Database Users

Ridiculously high quadrant score

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've been reading people say theyrebgetting low scores for the ota froyo so I decided to try it myself and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Ya, I'm getting 2k + also. Linpack is also running very fast with best of 342ms. I'm impressed. It's not only scoring great in benchmarks, but also as you mentioned very responsive.

Which versions did you guys flash, and which theme?

Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks

It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.

Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.

bobdude5 said:
and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me guess, the Christmas (or another) theme based on Quantum 1.5 ROM? That ROM had a specific configuration to explicitly display the futility of quadrant scores.

WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.....
Sent from my spot on the earth.

Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047

Electrofreak said:
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what other benchmark is non-biased?

NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, same here.

NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yerp. 1050 here on stock update.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me i could have sworn I was in the general section when I posted this! I think there's something funky going on witht the xda app
Sorry about that

ghostrid3r said:
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The the stock rooted deodexed one..and the theme is nova night..but I doubt that has anything to do with the score

Post your Quadrant Score

I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934

lanielf said:
I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHY????? This is for devs not synthetic scores.....................

... so what?

wow....
a thread

lanielf said:
I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Wrong section (At best it should go under General)
2. Read this Link

My quadrant is just over 9000

EarlZ said:
My quadrant is just over 9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have to take it out of the liquid nitrogen to make a call or is you nails?

let the flaming begin.
everyone's using the same device. this is like an overclocking thread instead =.=

I have 10000...Am i fast now?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

1925
Advanced voodoo v666.2
1.28ghz OC
JS3 2.2.1 rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

do these scores get you wet or something?

Whats the big deal?
Someone started the thread, if you ain't gonna answer it probably, why bother posting at all?
I see no problem in seeing which setup gives a higher score, regardless of whether quadrant guides an accurate comparison or not.
I posted mine, plus my setup for all too see.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

chrisjcks said:
Whats the big deal?
Someone started the thread, if you ain't gonna answer it probably, why bother posting at all?
I see no problem in seeing which setup gives a higher score, regardless of whether quadrant guides an accurate comparison or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no big deal. That's why some people are making fun of it...
Because Quadrant does not provide an accurate guideline score for speed of the phone, this thread is a joke, so what's the problem if we're making fun of it?
Peace dude.

The Op was curious and interested in other peoples scores and set up whether its accurate or not.
If youve nothing to contribute then dont post....simple.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

KennyLegend said:
The Op was curious and interested in other peoples scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung Galaxy S I9000 forum > search this forum > type in 'quadrant score' > show posts > enter > miracle

Eclair no lagfix 970
Eclair Ryans lagfix 2220
Froyo no lag fix 1140
Froyo Voodoo lag fix 1540 .
And thats why Quadrant is a bad benchmark laggy Eclair high score non laggy Froyo low score .
jje

The Nexus S get about 1750 so isn't it the score that we should get on a lagfixed Galaxy S?

stock js3 1301
no tweaks at all

Your best quadrant scores

I thought id better make this thread so people can get together and share the best quadrant scores they've been able to achieve with there Samsung galaxy s2.
When you post your scores include the following;
1:The ROM you are currently Running Albeit stock or custom.
2:What kernel you have installed.
3:if over-clocked include the speed at which its running (Min and Max).
4.Any other types of tweaks and mods you have.
5: And the finally your score.
Apart from that it would be nice to include how the battery life is etc. and how you think its the best for the speediest ROM (I'll make a chart sometime down the line with the top 10 fastest galaxy s2 phone on XDA)
These Are My Results So far;
1: Lite'ning Rom v6.1 XXKH3
2: SiyahKernel v1.2 - Battery Freindly Version
3: Over-clocked to 1.6ghz (min 1.6 max 1.6) smartass v2
4: No other mods or tweaks.
Score = 4434 Best for me so far
Im currently using lite'ning ROM because it offers me a lag free performance experience, not to keen on the blue theme but will be changing it to green soon. and as for battery life i think its very good and only sips on the battery when not connected to wifi and just pottering around town listening to music and texting with the occasional use of google maps.

Quadrant scores don't mean **** for the Galaxy S II... I guess nobody will ever learn this? Anyways I got a 6969 one time.

Villain rom
Niphetamine 2.0.4 (2.1.3 in screenshot)
200mhz/1600mhz
Under-volted
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I now use 1.4ghz with 200mhz min however.
Like the guy above me, quadrant doesnt mean much, but i still like using it too - its addictive.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

I've deleted Quadrant long ago as it is absolutely useless....
But I'm very happy with my current setup: fast and good battery life and high functionality.
Quadrant Score? I don't even want to know....

Oxygen 2.2.2 rom
Stock voltage/no overclock
Scores of around 4000-4500
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Join this with the other post your Best Quadrant scores posts .
Most useless app for SGS2 Quadrant .
jje

Performance is measured by functionality and application ability in my opinion. Having an app that runs a few tests doesnt mean nothing in my eyes.
Is the sgs2 what i want it to be - YES!
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

Hehe rolay.. Danger
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

Quadrant isn't using much of the galaxys resources, just compare the heat after running quadrant a few times and playing some 3d game.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

Sorry but I've seen far too many of these threads. and they are all irrelephant as I am getting a quadrant score that is greater than your phone number.....
Therefore, I win.

Quadrant Benchmark for Galaxy Note - 4308 (and probably higher)

Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.

the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.

Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave

I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....

foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?

rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?

Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!

Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??

i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D

Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri

RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000

How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3

I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri

MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000

It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri

post your galaxy s2 new quadrant version benchmark

I just get knew that the quadrant have an update with multicore cpu benchmark... so post your samsung galaxy s2 quadrant multicore cpu version score here....
Ps... just fot ref. And sorry for the bad english...

Quadrant = 3
jje

i get 3032 with quadrant standard version @ i9100G

I get 3495 with new version.

I get OVER 9000!!! Nah can't even get the update because AT&T throttled my data speeds down to near nothing. Thanks for the tip. I will definitely have to give it a try when I get home.

4179
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App

Although Quadrant carries no real meaning I'll humor the OP 4372
Stock Orange UK KJ4 & Siyah 2.6.12 OC to 1400 & UV

Iget 3919 in i9100g offical rom and kernel 2.3.6
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

4419
At the planets the FPS are under 60 strange even if all other tests show stable 60
Galaxy S II (I9100)
VK 2.5
Siyah kernel

It would be interesting to inform which ROM and kernel you are using.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

blizzari said:
4419
At the planets the FPS are under 60 strange even if all other tests show stable 60
Galaxy S II (I9100)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Planets run at 37/39 for me all others @ 60

4069
AndyX rom 5.2

Just thought it would be nice how much slower the Galaxy Nexus is compared to the S2.
This screenshot is taken at stock speed CPU and gpu. It's not as bad as I thought. Fps never dropped below 58-59.
3570.
Again, this is Galaxy nexus, not the S2. And the main purpose of posting is for comparison's sake.

alferret said:
Although Quadrant carries no real meaning I'll humor the OP 4372
Stock Orange UK KJ4 & Siyah 2.6.12 OC to 1400 & UV
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree with you there big boy. A good example of why this is so : My Motorola milestone 2 can get pushing up to 3500 running cyanogen mod 7. A work mates galaxy s on darky rom can only get around 1900-2200.
Yet in real life performance for speed, responsiveness, game performance his galaxy s absolutely dominates my ms2.
But all the same, it's part of the android fun just trying to push those scores as high as possible for simple kicks
Looking forward to testing out my gf's s2 with this when I get home, thanks for the tip OP

3624 i9100 running ics LPB

4,214 on XXLPB.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

I really don't get this quadrant thing, does it have any relevance?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk

I get 3897 with original 2.3.6 ROM and Siyah 2.6.12 kernel

3700 points

3983
System info SGS2 has one core only ... this new version is still flawed! Anyway, I don't even know why I bothered to install it
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk