We know that Sprint WiMAX band is 2500MHz;
does our Epic 4G support another frequency band like 2.3GHz or 3.5GHz?
I hope it supports 2.3GHz....
According to the spec sheets of the AWT6264 it is capable of 2.3 to 2.7 ghz spectrum range.
.......ok, you got me...why?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Kcarpenter said:
.......ok, you got me...why?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
IF I were to guess..its cause 2.3ghz spectrum is the most popular for wimax around the world....the 3 licensed spectrum for wimax are 2.3hz, 2.5ghz and 3.5ghz...
Kcarpenter said:
.......ok, you got me...why?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it does, then it is probably possible to use WiMAX with my Epic in another country which has 2.3GHz WiMAX.
nadcicle said:
According to the spec sheets of the AWT6264 it is capable of 2.3 to 2.7 ghz spectrum range.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great... but AWT6264 is just power amp. I think we need specific transceiver for specific band (usually multi-band for GSM/UMTS, but i don't know if that is the case with WiMAX.)
It seems CMC730S baseband processor only supports 2.5GHz, but let's see...
Related
I've been searching around and I can't get a definite answer...
Can the vibrant pick up the AT&T 850 MHz 3G network? Is there any way to turn on this feature?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Yes. The 1900mhz I believe as well. Idk what you search but Google "Vibrant on at&t 3G"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...vibrant+on+att+3G&aq=f&aqi=g-s1g-ms1&aql=&oq=
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Use SGS Tools. Select secret codes. Scroll down to band selection and it will give you all the options.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
I've turned every band on, but I'm still only on edge...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
wearmaize said:
I've turned every band on, but I'm still only on edge...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using the correct APN settings?
Don't really know what mine is set on but im running bionix v and my vibrant is unlocked and it works perfectly on 3g att so it will run on 3g
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
I can get 3G in other areas, but not here, which leads me to believe it's just a 850 MHz band.
I can take out the SIM and put it in an iPhone and it picks up 3G just fine, whereas the vibrant is stuck on edge. It's frustrating to keep having to reboot the phone to pop out the SIM
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
wearmaize said:
I can get 3G in other areas, but not here, which leads me to believe it's just a 850 MHz band.
I can take out the SIM and put it in an iPhone and it picks up 3G just fine, whereas the vibrant is stuck on edge. It's frustrating to keep having to reboot the phone to pop out the SIM
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its got to be unlocked doesn't it to work on att 3g network don't it?
Here we go again...
Here we go again. If you are referring to the T-Mobile USA Vibrant, it does not have support for 850Mhz UMTS bands. Period. The FCC says so. That is pretty definitive as far as I am concerned. It does not matter what some piece of software shows you. The hardware is not capable as it sits in the T-Mobile USA Vibrant. Search the FCC database for the Vibrant. GSM 850Mhz ≠ UMTS 850Mhz.
Pretty sure it's just 1900MHz. The FCC documents would have included the 850MHz band if it was really there.
Edit: Lol, yeah what he said.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Thanks for clearing it up now comes the dilemma of deciding whether to use the vibrant or an iPhone that uses the 3G speeds...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Tmobile Vibrant does have capability to operate on ATT 3G network.
I could get it working with iphone sim card.
Specification also includes ATT frequencies.
Att is using two frequencies for 3G.
If it don't run on 3g then why does my vibrant have a 3g data icon and is blazing fast on it?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
It runs on 3G in areas where AT&T uses 1900MHz for 3G. It runs on Edge in areas where AT&T only uses 850MHz for 3G.
Sent from my HD7 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
joe3681 said:
Yes. The 1900mhz I believe as well. Idk what you search but Google "Vibrant on at&t 3G"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...vibrant+on+att+3G&aq=f&aqi=g-s1g-ms1&aql=&oq=
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. No it can't.
Jesus Christ. Is it really that hard to not respond when you clearly don't know what the hell you're talking about?
Yes yes it can like I said I have a us vibrant and it switches between e witch is edge and 3g don't know how but it has a 3g icon that tells me that its on 3g if it not then why does it say 3g? And it is a beast on 3g on every once in a while it will have a H icon most of the time it SAYS 3G!!!!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
jlg19753 said:
Yes yes it can like I said I have a us vibrant and it switches between e witch is edge and 3g don't know how but it has a 3g icon that tells me that its on 3g if it not then why does it say 3g? And it is a beast on 3g on every once in a while it will have a H icon most of the time it SAYS 3G!!!!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
because of this:
inconceeeivable said:
It runs on 3G in areas where AT&T uses 1900MHz for 3G. It runs on Edge in areas where AT&T only uses 850MHz for 3G.
Sent from my HD7 using XDA Windows Phone 7 App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Precisely.
The Vibrant does not have 850mhz 3g support. Only AWS(1700)/PCS(1900)/IMT(2100) 3g support.
Wow...just wow. Seriously, the FCC does not generally lie about things like this. And no, I don't think it is a big conspiracy in this case...lol
kmdub said:
Wow...just wow. Seriously, the FCC does not generally lie about things like this. And no, I don't think it is a big conspiracy in this case...lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure what this is about. Maybe it's just wishful thinking run amok...seems like most of these people either want to switch to AT&T or bought the phone intending to use it on AT&T, have since found out that it won't work in their area, and are refusing to ultimately admit to themselves that it won't work.
People like to think to themselves, "Well, maybe the FCC screwed up and I DO have a pentaband (or quadband?) 3G phone." The slightest bit of uncertainty encourages such thoughts...there are threads with jokers enabling the fake 850MHz menu selection and exclaiming, "OMG, I have AT&T 3G on 850MHz" when they already had it on 1900MHz. People who bother googling the question ahead of time will no doubt find some older, confusing threads.(Albeit they will hopefully find more and more threads with people like us saying "No, it's not in the FCC docs," etc.)
We should have a sticky or something about this lol.
Yes, I googled it and found conflicting reports which is why I came here to clear it up.
Thanks again
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Take this for what it is, it could mean the EVO is going to get support for EVDO rev. B & LTE or it could just be leftover unused code but I did find these references in the leaked gingerbread init.rc.
My guess is that it's leftovers but I guess we won't know for a while
Code:
setprop net.tcp.buffersize.lte 4094,87380,196608,4096,16384,196608
setprop net.tcp.buffersize.evdo_b 4094,87380,262144,4096,16384,262144
Lte with the evo would be sooo tight
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
No ones sure about rev b ... so we can only hope! Not so hopeful about lte tho.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Much more likely to be left over code from other devices. The sense code is most definitely shared between devices.
A while back I also looked into Rev b support, and while the snapdragon has support, it lacks the transmitter. Likely to be similar with LTE and authorization will likely be done with SIMs.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Award Tour said:
Much more likely to be left over code from other devices. The sense code is most definitely shared between devices.
A while back I also looked into Rev b support, and while the snapdragon has support, it lacks the transmitter. Likely to be similar with LTE and authorization will likely be done with SIMs.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the radio on the EVO would not be compatible with LTE... AFAIK, only the towers can be upgraded by changing a few pieces of equipment to make them LTE-compatible. As far as the phone goes... well it won't connect to LTE since the radio was not designed for it.
At least that was my understanding around the EVO and its compatibility with LTE.
Calkulin said:
Take this for what it is, it could mean the EVO is going to get support for EVDO rev. B & LTE or it could just be leftover unused code but I did find these references in the leaked gingerbread init.rc.
My guess is that it's leftovers but I guess we won't know for a while
Code:
setprop net.tcp.buffersize.lte 4094,87380,196608,4096,16384,196608
setprop net.tcp.buffersize.evdo_b 4094,87380,262144,4096,16384,262144
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HTC builds a basic sense firmware, so this could be in there for verizon. I believe in the incredible people found wimax logos buried in the about phone HTC area
alainater said:
Lte with the evo would be sooo tight
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty silly statement. LTE is no better than WiMax in any way. Just b/c the Evo gets LTE doesn't mean it solves all the problems WiMax has given people. And by all the problems I mean the 1 and only problem in that is has provided poor coverage. This is mainly because of the freq its on. Just swaping over to LTE on the same freq will do nothing to help us.
sgt. slaughter said:
pretty silly statement. LTE is no better than WiMax in any way. Just b/c the Evo gets LTE doesn't mean it solves all the problems WiMax has given people. And by all the problems I mean the 1 and only problem in that is has provided poor coverage. This is mainly because of the freq its on. Just swaping over to LTE on the same freq will do nothing to help us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you stupid? LTE is wayy faster then wimax
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
davidc23 said:
Are you stupid? LTE is wayy faster then wimax
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you stupid? WiMax is not even running at it's full potential. Coverage and building penetration is the only issues I see with WiMax.
davidc23 said:
Are you stupid? LTE is wayy faster then wimax
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wayy faster? not the thread for that debate but your flat out wrong. please dont compare the 5 thunderbolt users speeds versus the thousands of thousands of evo users speeds.
davidc23 said:
Are you stupid? LTE is wayy faster then wimax
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't matter how fast it is if it's 2.5Ghz and won't propagate or penetrate walls. That freq range is only slightly lower than military satcom. It's best suited for circular polarized line of sight type
communications, or short range only.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
I think when people say LTE would be better it's because Sprints LTE implementation would almost definitely be done over their old Nextel frequencies. Which basically means better penetration than Clears WiMax.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
davidc23 said:
Are you stupid? LTE is wayy faster then wimax
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no saturation on Verizon's LTE networks so to make that statement makes you appear stupid. Please, next time, think before you speak.
Award Tour said:
I think when people say LTE would be better is because Sprints LTE implementation would almost definitely be done over their old Nextel frequencies. Which basically means better penetration than Clears WiMax.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that or they simply don't understand what they are talking about to begin with fully. Regardless anything being used on that freq will not take place till 2013 since thats when they said they plan to have iden shut off and switched over to using cdma.
btw Great to see you around Calk! Hows the kid doing? gotten a chance to check out the Sensation Port at all?
Unused code: LTE requires a new radio, Rev b most likely would too, but it doesn't matter as no carrier supports EVDO rev b anyway.
tx_dbs_tx said:
Coverage and building penetration is the only issues I see with WiMax.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You say that like it's trivial. Those two factors make the 4G network unusable even in areas where it's supposed to exist.
The EVO already has built in support for Rev. B, LTE would be impossible as it is in the GSM family and would require a SIM card.
jackjumper85 said:
The EVO already has built in support for Rev. B, LTE would be impossible as it is in the GSM family and would require a SIM card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct even the tbolt uses a sim card to access lte.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
jackjumper85 said:
The EVO already has built in support for Rev. B, LTE would be impossible as it is in the GSM family and would require a SIM card.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sure? The first gen Snapdragon chipset does, but the transmitter doesn't.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
http://www.engadget.com/2011/08/03/clearwire-adding-lte-advanced-ready-technology-to-its-holdings/
I'm confused. Are they talking about running their LTE over the 2.5 ghz spectrum? That seems ridiculous
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Has anybody heard of the HTC edge and the zeta 2.5ghz with qad core processor
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
mkjsr757 said:
Has anybody heard of the HTC edge and the zeta 2.5ghz with qad core processor
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No but hopefully its out by February when i can upgrade
We won't hear about the Edge til February or March at that Mobile World or whatever event. The Zeta doesn't exist.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
I haven't heard of it, but if it's out around April when I can upgrade, it sounds like it could be awesome. I'm going to look for some info on it now.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
From the pictures I've seen I know ill be getting it to retire the evo
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
There were a few things that might make me think it wont be for sprint. :'(
really no sprint?
According to Pocketnow, the device will supposedly offer a quad-core 1.5GHz CPU, 4.7-inch 720p HD display, 1GB of RAM, an 8MP rear camera with f/2.2 lens and Beats Audio. Curiously, no LTE capability was mentioned specifically, though 21Mbps HSPA+ appears to be good to go, and there's a slight possibility of Sense 4.0 being included
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isnt HSPA+ for at&t or tmobile, can't remember exactly.
oOflyeyesOo said:
Isnt HSPA+ for at&t or tmobile, can't remember exactly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
T-Mobile
Just like most beast I'm sure we'll get it's counter part or a CDMA version.
To All who are interested (TMO ppl) The South Korean Note is scheduled to be released on 11-29-11. This will be a variant of the Euro version and is scheduled to have penta-band capability (1700/2100) It also is a LTE version capable of 42 mb d/l (theoretically) You can read more here:
http://sammyhub.com/2011/11/24/sk-telecom-to-release-galaxy-note-in-south-korea/
This will be the version that is supposed to be compatible with T-Mobile USA.
No exynos though.
5150Joker said:
No exynos though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They are using the snapdragon?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
xandermpls said:
They are using the snapdragon?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The article says 1.5 ghz dual core, Exynos doesn't make 1.5. Take a look at the Galaxy Skyrocket...
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
xandermpls said:
They are using the snapdragon?
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah its the same Crapdragon as the one found in the AT&T ****rocket.
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
Provided by SK Telecom, wiki says they are CDMA based provider not GSM.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SK_Telecom
If some people think there is lag on the Note with the 1.4Ghz Exynos they'll really think it lags with the 1.5Ghz Snapdragon.
5150Joker said:
No exynos though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which means it uses Qualcomm S3 which means will likely support T-Mobile band. Great.
Twohothardware said:
If some people think there is lag on the Note with the 1.4Ghz Exynos they'll really think it lags with the 1.5Ghz Snapdragon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I doubt it'll be a problem if you root and get rid of the bloats and after developers get rid of Carrier IQ.
Questions is who's selling their 1.4hz to get the new 1.5hz. I know Im really looking at getting this one as soon as it becomes available in the us. EBAY here i come...
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
getmouse said:
Questions is who's selling their 1.4hz to get the new 1.5hz. I know Im really looking at getting this one as soon as it becomes available in the us. EBAY here i come...
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unless your in an LTE market that this Korean Note will work on and you have an Unlimited data plan there's no reason to get it. The 1.5Ghz Snapdragon is slower than the 1.4Ghz Exynos in the current non-LTE Note. It's slower than the 1.2Ghz Exynos in the SGS2 and people have commented on how the AT&T Samsung Galaxy Skyrocket which also uses the 1.5Ghz Snapdragon isn't as snappy as the SGS2.
Hold on you know what we should try first, the modem file. Lol
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Twohothardware said:
Unless your in an LTE market that this Korean Note will work on and you have an Unlimited data plan there's no reason to get it. The 1.5Ghz Snapdragon is slower than the 1.4Ghz Exynos in the current non-LTE Note. It's slower than the 1.2Ghz Exynos in the SGS2 and people have commented on how the AT&T Samsung Galaxy Skyrocket which also uses the 1.5Ghz Snapdragon isn't as snappy as the SGS2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know but Im looking at the fact that Im a t-mobile user with 3 phones on a family plan and Wish my note worked on t-mobile 4g. And I didn't have to run to at&t for service.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
oka1 said:
To All who are interested (TMO ppl) The South Korean Note is scheduled to be released on 11-29-11. This will be a variant of the Euro version and is scheduled to have penta-band capability (1700/2100) It also is a LTE version capable of 42 mb d/l (theoretically) You can read more here:
http://sammyhub.com/2011/11/24/sk-telecom-to-release-galaxy-note-in-south-korea/
This will be the version that is supposed to be compatible with T-Mobile USA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it is Korean wont it be 29-11-11?
seepage said:
If it is Korean wont it be 29-11-11?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cute Touche' Does anyone Know a Korean a website in English they have run into for ordering from the USA
As far as the snapdragon being slow, remember I have tried both chips and unless you are a gamer it is not that noticeable of an issue especially, when new roms start rolling out.
Has anybody found out what bands this new Galaxy Note from Korea will support I can't find anything.
I heard all bands, 1700 aswell.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
anyone know if it'll come with nfc?
Not really worried about NFC yet until more stuff works with it I just want it to work with T-Mobile
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App
Another problem I just thought of is that Korea is kinda locked down its going to be hard as hell trying to get a phone internationally shipped but I may be wrong
Sent from my SGH-T989 using XDA App