
.

quadrant scores are pretty much pointless unless its done on an untouched device ...
if you have data2sd and all the other add-ons it just falsifys the reading of the actual score if your phones runs 100% smooth and fast and stable then why bother about it , when people who have high scores mainly have slow buggy phones but coz all the add-ons they have it mostly makes the score better
but for the question my untouched desire when i 1st got it was 1760 ish
and now with redux 1.1.0 with stock kernal with ulv 875volts @ 275 mhz its 2127
with class 2 8gb generic sd
it dont mean nothing tho as i said
fast stable clean over any top score

Quadrant score - 2027.
Running miui-xj gb 1. 3. 25 D2W honeycomb themed with class 10 16gb SD 1g ext 4. Runs fast as a mofo SD bought from shop on eBay for £18. Best 18 I ever spent coming from a class 2. Haha.
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA Premium App

quadrant score on revolution hd 2.0.11

i think i have a problem.
i can only get a max of 1800 points in quadrant standard with revolution hd rom and setcpu with autodemand 245-1228.
why is this happening? i've done a factory default and the same.

Don't pay attention to these benchmarks... they tell you nothing. And noting wrong with that score, it's high enough, upgrading to ARHD 3.x might help.
If you are dumb enough to rate a phones performance on such bad benchmarks then..
Turn setCPU to performance
Restart your phone and kill all apps with task killer
Turn off sync/wifi

and update your rom maybe..
AR 2.0.11? AR 3.3 is already out...

quadrant scored really doesn't say a lot for the ROMS. you may have high 2000s scores but your battery lasts only have a day.. doesn't really means a thing

For me it was difficult to get consistent results with Quadrant.
Upgrading the app changed results dramatically.
You can run a benchmark now, and again in 5 minutes time and the results can be way different.
It was great at first but frustrating after a while.
For example: (on stock rom)
Original (2053)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Then I updated the app (1773)
Then 12 minutes later (1813)
Obviously many factors are involved but as Foladko and Baste07 suggest - I wouldn't pay too much attention. It's not as cut and dry as for example overclocking a desktop PC.

Loving Brainmaster's MIUI + Matr1x 5.5!

Just got my Nexus S the other day (for free! woo!) and I am loving it so far. Came from a Captivate to this phone and it is a lot nicer imho. I am currently running Brainmaster's MIUI ROM and Matr1x's Kernel.
Here are some awesome Quadrant Scores (Running 1.44GHz, stable but I'm running 1.2Ghz for daily user to save on battery life)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Loving it. This is a great piece of hardware. Was looking at the Atrix but figured this would be more fun until a dual core Nexus comes out

use paid version of quadrant and you will see why your score is so high
most of your high score has nothing to do with hardware performance you're using ext4 hack that comes with most kernels to trick people like you into thinking your phone is as fast if not faster than dual core phone when
its not

Never said it was as fast/faster as a dual core. Just comparing to other Nexus S quadrant scores and compared to my Captivate, it is much faster. I got it purely for the fact that it is easy to mod. And I do have the paid version, just need to redownload it.

Your making me jealous..
Haha.

What is this obsession with posting e-pen quadrant scores anyway?

Is it impossible for anyone to just say "Nice combo" or "Glad you are enjoying your phone!" instead of complaining like an emo high school kid. I mean, come on...

StockRider Kernel

any body tested this kernel ? ( It's only working on Exynos variant like S/L/K with Lollipop Rom )
StockRider Kernel Thread
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Download Link ( removed )

Really interesting clocks available in that kernel. I hope it can come to N910C as well.

Did you try it?

dislorth said:
Did you try it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no , i'm looking for kernel developer.

It would be much appreciated if you could provide the source to build EXACT version release. This will be required to also be updated with each version release. Without this, no one cannot legally redistribute the binary (zImage individually or re-packed into boot.img) as you are breaking GPL and XDA rules. I thank you for your understanding on this, no one is exempt.
If you are unable to do this, I would advise to remove the links until that is possible. For more info, you can search development and GPL or contact the Moderation Team for advise.
Cheers
UITA

Thanks for the valuable information. Just as I almost gave up on finding a custom kernel for my beloved N910S haha. Flashed this last night right away, gonna let it settle for 2-3 cycles. Currently charging in dead position
First cycle;
the most noticeable one is the CPUs are far cooler than before using Lionheart, (usually kinda hot during light browsing)
Lower benchmark (Antutu) result using Lionheart on both A53 and A57,
Red error within Synapse app in the CPU section, both A53 and A57, showing (Seek error or something)
Other than those, it's still butterysmooth as usual

Share your Basemark OS II result

Running on stock N, with background services tweaking....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This should be in the same level of Galaxy S6/Note 5
Please share yours...

No interest here? Such a bummer. I was hoping to see 2.3-2.5K from those with custom ROM.

^_^

I ran this benchmark and scored worse than you running the ROM, kernel, tweaks, etc. all listed in my signature, so I decided to not even post them. I then tried running with performance governors on both clusters and the phone hotplugged the Big cluster before the benchmark was complete, ending up with even worse scores.

​
Alcolawl said:
I ran this benchmark and scored worse than you running the ROM, kernel, tweaks, etc. all listed in my signature, so I decided to not even post them. I then tried running with performance governors on both clusters and the phone hotplugged the Big cluster before the benchmark was complete, ending up with even worse scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, it could be the result of throttling. I usually run mine after idling it for a while. If I run it more than once, it will drop to 1600-1700-ish.
Thanks for sharing your experience.

Running on N DP2

Mine is much lower with DU + Elementalx

Traxex_ said:
Mine is much lower with DU + Elementalx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something is eating up resources, Mem and Web are really low. Close all apps and kill background services. N has about 200-300 better score than M.
Thanks for sharing your experience.

All stock, rootless....
Broke the 2K barrier