Related
Hello. I've got a question: a very long time i use CleanDroid 2.55 GL v11uv. Usually, after the test in smartbench 2011 ~ 1500 performance. At hyperdroid, typhoon and other 2.3.3 android points - ~ 1200. With what it could be linked?
Plz report your benchmark results for comparasion...
score from my floyo v0.20 from racht:
using Quadrant 1150 with 748MHz
anyone know how to improve to get more? for me reboots if I set more than 748MHz :S
I once got 1323 with racht's floyo v20, 768MHz...
This has no place in DEV section ! Post in general.
I got 1026 in MiniCM with standard 600mMHz
I got 1113 with racht's floyo 0.20 without overclocking
anyone know how to improve ROM's to be stable for highter processor's frequency?
Crashes when set it more than 748MHz
Does anyone work at higher frequencies?
Max frequency depends on processor and every processor is different. One can run on higher frequencies without problems but other can't. For example: I can overclock max to 710 Mhz but you can overclock to 748 Mhz
quadrant 1132 floyo 0.20 [email protected]
floyo v0.20 from racht: 1081
Racht's floyo 0.20 - 600 MHz
About 1050
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App
MiniCM - 1430 (825 MHz)!
froyobread v004 no oc.
:1079
update: after switching to doixanh FroyoBread, I got 1114.
CPU Scores 3612.
Got floyo 0.20 , most system apps removed, max available ram 109 mb , no oc, max score 1100
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App
Nice scores
Is anyone try benchmark with new HACKDROID CM7 2.3.4 gaming rom realise?
1050...but i will try again with less apps
Total : 1175
CPU : 4038
Memory : 884
I/O : 347
2D : 265
3D : 383
Floyo 0.20
Overclock : 748mhz
some apps installed : advanced task killer , android booster , astro file manager , barcode reader , double twist , engadget , GPS speedo , just pictures , maverick , kreac Calculator , MultiTasking Pro , note Everything , opera Mini , Vplayer , SetCPU and smart keyboard
plus preinstalled apps in floyo
but before running quadrant i cleaned up memory with advanced task killer so i don't know if those apps was affecting the result or not
floyo .20 quadrant --> 1050
miniCM overclock 800+ --> quadrant bigger than moto droid x
but uselles because i dont like gameloft game, i more like strategy game like grave defense, majesty kingdom, etc.
FroyoBread with 825 Mhz - 1415 (first place!)
Why i don't get reboots on 825?
I got 1067 points in Quadrant GingerFroyo v1.4.16 ROM with no overclocking.
Up to how many can I overclock my MHz X8 without problems?
Greetings from Brazil!
A new benchmark app is out that promises
results that cannot be faked like some other apps.
It also gives you more relevant information like browser performance etc.
It works on HC although it switches to portrait automatically.
Check it out, what do you think of it? Post your test results and rom version here on this thread.
The name on market is Vellamo.
Results included, overall result 1174 - rom info in signature at bottom... LOL my galaxy rom hammered the actual galaxy 10.1 although she is clocked at 1.4
Enjoy
MJ-12
Can you try without OC, just to be fair
954 with my stock 4.010.40, stock kernel, stock rom, rooted, some extra apps
1060 on 1.2 OC, galaxy virtuous
Wysłane z Acera A500 przy pomocy swype
1171 With Honneyvillain 1.04 + OC kernel @ 1.5 Ghz
1213
Virtuous Thrive @ 1.6GHz UNITY V8
m-deejay said:
1213
Virtuous Thrive @ 1.6GHz UNITY V8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Your virtuous galaxy @ 1.6 1253
MJ-12
1094 With Honneyvillain 1.04 + thor`s villain OC kernel @ 1.5 GHz
1182
Clean wipe, HoneyVillain 1.04 + villain_iconia_kernel_1.1 @ 1.5 GHz
1213 with stock 3.1 + Thor 1.1b6. CPU @ 1.6ghz.
971 on rooted stock 3.1 (4.010.11).
cq842000 said:
1213 with stock 3.1 + Thor 1.1b6. CPU @ 1.6ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not too shabby with stock, but so far cant see anything better than virtuous galaxy...
MJ-12
My Iconia gets 986 with stock rom 4.010.22
the result does not really matter since some parameters have to be taken.
so let's compare like this
* from 100%, maximum light, maximum sound, wifi close (to avoid any kind of mail notification or else), during 30 minutes playing a game like let say "NFS and everybody's golf"
how much battery you left ?
then let say we can do some kind of math rules to be more FAIR
how compare score, with so difference in term of OC.
guys try to be fair, see the score between stocks, between roms, between oc, between kernel.
run also 3 or 5 test and make an average score
but do not forget the battery, nothing matter more than the lifespan hehehe
stock acer iconia 3.1 @ 1ghz = 950
Score: 1139
Cpu: 1408mhz
Stock plus custom kernel V1.3 20-05 Richard.
Cheers!
1080
Virtuous Xoom v.1.1.2 @ 1.5 GHz
1232
HoneyVillain 1.04 + villain_iconia_kernel_1.1
SetCPU: scaling = Interactive @ 216000-1504000
Changed since previous benchmark:
CPU Master to SetCPU
On demand to Interactive
Min. clock freq. back to 216 MHz (was 312 MHz)
1242
LightSpeed 1.01 + villain_iconia_kernel_2.5
SetCPU: scaling = Ondemand @ 216000-1504000
Simple.
Im currently using GingerDx v23 still..the PrimeHD seems awesome.
Can someone tell their experiences with these roms?
Which is faster? More smoother.
On stock kernel without oc or with some oc like 614mhz or similar!
I really dont want any kernel results or big OC-ing.
We know that these methods improve our phone speed!
Dude..sorry for saying this but you must not compare one ROM with other ROM since different user might having different experiences..if you are so currious with their experience, why don't you read the thread where the user express their experience..and why don't you try the ROM you want to compare with so you know the differences..
No heart feeling dude..
Cheers..:beer:
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
A fine gentleman you must be.
Still your right.
But the feedback is positive mostly.
Ginger had some battery issues,but thats fixed.
Also Im thinkin that somebody tried them both,so he could just say what he thinks.
Also gonna run the benchmark later. Post pics here with Ginger Dx then try the PrimeHD and compare the results.
had run both of them personal statement "the most stable and fast rom primeHD"
Sent from my E15i using XDA
I endorse
Sent from my X8 using XDA
Medo2 said:
Simple.
Im currently using GingerDx v23 still..the PrimeHD seems awesome.
Can someone tell their experiences with these roms?
Which is faster? More smoother.
On stock kernel without oc or with some oc like 614mhz or similar!
I really dont want any kernel results or big OC-ing.
We know that these methods improve our phone speed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both the ROMs are awesome. For people who cannot unlock their bootloader GingerDX is good, and for others who can PrimeHD is awesome, light, fast and awesome battery back up.... I have used GIngerDX v24 with Alfs v8 ICS kernel and currently using PrimeHD with nAa 11 Kernel...my vote is for Prime HD.....Hope this helps.
gingerdx is very awesome, but battery drain fast, i suggest prime hd for better battery life
GingerDx V024 is awesome for my stock kernel with NO OC.
However, PrimeHD has no battery drain unlike GDx, as I experienced it.
Personally, i found PRIMEHD to be better in terms of battery and light weight. It has a few non-relevant bugs (doesn't matter since they are hardly used)
But again, GDx has none... So both are good in their spheres
For my stock kernel and no OC, I use Prime HD
However, I recommend you to try both ROMS.
Just recently flashed PrimeHD last week and i think this is an amazing ROM... very smooth and fast plus good battery life for stock kernel...
Test
I made some tests with antutu on fresh installed GDX and PHD (without sd card,no OC):
GDX
First run: 1432 / 90 / 193 / 150 / 400 / 469 / 130
Second run: 1460 / 95 / 196 / 145 / 410 / 474 / 140
Third run: 1472 / 95 / 194 / 150 / 407 / 471 / 155
PHD
First run: 1481 /114/ 201 / 150 / 404 / 482 / 130
Second run: 1495 /115/ 199 / 151 / 411 / 474 / 145
Third run: 1505 /114/ 201 / 151 / 408 / 476 / 155
I think primehd because its fast,smooth & best of all more free ram...
But gdx is recomended too for daily rom & as far as i remember,they will release also gdx with some ics(correct me if im wrong)...I dont know what it is but its cool...
GingerDX is in my point of view better than PrimeHD. It is much faster
Sent from my X8 using xda premium
I had Prime HD on stock kernel installed few apparently and it was very very slow and lag, now I use GingerDX v24 and it is much much better
Sent from my X8 using XDA
tonin_haggard said:
I had Prime HD on stock kernel installed few apparently and it was very very slow and lag, now I use GingerDX v24 and it is much much better
Sent from my X8 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have used both of the roms for stock kernel and i have to say that both are great but I find primehd smoother and faster and also better for gaming . So my vote is for primehd!
Sent from my X8 using xda premium
lokibg said:
I made some tests with antutu on fresh installed GDX and PHD (without sd card,no OC):
GDX
First run: 1432 / 90 / 193 / 150 / 400 / 469 / 130
Second run: 1460 / 95 / 196 / 145 / 410 / 474 / 140
Third run: 1472 / 95 / 194 / 150 / 407 / 471 / 155
PHD
First run: 1481 /114/ 201 / 150 / 404 / 482 / 130
Second run: 1495 /115/ 199 / 151 / 411 / 474 / 145
Third run: 1505 /114/ 201 / 151 / 408 / 476 / 155
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And here you have the reason why you shouldn't take AnTuTu or any of the other synthetic benchmarks around overly serious. Looking at the first figure (CPU score) the result varies way too greatly with each run.
Anyway, while it's nice to see a few figures the greater sense of these comparison threads really escape me. Taking the drift rate of AnTuTu into consideration the averaged score is about the same and below any noticeable threshold (leaving the SD out of the equation as the difference between different X8's is simply too high due to the many classes of SDs).
As for ROMs that are actually DEVELOPED (and not some lousy apkedits by some wannabes) - I think everyone of us has a specific user-base, and having a selection of different ROMs is actually a good thing (keep in mind I still talk about ROMs that are actually developed and built from source).
HAKA does a excellent job and the same applies to nAa and his miniCM7|9 ROMs.
The question shouldn't be "<ROM> Vs. <ROM>" but rather "what do you like in the ROM you use most?"
Just my two cents.
just test
I was just curious and decided to make this experiment. In fact Im using GDX and I love it
Well you see these two roms are quite similar.
Both of them get updated and both of them got similar functions!
PrimeHD has all of GingerDx options..
pozdrav
i have used both of them and i get better antutu score with prime hd v6
it is kind`a smoother and i like it more for 2d and 3d performance,2d-410 3d-480
I get a much better battery life using PrimeHD than I ever did with GingerDX. Sometimes double... My record is over 3 days on one charge.
Although I have noticed something puzzling... I added 500MB of data to my phone 6 days ago and now I only have 150MB remaining and in that time I've only used it for SMS and a couple of calls, no internet usage. Is it possible that just syncing with my google account is using that much data?
I guess ginger dx is better. but in V024 i couldnt flash CWM zips ........... and i dunno why? Ginger dx wins Prime HD hands down .. I hav got lots of RAM issues with Prime HD as i run out of memory most of the time.... In my experience GDX wins I hope @B.Jay could give me a solution for the problem i have.......
Hi, in this theard i wanna make list of top Neocore score. Please write in reply name rom, kernel and height of overclocking.
WARNING! ACHTUNG! PLEASE ADDING SCORE WITH SOUND! PLEASE ADDING SREENSCHOOT OR PHOTO SCORE!
1.74 FPS - PrimeHD - Alfs8 cm7 - 768mHz - Mentafagyi
2.70.2 - MiniCM 2.2.0 - Alfs8cm7 - 748 mHz - sidkota
3.69 FPS - X8droid 7.0 - Alfs 8 - 768 mHz - santiago1104
4.67.5 FPS - GingerDX 25 - Alfs v8b - 806 mHz - Spevky
5.61.5 FPS - MiniCM 2.1.8 - nAa 10 - 806 mHz - RoberGalarga
5.61.5 FPS - Xperience 7.0 rev3 -nAa 11 - 748 mHz - Norbasenkos
Score of MiniCM7 2.1.8 + nAa kernel 10 @806Mhz in the attachment
My Neocore
With X8droid V 7.0 my neocore is 75.9 fps with 768 mhz Kernel Alf 8, my antutuscore is 2133 all work perfect,rom by Lucas Diaz, link x8droid2012.blogspot.com
EDIT:
Sorry, but add score without sound,,, with sound, the score is 69.0 Fps, sorry for the mistake
My score!
70.2 fps
MinICM7 2.2.0
Alfs-v8a
748 mhz
Neocore: 76 Fps
Cpu: 768 mhz
Rom: PrimeHD 8.0
Kernel: alfs8-cm7
Tweaks: new adreno libs and audio libs
Antutu: 2133 Points
Quadrant Standard 942 Points
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
norbasenkos said:
Hi, in this theard i wanna make list of top Neocore score. Please write in reply name rom, kernel and height of overclocking.
WARNING! ACHTUNG! Please adding score with sound!
1.76 FPS - PrimeHD - Alfs8 cm7 - 768mHz - Mentafagyi
2.75.9 FPS - X8droid 7.0 - Alfs 8 - 768 mHz - santiago1104
3.70.2 - MiniCM 2.2.0 - Alfs8cm7 - 748 mHz - sidkota
4.61.5 FPS - MiniCM 2.1.8 - nAa 10 - 806 mHz - RoberGalarga
4.61.5 FPS - Xperience 7.0 rev3 -nAa 11 - 748 mHz - Norbasenkos
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
screenshots must be added for fair results, i can write 80fps, but without screenshot, its worthless... I'm nt saying peoples scores are fake, just saying coz there are many who just want to show off...
I will make a screenshot
I did not do, cause i longpressed power, and the score picture had hone
(I tested it continually for about a hour, when i reached it )
So i'll post it
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
GingerDX v25 - Alfs v8b - Score 67.5 - overcloacek to 806 mHz
Hi guys!
Im sorry, but you (the thread author) have to edit my score to: 74 cause i installed some games and it went lower
So i cant produce that score anymore, just if i reinstall PrimeHD 8.0, but i don't want to do it
And thank you for the edit, im looking forward to you
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
74.6 fps... MiniCM7
768Mhz
Alfsv8a CM7
n my own customizations...
Antutu cm9
any antutu cm9 score?
The ROM is Ginger DX on Stock Kernel and locked bootloader(F**k you Sony!)
My overclock settings.
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
48.2 stok kernel with sound,no oc
I think my best score was 62 FPS.
Sent from my XPERIA using XDA Premium.
Like 70 Fps on my X8
Sent from my ST18i using xda premium
Tested Before On A X8 at 72.9 FPS
Alfs Kernel and PrimeHD
I'm new in android world, and only use froyobread, with max score in case of 50 without overclock.
Sent from my X8 using XDA