My device actually delivers good benchmark numbers, including on Antutu, BUT my MEM score is VERY VERY LOW. I've watched some Antutu video scores and every exynos s10 delivers around 11k~12K. My score is much lower even compared to very old phones like an S7.
I've even tested my RAM speed using an app called "RAM benchmark" and the speed is spot on with our model.
What's the MEM test? Is my RAM score low or is it my ROM score? Should I be worried? What could I do to solve this issue?
Edit/Solution: not sure which one solved the issue, but I deleted the dalvik/art cache and reinstalled the Antutu app, after both operations I ran the test again and my MEM score was 11,9k. Sorry for any inconvenience.
Related
One of my coworkers has a tmobile vibrant with some lag fix according to him.. he did a quadrant benchmark right in front of me and it was showing 2500 plus everytime.. Im very curious as to what is making his phone so fast. And can it be dont to ours. Hes not running a custom rom or overclocking. Im only getting 1030 with mine clocked at 1.2ghz. Any Ideas? I couldnt get into too much details with him yesterday and I dont know whens the next time ill see him..
If you were to look at a test break down you would see generally all the scores are identical or the epic a little ahead except in the read/write area. The scores from their read/write are just inflating their overall score. It's a issue with quadrant and how it handles its overall score. Basically it just makes the system easy to abuse/cheat. So I wouldn't worry much about the difference in your score and his.
Sent from my Samsung Epic
The reason other Galaxy S phones score high in quadrant is because of the lag fix they use. The lag fix mounts a different file system on the phone with DRAMATICALLY increases read-write times. That portion of the quadrant benchmark gets inflated beyond reason. Using this game technique, Cyanogen was able to score more than 3000 on a snapdragon phone.
All of the Galaxy S phones have the same processor. Also, quadrant is a terrible benchmark. It's the most over-quoted and abused benchmark for android phones
Ahh ok.. thats good to know.. so what would be a better benchmark to use? Linpack?
jok3sta said:
Ahh ok.. thats good to know.. so what would be a better benchmark to use? Linpack?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack is good for measuring raw CPU processing power... but only on devices running the same version of android. Phones with 2.2 will score insanely high due to the JIT compiler. For example, a snapdragon phone with Froyo can score ~40 Mflops. A snapdragon phone with eclair scores around 7 Mflops. Does Froyo make the phone run 5-6X faster? Hell no. In some cases, the difference is almost unnoticeable to the human eye.
Here is a rundown of what I believe to be the pros and cons of various benchmarks:
Linpack
Pros:
- Good for measuring CPU processing power on the same version of Android
- Great tool for measuring the performance gain from overclocking
Cons
- Scores are boosted unreasonably by Froyo's JIT compiler on snapdragon phones
Quadrant
Pros:
- Great tool for measuring the performance gain from overclocking
- Decent tool for measuring 3D graphics performance (just pay attention to FPS, not the end result)
- Decent tool for measuring 2D graphics performance (again, look at FPS)
- The paid version ("Quadrant Pro" I believe) shows which parts of the benchmark contributed to the score. Easier to spot the inflated CPU or I/O inflation
Cons:
- I/O portion isn't valued as much as others, but can boost scores beyond reason via exploits, hacks, fixes, etc.
- CPU portion is inflated on phones running 2.2. A Nexus One is not faster than any Galaxy S, Droid X, Droid 2, etc.
Neocore
Pros:
- Good tool for measuring graphics processing power
Cons:
- Graphics are not intense enough to push the power of very fast GPU's. Some phones will hit their FPS limit
- Only measures graphics processing power.
Nenamark1
Pros:
- Great tool for measuring graphics processing power
- Effects are advanced enough to show the performance of faster GPUs in relation to phones with lesser GPUs.
Cons:
- Only measures graphics processing power.
Sweet thanks for all the info man..
Agreed, this is great info thanks. I think the quadrant score is the most quoted becuase it provides a very easy to read graph built in with it for instant comparing/gratification. I guess I am gonna start going by linpack and nenamark1.
hydralisk said:
Linpack is good for measuring raw CPU processing power... but only on devices running the same version of android. Phones with 2.2 will score insanely high due to the JIT compiler. For example, a snapdragon phone with Froyo can score ~40 Mflops. A snapdragon phone with eclair scores around 7 Mflops. Does Froyo make the phone run 5-6X faster? Hell no. In some cases, the difference is almost unnoticeable to the human eye.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack is ok for when your using same CPU comparison, different CPU's can cause issues...The reason why snapdragon gets scores of 5-6x is for some reason the snapdragon utilizes the VFP rather then using raw processing power..aka snapdragon cheats on the Linpack.
In reality our I/O scores should be a lot higher then it is as even in the Epic some of samsung's crappy file system still exists. But not as high as the lagfixed Vibrant of course.
Quadrant Pro is probably best indicator out of them all(The non-pro version is pretty much useless unless your comparing the same phone)...the con of having 2.2 show is higher is expected as it is a measure of efficiency of JIT in comparison to the current. The OS always played a role in Benchmarks so it is expected.
it can be faked by using a different partition to test on. IIRC the data partition making the speeds much faster than they should be so be careful when accepting those high scores
rjmjr69 said:
it can be faked by using a different partition to test on. IIRC the data partition making the speeds much faster than they should be so be careful when accepting those high scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not exactly faking it..as you are increasing performance..thing is you cannot see at what it performs well at unless you see the individual scores from the Pro version....
how to get a high score in antutu using liquidsmooth rom?:fingers-crossed:
To be honest buddy....benchmark scores mean naff all! I couldnt give two toots about what "score" an app gives my device....i give it 10/10 because its what i want it to be....i wouldn't pay any attention to benchmark scores. People are always complaining about too much ram usage etc, remember....unused ram is wasted ram.
Throw out as much apps as possible, use as less features as possible (no phone calls, no messaging), overclock your CPU and GPU, use as less RAM as possible, switch to CyanogenMod or any other close-to-vanilla Android ROM.
What do you care more about? Some random numbers from benchmarks or the real performance and amount of features during daily usage?
Benchmarks only give pure performance rating based on some random calculations. It gives no overview about how good the phone performs during daily usage. The number does not show you anything. A phone with extremely low benchmark score can work perfectly with no lag in the UI during daily usage, whereas phone with high benchmark score can be laggy and stuttering.
Just my opinion... This thread really is stupid. I mean the OP question.
Sent from my N9005
Hey guys. I have really put this phone through the paces. Something isnt reallly making sense for me. I tested a lot of phones in this category and price range. On paper, it seems to be more powerful than the rest but im not noticing this. I had my deviced rooted etc but I have reverted back to stock reruud and tried to use the phone normally for a week or so with just the internal memory being used. I wanted to get the most realistic use case benchmarks possible.. Here are my results.. I just ran the test. Then I ran it again. Then I enable CPU high performance mode through dev options and ran it one more time. ANNNNNDDD one more time with CPU HP Mode Enabled with Airplane mode on. FYI.. this did nothign. Here are my ANTUTU RESULTS (P.S. I am using v6.1.4 on android 5.1)
Run 1
Overall Score 20734
3D 898
UX 7984
CPU 7799
RAM 4053
Run 2
Overall Score 20159
3D 894
UX 7611
CPU 7830
RAM 3824
Run 3 (CPU high performance mode)
Overall Score 20734
3D 898
UX 7926
CPU 7810
RAM 4025
Run 4 (CPU high perf mode x airplane mode)
Overall Score 20845
3D 903
UX 8111
CPU 7780
RAM 4051
CAN ANYONE POST THERE RESULTS and THE DEVICE VARIANT? Thanks!
Here's a pic with results from all four, I used quadrant because my phone wasn't compatible with the 3d app that AtTuTu needed for there test. I'm am the sprint variant and I'm on stock marshmallow 6.0.1
Hello , i am using the exyynos variant of the s7 edge. When i benchmark it i get a score of 105000 on average.
But the other s7 edge variants get a score of 138000. which is a big differance. Does anyone know y this is happening.
I experiance some log while playing games too.
Thanks in advance
jharsh143 said:
Hello , i am using the exyynos variant of the s7 edge. When i benchmark it i get a score of 105000 on average.
But the other s7 edge variants get a score of 138000. which is a big differance. Does anyone know y this is happening.
I experiance some log while playing games too.
Thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Be sure you bench the phone from a cold state as the score will drop big time if it's heated. Also the lag should go away in two weeks.
turn off all power saving options and other features present in nougat
also, whisper in its ear when you start the benchmark from cold...
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
It's normal. I get lower score in Antutu Benchmark every device I use like Note 2, Note Edge, S7 Edge. There are too many reasons for that, first is heat. Number of installed app, cache, thumbnails, Whatsapp Files and SD Card fullness are other things to effect Antutu score.
(Antutu Average Score is calculate in best conditions, I mean, it's just theorotical score, not pratically. So, you don't need to think about getting lower score on Antutu )
Like everyone said, you should bench from cold state. Also delete every app running in backround. :good:
like it matters... the overall performance is the most important and I addume you're happy with S7 speed.
life is too short to worry about benchmarks
Hi there,
I recently bought a used v20 and found it to be really slow for a SD 820 device so today i ran Antutu and Geekbench and i'm getting like 73k in antutu and 1800 multicore in Geekbench.
That does not look right. Any suggestions?
I've searched around and no one else who thinks their phone is lagging did the benchmarks.
That doesn't sound right. Mine is running nice and smooth with no issues, did you purchase the phone from a carrier of 3rd party?
antutu average for this phone is around 130k i believe so your phone isnt working right
Your scores are really low.
I've just ran both tests and get the following results:
Antutu - 148346
Geekbench 4 - Multicore - 4061