Related
According to engadget. Looks like it won't be too much longer now . I'm guessing early nov.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/15/galaxy-s-android-2-2-froyo-update-begins-to-trickle-out/
houkah said:
According to engadget. Looks like it won't be too much longer now . I'm guessing early nov.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/15/galaxy-s-android-2-2-froyo-update-begins-to-trickle-out/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's great and all but we're on Sprint, remember? I expect to have this by mid-February/March.
(sorry, couldn't resist)
Good news. Can't wait to see it. Would love to just use stock TW 3.0 to speed up my phone (ADW slows it down a bit.)
Considering GingerBread is supposed to drop next week some time....this really kind of blows. We really need a good CM6 then 7!
I can't remember exactly but I think Hero didn't get the 2.1 update until after code dropped for FroYo...Sucks being a version behind. And considering track record its the only OS Update we will see official. I highly doubt we will actually get GingerBread from Samsung/Sprint.
Kcarpenter said:
Considering GingerBread is supposed to drop next week some time....this really kind of blows. We really need a good CM6 then 7!
I can't remember exactly but I think Hero didn't get the 2.1 update until after code dropped for FroYo...Sucks being a version behind. And considering track record its the only OS Update we will see official. I highly doubt we will actually get GingerBread from Samsung/Sprint.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. Everyone getting their hopes up for Gingerbread for the Galaxy S phones, I think are setting themselves up for a big let down. I haven't seen any phone (besides Droid and N1) receive more than 1 official update. And considering Samsung's update history, I definitely don't see them supporting this phone beyond 2.2
los1223 said:
I agree. Everyone getting their hopes up for Gingerbread for the Galaxy S phones, I think are setting themselves up for a big let down. I haven't seen any phone (besides Droid and N1) receive more than 1 official update. And considering Samsung's update history, I definitely don't see them supporting this phone beyond 2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isn't Gingerbread geared to tablets anyways?
crabjoe said:
Isn't Gingerbread geared to tablets anyways?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not just tablets - Just better than 2.1 was with large screens (over 4.5 inchs).
GingerBread should add native video calling, a new UI, and a few other surprises.
And suspected release of Google Music.
Hopefully the ball keeps rolling until it gets to Sprint. Post any rumors you hear on this thread so we can keep track of this "gradual" rollout.
I agree that its unlikely we will get anything after 2.2...it seems like every Android I buy this happens to me lol. Oh well
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
i hope we will get beyond 2.2
lol maybe verizon has an agreement with google that only droids get support past froyo. Google and verizon are really close business partners and have almost colluded in other aspects of mobile markets.
Where in the heck are u guys getti.g this gingerbdead crap from
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
imtjnotu said:
Where in the heck are u guys getti.g this gingerbdead crap from
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume its the moment/hero skip from 2.0 to 2.1 but still took forever
imtjnotu said:
Where in the heck are u guys getti.g this gingerbdead crap from
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe the reports for gingerbread are 4th quarter of 2010. That's probably why everyone thinks it's coming soon. Other gingerbread info was from the last IO (they showed the music player streaming music from cloud) and just general quotes from google engineers about trying to get rid of carrier skins and what not.
Having said all that, didn't they just hire that webOS designer a few months ago? He's supposedly the lead designer for gingerbread, so could it really be coming in q4?
As for support, i think it'll be awhile but it will be supported. I feel like sammy has to support the galaxy line at this point w/ their 5 million handsets sold and the imminent galaxy tab (which they already stated will have gingerbread at some point). This is my first sammy phone and it's pretty apparent people have gotten burned by them in the past, but it would be a customer relations nightmare if they did this w/ the galaxy line.
imtjnotu said:
Where in the heck are u guys getti.g this gingerbdead crap from
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gingerbread supports large screens which suppose to go on tablet pads...I dunno where they get the idea that its gonna come out for phones
Maybe it will be a good reason to upgrade galaxy s phones because of the name similarities, now whether they have any similar parts inside I doubt but kind of gives us some of that 'hope' it will come out for phones also.
They have a development center here in Irvine, ca..... I will mission impossible into the facility and retrieve the release date in the laser protected vault room.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Very pleased to see we are getting froyo on epic cannot wait for flash support hopefully. Can use hulu again like winmo
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
ultra78721 said:
Gingerbread supports large screens which suppose to go on tablet pads...I dunno where they get the idea that its gonna come out for phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it will be released with phones that have a 1Ghz Processing chip and at least 3.5 inch screen or larger.
Google themselves stated that gingerbread will require ATLEAST the N1's specs bare minimum. I read that a LOOOOOONG time ago though so idk...
But ayways, sammys rep for the tab mentioned honeycomb...
What if honeycomb is the start for android tablet OS and gingerbread is the continuation for the phone os?
I mean, tink about it...honeycomb isn't a sweet snack...atleast one that I know of...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
A_Flying_Fox said:
I mean, tink about it...honeycomb isn't a sweet snack...atleast one that I know of...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honeycomb is both a delicious treat as well as a continuation of the alphabetical nomenclature Google has chosen for their OS's. If they were going to branch off and make a separate lineage for tablets alone, I doubt they would interrupt their alphabetical naming scheme for phone based OS' to do it.
muyoso said:
Honeycomb is both a delicious treat as well as a continuation of the alphabetical nomenclature Google has chosen for their OS's. If they were going to branch off and make a separate lineage for tablets alone, I doubt they would interrupt their alphabetical naming scheme for phone based OS' to do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mmmmm honeycomb is delicious! I got a chunk of white chocolate covered honeycomb from a local confection shop and it was DELICIOUS.
But I agree.... I dont honestly believe that any of the Galaxy phones will get anything past 2.2.
By the time 2.2 is FINALLY pushed to all the galaxys, new and better phones will be out.
I've never seen ANY android that had more than 1 system upgrade that wasn't a leaked developer made upgrade.
posted from a EPIC4G.
Could be the next vibrant? (if T-Mobile picks it up)
http://androidapproved.com/item/samsung-galaxy-s-2-i9200/
Give me the specs of that phone with the exact same body design as my phone now and I might shell out the money for something like that. I don't really feel I'm lacking much with my phone as is so that might not even be an option
Sexy Vibrant featuring Sombionix 1.9.1, JAC's OC/UV, FFC installed
bdveteran18 said:
Give me the specs of that phone with the exact same body design as my phone now and I might shell out the money for something like that. I don't really feel I'm lacking much with my phone as is so that might not even be an option
Sexy Vibrant featuring Sombionix 1.9.1, JAC's OC/UV, FFC installed
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I don't really like the look of the phone if that's the final model. I like the design of the vibrant. One of the few things Samsung got right about the phone.
Nice find. Those specs look mighty delicious.
Great specs.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
4.3-inch SAMOLED2 display at 1280x720 and 340 dpi
Holy ****, yeah, I would leave my Vibrant for that.
I personally find the squarish design quite sexy.
What's really crazy is that those specs mean it's better tricked out than 90% of netbooks out there.
Ill take the 4.3 inch screen. My sister has an evo and that her only form of braging right because the vibrant w/bionix smashes her's with a custom sense rom.
Plus the 2GHz
That thing is so fake(IMO) it would suck too because the first vibrant just came out. Why would they release it so soon?
That's an amazing device. I would do everything in my power to pick that up if Tmo gets it.
felix.akinyemi said:
I agree. I don't really like the look of the phone if that's the final model. I like the design of the vibrant. One of the few things Samsung got right about the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's just someone's crappy rendering. If you follow the link to the FCC page and view the label location PDF you'll see that it's rounded like the Vibrant.
If that device is real. Its to high end for tmo. Verizon maybe sprint. But lolz at tmo
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Ahh yes That would be nice
If true it would be nice. i do miss the HD2 size. For me a slightly larger screen would be nicer as I would like it to be more business friendly. I'd go for a 4.5-7 size screen if they could work out the battery issues, but then that's just me. Nice specs if it is real.......and yes TMO will have it if it does come out.
No Android device is going to have 2ghz in 2011, let along Q1 2011.
lemarg said:
If that device is real. Its to high end for tmo. Verizon maybe sprint. But lolz at tmo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I don't think tmo would pick this up with those specs
--
Sent from Vibrant + XDA
anthonys2r said:
No Android device is going to have 2ghz in 2011, let along Q1 2011.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specs are probably not final. it could be one of the first dual core android phones of 2011
--
Sent from Vibrant + XDA
Samsung is the business of kicking out hardware for the android market right now and the primary reason software updates are taking a back seat. Samsung doesn't have resources to dedicate. Whatever software and/or hardware problems encountered, the customer will ultimately need to except partial operability. Samsung is on rise of becoming THE android manufacturer. This new device doesnt surprise me.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I call BS, no way there is be a 2ghz chip in Q1 2011.
@OP: Are you the owner of that website? Looking at your past posts, you have posted quite a many links to that particular website, which, btw, doesn't look too legit.
DarkAgent said:
@OP: Are you the owner of that website? Looking at your past posts, you have posted quite a many links to that particular website, which, btw, doesn't look too legit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im not the only one that has posted about this. Its all over the web.
http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-galaxy-s2-i-want-believe
http://www.unwiredview.com/2010/07/05/samsung-i9200-galaxy-s2-details-leak/
This rumor has been around for a while.
IMO fake
Edit
Felix your 2nd link dates all the way back to july 5.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Now if this true a google optimized samsung would mean the developers working on our phone will get an optimized kernal etc for hardware similar to our own
plus it is supposed to be a google phone meaning no custom ui so a we would better ports and roms for our phones.
http://androidandme.com/2010/10/news/rumor-samsung-will-announce-the-nexus-two-on-november-8th/
Very very exciting indeed. I am so glad I am getting a total refund now. Will def. wait and see if this is true!
If this is true, Android 3.0 running on the Orion makes me all giddy inside
Dual core 1Ghz A9 with 5x the graphic preformance of the current hummingbird.
http://i.engadget.com/2010/09/07/samsungs-orion-is-the-1ghz-dual-core-arm-cortex-a9-weve-all-be/
And an OS tuned by google. No.more ****ty software problems. What a match
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
God I hope not, I was thinking of the n1s successor being the next Google phone, but not if its made by those clowns.
it is not true.
tameracingdriver said:
God I hope not, I was thinking of the n1s successor being the next Google phone, but not if its made by those clowns.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Clowns or not they are currently the ONLY phone maker who did not lock android down like a prison. Do you prefer getting a new HTC with their horrendous nand lock? Or maybe a Motorola with their encrypted bootloader ?
I didn't think so. Nuff said.
I really really hope it's true, in this case that's my next phone!
Samsung hardware with google software is indeed a deadly combo!
I told my cousin yesterday that samsung should drop dealing with the software side, and keep on concentrating on hardware. It seems they took my advice. Good boy Samsung!
Soniboy84 said:
I really really hope it's true, in this case that's my next phone!
Samsung hardware with google software is indeed a deadly combo!
I told my cousin yesterday that samsung should drop dealing with the software side, and keep on concentrating on hardware. It seems they took my advice. Good boy Samsung!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Deadly indeed. Hopefully the customers will be able to survive using the phone for at least a few minutes
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Nexus Two = Galaxy S
Have you heard the news? Google is working with Samsung on Nexus Two.
And rumors claim that it will be actually called Nexus S. It is supposed to have the same specs as Galaxy S have and to be released with Android 2.3 (Gingerbread)
http://androidandme.com/2010/10/news/rumor-samsung-will-announce-the-nexus-two-on-november-8th/
The device will be the Nexus S
* It will be branded as a Google experience device featuring Android 2.3
* It will have the same 4" SAMOLED screen seen on the Galaxy S devices
* It will feature the same Hummingbird processor from the Galaxy S handsets
* It will be easily rootable like the Nexus One was
* It will be at least GSM, unknown about carrier or CDMA
* It will have no hard buttons on the face, similar to a Vibrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are good news for us, 'coz we may be able to have Nexus Two goodies and seems like Gingerbread will be ported to Galaxy S (if not officially released) very easily.
If this is the case, nov. 8th announcement will be Da Bomb!!
If this is true, I might sell my SGS and get this one instead for a bigger modding community and faster updates!
tameracingdriver said:
God I hope not, I was thinking of the n1s successor being the next Google phone, but not if its made by those clowns.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, Galaxy S is the best Android phone on the market at the moment (hardware wise). So if there isn't going to be released any better soon, Galaxy S is the most obvious choice for Nexus Two.
EarlZ said:
If this is true, I might sell my SGS and get this one instead for a bigger modding community and faster updates!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you? It's basicaly the same phone, only ported!
You'd have to do the hastle to sell the phone, get another one with the same internals but with Google's logo instead. Just flash a rom on the first one and it'll be the same (ok... not the logos, but you can get those on eBay if you REALY want em!)
t1mman said:
Why would you? It's basicaly the same phone, only ported!
You'd have to do the hastle to sell the phone, get another one with the same internals but with Google's logo instead. Just flash a rom on the first one and it'll be the same (ok... not the logos, but you can get those on eBay if you REALY want em!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting may have a long wait time and additional bugs might arise and also I dont want any hard buttons on my screen.
i highly doubt this is true, but it would be wonderful.
we would probably get an optimized jit for the hummingbird finally, among other things.
evil-doer said:
i highly doubt this is true, but it would be wonderful.
we would probably get an optimized jit for the hummingbird finally, among other things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phone weight = 400g
Nice power pack battery lol
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I doubt its true, but however im sure it will be better than sgs even if they have the same a firmware.Anyone wants to bet?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Wow I hope it's true it has the same hardware. Especially as I just got my Galaxy S lol.
Just about bought a nexus one yesterday.
Maybe I will wait for the Nov 8th announcement
I’m probably living in a pipe dream or just smoke to much, but imagine if they announced that the Galaxy S is going to be the first phone to have Gingerbread and be Google’s new Dev phone !
Hey it would make sense if it happened due to them pulling and delaying the Froyo release.
Ahhh a man can dream!
This isn't a rant or anything, or I won't try to make it one. But I just came across on Android Central that the Droid is getting 2.2.1.
Now this is just so depressing already that we have a phone that's been out for about 5 months now and haven't seen Froyo (only in Unoffical leaked builds). The Droid has been out far longer, I know that. But Samsung is really dragging their feet. Froyo offically, when it comes out, better knock our ****ing socks off or it was a waste of time to wait for them to deliver.
I'm just saying, this just makes Samsung look that much worse.
http://www.androidcentral.com/leaked-android-221-motorola-droid-frg83
so you complain about our leaked ROMs by posting about another phones LEAKED ROM?
Dude... just flash froyo. They are daily drivers and quit posting the same stuff.
The leaked FroYo build is knocking my socks off...
Just sayin'
s15274n said:
so you complain about our leaked ROMs by posting about another phones LEAKED ROM?
Dude... just flash froyo. They are daily drivers and quit posting the same stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't mean to bash or knock it. There's nothing wrong with the builds, it'd be nice to have an official build though I guess..
Okay, but is it not ironic you started your non-rant post stating that the Droid was getting 2.1.1 and how it looks bad for Samsung, but you completely ignored the fact it ALSO was a leaked build?
Just let it die..
s15274n said:
Okay, but is it not ironic you started your non-rant post stating that the Droid was getting 2.1.1 and how it looks bad for Samsung, but you completely ignored the fact it ALSO was a leaked build?
Just let it die..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
K, I'm done.
presence06 said:
The Droid has been out far longer, I know that. But Samsung is really dragging their feet. Froyo offically, when it comes out, better knock our ****ing socks off or it was a waste of time to wait for them to deliver.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's really no debate that Samsung is WAY behind here. Yes. the Droid has been out way longer, but the Incredible and Droid X haven't and they've gotten Froyo a long time ago. Incredible got it around 8/30 and X around 9/21.
Assuming that Samsung does get it out this year, that puts them anywhere from 2-4 months behind the competition, depending on when they do finally release it.
That's really bad. Sure they didn't promise 2.2 at any particular time, but that doesn't mean I don't factor it in when making my next phone purchase. I hope everyone does. If not, it'll give the manufactures even more reason to withhold updates in the future and try to push new phones instead.
Just heard from Cyanogen's twitter that CM6 is finished for the G2. I'm sure the new my touch isn't far behind.
Depressing
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
s15274n said:
Okay, but is it not ironic you started your non-rant post stating that the Droid was getting 2.1.1 and how it looks bad for Samsung, but you completely ignored the fact it ALSO was a leaked build?
Just let it die..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but you seem to be ignoring the fact that the Droid already HAS an official Froyo, and the leaked build is a second generation update.
The Vibrant does NOT have an official build, and the way it's going, the Droid X may have Gingerbread before we get an official Froyo build.
How can you even begin to defend Samsung?
Yes, it is "just" another Froyo post. +1 Ignore!
~SB
Geez, people, of course Samsung is going to be behind. Motorola's and HTC's phones all have the same OMAP and Snapdragon cores they've used from the first Droid and Nexus One. No wonder they've all gone to Froyo before Samsung.
How many phones used the Hummingbird before the Galaxy S line? None. But I'll bet you that future updates will come faster now they've got Froyo figured out.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Kubernetes said:
Geez, people, of course Samsung is going to be behind. Motorola's and HTC's phones all have the same OMAP and Snapdragon cores they've used from the first Droid and Nexus One. No wonder they've all gone to Froyo before Samsung.
How many phones used the Hummingbird before the Galaxy S line? None. But I'll bet you that future updates will come faster now they've got Froyo figured out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL....
Strange reasoning, since Samsung developed the chip themselves, so they should know it better. Plus, they've had a long time to figure Froyo out. And still haven't, officially.
MacGuy2006 said:
LOL....
Strange reasoning, since Samsung developed the chip themselves, so they should know it better. Plus, they've had a long time to figure Froyo out. And still haven't, officially.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Designing the chip and modifying the software to work with the hardware are two different things. Just because you know the hardware, doesn't mean it's easy to make the software work with it nicely.
Only thing wrong with these threads is they are always full of hearsay. Rarely anyone states fact, just opinion. Who says sammy is holding it back? The leak came from tmo right? this pessimistic view is what makes ppl always have that "omg I have froyo & I hate it, its not perfect.... I want gingerbread" mentality. Life lesson, you'll never be happy with this attitude.
I, myself, try to look at the recent events of the "rumoured nexus s" that engadget posted pics. If this does happen to grace the GS community think of how fast, far, & easily we may make it to 2.3! Im no tech & I may be way off, but id like to think that this would give us the OPEN "NEXUS" development base we'd need to achieve that level of vanilla android base w/ drivers, code & hopefully working gps ;j (minus the new chipset, obviously).
Just be glad that we do have devs who do what they can & hope that sammy doesn't do anything else to screw us. I will be hoping (but not holding my breathe) for a nexus $ gingerbread port.
DKYang said:
Designing the chip and modifying the software to work with the hardware are two different things. Just because you know the hardware, doesn't mean it's easy to make the software work with it nicely.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Remember that Froyo was actually built for the Snapdragon, whereas most of the GS hardware is unlike that seen in other previous phones.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
If theres a leaked froyo it means Samsung has fine their part. Its up to tmo to push it out.
--
Sent from Vibrant ~ XDA App
DKYang said:
Designing the chip and modifying the software to work with the hardware are two different things. Just because you know the hardware, doesn't mean it's easy to make the software work with it nicely.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apple doesn't seem to have any problems with doing this. Samsung is way bigger. They should have their crap together
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Tempestrs4 said:
Apple doesn't seem to have any problems with doing this. Samsung is way bigger. They should have their crap together
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yey but we get to modify the crap out of one of the fastest phones with one of the best screens, and do whatever we want with it, thanks to some great sharing devs, to a device that's almost un- brickable.
Now thats fun!
Apple crapple, great form and simply reliable yet unbendable device to buy all things Apple dollars via only iTunes. No thanks. I'll take what Samsung doesn't have together.
Yes I've complained before but now I have learned a bit more and I have Froyo.
Sent from my SGH-T959 Obsidian V2 Froyo (for now) using the XDA App
How come none of the people that rant about not having an official Froyo release remember that 1. we have they best hardware of any phone out, I can't recall how many times I've heard owners of other phones complain that they've run out of room for their apps because they only have 2gb internal storage, and 2. this site is XDA Developers not XDA stock software release news. If you want to rant about the official release go over to the T-Mobile or Samsung forums and do it.
Sent from my SGH-T959 running Obsidian V2 w/ Froyo Core 1.2ghz using XDA App
12paq said:
Yey but we get to modify the crap out of one of the fastest phones with one of the best screens, and do whatever we want with it, thanks to some great sharing devs, to a device that's almost un- brickable.
Now thats fun!
Apple crapple, great form and simply reliable yet unbendable device to buy all things Apple dollars via only iTunes. No thanks. I'll take what Samsung doesn't have together.
Yes I've complained before but now I have learned a bit more and I have Froyo.
Sent from my SGH-T959 Obsidian V2 Froyo (for now) using the XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The devs have no choice but to share. Voiding warranties is uncool for many of us.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Nexus S gets a small preview?
http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/nexus-s-for-t-mobile-gets-brief-best-buy-mobile-nod-there-and-g/
Well, this was rather unexpected. Earlier today, Best Buy Mobile published a humble (if not incomplete) ad for the "Nexus S for T-Mobile," touting both its "pure Google" experience (i.e. vanilla Android) and holiday availability exclusively from Best Buy. It's gone now, saved only by the grace of Google cache. To be honest, all we can do is speculate beyond that. An anonymous tipster to RadioAndroid pegged the Nexus S name late last month and claimed it would feature Android 2.3 Gingerbread, a 4-inch Super AMOLED screen, and a Hummingbird processor. TechCrunch later described a Samsung-borne "Nexus Two" that has since been delayed due to some serious hardware issue. Is this a placeholder from the online devs? Does / did the S stand for Samsung, or something else entirely? And most importantly, is this presumed follow-up to Nexus One actually coming out, or did you just get your hopes up for nothing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am not out to give people more hope than necessary but I think that google releasing this phone as sheep in galaxy clothing is the best news galaxy owners could get. Development of the hummingbird platform, gingerbread...... Huge opportunities here
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/is-this-the-nexus-s/
An update!
Now it only remains to be seen how similar the hardware on this bad-boy is to the Galaxy S's that we already have for the inevitable rom-porting. With any luck we'll be rolling in Gingerbread before we know it.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/is-this-the-nexus-s/
Now on the web flyer, looks pretty vanilla to me!
Engadget is on fire!!
http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/google-nexus-s-is-the-samsung-gt-i9020/
This is nice. Like a dream come true!
http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/this-is-the-nexus-s/
Again!"
http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/this-is-the-nexus-s/
Thank God for 30 day return policies. Goodbye vibrant, hello Nexus S
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
Now the cynic in me is starting to feel that Samsung may be deliberately crippling Galaxy S performance to make the Nexus S look even more beastly when it comes out and make people want to buy it.
Intratech said:
Now the cynic in me is starting to feel that Samsung may be deliberately crippling Galaxy S performance to make the Nexus S look even more beastly when it comes out and make people want to buy it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, basically, Android was built and optimised for Nexus One, it surely is not performing to it's maximum on the hardware of Samsung. The hardware of SGS is realy good, but the OS is not (yet) optimised for it.
But if you built and optimise the OS around this hardware, i'm pretty sure it'll fly! (and it'll give optimised OS to samsung's users as well)
Anyone know the specs
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
t1mman said:
Well, basically, Android was built and optimised for Nexus One, it surely is not performing to it's maximum on the hardware of Samsung. The hardware of SGS is realy good, but the OS is not (yet) optimised for it.
But if you built and optimise the OS around this hardware, i'm pretty sure it'll fly! (and it'll give optimised OS to samsung's users as well)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you seen what CyanogenMOD are doing and the performance they are getting with an unoptimised, incomplete, Android 2.2.1 ROM on the Galaxy S using RFS file system? They put the Samsung software development team to shame.
Now post me a link to a Gingerbread ROM I can slap on my Captivate ASAP.
Intratech said:
Have you seen what CyanogenMOD are doing and the performance they are getting with an unoptimised, incomplete, Android 2.2.1 ROM on the Galaxy S using RFS file system? They put the Samsung software development team to shame.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CyanogenMOD are putting every dev team to a shame!
Now the cynic in me is starting to feel that Samsung may be deliberately crippling Galaxy S performance to make the Nexus S look even more beastly when it comes out and make people want to buy it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really dude. This will be a low-volume device compared to the "regular" Galaxy S line.
Looking at some of those pics, there's quite a bit of internal differences. No visible SD card slot, for one, and a different battery (with power connectors on the left instead of top of the phone). That makes me wonder how much the rest of the internal hardware differs.
It's also bulkier at the bottom than an I9000, and looks to have antenna leads on the battery cover (like the Captivate), though those might be DTV leads instead.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/this-is-the-nexus-s/
Confirmed
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
nCoder said:
http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/11/this-is-the-nexus-s/
Confirmed
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing is confirmed if not from Samsung or Google
Update: We contacted Google for comment and were told that the company doesn't comment on rumors or speculation -- the usual drill.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But still, it looks good so far!
Intratech said:
Now the cynic in me is starting to feel that Samsung may be deliberately crippling Galaxy S performance to make the Nexus S look even more beastly when it comes out and make people want to buy it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree ....they are not fixing the filesystem lag issue because they are already thinking of future sales of new models, they want to keep it crippled, typical samsung.
on another note i much prefer the samsung's touchwiz additions to stock android, the apps are better (calendar for example) and there are more built in apps.
if only not for the lag
t1mman said:
Nothing is confirmed if not from Samsung or Google
But still, it looks good so far!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What looks good? I believe you don't mean that stretched Nokia 5800XM...