I have been reading around and i can't seem to find any kernel for the latest gingerbread leak the one to hit XDA about 3 or 4 days back, i wondered if anyone knew of such kernel?
For example the OC/UV BUZZ kernel i used before in the android revolution HD 3.1 ROM but apparently now only stock kernels could be used with the new 4.0 Beta 2 ROM (thanks mike) but the question i am asking is can it be done? what is stopping devs from creating a new kernel for this? i can't i haven't a clue what i'm doing when it comes to coding and such ill hold my hands up i'm new.
Why there are no kernels:
1) The source isn't out.
2) There are no drivers.
There is now
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA Premium App
Related
Normally I swap Roms like a mad man but after a lot if experimenting I been on Cm7.1 Rc1 and I curious how do I know what kernels are compatible with what Roms some aren't to specific. I'm just trying to get the Max battery life I'f anyone knows a rom or a kernel that helps maximize that let me know ty. P.s sorry for noob question
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App
the kernel will say cm7,aosp,sense,miu etc as well as which version of android it supports(froyo,gingerbread) your best bet is checking faux's cm7/aosp kernel thread in dev section, thederekjays kernel is also a winner and should be checked out.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App
keji13 said:
Normally I swap Roms like a mad man but after a lot if experimenting I been on Cm7.1 Rc1 and I curious how do I know what kernels are compatible with what Roms some aren't to specific. I'm just trying to get the Max battery life I'f anyone knows a rom or a kernel that helps maximize that let me know ty. P.s sorry for noob question
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are only two kernels for our phone. Sense kernels and asop/cm7 kernels.
However, there are two different kernel version for asop .32 and. 35
The op will designate which it is and what it is used for. Just read carefully and you wont have a problem.
Sent from my Google Nexus 12! yup I'm from the future
Thanks a bunch I was on deemonspeeds kernel last with scary governor.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App
I have been looking around recently, and noticed we only have the .32 kernel, which is made for froyo.
CyanogenMod team are apparently upgrading all MSM7x30 devices to the 3.0 kernel.
I was wondering for in the meantime, some HTC phones are MSM7x30 (DHD) and have .35 kernel source, would it be possible to port a kernel?
Keiran
Just do it up big guy I'll test it out when your ready
Sent from my R800a using XDA App
thatsupnow said:
Just do it up big guy I'll test it out when your ready
Sent from my R800a using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+ 1 on that
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
KeiranFTW said:
I have been looking around recently, and noticed we only have the .32 kernel, which is made for froyo.
CyanogenMod team are apparently upgrading all MSM7x30 devices to the 3.0 kernel.
I was wondering for in the meantime, some HTC phones are MSM7x30 (DHD) and have .35 kernel source, would it be possible to port a kernel?
Keiran
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Won't we end up with no touch pads and xloud without the libs for the .35 (that don't exist)
Sent from my R800i using Tapatalk
Touchpads is ROM related, the whole touchpad goes under a generic multi-touch mouse pad if I remember correctly.
About this, I tried but cant compile, some major porting needs to be done and I just don't have the time.
Sent from my Xperia Play
Lukenda has claimed at least twice that this particular version of Gingerbread (2.3.5) runs better on stock kernel... His opinion.
So, come on Lukenda, tell us more.
Anyone who has toyed with this version is more than welcomed to chime in.
One particular thing worth noticing is that no stable release of CyanogenMod is based around 2.3.5.
MiniCM7 2.0.7 is based on 2.3.5 and it's stable
yes i did and i based it on a long time of using them.
there is a stable 2.3.5 rease by nAa
,there are few minor bugs but i dont mind them.
try to use minicm7 2.0.7 and some 2.3.7
rom such as gdx.
make a comparison between those two and test battery speed in apps such as YouTube and internet browsers.
All games I have been able on 7 rom were playable on .5 rom.
Please test for your self and report.
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
Let me repeat myself. there's no stable release of CyanogenMod based around 2.3.5: http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/CyanogenMod_7_Changelog
Stable release, as in final release, as opposed to a nightly release or a release candidate.
Lukenda said:
yes i did and i based it on a long time of using them.
there is a stable 2.3.5 rease by nAa
,there are few minor bugs but i dont mind them.
try to use minicm7 2.0.7 and some 2.3.7
rom such as gdx.
make a comparison between those two and test battery speed in apps such as YouTube and internet browsers.
All games I have been able on 7 rom were playable on .5 rom.
Please test for your self and report.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*Sigh*
I was really hoping for something better than that. Your claim that the 2.3.5 is indeed better is totally unfounded.
The only thing you are left with after that kind of testing is that for your use MiniCM is better than other ROMs and the hypothesis that it might be because of the android version.
You could have at the very least get your hands on GingerDX v015 to test your claim.
And if anyone is interested in actual testing, a proper way would be to compare GingerDX v015 to GingerDX v016.
To take it a step further comparing XGin 5.4 to XGin 6.0 and kuyaDROID v3.2.175 to v.4.3.233 (which I think was the next available release) would be needed.
I still have the original nAa's GB (2.3.5 for stock kernel) rom, so if anybody is interested in testing that rom, i'll ask nAa if i could reupload it on MF if nobody finds a working link .
Fortun said:
Let me repeat myself. there's no stable release of CyanogenMod based around 2.3.5: http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/CyanogenMod_7_Changelog
Stable release, as in final release, as opposed to a nightly release or a release candidate.
*Sigh*
I was really hoping for something better than that. Your claim that the 2.3.5 is indeed better is totally unfounded.
The only thing you are left with after that kind of testing is that for your use MiniCM is better than other ROMs and the hypothesis that it might be because of the android version.
You could have at the very least get your hands on GingerDX v015 to test your claim.
And if anyone is interested in actual testing, a proper way would be to compare GingerDX v015 to GingerDX v016.
To take it a step further comparing XGin 5.4 to XGin 6.0 and kuyaDROID v3.2.175 to v.4.3.233 (which I think was the next available release) would be needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why dont yo do it?
i was just saying how clean version is it,and if u have something to say first try out yourself. :screwy:
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
That was his opinion , all you do now is to judge him...
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app
Mockingbird said:
That was his opinion , all you do now is to judge him...
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
who is judging,i just layout my personal opinion and he startrd a whole new thread about it .
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
woah guys. let's keep this a clean discussion. i'm actually interested as i haven't tried 2.3.5 myself.
Sent from my rooted tomato using xda app
KuyaDroid is stable rom,and it's 2.3.5 android version!
Link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1109563
mimicm is stable too
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
how about the performance against froyo and 2.3.7? haven't tried kuyadroid.
Sent from my rooted tomato using xda app
cascabel said:
how about the performance against froyo and 2.3.7? haven't tried kuyadroid.
Sent from my rooted tomato using xda app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.3.7 roms has best performance then all other versions
benchmarks are not reliable.:thumbdown:
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
Hey everyone! So I've pretty much left gingerbread ever since there was a stable Ics, and never looked back...until last week! Ive gone back to Oxygen 2.3.2, and I'm wondering if anyone has an old version of the Matr1x kernel? I think ever version before 11.0 is compatible, so does anyone have a version laying around? I asked around in the matr1x thread, but didn't get an answer
Thanks in advanced!
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Matr1x GB kernels, from my personal box account, as always.
CFS
Matr1x-cfs_v5.5
Matr1x-cfs_v6.5
Matr1x-cfs_v7.0
Matr1x-cfs_v8.0
Matr1x-cfs_v9.0
Matr1x-cfs_v9.5
Matr1x-cfs_v10.0
Matr1x-cfs_v10.5
Matr1x-cfs_v11.0
Matr1x-cfs_v11.5
BFS
Matr1x-bfs_v11.5
https://www.box.com/s/vov09izaiakzewtvddzw
here is the link from matrix site for v11. it works for gingerbread
http://downloadandroidrom.com/file/matr1x/NexusSandNexusS4G/11.0
and v11.5 also works on gingerbread i think:
http://downloadandroidrom.com/file/matr1x/NexusSandNexusS4G/11.5
My bad, I thought starting at 11.0, it was ics and above, thanks though!
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Hello guys, I'm looking for the fastest kernel+ROM combination for this phone (i9000). Would be awesome if it was with android 4.1.2 (at least)
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
There is no fastest Rom and kernel. You have to find what suits for you.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Fastest? This is the fastest...
I use gamerzrom and im happy.
Depends on you really what apps are you running.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
What version and with which one of the kernels?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
i do not like cm's overcharging that made my battery swell
also i find it not reliable as often i had missed calls (phone restarted or lost signal) while it waas untoched on the desk
Best rom+kernel is GamerzROM Legend Edition v3.0 (Android 4.2.2) with Semaphore Kernel 2.9.25s . PM me if you need a download link for the ROM.
Zahovay said:
Hello guys, I'm looking for the fastest kernel+ROM combination for this phone (i9000). Would be awesome if it was with android 4.1.2 (at least)
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP Super Nexus ROM 2.0 BIULD 4 + Mackay Kernel 0.318 is the best and fastest combination for your I9000...I am using it right now and no problems so far with this kernel you get 396MB of RAM and purest and closest to stock Android ROM...That's all from me the choice is yours now...
Could you link it?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Zahovay said:
Could you link it?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2024374 - for the Mackay Kernel 4.2 (0.318)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2219235 - for the BEST ROM Super Nexus 2.0 BUILD 4
go to http://get.cm/?device=galaxysmtd and pick RC4 build or later. It'll probably not dissapoint. There's helly bean which I've been using before, but it hasn't been updated since 130426 I think, and it's really disappointing compared to cm 10.1 RC4.
Other than that, I guess the last cm9 is pretty good and cm7 but it's old now. If you decide to go with some kind of stock rom, particularily value pack. Try hardcore's last speedmod kernel for sgs. It's THE best kernel I've used with the phone regarding speed/stability.
It's a pity hardcore doesn't make cm kernels.
Personally
My selection: Fastest, stable, .... ¿but? battery eater: GamerzROM Legend Edition v3.0 (semaphore Updated). Promising one, with good battery live SuperNexus 2.0 - I9000 - Milestone 1. Battery live and goof performance: SAURON (GB). C-RoM Mix good other to try. And maybe you like Slim Bean. Test and decide..
For me Infamous AOKP with semaphore has been good
Thanks bro atm i'm trying the gamerzROM. Its quite good but as u said battery eater.. Ill try the rest later( there are still some game to test)
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
are you aware that gamerzROM / SuperNexus / AOKP are all the same with few diff PNG's in few system apk's and all are still based on CYANOGEN ?
so best you can do is use CM latest nightlies (from it comes your beta rom versions) in combination with some kernel that You like
so none of those got better battery life or better perrformance - the only diff betwen them is the kernel.
remember CM is the base and then comes someone calling himelf a dev like faryab and copy pastes cm and aokp features,
depending on complication of that he might screw it or leave it ok as it was in CM or AOKP
then adds some kernel stolen from another devs and there you go a ROM
more features it incorporates (kernel) the worse - belive me ...
and stock 2.3.6 is still more stable lacks only jb look but thats i9000 for **** sake ...
i really like semaphore with slimbean
good for you, semaphore is good kernel maker and as for themes i like stock look
What's the difference between nightlies and simple cyanogen? Do you know? And u say then that i should simply take back my cm10.1 with semaphore?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
nightlies introduce new functions, bugfixes first but also might be unstable or even introduce faulty update packages leading to a softbrick (had such situations once)
normal are tested and marked as stable, daily use (bs)
And u sure that cm is compatible with semaphore? Or do u know any faster kernel for i9000?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium