Database Users

Linpack top ten

I was curious if one of the senior members could explain how people are able to achieve some of these crazy mflop and mhz when you go to the linpack site. I understand that the droid has a beefier processor so I get the 1300 mhz numbers - I just dont understand how you could hit 80 mflops.
Are these stable everyday devices or are they maxed out to hit the number and then dialed back for normal use.
Thanks.

The Linpack results are manipulable. If you know what you are doing you can get it to say pretty much what ever you'd like it to say.

I have no clue either, but I saw framework hit 8 mflops with evil Eris 3 Rom

korben dallas said:
I have no clue either, but I saw framework hit 8 mflops with evil Eris 3 Rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.

pjsockett said:
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I did see it regardless if it was fake.

Thats cool - Thanks guys - seemed kind of unrealistic.
I and running XTR and hit about 2.6 - 3.1 @ 710mhz.
Anytime I exceed 710 I get boot looped.

pjsockett said:
No you didn't. That's fake also and was done well before Evil Eris 3 was done. I assure that Framework is not running a 1ghz overclock on an Evil Eris 3.0 rom. The 5.6 value is the highest legitimate value.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I can confirm, I hit this number with Tainted Vanilla 1.4, JIT, overclock to 806mhz, and Airplane Mode enabled.

LexusBrian400 said:
Yeah I can confirm, I hit this number with Tainted Vanilla 1.4, JIT, overclock to 806mhz, and Airplane Mode enabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seriously?
the highest i hit was 5.43 or something and that was white widow 3.2 767 overclocked and nothing running in the background... i should try airplane mode.

I faked them, linpack is worthless.

I put froyo on my wife's droid and it gets 9.8 consistently without messing with her everyday settings. It only has a 800mhz kernel too.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

zwade01 said:
I put froyo on my wife's droid and it gets 9.8 consistently without messing with her everyday settings. It only has a 800mhz kernel too.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and that is NOT Unbelievable. (Thats not sarcasm BTW)
Froyo is like:
Giving your phone extacy...
Its fasstttt

Quadrant Benchmark results.

Just wanted to know the highest score anyones ever got. Im using myns rls5 underclocked to 806 with nets kernel. Im getting a score of 908 lmao, wtf?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

Well the fact that the new version reads lower plus the fact that your underclocked that much, I'm surprised it was that high, unless you're still on 1.5.
The highest scores are from CM6 w/ the Snap Turbo Kernel and range from 2500 to ~3000. Highest I ever got was 2700. Miui also gets high scores of like 1700 to 2000ish for some people, although I usually go 1500s. For Sense ROMs, I think the highest I've gotten was 1500s or maybe low 16s with the old Quadrant and MikFroyo + Ziggy's BFS kernel.
I also used to get 1400s with EViO 2 1.7 underclocked to 921. That is a sweet ROM.

Its been a few month's since i ran one, but I think it was a little over 1200

Benchmarks
CM7 Nightly #11, Kernel 2.6.37.1
Quadrant / Linpack / Neocore

9000 my phones a BEAST !
funny part is all the numbers mean squat

CheesyNutz said:
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, if you're phone feels snappy thats all that matters.

CheesyNutz said:
9000 my phones a BEAST !
funny part is all the numbers mean squat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG 9000? Is that a phone or pc bro? lmao
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

I get 600 at 384mhz. beat that

Desire hd 1.99 ghz kernel..

Guys have you seen a kernel for the desire hd with oc up to 1.99 ghz ?
Damm thats oc man....you think it can be ported to our phones ?
Sent From My CM7 HTC Glacier Running @1.401 GHz

Probably not. Kernel ports are EXTREMELY difficult.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA Premium App

Man that would be Kick Ass if we could get it to work!!

With 1.85 ghz kernels available, is .14 ghz that important to you?

Faster is faster I suppose. I would be afraid of frying chips from excessive heat at that point. I think 1.8ghz is pushing it a bit.

Actually the sky is the limit with the 2nd generation snapdragons. I could have gone beyond 2.0 GHz if I wanted to. I didn't want people to come crying here because my kernel bricked their phones I may release beyond 2 GHz versions if people are that crazy with speed.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App

faux123 said:
Actually the sky is the limit with the 2nd generation snapdragons. I could have gone beyond 2.0 GHz if I wanted to. I didn't want people to come crying here because my kernel bricked their phones I may release beyond 2 GHz versions if people are that crazy with speed.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But that would require stock voltage since 2.0GHz is kind of highish. The G2 and its scorpion gets to 2.0GHz which is odd since it defaults at 800MHz. I would love to see a 2.0 or 1.9 variants though, but stability should be the main focus.

are you guys rendering 3d scenes from avatar on your phones or what?

faux123 said:
Actually the sky is the limit with the 2nd generation snapdragons. I could have gone beyond 2.0 GHz if I wanted to. I didn't want people to come crying here because my kernel bricked their phones I may release beyond 2 GHz versions if people are that crazy with speed.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Faux your the man!! I would sure try one of those + 2GHz Kernals.

darinmc said:
are you guys rendering 3d scenes from avatar on your phones or what?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMAO...No, I think their "literally turn my phone into a lightsaber" app is lagging a bit.
Kidding aside, we all love a strong kernel! Faux, you're top notch, and I appreciate the hard work you do...would love to maybe see some kernel love for the fusion sense 3.0 rom...*cough cough*

It's true that people get really crazy with their speed. A guy i know at my college OC'd his thunderbolt to 3.1ghz at one point.

I agree... I am on the fusion ROM now and it is Kick A$$. We would Love to see a BIG Kernal for that. I sure would Donate for the Project.

I took my 3.0 ghz wolfdale cpu to 4.5 ghz on air, so I understand the bug, but the fun in that was all of the work it required, including lapping the cpu and heatsink, making a perfectly balanced connection, modding the case to have excellent airflow, playing with voltages and stress-testing, dialing back and trying something new, etc. When it came down to it and everything was done, i just sat there, looked at my faster computer and realized there was no actual difference in anything I did on the PC, so I pulled back to a moderate O/C and haven't touched it since. I mean it's great when you can calculate Pi out the the millionth decimal in seconds flat, but evidently that doesn't have much value in day to day terms. Most of my nerd moments end up like that, the whole journey before destination thing...

faux123 said:
Actually the sky is the limit with the 2nd generation snapdragons. I could have gone beyond 2.0 GHz if I wanted to. I didn't want people to come crying here because my kernel bricked their phones I may release beyond 2 GHz versions if people are that crazy with speed.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would love to see the numbers my MT4G could pump out at 2Ghz+....faux your simply amazing

faux123 said:
Actually the sky is the limit with the 2nd generation snapdragons. I could have gone beyond 2.0 GHz if I wanted to. I didn't want people to come crying here because my kernel bricked their phones I may release beyond 2 GHz versions if people are that crazy with speed.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.0 ghz + sense 3.0 (when we get kernel source) then faux will be a demi god

Quadrant standard scores! OC atrix!

Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
This is kp's rom.
UPDATE: Now im getting around 4200 on cm7 prebeta 2 with the built in oc and it feels alot smoother!

No! My highest was 303x!

My highest is always ~2900

3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

4700, and only running one core!

TechnoNeto said:
Anyone else getting 3550 and above on quadrant standard overclocked to 1.1 ghz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?

How is it you were getting 4000 or 4700 on quadrant standard?

BravoMotorola said:
Sadly on stock when I first got the phone I would get over 4000 but now with GB and a 1.1 overclock I only get up to 3600. Is it really that far off on performance because it isn't a final build or is the final build going to be like this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is in beta so we could still see much improvement also you were getting that on quadrant or antutu?

mramirezusa said:
3600 here faux and custom hack system
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same as me is it saying that you are oc to 1.2 as mine does?

J-man67 said:
No! My highest was 303x!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
make sure you have set cpu to 1.1 min and max

hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.

my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.

dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You felt the need to express this why? This wasn't in the Q&A section as do benchmarks mean anything. It's a post about your scores not about people trying to prove their tech hierarchy.

dLo GSR said:
hey guys, big news! benchmarks don't mean anything in reality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.

I got a 3600 "in-use" benchmark, with max and min set to 1.1. With max at 1.1 and min still at .2, I still got 3200, which is not bad.
You seriously got 4000+ while on the phone's original stock system and everything??
Mine feels so much faster and snappier now on GB with the faux kernel and everything..

Tao_Man said:
Neither do 1/4 mile or 0 to 60 times, but they are fun to throw around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
very true and in response to first post i get around 3330+ with most of my apps going but i have both min and max set to highest in set cpu

As does mine feel faster on gingerbread

Tao_Man said:
my best "In Use" score is 3196. by in use I mean I have all the programs running I would have normally so I got a lot of junk running in the background. I have yet to kill everything and see what I can get with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the way I test also. I'm around 3000 with all the normal apps running that I leave running and min and max CPU speeds kept where I use them. It feels very smooth!

I have an atrix benchmark thread!
\/

i can't seem to pass 2800 running stock

Overclocking snapdragon 800.

So I was wondering about the truth behind the risks of frying your cpu through overclocking or the chip itself degrading faster over time, and if there are such risks do they apply to a simple 2.5 ghz overclocking ?

There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...

devilsdouble said:
There isn't any risk like that, unless you are using extremely high voltage, or are at terribly hot place.
I have tested all the overclockable kernels, and haven't found a single one which is steady at 2.6 or 2.8 GHz. Only Faux's kernel at 2490 MHz is stable.
Don't be scared, there's no risk.
PS: I personally use Performance governor by the way, so the CPU is always at max frequency, against all advice I keep using that for past three years, never had a problem, and you can understand where I live the temperature reaches extremely high in summer, so...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.

MohamedOMostafa said:
That's actually comforting I too am using fauxclock and I live in Egypt so the temperature gets pretty high here, but I'm constantly monitoring the cpu's temperature so I will give the 2.5 ghz overclock a try for a while and see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.

devilsdouble said:
Yeah do that. Just to see if the OC is stable run that damn Antutu benchmark. If the device doesn't reboot/stuck then OC is stable
Best of luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the first thing I did actually

MohamedOMostafa said:
That's the first thing I did actually
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once

devilsdouble said:
Ha ha. Good. That's on Faux right? I got almost same score (44.7k) when I was checking.
Now if you want more then flash one of those 2.6 or 2.8 GHz kernels, and do the test, and message me if Antutu finishes the benchmark even once
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
will do.

If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).

Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??

Graffiti Exploit said:
If you want higher you should try out Ultimate Kernel. Although it is removed from XDA, you can still find it on some foreign language site. It's the highest and most stable OC kernel I have used (3.0GHz).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.

djak272 said:
3.0 GHz
any benchmark screenshots ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
devilsdouble said:
Hmm, just found the topic, and it's mentioned that the topic was close due to non-compliance with the GNU GPLv2 and XDA forum rules, now what's the former thing?
Anyone has the latest version, if it's still updated outside XDA? Want to try it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.

Graffiti Exploit said:
Sorry cleaned up my screenshots folder as it was taking up a lot of space. Besides Antutu has been constantly getting updates so it may not be accurate.
I don't know if this is allowed but here it is.
v72
http://www.android-hilfe.de/custom-...ernel-kitkat-tw-only-ultimate-kernel-v72.html
v73
https://www.androidsource.club/foru...kernel-ultimate-kernel-v73-galaxy-note-3.html
Last one I used was v63. So do test it out more because I cannot vouch for the updates. But based from experience, I have never gotten an unstable update from that kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!

devilsdouble said:
Thanks a lot for the link mate. Downloaded and flashed v73, but I can't get it past the stock clock rate of 2265 MHz! I mean I have tried to set higher frequency than that in S Tweaks, even downloaded Trickstar, SetCPU, but the it'd just stuck at 2265 MHz! I can go lower than 2265 but not higher! Weird!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it comes with 2 apps for customization. You apply frequency on the first one and open the other and select apply changes. I'm not sure if it was this kernel or was it AEL. Lol. Anyways good luck. Maybe your ROM doesn't support a certain "stuff". I'm sorry but I really forgot about those terminologies. You can read up on the closed thread if you want. I'm sure you'll have a clue or on that link I gave you. *Google Translate ftw*