as the title says i found it interesting Stock on I9000M JH2 runs faster than Stock I9000 according to this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
A speedup of 3%.... No offence, but I can do nothing but laugh when I see excitement over such a marginal speed increase (especially in a benchmark).
It's like comparing a 1.03GHZ processor over a 1GHZ processor.
that's the point, it seems like the JH2 stock ROM is better optimized, after all it's the same hardware
(Fixed the percentage). 3% isn't high enough to be of statistical value though. All firmware gets faster, but 3% isn't likely to be noticeable..
Furthermore, the speed increase may have come because a function which is heavily used by the benchmark program has been optimised, whilst real apps may use it less.
It's typical for firmware to get faster, but a 3% increase probably has no real-life impact on productivity on a phone (until they accumulate). And it doesn't really say the i9000M is faster in all situations. It might only be in the benchmark.
Btw, whilst I am no fan of quadrant, which version of stock rom are you comparing with? A late version, or the one shipped in the box originally?
Either way, let us know when there are MAJOR noticeable differences maybe (10% perhaps), because I wonder if simply turning on MobileAP (and streaming some traffic through) is enough to affect the scores by a few percent..
5% margin of error
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Related
i think i have a problem.
i can only get a max of 1800 points in quadrant standard with revolution hd rom and setcpu with autodemand 245-1228.
why is this happening? i've done a factory default and the same.
Don't pay attention to these benchmarks... they tell you nothing. And noting wrong with that score, it's high enough, upgrading to ARHD 3.x might help.
If you are dumb enough to rate a phones performance on such bad benchmarks then..
Turn setCPU to performance
Restart your phone and kill all apps with task killer
Turn off sync/wifi
and update your rom maybe..
AR 2.0.11? AR 3.3 is already out...
quadrant scored really doesn't say a lot for the ROMS. you may have high 2000s scores but your battery lasts only have a day.. doesn't really means a thing
For me it was difficult to get consistent results with Quadrant.
Upgrading the app changed results dramatically.
You can run a benchmark now, and again in 5 minutes time and the results can be way different.
It was great at first but frustrating after a while.
For example: (on stock rom)
Original (2053)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Then I updated the app (1773)
Then 12 minutes later (1813)
Obviously many factors are involved but as Foladko and Baste07 suggest - I wouldn't pay too much attention. It's not as cut and dry as for example overclocking a desktop PC.
I know is basically meaningless but still post your top score
just for grins
heres mine\/\/\/\/\/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CM7
Netarchy-nexus 1.3.0.2
max cpu 1300
min cpu 800
OC'd
miui 1.4.15
oc 1,4ghz performance
wuadrant scores actually do have meaning as long as you are comparind scores within the same device hardware (and not using any cheats or tricks) because it lets you compare how well your hardware is performing based on other people's harddware. but it does NOT have meaning comparind scores across different device models. at that point its meaningless.
company A could optimize a 500mHz phone to be smooth as butter, super optimized and efficient working on it for 3 years. while company B could not do crap, release a 2gHz phone, but not optimize it at all. so scores between those 2 devices would be meaningless.
RogerPodacter said:
wuadrant scores actually do have meaning as long as you are comparind scores within the same device hardware (and not using any cheats or tricks) because it lets you compare how well your hardware is performing based on other people's harddware. but it does NOT have meaning comparind scores across different device models. at that point its meaningless.
company A could optimize a 500mHz phone to be smooth as butter, super optimized and efficient working on it for 3 years. while company B could not do crap, release a 2gHz phone, but not optimize it at all. so scores between those 2 devices would be meaningless.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
theres no way to distinguish if they're cheating on the benchmark.. unless they're using Quadrant Advanced.
Just got my Nexus S the other day (for free! woo!) and I am loving it so far. Came from a Captivate to this phone and it is a lot nicer imho. I am currently running Brainmaster's MIUI ROM and Matr1x's Kernel.
Here are some awesome Quadrant Scores (Running 1.44GHz, stable but I'm running 1.2Ghz for daily user to save on battery life)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Loving it. This is a great piece of hardware. Was looking at the Atrix but figured this would be more fun until a dual core Nexus comes out
use paid version of quadrant and you will see why your score is so high
most of your high score has nothing to do with hardware performance you're using ext4 hack that comes with most kernels to trick people like you into thinking your phone is as fast if not faster than dual core phone when
its not
Never said it was as fast/faster as a dual core. Just comparing to other Nexus S quadrant scores and compared to my Captivate, it is much faster. I got it purely for the fact that it is easy to mod. And I do have the paid version, just need to redownload it.
Your making me jealous..
Haha.
What is this obsession with posting e-pen quadrant scores anyway?
Is it impossible for anyone to just say "Nice combo" or "Glad you are enjoying your phone!" instead of complaining like an emo high school kid. I mean, come on...
Went into a Telco store. Cleared recent apps for all. 2 s5s had 28k antutu x score. 1 other one had a decent 35k one. Note they weren't overheating at all.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Demo edition <> edition you buy
Power saving is activated?
Sent from GT-I9500
Let's suppose you got 50,000 points on Antutu X. Would that suddenly justify your purchase? or would that make you sleep better at night? Trust me whether it's 25,000 or 50,000 it's not going to have any impact at all how the phone works. Judging a phone based on Antutu score is just wrong.
BTW, a benchmark which doesn't provide repeatable consistent result isn't worth it.
I do analyze benchmarks for a living (not these tiny consumer devices, but mission critical enterprise products). I can appreciate good benchmarks and we also understand why certain statistics are irrelevant or just simply wasteful.
28xxxx something with power saving on and a much better 36xxx something with it off.
I dont hold much stock in these things but it is a tool to play with none the less. :cyclops:
mine has a ~35,000 score
Possibly because it has some store demo stuff on there. I heard some store units ran different firmware than units that were sold, hence some store units were called SM-G900X
I know this probably doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things, but I got an new S7 Edge in November after being forced to surrender my perfectly awesome Note 7. I decided today to run some benchmarks on it because it's performance has been questionable.
To qualify:
choppy transitions
choppy app switches
long app launch sequences
long load times for videos and download performance on LTE and 100Mb WiFi
It is performing worse than my old S6 Edge.
I closed all apps, set the High performance settings and benchmarked...
I was shocked by the results.
I ran GeekBench 4, AnTuTu, and 3DMark (which barely ran) and the results were consistent. (Quadrant errored out connecting to the servers) ~30% slower CPU scores, ~50% slower memory, 3DMark scores were horrid, and everything in between.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Has anyone else seen such behavior?
Can't see the images
Are you sure it's a real official S7 edge, not a counterfeit ?
BigBen60 said:
Can't see the images
Are you sure it's a real official S7 edge, not a counterfeit ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't posted enough to use external links I guess.
Yeah, I checked with the AnTuTu Validator and it is authentic Samsung bits.
You can look at the results on flickr (just remove the carriage returns)
https://
flic.kr
/s/aHskXtgxmf
You should try a factory reset or changing ROM, clean install
There might be some apps draining your performances
edit
not worth it