Database Users

Ridiculously high quadrant score

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've been reading people say theyrebgetting low scores for the ota froyo so I decided to try it myself and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Ya, I'm getting 2k + also. Linpack is also running very fast with best of 342ms. I'm impressed. It's not only scoring great in benchmarks, but also as you mentioned very responsive.

Which versions did you guys flash, and which theme?

Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks

It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.

Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.

bobdude5 said:
and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me guess, the Christmas (or another) theme based on Quantum 1.5 ROM? That ROM had a specific configuration to explicitly display the futility of quadrant scores.

WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.....
Sent from my spot on the earth.

Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047

Electrofreak said:
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what other benchmark is non-biased?

NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, same here.

NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yerp. 1050 here on stock update.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me i could have sworn I was in the general section when I posted this! I think there's something funky going on witht the xda app
Sorry about that

ghostrid3r said:
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The the stock rooted deodexed one..and the theme is nova night..but I doubt that has anything to do with the score

Linpack scores on stock xoom after 3.0.1

My score in linpack are now around 35 sin e I updated....that's a drop of 10 to 15 points from before the update. Anyone else notice a drop in linpack?
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

Do you have flash installed?
Also, what app do you use to check the linpack? [edit] nevermind. I found it.
33.614.
3.0.1 with flash installed.
36.14 when I uninstalled flash.
I know it's the same range, but it's strange how everything seems faster without flash installed. I've uninstalled and reinstalled it twice today to see if it made a difference, and I think I'm going to leave it uninstalled until next week.

Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?

First thing I did was unistall flash and then reboot....no good. Then I unintalled most of my apps, reboot, retest, same results. Using linpack app from market.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

Does your Linpack score somehow have something to do with how your Xoom performs, real world?

muyoso said:
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The iPad2 is murdering the xoom in most benchmarks, perhaps it is the better device after all...

ilogik said:
The iPad2 is murdering the xoom in most benchmarks, perhaps it is the better device after all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but that cannot be the only thing at work here. I mean the iPad2 is scoring 5x better than the Xoom in linpack. I highly doubt that the hardware is 5x better than the Xoom, especially when the iPad2's CPU is only clocked at 900mhz.

muyoso said:
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wth... just, wth.

That's got to be photoshop. Who ran the test, using what, and how many times?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App

Usmc7356 said:
That's got to be photoshop. Who ran the test, using what, and how many times?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anandtech. I would trust their numbers over any other site I can think of. They are legit. You can go check out the numbers in their preview of the iPad2.
Link to preview of iPad2:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dualcore-cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2
link to relevant section:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dualcore-cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2/2

AnTutu Benchmark

I know some of you think benchmarks are wack but I use them from time to time to see if im gaining any better performance from different roms and kernels. Used to use Quadrant all the time but a friend told me about AnTutu on the market. Don't know if any of you have used it, but its free and im kind digging it over Quadrant. Try it out if you haven't. Here are some screen shots.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Trigger + Tigersblood = Winning

Thanks will check it out.
Here's a link for anyone wanting to try it out.

Just tried it out. Got a score in the low 1500s. Seems pretty good, although it's kind of depressing not seeing my phone at the top of the list like it always was in Quadrant

Thanks for the heads up

dpaul007 said:
Just tried it out. Got a score in the low 1500s. Seems pretty good, although it's kind of depressing not seeing my phone at the top of the list like it always was in Quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol yeah im used to seeing my score at the top too. This bench gives out some useful info tho. More than the free version of quadrant. Don't know if I wanna pay 24 bucks for the pro version of quadrant to see how that is. Sure its a lot better than the free version. Im going to stick with this for a bit until I find something better.
Trigger + Tigersblood = Winning

quadrant pro is bull does nothing but give "detailed" stats which means the same thing this does for free, the bar thing is colored and it gives GPU CPU etc.
After saying all that, i should admit...
I have Quadrant Advanced...
I'll check this out in a sec. thanks for sharing!

I ran this benchmark a couple weeks ago and scored 2081.
I re-ran the benchmark after the recent update, and I just scored 3254 total, which ranks me 30th in the world. Wow!
Stock Motorola Atrix 4G 2.2.1 FroYo

Sid 6.7 said:
I ran this benchmark a couple weeks ago and scored 2081.
I re-ran the benchmark after the recent update, and I just scored 3254 total, which ranks me 30th in the world. Wow!
Stock Motorola Atrix 4G 2.2.1 FroYo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*****of the world of people who have actually ever used the app lol****

Warchief337 said:
*****of the world of people who have actually ever used the app lol****
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good one lmao

Quadrant Benchmark for Galaxy Note - 4308 (and probably higher)

Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.

the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.

Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave

I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....

foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?

rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?

Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!

Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??

i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D

Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri

RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000

How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3

I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri

MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000

It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri

What's your RealPi score?

Anyone done a Pi bench on their S6? I imagine several others Pi scores will beat my 6. 30 seconds.
Use AGM + FFT Formula, test 1000000 digits, and post your fastest time.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I get the same

I win!
http://i57.tinypic.com/2cyfb88.png
Sent from my SM-G920F

Romanius said:
I win!
http://i57.tinypic.com/2cyfb88.png
Sent from my SM-G920F
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bah! I'll have to run mine again, see if it'll improve.
Nice score!

Aha! Power off device and cool down seemed to help (maybe?)

Sorry guys
First run after download, no special settings, only power saving mode is disabled.

Nice one kurczak94! However...
I just did another run. I believe this is going to be the fastest that the test will do on my phone.
edit: oh, nope, I'm wrong! I just did another faster test which I'll post in a bit. How are you guys getting the full length of the result screen showing in your screenshots? I have to scroll down to show the time and that cuts off the top saying 'Intitialising... '

Wow, nice! I can't beat it ;(

One more. I wonder if THIS is my limit. Who's going to be the first to 1. 18 I wonder. :fingers-crossed:

I'll beat you just wait
Sent from my SM-G920F

There is no Pi

Romanius said:
I'll beat you just wait
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You probably will, I'm getting nothing faster than 6. 19 at the moment. Good score, you've matched me.

Not sure if this is considered cheating, but I'm running the Sac23 ROM and Ktoonsez kernel on my Sprint S6. I didn't expect to get a higher score cause I haven't adjusted kernel at all. I might try some over clocking and run it again later.

Android Attack said:
Not sure if this is considered cheating, but I'm running the Sac23 ROM and Ktoonsez kernel on my Sprint S6. I didn't expect to get a higher score cause I haven't adjusted kernel at all. I might try some over clocking and run it again later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see what others say about it, but imo, it's legit because you've simply managed to get the phone tweaked to run faster. Excellent time! :good:
Pro tip for everyone: Power off the phone and let it cool right down before running the bench to obtain the best scores. Example, when I ran Pi just a moment ago after just finishing running antutu, my Pi was over 8 seconds.

After many attempts yesterday and today of running the test consecutively, I just this moment got a freak 6. 17 seconds.
Edit: skip that, just improved again. 6. 16 secs. Blimey.

First go 5.61 got 5.57 second try

thatsupnow said:
First go 5.61 got 5.57 second try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What all mods and/or ROMs are you running and any overclock?

luv2increase said:
What all mods and/or ROMs are you running and any overclock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm running xtresolite ROM, with ktoonesz kernel with no overclock

6.23 - 7.2 using 5.1.1 stock H930FXXU2BOFN
seems as the time creeps each time its run.