Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.
the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....
foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?
rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?
Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!
Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??
i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D
Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri
RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri
MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000
It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri
Related
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've been reading people say theyrebgetting low scores for the ota froyo so I decided to try it myself and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Ya, I'm getting 2k + also. Linpack is also running very fast with best of 342ms. I'm impressed. It's not only scoring great in benchmarks, but also as you mentioned very responsive.
Which versions did you guys flash, and which theme?
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
bobdude5 said:
and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me guess, the Christmas (or another) theme based on Quantum 1.5 ROM? That ROM had a specific configuration to explicitly display the futility of quadrant scores.
WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.....
Sent from my spot on the earth.
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Electrofreak said:
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what other benchmark is non-biased?
NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, same here.
NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yerp. 1050 here on stock update.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me i could have sworn I was in the general section when I posted this! I think there's something funky going on witht the xda app
Sorry about that
ghostrid3r said:
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The the stock rooted deodexed one..and the theme is nova night..but I doubt that has anything to do with the score
I thought id better make this thread so people can get together and share the best quadrant scores they've been able to achieve with there Samsung galaxy s2.
When you post your scores include the following;
1:The ROM you are currently Running Albeit stock or custom.
2:What kernel you have installed.
3:if over-clocked include the speed at which its running (Min and Max).
4.Any other types of tweaks and mods you have.
5: And the finally your score.
Apart from that it would be nice to include how the battery life is etc. and how you think its the best for the speediest ROM (I'll make a chart sometime down the line with the top 10 fastest galaxy s2 phone on XDA)
These Are My Results So far;
1: Lite'ning Rom v6.1 XXKH3
2: SiyahKernel v1.2 - Battery Freindly Version
3: Over-clocked to 1.6ghz (min 1.6 max 1.6) smartass v2
4: No other mods or tweaks.
Score = 4434 Best for me so far
Im currently using lite'ning ROM because it offers me a lag free performance experience, not to keen on the blue theme but will be changing it to green soon. and as for battery life i think its very good and only sips on the battery when not connected to wifi and just pottering around town listening to music and texting with the occasional use of google maps.
Quadrant scores don't mean **** for the Galaxy S II... I guess nobody will ever learn this? Anyways I got a 6969 one time.
Villain rom
Niphetamine 2.0.4 (2.1.3 in screenshot)
200mhz/1600mhz
Under-volted
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I now use 1.4ghz with 200mhz min however.
Like the guy above me, quadrant doesnt mean much, but i still like using it too - its addictive.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
I've deleted Quadrant long ago as it is absolutely useless....
But I'm very happy with my current setup: fast and good battery life and high functionality.
Quadrant Score? I don't even want to know....
Oxygen 2.2.2 rom
Stock voltage/no overclock
Scores of around 4000-4500
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Join this with the other post your Best Quadrant scores posts .
Most useless app for SGS2 Quadrant .
jje
Performance is measured by functionality and application ability in my opinion. Having an app that runs a few tests doesnt mean nothing in my eyes.
Is the sgs2 what i want it to be - YES!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Hehe rolay.. Danger
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Quadrant isn't using much of the galaxys resources, just compare the heat after running quadrant a few times and playing some 3d game.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Sorry but I've seen far too many of these threads. and they are all irrelephant as I am getting a quadrant score that is greater than your phone number.....
Therefore, I win.
Like the topic says.
Post here your benchmark score's, olso tell us what rom and kernel you use .
I prefer quadrant to use
I did a amazing record for my feeling yesterday , with latest Miui rom 1.10.28 + Siyah kerrnel RC3 and made a score of 6040
http://miuiandroid.com/ for the rom
http://www.gokhanmoral.com/gm/ for the kernel
Oc to 1.6 + 1600mV
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thx to all the developers !
Great, another measurebating thread...
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
antiochasylum said:
Great, another measurebating thread...
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^.^ that made me laugh.
tbh, its not the worst thread idea but i wouldnt say quadrant is good for this on the sg2. id suggest using the following.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1134768
My Signature says all
My handset is only running 100 on Quadrant, 200 on Antutu and 300 on CF's benchmark, yet it's lovely to use, so as I'm not 12-years-old or a 50-year-old listening to Phil Collins in a Porsche convertible I'm cool with it.
omgg nice!!!!
Lets compare Avg FPS on angry birds next!!
Nice , goin try the fps when im home .
This thread has been posted multiple times before.. Quick example:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1265184
Oh, and I'm just assuming you posted this thread to show of your score, so please, stop being shy over it. We all got the same device..
Shy of what? Im happy with that score . Always wining complaining pll.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Batista70 Foxhound Edition 3.7.4 + Siyah Kernel 2.1 @ 1,6GHz
Hyperdroid 2.8.7 with siyah 2.1 DK at 1.6ghz
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
@ ephraim033 lol , Thats realy awsome
Thougt that 6k was the top
My benchmark scores are in my signature.
I have decided to abandon Quadrant since it's kinda bad to show how powerfull the Galaxy S II is.
Tom-Helge said:
My benchmark scores are in my signature.
I have decided to abandon Quadrant since it's kinda bad to show how powerfull the Galaxy S II is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont get it, whats wrong with that?
I love galaxy s2
Fibercoax said:
I dont get it, whats wrong with that?
I love galaxy s2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is easy to achieve a high Quadrant score by using kernels/ROMs which are optimised specifically for Quadrant but does not give an increase in other benchmarks or real world usage.
On the previous page, adrianmignogna got an amazing 6380 on Quadrant and 13111, 2853, 6956 on CF-Bench. So his SGS2 must be a super whopper phone which blasts my SGS2 away since I only get 4226 on Quadrant.
However, my exact same phone when tested on CF-Bench gives 12920, 3719, 7399 which actually puts it quite close in performance against his phone (actually beats his score of 6956 vs my 7399). Note that I am using only a fully stock XWKJ1 ROM with root.
Quadrant score
I used quadrant score mostly here's my score ...........
I just get knew that the quadrant have an update with multicore cpu benchmark... so post your samsung galaxy s2 quadrant multicore cpu version score here....
Ps... just fot ref. And sorry for the bad english...
Quadrant = 3
jje
i get 3032 with quadrant standard version @ i9100G
I get 3495 with new version.
I get OVER 9000!!! Nah can't even get the update because AT&T throttled my data speeds down to near nothing. Thanks for the tip. I will definitely have to give it a try when I get home.
4179
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
Although Quadrant carries no real meaning I'll humor the OP 4372
Stock Orange UK KJ4 & Siyah 2.6.12 OC to 1400 & UV
Iget 3919 in i9100g offical rom and kernel 2.3.6
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
4419
At the planets the FPS are under 60 strange even if all other tests show stable 60
Galaxy S II (I9100)
VK 2.5
Siyah kernel
It would be interesting to inform which ROM and kernel you are using.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
blizzari said:
4419
At the planets the FPS are under 60 strange even if all other tests show stable 60
Galaxy S II (I9100)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Planets run at 37/39 for me all others @ 60
4069
AndyX rom 5.2
Just thought it would be nice how much slower the Galaxy Nexus is compared to the S2.
This screenshot is taken at stock speed CPU and gpu. It's not as bad as I thought. Fps never dropped below 58-59.
3570.
Again, this is Galaxy nexus, not the S2. And the main purpose of posting is for comparison's sake.
alferret said:
Although Quadrant carries no real meaning I'll humor the OP 4372
Stock Orange UK KJ4 & Siyah 2.6.12 OC to 1400 & UV
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree with you there big boy. A good example of why this is so : My Motorola milestone 2 can get pushing up to 3500 running cyanogen mod 7. A work mates galaxy s on darky rom can only get around 1900-2200.
Yet in real life performance for speed, responsiveness, game performance his galaxy s absolutely dominates my ms2.
But all the same, it's part of the android fun just trying to push those scores as high as possible for simple kicks
Looking forward to testing out my gf's s2 with this when I get home, thanks for the tip OP
3624 i9100 running ics LPB
4,214 on XXLPB.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I really don't get this quadrant thing, does it have any relevance?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
I get 3897 with original 2.3.6 ROM and Siyah 2.6.12 kernel
3700 points
3983
System info SGS2 has one core only ... this new version is still flawed! Anyway, I don't even know why I bothered to install it
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
I flashed temasek cm13 and ran a benchmark test. Scores surprised me.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The score is not showing
44k how?
Unbeliveable high score.Is it possible in Redmi 2
sarath67 said:
Unbeliveable high score.Is it possible in Redmi 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looks impossible. Antutu Must have some glitches...
Score is in red color
UX score is unbelievably high. Some glitch. Others please try antutu on cm13 temasek. Very stable rom
I had same with standard miui ROM.
This was my score when i was on rr of nick latest build 5.9
sc123001.11 said:
This was my score when i was on rr of nick latest build 5.9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why u all guys thinking its impossible may be of some tweaks in kernal of some in build.prop can make this type of score in antutu... Chill it's our device.... ????
Guys we all know benchmark scores are useless as they can and have been inflated by fake means. I could make a rom that blows all tests away and runs like crap.
zelendel said:
Guys we all know benchmark scores are useless as they can and have been inflated by fake means. I could make a rom that blows all tests away and runs like crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
zelendel said:
Guys we all know benchmark scores are useless as they can and have been inflated by fake means. I could make a rom that blows all tests away and runs like crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but those scores are based on Antutu's new scoring system.
nick37332001 said:
Yes but those scores are based on Antutu's new scoring system.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still means less then nothing. The only people that even run these tests now are noobs and people trying to show off. Or companies trying to reel in the uninformed.
zelendel said:
Still means less then nothing. The only people that even run these tests now are noobs and people trying to show off. Or companies trying to reel in the uninformed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you can say that but most importantly, the system must be stable and perform well in daily task
Sent from my 2014817
nick37332001 said:
Well you can say that but most importantly, the system must be stable and perform well in daily task
Sent from my 2014817
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is true. Which is why no one pays attention to the scores. It has no bearing on how a device runs day to day.