Any Dev's working on CIQ removal for EF02? Or are you all waiting for the final GB to drop before digging in that deep?
twolostminds said:
Any Dev's working on CIQ removal for EF02? Or are you all waiting for the final GB to drop before digging in that deep?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Marcusant tried(or is trying?) But found that it broke sms
Sent from my SPH-D700
ac16313 said:
Marcusant tried(or is trying?) But found that it broke sms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe that the beta code from Bonsai was put into this rom. If you want this fixed then I suggest you get the original updated code from Randy_T. The CIQ removal has been problematic, however we are still working on it. BTW, K0nane gets the credit for the CIQ removal.
Sent from Asus Transform Bonzai!
Top Nurse said:
I believe that the beta code from Bonsai was put into this rom. If you want this fixed then I suggest you get the original updated code from Randy_T. The CIQ removal has been problematic, however we are still working on it. BTW, K0nane gets the credit for the CIQ removal.
Sent from Asus Transform Bonzai!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes he does. it's as if him leaving, along with him was CIQ mod =/
Shoulon said:
yes he does. it's as if him leaving, along with him was CIQ mod =/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Give it time...it's only been a few days. Not to mention it isn't final release so it isn't top priority. Oh and there is no source to help right now either.
Dulanic said:
Give it time...it's only been a few days. Not to mention it isn't final release so it isn't top priority. Oh and there is no source to help right now either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wha? i was just saying k0nane made a mod that EVERYONE uses and its sooo default that we forget who gave us NO-CIQ.
but anyway bak to what the thread was made for.
This is a lot of work to do on a leaked build when we could see another one at any point.
ptfdmedic said:
This is a lot of work to do on a leaked build when we could see another one at any point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct me if Im wrong but no removing CIQ without source?
rjmjr69 said:
Correct me if Im wrong but no removing CIQ without source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is they don't actually need source. However, I am sure it helps.
Dulanic said:
My understanding is they don't actually need source. However, I am sure it helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you,..... For some odd reason the need for source sticks with me... Anyhow Im sure this will be done soon enough
Dulanic said:
Give it time...it's only been a few days. Not to mention it isn't final release so it isn't top priority. Oh and there is no source to help right now either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wasn't trying to rush anyone, was just curious. Makes sense that with at least 2 other version numbers already floating around in rumor land that there would be no rush to de-CIQ this leaked version.
I still have faith that Mystery will be able to do it and worst case scenario k0nane wouldn't hang him out to dry if he needed help with code. Besides, people will see the patterns k0nane was onto when he did it the first time. No worries, people.
rjmjr69 said:
Thank you,..... For some odd reason the need for source sticks with me... Anyhow Im sure this will be done soon enough
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice to see you back
rjmjr69 said:
Thank you,..... For some odd reason the need for source sticks with me... Anyhow Im sure this will be done soon enough
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Coming from the team leader himself. You should kno this!!
Sent from my Epix 4G using XDA
rjmjr69 said:
Correct me if Im wrong but no removing CIQ without source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source would be a big help. Our attempts at removing it without source caused unwanted problems.
Sent from Asus Transform Bonzai!
Related
Looks like Samsung released source for the Vibrant
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=959361
Does this help us at all?
Probably wont take much to boot it on our captivates. I've ran 2 vibrant roms on my cappy without having to modify them..... though I did have to switch out one modem because I only got 2g with one of the vibrant modems.
Downloading now. Will tear it apart.
adamholden85 said:
Downloading now. Will tear it apart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DITTO! Now only if this could happen for Captivate
adamholden85 said:
Downloading now. Will tear it apart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome. I'm a fan of Supernova so I'm glad to see you dive in to this
xtremekilla09 said:
DITTO! Now only if this could happen for Captivate
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I may have that on my pc as well. There was another post in the forum with a link and I am checking it out right now.
After everyone's updated their roms to vibrant source, cap source will come out. Ha, samsung is watching.
This should be fun...
JFX said:
After everyone's updated their roms to vibrant source, cap source will come out. Ha, samsung is watching.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I bet so too
Go Adam "you can do it"
adamholden85 said:
Downloading now. Will tear it apart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
adamholden85 said:
I may have that on my pc as well. There was another post in the forum with a link and I am checking it out right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
other link def confirmed eclair
adamholden85 said:
Downloading now. Will tear it apart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if i were ever to have a man crush... it would be you sir... lol
Would love to see another vibrant based rom
mm hopefully the captivate is next.. And when I mean next I mean this after noon or something lol
adamholden85 said:
Downloading now. Will tear it apart.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So how is it looking?
Digging through it now...
Appears they went ahead and released source for the Epic too
Im not a dev by any means, but I would assume that the source code and kernal should be set uppretty similar for our Captivates (minus the parts that refer to look for a CDMA radio instead of GSM) on 2.2 and hopefully the good devs here will be able to rip out the good stuff and incorporate into their own roms.
Go get 'em devs!
i896 source is available too. But no one wants it =.=
^ i guess when it come to kernel sources beggars can be choosers. Rogers 2.2 sources have been out a while and i can only think of one person taking advantage of them for a Froyo AOSP Rom.
Whats wrong with the rogers sources?
Why use source from a different phone?
If the Defy can do it, why can't we? It has a locked bootloader too. I bet I sound pretty stupid because there is something I'm missing, but oh well...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1033654
A quick glance says that they're using update.zip files to clobber /system, so they're not touching the bootloader. So this should be doable, although I believe that our CWM could use some more work.
Sogarth said:
A quick glance says that they're using update.zip files to clobber /system, so they're not touching the bootloader. So this should be doable, although I believe that our CWM could use some more work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To tell you the truth, I was thinking somewhere along those lines also.
So why couldn't we do this for the Atrix?
no dev is working on it o.o
p.s. been doind this on my x10 for months now lol
BravoMotorola said:
To tell you the truth, I was thinking somewhere along those lines also.
So why couldn't we do this for the Atrix?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it's doable, there probably is someone already doing it, just keeping quiet till a working version is reached. This phone is quite new, I think we just need some patience...
Cheers
tsouza said:
If it's doable, there probably is someone already doing it, just keeping quiet till a working version is reached. This phone is quite new, I think we just need some patience...
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh. And another thing, anybody know what "2nd init" is?
Wow. Didn't know that was possible. That'd be awesome if we actually got CM7!
Swyped from my Motorola Atrix 4g using XDA Premium App
PixoNova said:
Wow. Didn't know that was possible. That'd be awesome if we actually got CM7!
Swyped from my Motorola Atrix 4g using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We just need to figure out wtf 2nd-init is . Any dev around?
A quick search reveals this.
that is pretty great for defy users, now i am jealous again
Sogarth said:
A quick search reveals this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha thanks. Yea I tried "2nd init" and "2nd init androrid" and couldn't find that. I wonder what you searched...
Anyways this is 2.3.3 they have running on the Defy, and I had no clue this was even close to possible. We got some pro dev's? Pay the guy who ported Cyanogen to the Defy money for an Atrix and money for a monthly AT&T bill and maybe he'll do it
Apparently nobody reads my thread I posted this weeks ago -_-
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
BravoMotorola said:
Haha thanks. Yea I tried "2nd init" and "2nd init androrid" and couldn't find that. I wonder what you searched...
Anyways this is 2.3.3 they have running on the Defy, and I had no clue this was even close to possible. We got some pro dev's? Pay the guy who ported Cyanogen to the Defy money for an Atrix and money for a monthly AT&T bill and maybe he'll do it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to this, I come from N1 and I really really miss CM7
tsouza said:
+1 to this, I come from N1 and I really really miss CM7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can only hope that one of our talented devs could somehow make this work for us
Wish I knew how to do this stuff. I'd be all over it if I knew.
I posted over there asking if he would mind stopping by our forum or the IRC channel and giving us a few pointers. We'll see if he does I guess...
bearsfan172 said:
I posted over there asking if he would mind stopping by our forum or the IRC channel and giving us a few pointers. We'll see if he does I guess...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who is this person?
Also I really want CM7 please some developer can you work on this? The building blocks are here already.
RacecarBMW said:
Who is this person?
Also I really want CM7 please some developer can you work on this? The building blocks are here already.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Assuming he's talking about Quarx. The TC of the Defy CM7 topic.
I wonder if he'd be willing to give some devs pointers. Or even attempt this himself
It all starts here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1026853
We'd have to port that before anything else...
He says something about Korean developers... Ah ha! That's what has been missing from this equation all along!
Yeh, you are probably right. And as next step would be understanding the current cm7 defy port and maybe try do to the same thing using cm7 harmony as a base.
I could try doing it, I'm a quite experienced java developer (6+ years) and wouldn't have problems learning it BUT, as I already sold my old Nexus One, Atrix is my current phone and I don't wanna risk it... =/
Im guessing no Gb this month
http://device.sprintpcs.com/Samsung/SPH-D700/EH17.rdf
http://device.sprintpcs.com/Samsung/SPH-D700/EH18.rdf
This sucks..
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Personally I don't really care. We are getting good and frequent leaks and I would prefer them to get it right than rush something out. At least they are putting a huge effort into getting us gingerbread.
crawrj said:
Personally I don't really care. We are getting good and frequent leaks and I would prefer them to get it right than rush something out. At least they are putting a huge effort into getting us gingerbread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 especially since this will probably be our last official upgrade, so I would want the best they can produce instead of getting the update as soon as possible
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Dont get me wrong the leaks are great...but i want them to finish even if buggy and give us the source so some of our guys that know wtf they are doing can have at it and give us some well..epic
Keith
as you guys can see, the new builds are becoming more recent. which usually means our time is getting very close to official release.
EH13 not EH17?
This is the EH13 page not EH17.
jrwEpic said:
This is the EH13 page not EH17.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, it's EH17. Although I do see the EH13 listed in the specs.
Modem perhaps? Especially if it has another version listed within it.
Bleh, I'm getting angry now.
Too many builds.
But, they must think they're close.
Posted by Mr. Z's Epic 4G.
zanderman112 said:
Bleh, I'm getting angry now.
Too many builds.
But, they must think they're close.
Posted by Mr. Z's Epic 4G.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's safe to now ask...
"Are we there yet?"
zanderman112 said:
Bleh, I'm getting angry now.
Too many builds.
But, they must think they're close.
Posted by Mr. Z's Epic 4G.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They must be getting close. Also samfirmware indicated there would be multiple leaks before the end of the month. There is still a chance that final will be done by the predicted date even though prior history doesn't point to the likelihood of that.
Overstew said:
I think it's safe to now ask...
"Are we there yet?"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha
Posted by Mr. Z's Epic 4G.
I went from "GB? Who cares?" to "GB! Awesome!" almost to "Whatever." Hope reviews are great and prerooted flash packages are in supply. The pre-Froyo urgency just isn't there but at least they're working on it. And maybe it really does squeeze much more performance out of it.
They don't need to be releasing any final version until they finally get the GPS crash/force close bug fixed, that'll be a deal breaker for thousands of people if they release anything official with that issue still in play.
shane6374 said:
Nope, it's EH17. Although I do see the EH13 listed in the specs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm... a mis-labeled rdf file? It must be a fake! Time to start a huge stink. /sarcasm. Not trying to start drama, but where's WDM? He must be the one "faking these" again
djbacon06 said:
Hmm... a mis-labeled rdf file? It must be a fake! Time to start a huge stink. /sarcasm. Not trying to start drama, but where's WDM? He must be the one "faking these" again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha awesome timing...
PythonFanTN said:
They don't need to be releasing any final version until they finally get the GPS crash/force close bug fixed, that'll be a deal breaker for thousands of people if they release anything official with that issue still in play.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my thinking. All these people annoyed at another new build, meanwhile the one we have still doesn't work. Are they expecting Samsung to release it full of holes? With the current version rebooting and having no function GPS, I'm happy to see new versions hitting. Means hopefully they're actually working on the problem.
I still can't understand how what is now a legacy device can possibly give their engineers such problems with the modem and other comm chipsets. It looked to be all solidified in Froyo and now for GB it's the biggest boogeyman?! What are they trying to do...?
The problem isn't how many builds they're making, it's how long will it take them to get it right this time. No one wants the froyo situation to repeat itself with gingerbread.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Did everybody see this? Its an interesting read. Afaik Motorola hasnt been mentioned yet in the Carrier-IQ fiasco but I wouldn't be surprised if Blur has it baked in. Anybody know? Opinions?
WiredPirate said:
Did everybody see this? Its an interesting read. Afaik Motorola hasnt been mentioned yet in the Carrier-IQ fiasco but I wouldn't be surprised if Blur has it baked in. Anybody know? Opinions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Running his logging finder app thingy doesn't show any of the normal CIQ logs. I think Blur has it's own "phone home" service baked in, not some third-party hack job.
Nice article. I'll be following this one closely! Very interesting.
WiredPirate said:
Did everybody see this? Its an interesting read. Afaik Motorola hasnt been mentioned yet in the Carrier-IQ fiasco but I wouldn't be surprised if Blur has it baked in. Anybody know? Opinions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, read the article earlier and i can say that TreVe is as innocent as a saint who landed in a Strip club by accident.
I would not be worried if i was him though. CIQ are in deep ****, their initial intentions were to get TrEve to panic and write them a letter of apology because of the 24-hour deadline.
What TrEve did is not an act of piracy as he was solely reading the codes for Educational and journalism purposes, and the laws allow this as long as he does not redistribute these codes himself. Logically speaking though, there is absolutely nothing wrong about wanting to know what's going on inside your handset and what the guy discovered is actually quite scary. Why on earth would CIQ implement their codes on sense UI, etc....? Seems kind of creepy if you ask me. What other hidden codes might they have? Why on earth did HTC allow this?....because there is absolutely no way that they don't know about the hidden codes.
I am with TrEve 100% on this one, definitely posting these on FB, G+, etc....
yeah, i was asking about it myself a few days ago
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/more-on-carrier-iq/
WiredPirate said:
Did everybody see this? Its an interesting read. Afaik Motorola hasnt been mentioned yet in the Carrier-IQ fiasco but I wouldn't be surprised if Blur has it baked in. Anybody know? Opinions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They say it's baked into the Kernel and RAM. So if we have this and we are running CM7 with a custom kernel we could still have it.
http://www.androidcentral.com/security-advocate-eff-go-toe-toe-data-collection-company-carrieriq
WiredPirate said:
http://www.androidcentral.com/security-advocate-eff-go-toe-toe-data-collection-company-carrieriq
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow. ridiculous article.
why wouldn't they agree to post the information that was sent to them?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
ifalldownalot said:
wow. ridiculous article.
why wouldn't they agree to post the information that was sent to them?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, they focused much more on the legal aspects of the story than they did being informative about Carrier-IQ. It seams like they dont want to risk getting a C&D letter too.
carrier-iq withdraws C&D.
http://briefmobile.com/breaking-carrier-iq-has-withdrawn-cease-and-desist-order-on-tevor-eckhart
and they apologized, as well.
However, damage is done, i'd say.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
ifalldownalot said:
carrier-iq withdraws C&D.
http://briefmobile.com/breaking-carrier-iq-has-withdrawn-cease-and-desist-order-on-tevor-eckhart
and they apologized, as well.
However, damage is done, i'd say.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just read the same story here:
http://techcrunch.com/2011/11/23/carrier-iq-retracts-their-cd-apologizes-to-the-android-researcher/
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/the-storm-is-not-over-yet-lets-talk-about-ciq/
Two "new" stories today:
Android Central
Android Community w video of keystroke recording.
Atrix infected with Carrier-iq
Can anyone confirm that the Atrix is currently with or without any of the Carrier-IQ spyware?
From what I have ready its not in MOTO devices (yet) but there is probably something similar. Another reason to move to CM7 when it gets mature enough for me to use (I'm sticking with Aura for the time being, and thoroughly enjoying it I might add).
rog1121 said:
They say it's baked into the Kernel and RAM. So if we have this and we are running CM7 with a custom kernel we could still have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding was that if you run CM7, you're clean.
kennydjr83 said:
From what I have ready its not in MOTO devices (yet) but there is probably something similar. Another reason to move to CM7 when it gets mature enough for me to use (I'm sticking with Aura for the time being, and thoroughly enjoying it I might add).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The atrix 2 appears to have it, but probably atrix doesn't, might figure the next update if it ever comes will have it
Wow collecting info without us knowing. That's got to be illegal on some level. Glad I switched to cm7 the day I got my phone now
sent from my atrix-CM7
GIZMODO lists the Atrix 4G as NOT having carrier-IQ.
WiredPirate said:
GIZMODO lists the Atrix 4G as NOT having carrier-IQ.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't know if i should be offended or glad that our phones weren't invited to this party.
As many of you know, I had a kernel named Singularity. I chose to cease development. As users still want the kernel, I am looking for someone to take over. If you are interested PM and if I decide your serious Ill give you the source
I would love it if someone would take this over! I don't know Jack about coding but have been very happy with the kernel. Maybe one of the kernel devs could build it as a side project to their own or at least go through the code and give some feedback as to the viability of adopting it...
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA-Developers mobile app
apophis9283 said:
As many of you know, I had a kernel named Singularity. I chose to cease development. As users still want the kernel, I am looking for someone to take over. If you are interested PM and if I decide your serious Ill give you the source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why not just release the source? I'm sure someone will take over or put the features into another kernel.
Meowdib said:
Why not just release the source? I'm sure someone will take over or put the features into another kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if its on XDA, then sourse is released.
simms22 said:
if its on XDA, then sourse is released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its not on xda anymore and the source isn't either.
I wish i had the time and ingenuity to take it.
But I don't.
If I were to do it updates would be inconsistent and I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to keep it up nearly as well as apophis did.
But thank you @apophis9283 for the offer to allow someone to take over
klabit87 said:
its not on xda anymore and the source isn't either.
I wish i had the time and ingenuity to take it.
But I don't.
If I were to do it updates would be inconsistent and I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to keep it up nearly as well as apophis did.
But thank you @apophis9283 for the offer to allow someone to take over
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really wish I could keep the kernel alive. I put 4 years into XDA with various projects. Being burnt out doesnt even begin to describe how I feel. I promise if I change my mind down the road Ill let everyone know
apophis9283 said:
I really wish I could keep the kernel alive. I put 4 years into XDA with various projects. Being burnt out doesnt even begin to describe how I feel. I promise if I change my mind down the road Ill let everyone know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Edited because I didn't fully read the main post.
deleted
I just added cpuquiet to my source. I am going to test it and just post source here for anyone who wants it. I dont need one person to carry on the kernel, everyone can have access and it will go on that way. Have fun.
EDIT: https://gitlab.com/apophis9283/Singularity
apophis9283 said:
I just added cpuquiet to my source. I am going to test it and just post source here for anyone who wants it. I dont need one person to carry on the kernel, everyone can have access and it will go on that way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That will be so awesome and appreciated!
I know I will be building it myself every now and then when I have time.
Thanks again!
klabit87 said:
That will be so awesome and appreciated!
I know I will be building it myself every now and then when I have time.
Thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a problem. Didnt want to be an ass. I still add things every now and then. So everyone is welcome to check back now and then. I just felt that this wasnt just my work, its the work of many. Many should be able to enjoy it.
apophis9283 said:
Not a problem. Didnt want to be an ass. I still add things every now and then. So everyone is welcome to check back now and then. I just felt that this wasnt just my work, its the work of many. Many should be able to enjoy it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your work. You were one of the most involved, and concerned devs I've encountered in what I call the "neo-XDA" era. I'm sad to hear about this, but am glad you are putting yourself first. Enjoy your time away.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
mexiken said:
Thank you for your work. You were one of the most involved, and concerned devs I've encountered in what I call the "neo-XDA" era. I'm sad to hear about this, but am glad you are putting yourself first. Enjoy your time away.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume you are talking about iamtheonetheycallneo?
apophis9283 said:
I assume you are talking about iamtheonetheycallneo?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No sir. You and uh, I think it was Yoinx that ran the Singularity thread, right???? You guys worked really hard to get it up and running for us low binned guys.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
mexiken said:
No sir. You and uh, I think it was Yoinx that ran the Singularity thread, right???? You guys worked really hard to get it up and running for us low binned guys.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that was Yoinx. Hes a great guy, I actually didnt know that some phones had a lower bin. This was my first kernel. You said neo-era. I thought you were talking about neo the developer who is now a mod. He actually tought me about android. Neo has been an amazing friend for almost 4 years. I stand by Yoinx. Great guy and highly intelligent. He was the one who taught me about kernels.
I will be updated the kernel soon. This in no way means I want to do it for the masses. Just stuff I'm doing for myself but you have my source and you can compile it yourself.
apophis9283 said:
I will be updated the kernel soon. This in no way means I want to do it for the masses. Just stuff I'm doing for myself but you have my source and you can compile it yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sad to hear that you're burned out... But Glad that you're embracing what open source is about.
Yoinx said:
Sad to hear that you're burned out... But Glad that you're embracing what open source is about.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Loving the app
Im trying to get the state helper stuff along with the new msm limiter stuff. Could be a minute
apophis9283 said:
Im trying to get the state helper stuff along with the new msm limiter stuff. Could be a minute
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My fork's already supporting it app-side, so that's done. I managed to knock out getting that uploaded during a port call.