Samsung Epic 2.2 foyo leak benchmarks - Epic 4G General

Just thought i'd try and find out what everyone's benchmarks are. And how your daily use is.
Daily usage for me is great there is a little bit of lag on auto rotate, I'm guessing that is why they did not use touchwiz 3.0 in the first place wen the epic came out. And bout the gps issue, I don't really use gps much at all so it is not a concern for me right now. My neocore is around 55fps, linpack is around 20 mflops, benchmarkpi is around 1200 and the unreliable quadrant is around 1024. I say unreliable because I have setcpu at 100-1ghz conservative, and my quadrant is reading my cpu at around 1300. Samsung epic. 2.2 froyo. benchmark tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Neocore was 55.7
Linpack was 13.something MFlops in 6 seconds
I feel like those should be higher
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

I have a filling that setcpu is only a gimmick doing nothing.
dito33

dito33 said:
I have a filling that setcpu is only a gimmick doing nothing.
dito33
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if the kernel supports 1300 maybe thats why quadrant sees it that way...As for setcpu you need an overclocked kernel that supports higher clocks,but this is also used to aquire better battery life...And it does work,period.

Related

Nero 2 with Super I/O Kernel, Yes or No?

will it make difference?
I just finished my titanium restore, but it's smooth so far.
A lot of nice little touches. And Quadrant says 1193 so that ain't bad.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Runnin nero+dow+oclf
im only running around 1000 with nero 2 and IO kernel... not sure why
willsnews said:
Runnin nero+dow+oclf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is dow?
Good god, yes, this is a terrific combination. Buttery smooth.
As for varying Quadrant scores, I find that if I kill all user apps right before running the benchmark, I'll hit in the 1200 range. Otherwise I'm only around 1000. Doesn't matter either way though, because it's silky smooth either way. I haven't even bothered with a lagfix because I don't think it's necessary. I noticed that TW tweaked the mounts so that even though it's still RFS, it's considerably faster than stock JK2 or JK6. Eugene's kernel is also the bomb and I've seen great battery and stability.
I've been waiting for a while for a Froyo build that approximates my reference setup on Eclair, which was the final Fusion w/ OC/UV (1.2ghz) with z4mod. That is the benchmark for me, and I think I've finally found it's equal in Froyo. Very happy with my Vibrant right now.
I completely agree this is the first froyo rom that matches that speed and stability I had with fusion oc'ed lag fixed.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
ionic7 said:
What is dow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Destroyer of worlds
Runnin nero+dow+oclf

quadrant score on revolution hd 2.0.11

i think i have a problem.
i can only get a max of 1800 points in quadrant standard with revolution hd rom and setcpu with autodemand 245-1228.
why is this happening? i've done a factory default and the same.
Don't pay attention to these benchmarks... they tell you nothing. And noting wrong with that score, it's high enough, upgrading to ARHD 3.x might help.
If you are dumb enough to rate a phones performance on such bad benchmarks then..
Turn setCPU to performance
Restart your phone and kill all apps with task killer
Turn off sync/wifi
and update your rom maybe..
AR 2.0.11? AR 3.3 is already out...
quadrant scored really doesn't say a lot for the ROMS. you may have high 2000s scores but your battery lasts only have a day.. doesn't really means a thing
For me it was difficult to get consistent results with Quadrant.
Upgrading the app changed results dramatically.
You can run a benchmark now, and again in 5 minutes time and the results can be way different.
It was great at first but frustrating after a while.
For example: (on stock rom)
Original (2053)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Then I updated the app (1773)
Then 12 minutes later (1813)
Obviously many factors are involved but as Foladko and Baste07 suggest - I wouldn't pay too much attention. It's not as cut and dry as for example overclocking a desktop PC.

Why such low scores...

Just trying to identify why my phone scores so low in quadrant. I know its not the be all or end all but I'm consistently under 3000 when the norm is 3000-3500.
Just wondered if I have faulty something?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
hmm you did manage to get some low quadrant score. on all my tests its always above 3000.
pic 1. with shell 3d launcher
pic 2. active programs
pic 3. with launcher pro and on power saving mode.
may be due to premium quadrant app.....
Quadrant doesn't really mean anything, it varies a lot too.
As long as you're getting close to 3000 I wouldn't worry about it.
Was the same on standard.
Just don't want to have faulty ram or internal sd or something.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
If you want to compare scores, use a benchmark, not Quadrant. I wouldn't worry with that score.
I'm certain its the read speed of the internal sd.
Getting about 30mbps compared to others 400+. Only 3 other benches on AnTutu. 2 have read speeds of 400+ and the other has similar, around 30.
Have root. Any tweaks for it?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App
On my captivate I would get scores ranging from 1100 to 1200 repeatedly, then I could reboot and get 1800's repeatedly. Quadrant is weird.
What is the class of your Sd card? Might affect a little.
Anyway you should do other benchmarks as well other than quadrant.
AnTutu bench rates the internal sd. Thats the issue.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Premium App

Loving Brainmaster's MIUI + Matr1x 5.5!

Just got my Nexus S the other day (for free! woo!) and I am loving it so far. Came from a Captivate to this phone and it is a lot nicer imho. I am currently running Brainmaster's MIUI ROM and Matr1x's Kernel.
Here are some awesome Quadrant Scores (Running 1.44GHz, stable but I'm running 1.2Ghz for daily user to save on battery life)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Loving it. This is a great piece of hardware. Was looking at the Atrix but figured this would be more fun until a dual core Nexus comes out
use paid version of quadrant and you will see why your score is so high
most of your high score has nothing to do with hardware performance you're using ext4 hack that comes with most kernels to trick people like you into thinking your phone is as fast if not faster than dual core phone when
its not
Never said it was as fast/faster as a dual core. Just comparing to other Nexus S quadrant scores and compared to my Captivate, it is much faster. I got it purely for the fact that it is easy to mod. And I do have the paid version, just need to redownload it.
Your making me jealous..
Haha.
What is this obsession with posting e-pen quadrant scores anyway?
Is it impossible for anyone to just say "Nice combo" or "Glad you are enjoying your phone!" instead of complaining like an emo high school kid. I mean, come on...

Share Your Quadrant Score

Hi
I am new in XDA and in I9100
so i want seee yours scores in Quadrant
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Cpu @ 1600mhz
If you want to compete, use Antutu instead. Then you can compete with the best. But don't put your SG2 in the freezer before you measure
Alot of threads like this has been made and will be at the bottom of the forum in no time..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
nilste said:
If you want to compete, use Antutu instead. Then you can compete with the best. But don't put your SG2 in the freezer before you measure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu Benchmark 7414
AGAIN!? Theres billions of threads like this, there was one just the other day!
Use the search function, its there for a reason!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
rauliporto said:
Hi
I am new in XDA and in I9100
so i want seee yours scores in Quadrant
Cpu @ 1600mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice I/O cheat there.
Anyway, Quadrant scores bore me. I'm only waiting for when someone gets higher than 9k, so that everyone forgets about it.
Rawat said:
I'm only waiting for when someone gets higher than 9k, so that everyone forgets about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right on, anything under 9000 is slow...
15000000 here. Dunno what's wrong wit you nubs.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using xda premium
why do I only get 3100?

Categories

Resources