Related
anybody else getting results like this? What can I do to improve on this. The tablet is not rooted.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using XDA Premium HD app
Third one down is my result.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using XDA Premium HD app
I didn't benchmark but my tf300 feels faster than my hox, a fair bit actually....
I'm not at all disappointed (and it will only get better)
Edit: I've only done the build.prop modifications in the thread mentioned below.
I have never been one to hover over benchmark scores. But for not running optimized custom roms, the only really thing you can try is this http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1641219
dilfatx said:
anybody else getting results like this? What can I do to improve on this. The tablet is not rooted.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You. No.
Here are some benches after rooting and clocking to 1.5.
I also watched a video from Richie's closet on YouTube the Asus infinity tf700 vs ipad 3. So I tried 2 of the benchmark tests they used.
First one mine beat the ipad 3 by 15 to 20,000 but the tf700 got like 40,000 more.
Second one beat both ipad 3 by triple the score and beat the tf700 by 200.
So I am happy with the tf300 performance.
http://m.youtube.com/index?desktop_uri=/&gl=US#/watch?v=4jdbtiNnZzE
Quadrant is a bad benchmark, can be influenced easily an score is heavily dependand on IO performance.
Hence the relatively bad scores for the transformers.... internal memory performance is very bad!
I tried overclocking with antutu cpu but I wasn't getting any performance gains when I benchmarked.
I respecfully suggest the quadrant scores do correlate. Over the past year I have had the following tabs and here is the rank in actual performance, using MAME Reloaded, FPse and N64 to test ram speed and cpu power (GPU as well for FPSe and N64). The HTC View is an apparent exception to the ranking from a single and dual core standard.
Thrive
View (Thrive benches better for some benchmarks, but actual View usage seems smoother- 1ghz vs 1.5ghz).
A510/TF300 Basically a tie (within 100 points).
Prime
Excite
Excite benchmarks about 13% faster than the A510/TF300 and the FPS of the emulators (on average) correlate. That said, ignorance is bliss, so if you do not actually sit with them and nitpick, they are all functionally the same for performance- IMO.
One thing I did notice is in spite of the View being a single core S4, it's 1.5ghz speed and memory channel appears better when downloading apps at the same time than the Tegra 2 and 3. All three SoCs have single channel memory, so none will win multi task battles. BTW, the memory channel (edit) a constraint/bottleneck most users experience when trying to download from the market or other sources while trying to run certain apps that are also using it.
Added: The 28nm S4 dual that is in the newer phones actually blows our Tegra 3 away for performance. In part due to the dual channel memory. I would prefer that SoC in the TF300 since also even better battery life and runs cooler (both due to the 28nm).
Sadly, it will be a while before we see many tablets with it since demand for then new phones from HTC and especially Samsung are killing supply until first quarter next year.
rushless said:
I respecfully suggest the quadrant scores do correlate. Over the past year I have had the following tabs and here is the rank in actual performance, using MAME Reloaded, FPse and N64 to test ram speed and cpu power (GPU as well for FPSe and N64). The HTC View is an apparent exception to the ranking from a single and dual core standard.
Thrive
View (Thrive benches better for some benchmarks, but actual View usage seems smoother- 1ghz vs 1.5ghz).
A510/TF300 Basically a tie (within 100 points).
Prime
Excite
Excite benchmarks about 13% faster than the A510/TF300 and the FPS of the emulators (on average) correlate. That said, ignorance is bliss, so if you do not actually sit with them and nitpick, they are all functionally the same for performance- IMO.
One thing I did notice is in spite of the View being a single core S4, it's 1.5ghz speed and memory channel appears better when downloading apps at the same time than the Tegra 2 and 3. All three SoCs have single channel memory, so none will win multi task battles. BTW, the memory channel is the constraint/bottleneck most users experience when trying to download from the market or other sources while trying to run certain apps that are also using it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No its not the memory channel that's the bottleneck, it's not RAM that performs bad it's the internal storage.
I dont know what tegra2 device you tested but the Transformer1 performs aprox the same as the tf201\tf300 IO-wise (bad).
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
Tempie007 said:
No its not the memory channel that's the bottleneck, it's not RAM that performs bad it's the internal storage.
I dont know what tegra2 device you tested but the Transformer1 performs aprox the same as the tf201\tf300 IO-wise (bad).
Sent from my Transformer Prime TF201 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true on the flash being a part of the factor! Since a series process (especially with single channel) you are only as good as your weakest link. The only Tegra 2 tabs I have had are the A500 (only a few days) and the Thrive.
I find all the tablets noted above to have some issues with downloading from market and using other apps at same time to be near as bad. Again, the HTC View seems better and probably due to your point.
yep
My score was around 10k... but I'm waiting for some Genius to OC the kernel to blow those scores out of the water... i read in the Dev thread someone is using Faux kernel... (or asked him for help) either way I'm waiting for a Legit ROM with an even more legit OC Kernel
I think 10k is not bad at all for me considering that im using stock ROM. Plus, it really feels fast.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using XDA Premium HD app
omidz said:
I think 10k is not bad at all for me considering that im using stock ROM. Plus, it really feels fast.
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do you get to 10k using the stock rom? Anything else than the build.prop?
I always match transformer prime or a bit more on antutu benchnark.. also this is not 1.5ghz on performance mode. Every single app atm missreads the tablet for 1.5 when it is 1.2. I have tried overclocking and when set to 1.5 it will score same as set to 1.2.
Dont forget to set performance mode before benchmarking and be on a fresh boot
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using XDA Premium HD app
[Videos] HTC One AnTuTu & Quadrant BenchMarks & Internet 4G / Boot Speed Tests
Greetings,,
I recorded some speed tests for the HTC One and would like to share it here
Boot Speed Test (FastBoot):
Quadrant Benchmark:
AnTuTu Benchmark:
4G Internet Speed Test (Compared to Galaxy Note II N7100 3G):
Regards,,
Hello everyone,
What should be the normal SD card read speed? I hve done a benchmark test on antutu, and almost every time, my SD card read speed comes low (esp as compared to sd card write). Is it normal? And if the sd card speed read is slow, that means phone/apps/games stutters?
Please see attached image:
No.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Benchmark scores are just for referral ... it's all about the usability ... if you think your phone is fast then you have no problem.
Anyone wanna help donate some performance metrics for different models? So we can have an overview of average performance differences between models.
Benchmarks:
Geekbench - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.primatelabs.geekbench
AnTuTu - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark&hl=en
Futuremark - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.futuremark.dmandroid.application&hl=en
SunSpider - https://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html
Please tell us what version you have (4GB/2GB, Z3580/Z3560) so I can catalog averages for each model.
average results per model
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML - 4GB RAM/Intel Z3580 - 1080p
AnTuTu average 47381 - top 48981 - results: 2
GeekBench average MC:2955 SC:912 - top MC:3013 SC:919 - results: 2
SunSpider average 698.4ms +/- 5.4% - top 698.4ms +/- 5.4% - results: 1
3DMark Icestorm average 19796 - top 19796 - results: 1
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML - 2GB RAM/Intel Z3560 - 1080p
AnTuTu average 41859 - top 42046 - results: 2
GeekBench average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
SunSpider average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
3DMark Icestorm average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE550ML - 2GB RAM/Intel Z3560 - 720p
AnTuTu average 43581 - top 43581 - results: N/A
GeekBench average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
SunSpider average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
3DMark Icestorm average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
Bought from gearbest.com China version 4GB RAM, 1.8GHz processor, 32GB storage. AnTuTu 41672. For comparison my Note 3 running CM11 Latest Snapshot build got AnTuTu 42212.
ZE550ML 5.5" 720P 16GB 2GB
Very happy with this benchmark. Also scored over 18000 on 3Dmark Ice Storm
Mine got 42046 antutu on 1.8ghz/2GB version [emoji1]
Bechmarks? Meh!!
Are benchmarks really a point of concern? I mean come on, ZenFone 2 is a flagship of Asus, it's gotta be a one hell of a device.
It surely beats its competitors with the performance.
Cheers!
mihir2035 said:
Are benchmarks really a point of concern? I mean come on, ZenFone 2 is a flagship of Asus, it's gotta be a one hell of a device.
It surely beats its competitors with the performance.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, we all known, benchmark is just for fun with zenfone 2 [emoji1]
Hey there, here are my benchmarks.
I've got the 2.3ghz atom with 4gb of ram and 1080p display 32gb storage
antutu
45781
3dmark Ice Storm Unlimited
19796
3dmark Ice Storm Extreme
MAXED OUT (10294)
Geekbench
single core
905
multi core
2897
Sunspider (chrome)
698.4ms +/- 5.4%
mihir2035 said:
Are benchmarks really a point of concern? I mean come on, ZenFone 2 is a flagship of Asus, it's gotta be a one hell of a device.
It surely beats its competitors with the performance.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they are, especially due to all the different variations.
It's a good way to see if paying an extra 50 per model step is worth the performance bump or not.
Also thanks everyone for submitting scores!
I guess its pretty accurate score
Here's mine in Antutu.
Im using the 2.3GHz, 4GB Ram, 32GB ROM.
Got this score once.
And average of 43-44k.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using xda premium
Antutu 47k
Thanks for the new submissions, I'll add them to the results as soon as I'm home
Hello, on 1,8ghz/2go ram - 720p
62328
Cm13
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using Tapatalk
Looks like CM13 isn't fully optimized..
I get around 65k antutu points on stock rom.
kenbo111 said:
Cm13
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2gb or 4gb?
Stock rom deodex, root, deleted bloat, boret24's kernel, stock daily settings
65k
http://shrani.najdi.si/?46/10A/2kH18SQn/screenshot2016-04-25-21-.jpg
http://shrani.najdi.si/?3h/jG/3wmAKXhK/screenshot2016-04-25-21-.jpg
My device actually delivers good benchmark numbers, including on Antutu, BUT my MEM score is VERY VERY LOW. I've watched some Antutu video scores and every exynos s10 delivers around 11k~12K. My score is much lower even compared to very old phones like an S7.
I've even tested my RAM speed using an app called "RAM benchmark" and the speed is spot on with our model.
What's the MEM test? Is my RAM score low or is it my ROM score? Should I be worried? What could I do to solve this issue?
Edit/Solution: not sure which one solved the issue, but I deleted the dalvik/art cache and reinstalled the Antutu app, after both operations I ran the test again and my MEM score was 11,9k. Sorry for any inconvenience.