whats your quadrant score? and how did u achieve that?
HRodMusic said:
whats your quadrant score? and how did u achieve that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stock vibrants are usually 800-1000
w/ voodoo ext4 lagfx: 1400-1800
OCLF ext2 lagfix : 2k+
quadrant scores dont mean much to me anymore.. its all about user experience. even tho OCLF has a higher quadrant, i found voodoo a lot more stable,faster and overall better user experience
HRodMusic said:
whats your quadrant score? and how did u achieve that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im running macnut r14, dow oc 1.3 kernel, and oclf.
Getting around the area of the 2100s.
But sometime this week im going back to Master's Axura final rom.
Scores really don't matter but hitting 2800. I'm running Nero3 w/ dow1.3 and oclf.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nerobeta3+dow1.4+oclf
Axura final 1.3 D.o.w and oclf
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Let me tell you, get the paid quadrant app and you can see the breakdown of how you got your score.. if you lagfix you will see it is mostly I/O. I am more than happy with the performance of my axura rom with a score of 968 with no lagfix.
Total: 968 Cpu: 1358 Memory: 1704 I/O: 592 2d:303 3d: 881
I don't usually use the free version of things for to long before I buy them but I will not pay for something like this ,just saying
Nerobeta3+dow1.4+oclf
D.O.W. DOW ??
What's dow?
shawn605 said:
What's dow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's one of tw's kernels:
http://board.teamwhiskey.com/viewforum.php?f=26
i got like 1153 with nero3 and dow14bln. not bad for no lagfix.
i tried this though i don't believe in this scores. Mine is 1253.
Can anyone tell ke whats dow?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
hitman818 said:
Can anyone tell ke whats dow?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's the destroyer of worlds kernel by team whiskey. it's an oc 2.2 kernel with 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4ghz overclocks. it's not in the dev section, you have to go to their forums for it.
Nero3 w/DoW14 +OCLF got a 2525 quad score.
1381
Using Axura 2.1 with voodoo
2500 eugenes cyagenmod up CPU is higher then the n1 and with everything else
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
i get around 1.9k at max.
sig for rom and lag fixes.
Nero beta 3 + OCLF + Super io
I'm over 5000! Lol.
When there is a test/score app that uses a human interaction algorithm I'll post my score.
All~G1 said:
I'm over 5000! Lol.
When there is a test/score app that uses a human interaction algorithm I'll post my score.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wtf
Nero beta 3 + oclf + super I/O
Related
please post your quadrant scores so we can compare!
Quadrant doesn't mean much
even when you hit 2000+ score, your device still performs about the same in real life.
think about it
not sure i agree - after lag fix, my quadrant scores jumped up to 2109 to 2312 (e test ran)
and i notice Market opens now almost instantly, same with youtube
other apps, all appear to be opening faster, some only slightly faster while others i can major improvement
either way quadrant is definitely miz and we need something better. It's like looking at 3D mark scores, sites like Tomshardware and Anandtech might post them, but they specifically state how superfluous they are.
2200
Firmware JG5 + RyanZA's lag fix
alovell83 said:
either way quadrant is definitely miz and we need something better. It's like looking at 3D mark scores, sites like Tomshardware and Anandtech might post them, but they specifically state how superfluous they are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my though
Also, quadrant only tests specific things.. Benchmarks are a tool, and it's easy to optimise for them, with much less gains to everything else..
1020 no lagfix jp2 "hk"
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Around 2500-2700
2244 using one click RyanZA's lag fix on JF5 firmware
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I got 2350 with lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
1675 lagfixed ^^ idk how ppl get 2K+
Not that it matters, but standard bell firmware, rooted and lagfixed:
2144
2245 and very happy.
Sent from galaxy s. JG4 + oneclick lag fix version 2.3
Andrewwelton said:
Not that it matters, but standard bell firmware, rooted and lagfixed:
2144
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exact same here.
I wish people would stop posting quadrant requests everywhere. Any developer can tell you they don't always mean much..
ZSJH1 + OCLF
2121
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2241
2240
Stock JF4 + RyanZA's One click lagfix.
larryccf said:
not sure i agree - after lag fix, my quadrant scores jumped up to 2109 to 2312 (e test ran)
and i notice Market opens now almost instantly, same with youtube
other apps, all appear to be opening faster, some only slightly faster while others i can major improvement
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even know why this happens? It just shows that the overall score is meaningless.
Yes, the lagfix makes the phone more responsive but you can compare it to other scores with the fix in place. You COULD get Quadrant Advanced and compare all the other bits (not I/O).
I got 910 with everything stock
Sent from my GT-I9000M using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've been reading people say theyrebgetting low scores for the ota froyo so I decided to try it myself and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Ya, I'm getting 2k + also. Linpack is also running very fast with best of 342ms. I'm impressed. It's not only scoring great in benchmarks, but also as you mentioned very responsive.
Which versions did you guys flash, and which theme?
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
bobdude5 said:
and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me guess, the Christmas (or another) theme based on Quantum 1.5 ROM? That ROM had a specific configuration to explicitly display the futility of quadrant scores.
WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.....
Sent from my spot on the earth.
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Electrofreak said:
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what other benchmark is non-biased?
NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, same here.
NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yerp. 1050 here on stock update.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me i could have sworn I was in the general section when I posted this! I think there's something funky going on witht the xda app
Sorry about that
ghostrid3r said:
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The the stock rooted deodexed one..and the theme is nova night..but I doubt that has anything to do with the score
I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934
lanielf said:
I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHY????? This is for devs not synthetic scores.....................
... so what?
wow....
a thread
lanielf said:
I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Wrong section (At best it should go under General)
2. Read this Link
My quadrant is just over 9000
EarlZ said:
My quadrant is just over 9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have to take it out of the liquid nitrogen to make a call or is you nails?
let the flaming begin.
everyone's using the same device. this is like an overclocking thread instead =.=
I have 10000...Am i fast now?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1925
Advanced voodoo v666.2
1.28ghz OC
JS3 2.2.1 rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
do these scores get you wet or something?
Whats the big deal?
Someone started the thread, if you ain't gonna answer it probably, why bother posting at all?
I see no problem in seeing which setup gives a higher score, regardless of whether quadrant guides an accurate comparison or not.
I posted mine, plus my setup for all too see.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
chrisjcks said:
Whats the big deal?
Someone started the thread, if you ain't gonna answer it probably, why bother posting at all?
I see no problem in seeing which setup gives a higher score, regardless of whether quadrant guides an accurate comparison or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no big deal. That's why some people are making fun of it...
Because Quadrant does not provide an accurate guideline score for speed of the phone, this thread is a joke, so what's the problem if we're making fun of it?
Peace dude.
The Op was curious and interested in other peoples scores and set up whether its accurate or not.
If youve nothing to contribute then dont post....simple.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
KennyLegend said:
The Op was curious and interested in other peoples scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung Galaxy S I9000 forum > search this forum > type in 'quadrant score' > show posts > enter > miracle
Eclair no lagfix 970
Eclair Ryans lagfix 2220
Froyo no lag fix 1140
Froyo Voodoo lag fix 1540 .
And thats why Quadrant is a bad benchmark laggy Eclair high score non laggy Froyo low score .
jje
The Nexus S get about 1750 so isn't it the score that we should get on a lagfixed Galaxy S?
stock js3 1301
no tweaks at all
Like the topic says.
Post here your benchmark score's, olso tell us what rom and kernel you use .
I prefer quadrant to use
I did a amazing record for my feeling yesterday , with latest Miui rom 1.10.28 + Siyah kerrnel RC3 and made a score of 6040
http://miuiandroid.com/ for the rom
http://www.gokhanmoral.com/gm/ for the kernel
Oc to 1.6 + 1600mV
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thx to all the developers !
Great, another measurebating thread...
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
antiochasylum said:
Great, another measurebating thread...
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^.^ that made me laugh.
tbh, its not the worst thread idea but i wouldnt say quadrant is good for this on the sg2. id suggest using the following.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1134768
My Signature says all
My handset is only running 100 on Quadrant, 200 on Antutu and 300 on CF's benchmark, yet it's lovely to use, so as I'm not 12-years-old or a 50-year-old listening to Phil Collins in a Porsche convertible I'm cool with it.
omgg nice!!!!
Lets compare Avg FPS on angry birds next!!
Nice , goin try the fps when im home .
This thread has been posted multiple times before.. Quick example:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1265184
Oh, and I'm just assuming you posted this thread to show of your score, so please, stop being shy over it. We all got the same device..
Shy of what? Im happy with that score . Always wining complaining pll.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Batista70 Foxhound Edition 3.7.4 + Siyah Kernel 2.1 @ 1,6GHz
Hyperdroid 2.8.7 with siyah 2.1 DK at 1.6ghz
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
@ ephraim033 lol , Thats realy awsome
Thougt that 6k was the top
My benchmark scores are in my signature.
I have decided to abandon Quadrant since it's kinda bad to show how powerfull the Galaxy S II is.
Tom-Helge said:
My benchmark scores are in my signature.
I have decided to abandon Quadrant since it's kinda bad to show how powerfull the Galaxy S II is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont get it, whats wrong with that?
I love galaxy s2
Fibercoax said:
I dont get it, whats wrong with that?
I love galaxy s2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is easy to achieve a high Quadrant score by using kernels/ROMs which are optimised specifically for Quadrant but does not give an increase in other benchmarks or real world usage.
On the previous page, adrianmignogna got an amazing 6380 on Quadrant and 13111, 2853, 6956 on CF-Bench. So his SGS2 must be a super whopper phone which blasts my SGS2 away since I only get 4226 on Quadrant.
However, my exact same phone when tested on CF-Bench gives 12920, 3719, 7399 which actually puts it quite close in performance against his phone (actually beats his score of 6956 vs my 7399). Note that I am using only a fully stock XWKJ1 ROM with root.
Quadrant score
I used quadrant score mostly here's my score ...........
Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.
the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....
foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?
rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?
Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!
Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??
i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D
Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri
RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri
MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000
It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri