Database Users

FPS limit cap

whilst running Quadrant, there were a few issues that occured to me, The TF is supposed to have a superior GPU so why has Asus capped the frames per second in the graphics benchmark my Xperia X8 which is far less superior than the TF can reach around 50 FPS on the moon orbiting sun graphics, while the TF can only do about 30-35, i was just wondering if this should be an issue

Resolution

rilot said:
Resolution
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
very straightforward answer man.

Nenamark1 => 35fps
Nenamark2 => 18fps
Quadrant => 2528 avg
Smartbench 2011 = 3232
Running Roach's Prime 1.4 (HC 3.1)
Terrible FPS scores in comparison to other inferior devices. The Smartbench scores show it's pretty close to other 1.0ghz HC Tegra2 devices.... but still not great....

dual core snapdragon s4 version only getting 6800 range using Antutu

YouTube vids circulating with the dual core version only getting 6800 range using antutu whereas the international quad core version is getting 11 - 12k
Is antutu a bad benchmark?

For_itembine said:
YouTube vids circulating with the dual core version only getting 6800 range using antutu whereas the international quad core version is getting 11 - 12k
Is antutu a bad benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu is a benchmark that scales very well with more cores, it's just the way the app is written. So in a sense it is a very good benchmark, but as a representation of a devices ability to run android apps, it is fairly inaccurate as not many apps take advantage of more than 2 cores.
Hope i helped
Regards
Jack

[Q] Nexus 10 Geekbench - Benchmark

Hi all,
I can't find any benchmark about Nexus 10 on GeekBench. I need to compare it with Apple Ipad 4 CPU (already listed on geekbench website).
Someone could help me?
Where can I find a benchmark?

crashlab said:
Hi all,
I can't find any benchmark about Nexus 10 on GeekBench. I need to compare it with Apple Ipad 4 CPU (already listed on geekbench website).
Someone could help me?
Where can I find a benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will smash the iPad 4. But no-one has had a chance to bench it yet.
Dual Exynos 5250 ARM-Cortex A15 CPU vs @1.7GHz
Dual Apple A6 ARM-Cortex A9 (with some architectural enhancements from A15) @ 1.3GHz
Mali-604 GPU which is 4-5x faster than previous generations Mali-400 GPU
PowerVR SGX543MP4 GPU which is great compared to Tegra and OMAP, but not compared to Mali-604
RAM is double on Nexus 10.

Geekbench on N10 is 2315 as per ZDNET. On N4, it's 1961.
I think they should improve further as Google clearly haven't optimized the drivers properly. A lot of work needs to be done from google to to optimize the devices. Expect to improve further in future.

Just got 2657 on geek bench on my nexus 10. It's rooted with a custom rom but not overclocked

I got only 1590 with geekbench on my CM11+KTmanta Nexus 10..
so how can you get 2700..?

rhyxos said:
I got only 1590 with geekbench on my CM11+KTmanta Nexus 10..
so how can you get 2700..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi
Geekbench 3 scores shouldn't be compared with Geekbench 2 scores. AFAIK your score is related to GB3 while theirs (that are older) are related to GB2 .
~Lord

XxLordxX said:
Hi
Geekbench 3 scores shouldn't be compared with Geekbench 2 scores. AFAIK your score is related to GB3 while theirs (that are older) are related to GB2 .
~Lord
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought my device had some power issues with that score (1500)

North America 2.3/64 model benchmark results

Here are my benchmarks for the North America 2.3/64 model:
3DMark: 20458
Quadrant: 23146
Antutu: 47777
Vellamo HTML5: 3718
Vellamo Metal: 1395
Linpack: 510.053
Geekbench single: 913
Geekbench multi: 2868
NenaMark 2: 59.7
GFXBench 3.1 T-Rex: 1674
GFXBench Manhattan: 775
Basemark X: 19438
Basemark OS II: 1224
http://postimg.org/gallery/2cxh8x5p2/dc3078d8/
And yes, T-Mo sucks here lol.

How did u get over 47k in antutu?

Geekbench isn't really a good source at the moment. It is limited to 32-bit, so it can't utilize the full potential of the SoC.
They need to release a 64-bit compliant version to really be able to run the tests correctly.

elkay said:
Here are my benchmarks for the North America 2.3/64 model:
3DMark: 20458
Quadrant: 23146
Antutu: 47777
Vellamo HTML5: 3718
Vellamo Metal: 1395
Linpack: 510.053
Geekbench single: 913
Geekbench multi: 2868
NenaMark 2: 59.7
GFXBench 3.1 T-Rex: 1674
GFXBench Manhattan: 775
Basemark X: 19438
Basemark OS II: 1224
http://postimg.org/gallery/2cxh8x5p2/dc3078d8/
And yes, T-Mo sucks here lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not BM mine yet but based on those numbers.... WOW!!!!
I am also considering the price of the phone vs the scores when I say that.
The S6 comes in at nearly 68k on Antutu but the 48k score still puts this phone in the current top 10.

ze551ml antutu test :

Also...
Antutu: 48475

2.3Ghz Clock Speed

Just noticed after doing benchmark tests that the results are showing all 8 cores clocking in at max of 1.8Ghz (which should be the co processors speed). The main should be 2.3Ghz according to Huawei's spec on the phone. Battery Management setting is set to Performance.
Just wondering if anyone else noticed this or has input?

yeah ive been seeing this on pretty much all apps thus far. my guess is that its an issue with reading the correct clocks on the A72 cores, only the weaker A53 cores seem to be registered and monitored. as long as your scores are fine i wouldnt worry too much about it cpu-wise, the kirin 950 is on par with SD820 and exynos 8890
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk

jbmc83 said:
yeah ive been seeing this on pretty much all apps thus far. my guess is that its an issue with reading the correct clocks on the A72 cores, only the weaker A53 cores seem to be registered and monitored. as long as your scores are fine i wouldnt worry too much about it cpu-wise, the kirin 950 is on par with SD820 and exynos 8890
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just making sure we're not getting a device that's quite a step down in clock speed from what the manufacturer is telling us.
2.3 & 1.8 is quite a difference.
Sent from my HUAWEI NXT-L29 using XDA-Developers mobile app

mthorn79 said:
Just making sure we're not getting a device that's quite a step down in clock speed from what the manufacturer is telling us.
2.3 & 1.8 is quite a difference.
Sent from my HUAWEI NXT-L29 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.3GHz is the max speed of big cores, and 1.8 is the max speed of the little cores. A lot of apps incorrectly report max speeds, core number...

ufoman said:
2.3GHz is the max speed of big cores, and 1.8 is the max speed of the little cores. A lot of apps incorrectly report max speeds, core number...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can understand that maybe some outdated apps could do this, like say Quadrant that hasn't been updated since 2012, but a top rated app like Antutu also reports 1.8...even CPUZ which has been the most accurate in desktop and mobile data even shows 1.8ghz. Should we just assume these apps can't read the A72 chip?
«Mate8»

So after using these tools:
Antutu
Geekbench 3
Quadrant
Vellamo
Cpuid
Vellamo was the only one to distinguish processors#1-#4 [email protected] and processors#5-#8 at 2.3ghz
«Mate8»

mthorn79 said:
So after using these tools:
Antutu
Geekbench 3
Quadrant
Vellamo
Cpuid
Vellamo was the only one to distinguish processors#1-#4 [email protected] and processors#5-#8 at 2.3ghz
«Mate8»
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Antutu 6 definitely shows 2,3GHz in info screens.
in Vellamo, if you look at benchmark details, you can see CPU going up to 2.,3GHz.
For most comprehensive information about the CPU, you might want to install AIDA64.

mthorn79 said:
So after using these tools:
Antutu
Geekbench 3
Quadrant
Vellamo
Cpuid
Vellamo was the only one to distinguish processors#1-#4 [email protected] and processors#5-#8 at 2.3ghz
«Mate8»
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was taken using Chainfire's CPUMon while running Antutu :

if the A72 cores were really only ramping up to 1.8 ghz we wouldve noticed by now according to the geekbench scores, trust me
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk

Ok so ran Antutu again and now it's showing max freq @ 2.3...I swear last week it was showing 1.8 as max...oh well, all is good. False alarm.
«Mate8»

maybe theyve updated smth in the meantime
Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10 using Tapatalk